Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Investigating an Alleged “Real-Time Recession Indicator” That Lags Miserably

Recession Indicator by Claudia Sahm, Data From St. Louis Fed, Chart by Mish

The Claim vs the Reality

The Sahm rule is an empirical regularity, not a proposition. It says that when the 3-month moving average of the unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage point above its low over prior 12 months, we are in a recession. Since 1970, hits every one of them.

Currently, the Sahm rule is 0.03, which is 0.47 percentage point below the trigger. We are not in a recession now.”

Let’s take a look at the data, the claim, and the trigger. 

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 1960

In the above chart and all those that follow, the first number is the recession indicator at the time the recession started and the second number is the first trigger at 0.50 or higher.

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 1970

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 1973

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 1980

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 1982

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 1990

Real Time Sahm Rule Recession Indicator 2022

Last 9 Recessions Recap

  • 1960-05-01: 0.07!
  • 1970-01-01: 0.30
  • 1973-12-01: 0.03!
  • 1980-02-01: 0.30
  • 1981-08-01: -0.13!
  • 1990-08-01: 0.17
  • 2001-04-01: 0.40
  • 2008-01-01: 0.40
  • 2020-03-01: 0.30

Not Recession Because?

Allegedly we are not in recession now because the indicator is 0.03.

In 1973 the economy was in recession at 0.03. In 1981 the economy was in recession at -0.13. 

In 33% of the recessions, the indicator was 0.17 or less, once negative. 

7 out of the last nine recessions started with the trigger at 0.30 or less. 

Not Real Time

There is nothing about the indicator that is real time. 

I will grant Sahm that when 0.50 is “triggered” the economy is likely in recession. But how useful in practice is that?

By the time the indicator signals recession, everyone but the Fed and White House already is painfully aware

This is like “predicting” rain when the raindrops hit your head. There is no knowledge gained by this indicator. 

Logic Error 

More problematic is Sahm’s logic error. Did you catch it?

Currently, the Sahm rule is 0.03, which is 0.47 percentage point below the trigger. We are not in a recession now.”

Mathematically, If A then B does not imply if Not A then Not B.

There are also problems on the back end.

“The Sahm rule is an empirical regularity, not a proposition. It says that when the 3-month moving average of the unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage point above its low over prior 12 months, we are in a recession. Since 1970, hits every one of them.”

When did the 1990 recession end by that logic?

Has Recession Started?

I happen to believe so. But I am not the one who decides. The NBER does. And I might be wrong. 

However, the alleged “real time” indicator provides no useful information nor any reason to say that a recession has not started!

Models Don’t Think

One can say jobs are not signaling recession. But jobs are a very lagging indicator and so is the 0.50 trigger based off unemployment rates. 

100% of the time a recession started before the “real time” trigger says it did! 

In 1990 and 2022 the recession was half over before the trigger hit. 

Housing Bust and Cyclicals the Recession Key

Existing home sales have fallen six consecutive months and 25.9 percent since January. There is no instance where that has happened and the economy was not in recession. 

In case you missed it, please see Cyclical Components of GDP, the Most Important Chart in Macro

Also see A Big Housing Bust is the Key to Understanding This Recession

If the data follows the path I expect, we will have a third quarter of negative GDP with real final sales falling since May.

Don’t Count on GDI Either

For discussion, please see On an Income Basis the Economy is Humming, GDP says No, Which is Believable?

Maybe the NBER says I am right but perhaps I am wrong. Regardless, what good is a “real time” measure that does not predict rain until everyone can see the rain is falling?

Even sillier, the model’s creator now says it is not raining when perhaps it is. We will not know until months from now whether it is raining today!

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
The “How and When” of the Fed’s Balance Sheet Runoff | by New York Fed | New York Fed | Sep, 2022 | Medium
Some of the graphics are illuminating (sept. 8th)
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
““Borrowers are particularly vulnerable to the double whammy of weaker earnings and rising interest rates,” Morgan Stanley strategist Srikanth Sankaran said”
Junk-Loan Defaults Worry Wall Street Investors – WSJ
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
To quote Claudia Sham, Council of Economic Advisors economist, (from Sept 8th) !
“On a more personal note, I think both @paulkrugman and @LHSummers are excellent macroeconomists. Paul has a Nobel. Larry was youngest tenured at Harvard econ, later President of Harvard, Sec of Treasury, NEC Director, and has a direct dial to @POTUS now.”
With Sham, Krugman, Summers, and Cluster Fudge… We’re f^ *ked.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Stagflation at this point is more descriptive (business stagnation accompanied by inflation).
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“at this point” being the operative words.
When credit losses hit (they will) things will change.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
If we’re not in a recession, we’ll soon be. I don’t see how it’s avoidable. Unless Biden starts handing out more money. Which coupled with QT would be disastrous for yields.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Mish,
All indicators aside, I think what we really need is a psychology indicator. I don’t know if the image on the link (Wall Street Cheet Sheet) below is copyrighted but it should be required viewing at least once a year. I think we are somewhere between complacency and anxiety. The next stage is denial then panic.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
I’d like to know where everyone else here thinks we are. I was going to say Denial. I also think answers will be different depending on age and how you invest.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
Most people here are in the “Angry” stage. Though some of us are in the “Looking for opportunities” stage.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
Smart money is starting to leave the party. Only the ‘degenerate drunks’ will stay behind not knowing what is happening.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
You might be lagging–Sahm is clearly in denial. Panic will be when she realizes her Sham rule gives inconsistent results depending on factors underlying the recession.
Meanwhile, I ponder her FRED chart with the y-axis labeled, ‘Percentage Points’.
Who knows, given the SHAM rule: the 3-month moving average of the unemployment rate is 0.5 percentage point above its low over prior 12 months… is the low also a three-month moving average?Any monthly value? Seasonally adjusted?
Mish nailed it though. ‘This is like “predicting” rain when the raindrops hit your head.’
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
SPX monthly channel : 1974 to 1982 lows / parallel Nov 1980 high is waiting for us > Mar 2020 low. Can we get there : why not. May h/lo 1961 is backbone #1. May/June 1965, BB #2. // BB #2 led to Jan 1966 high, before plunging to Oct 1966 above BB #1. SPX made a new all time high in Dec 68, before plunging to BB #1 in May 1970. Nixon was elected in Nov 69. He launched SPX to the moon, in Jan 1973, before breaching BB #1 in Oct 74. // Mar 1980 and Aug 1982 were above BB #2, because oil co were very profitable. July 84 tested Nov 1980 high. That led to the Plaza accord and sent dxy to 165 in 1985.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
All boom/busts since WWII, excluding Covid-19, were predictable and preventable. Stocks bottomed in June 1984 when short-term money flows bottomed (proxy for real output). Stocks bottomed in Oct. 2002 and Mar. 2009 when short-term money flows bottomed. But today, that metric has been discontinued.
Traders might be just focusing on the deceleration in the inflation rate today. Sept. 13, 2022, is the next release. The S&P 500 bottomed on August 12, 1982 at 102.42, down -27.11%.

“By the time the stock market had bottomed, inflation had been reduced 8.54% and was only 5.04%.”

Karlmarx
Karlmarx
3 years ago
Oh if only the world were so simple.
Recessions are not about employment they are about growth. North Korea has full employment and still zero growth.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
At some point everyone will be in the same situation as North Korea because we live on a finite planet.
That means an infinitely long recession is the final outcome by your definition.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
I thought recessions in communist nations were measured by how fat the leaders were? Strange that those in power are changing the USA’s definition of a recession.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
The best recession indicator in real time is daily layoffs and/or cratering traffic. No recession where I live. Traffic is steady and no one in my area is losing their job.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Ridiculous
Does traffic in your neighborhood determine recession for the nation.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
That isn’t what he said.
Anyway; any thoughts on creating your own recession indicator?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
When PapaDave ceases to tout oil and gas we are in a recession.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
And I’m in Chicago and it’s dead. The streets are fairly empty, plenty of retail space un-leased everywhere. The only two areas where there is activity is the Viagra triangle and Fulton. There is plenty of exciting daily crime though.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
But I hear that they are bringing in new unskilled workers by the bus load!
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
I don’t remember any recession that had much effect on traffic. But, I live in the DC metro area. We’re somewhat immune to recessions.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
This facile argument weakens your other comments.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
From 3 days ago:
“But the whole recession debate is now silly.”
Agreed.
“Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession”
Agreed.
Perhaps we need a “Mish Recession Indicator”. Some number that you can post once a week or once a month.
BlauGloriole
BlauGloriole
3 years ago
Poor Claudia!

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.