Biden is Finally Doing What Trump and Obama Promised, Yet Few Cheer

Remarks by President Biden

On Thursday, President Biden gave an East Room Speech on the Drawdown of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan (emphasis mine)

When I announced our drawdown in April, I said we would be out by September, and we’re on track to meet that target.

As I said in April, the United States did what we went to do in Afghanistan: to get the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 and to deliver justice to Osama Bin Laden, and to degrade the terrorist threat to keep Afghanistan from becoming a base from which attacks could be continued against the United States. We achieved those objectives. That’s why we went.

We did not go to Afghanistan to nation-build. And it’s the right and the responsibility of the Afghan people alone to decide their future and how they want to run their country.   

Q&A Following the Speech

Q:  Is a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan now inevitable?
Biden: No, it is not.

Q: Why?

Biden: Because you — the Afghan troops have 300,000 well-equipped — as well-equipped as any army in the world — and an air force against something like 75,000 Taliban. It is not inevitable.

Q: Mr. President, thank you very much. Your own intelligence community has assessed that the Afghan government will likely collapse.

Biden: That is not true.

Q: Is it — can you please clarify what they have told you about whether that will happen or not?
Biden: That is not true. They did not — they didn’t — did not reach that conclusion.

Q: So what is the level of confidence that they have that it will not collapse? 
Biden: The Afghan government and leadership has to come together. They clearly have the capacity to sustain the government in place. The question is: Will they generate the kind of cohesion to do it? It’s not a question of whether they have the capacity. They have the capacity. They have the forces. They have the equipment. The question is: Will they do it? And I want to make clear what I made clear to Ghani: that we are not going just sus- — walk away and not sustain their ability to maintain that force. We are. We’re going to also work to make sure we help them in terms of everything from food necessities and other things in — in the region. But — but, there’s not a conclusion that, in fact, they cannot defeat the Taliban.

Analysis 

Biden’s speech was very long. Too long. And so was the Q&A period. 

He should have stopped his speech right here: “We did not go to Afghanistan to nation-build. And it’s the right and the responsibility of the Afghan people alone to decide their future and how they want to run their country,” followed by “Questions?”

Instead he went on and on and on. Then the Q&A was arguably a disaster but with some high points and a hugely missed opportunity. 

Military analysis is indeed that Afghanistan will fall, much like Saigaon fell after the Vietnam war. 

Rather than denying that, Biden should have answered the question just as he did in the a Q&A I listed above.

They have the capacity. They have the forces. They have the equipment. The question is: Will they do it?” 

That was a near perfect answer. To which Biden then should have reiterated something like ‘We did not go to Afghanistan to nation-build. We have been there three decades and spent many trillions of dollars. Two former presidents pledged to get out and failed. I am keeping my pledge. It is now up to the Afghan nation. Thank you and God bless.’ 

Instead, like the speech the Q&A went on and on.

Bumbled Conference?

Biden made some excellent point but failed to stay on target. 

Yet, he did get his primary message across clearly: We are “On track to leave by September“. 

Fox News Says Disgraceful, Badly Fumbling says NY Post

No Win Decision

Warmongers did not like Obama’s announcements, quietly balked at Trump’s failed plans, and are out in force once again now that Biden is on the verge of success.

Of course, Right wing news media would have criticized Biden no matter what he did. 

Bloody Result

It’s the warmongers, Right and Left who are most displeased. The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal (warmongers to the hilt) provide the perfect example of what I mean. 

The Journal board says “Biden and Trump will own the bloody result of America’s withdrawal.”

Had Trump pulled out, the perennial Warmongers would have gone after him, but the party faithful would have either been silent or given praise.

But don’t expect the Trump faithful who would have been OK with Trump pulling to be kind to Biden. And what about the Left?

No Mainstream Media Praise Anywhere

I spent an hour seeking mainstream media praise of the withdrawal.

Guess what? I found none. 

You can find coverage of the speech, but it is either coverage without comment or a blistering attack similar to the examples above.

The US Failed

It’s time we admit failure, lots of them.

The US tried to nation build Iraq and failed, nation build Afghanistan and failed, and lost the Vietnam war.

The warmongers at the Journal would keep US troops in Afghanistan for as long as it takes, which translates to forever. 

Anyone with an ounce of common sense should be able to see these failures. But warmongers are not known for common sense and the Left wing media, willing to take a stand on complete BS issues, is suddenly silent. 

In Praise of Biden

Biden gave a speech with some good ideas and one excellent one (that being leaving) but his delivery fell far short.

It’s time we leave, but someone needs to say we never should have been there or been there as long in the first place.

Regardless, Biden is on the cusp of doing what Obama and Trump said they would do and indeed should have done. 

That’s the best we could have hoped for and worthy of praise. Yet all we have is silence on the Left and attacks from the Right.

Please understand that the Left supports warmongering too. The difference is the Left often accomplishes the goal via complicit silence.

Lesson Not Learned

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MrGrummpy-
MrGrummpy-
2 years ago
According to the Foundation for Economic Education the cost in dollars for the war in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2021 is about $2.261 Trillion.  That is a huge expenditure of our resources.  Consider if we had used those resources for something a bit more useful.  For example, it would take about 1.26 million wind turbines to power the entire USA.  At a cost of about $1 million each that comes to $ 1.26 Trillion.  I am no fan of wind turbines, but I find it interesting that the costs of either a war in Afghanistan or replacing our energy source would be in the same order of magnitude.   If you share my misgivings about wind power,  we could try for some other useful projects. 
That $2.261 Trillion is equal to about $6851 per each and every US citizen, adult or child.  What could we have done with that money?  
Northeaster
Northeaster
2 years ago
Most of those Afghan troops are conscripts. They’re not going to do crap. They run. They all run. 
Winn
Winn
2 years ago
Reply to  Northeaster
Just like US fled Bagram Air Base.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“No Mainstream Media Praise Anywhere”
Stephen Colbert may be disappointed. On his late nite talk show he previously attacked presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard as an Assad apologist, for her anti-war stance.
Anon1970
Anon1970
2 years ago
From noon Friday to 11am Sunday local time, there were 11 homicides and 30 more wounded in Chicago reported by http://heyjackass.com. We have tremendous problems at home and need to stop trying to be the policeman of the world and trying to impose our brand of democracy abroad at the barrel of a gun. Of the 47 homicides reported so far in July in Chicago, one really hit me hard: a University of Chicago student who was lucky enough to score a summer internship at an investment banking firm downtown was shot by a stray bullet on the Green line subway while returning home from work on July 1. He was critically wounded and was taken off life support on July 4. The Green Line goes through some very rough parts of Chicago. I still wonder why he didn’t commute to his job using the Metra commuter line and the only answer I can think of is that Metra is a little more expensive than the local subway. As a student at the same university 50 years ago, I was a victim of a mugging near campus, so this event brought back bad memories.
jiminy
jiminy
2 years ago
Misch is correct.  I wonder if the elite realize the government is running out of resources for its climate agenda and social initiatives and need to conserve funds.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
There will be other opportunities to push back the barbarians from the empire’s limes.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
The next 9/11 won’t be that far off once Pakistan’s ISI uses the the Taliban and Al-Qaeda to attack the west again. The last time it only took about 10 years. 
Jackula
Jackula
2 years ago
Like the analysis! Only suggestion I have is to use Democrat and Republican party (partisan hacks)  are against the withdrawel. Swing voters that really count are prob for but this is a guess and are both right and left. Big portions of the right and left are very pro getting the hell out.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
SK should be next to exit from.  Finally.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
What you refer to as the “Left” is actually the socially moderate right-wingers aka Democrats.   And yes, they are as bloodthirsty as the Republicans, perhaps even more.  
The REAL left has ALWAYS opposed the war on Afghanistan from Day 1 – link to wsws.org
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Maybe the Afghan government reaches out to someone else to protect them.  Russia?
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
2 years ago
Spot on, great points. The only thing to add here is the silver lining. He is doing the right thing, even if he can’t advocate for himself or effectively explain why. Better to do good and be a trash communicator than be a smooth operator who does damage surreptitiously. 
vsest
vsest
2 years ago
What US can do without military bases in Japan, S.Korea, ME and Africa? Who’s gonna buy “Made in USA”? All these countries flip sides immediately.
rktbrkr
rktbrkr
2 years ago
Short, honest and direct answers by Biden about the chances of our puppet government in Kabul surviving would have undermined what little chance they have of succeeding. We could have stayed 200 years and gotten the same results. It won’t be like the fall of Saigon because our Vietnamese government fought initially, Kabuls troops have zero fight in them. It is what it is, time to cut our misguided losses.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
2 years ago
So where will those US soldiers be redeployed? Maybe the drawdown in Afghanistan is a signal to the Chinese that the US military is no longer stretched and preparing for a confrontation with China.
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
2 years ago
I am happy we are leaving. Have left?
I am very unhappy that we are not bringing 100K deserving Afghanis to the USA. They are going to slaughtered.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
I’m very pleased…..although I could stand for Biden to quit declaring victory. What a crock.
And my best guess is that the Taliban will slit the throats of the interim government in short order, and assume full control. 
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I agree they will. Most of the government forces will switch sides immediately.
But who cares since it’s on the far side of the world and has zero strategic value in terms of military position or resources.
thimk
thimk
2 years ago
great – look at all the money we will save . /s
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Eh, the first article on this site about the debacle in Afganistan.
Let’s start with some assertions: the debacle is the result of neocon grand project to reshape the region. Afganistan was not only supposed to be the staging ground for threatening Iran, but also to undermine bigger players: Russia and China. That plan is now in the thrash can.
The neocons wrecked their own plan by invasion of Iraq. Otherwise, it might just have a chance.
NATO exercised a modern version of cut and run, leaving it’s main air base under the cover of the night.
It will have repercussions: it telegraphs to regional parties that outside powers are there only for the short run. Plan accordingly.
Given the financial train wreck on the home front, it’s not the happy end that many might think. Just as pullout from Afganistan was not the happy end for the Soviet Union, this story is still developing…
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
18 years is the short run? That’s longer than WWII, Korea and Vietnam combined.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Well, the neocons had even bigger plans.  Iraq was just the start.  “Boys Go to Baghdad, Real Men Go to Tehran” was pretty much their slogan.   

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.