Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Still More Green Hypocrisy In the EU, This Time Hydrogen

Hooray More Green Energy!

The EU is cheering a new hydrogen project at a refinery in Germany. 

The plant will be built by Shell and ITM power and will be able to produce about 1,300 tonnes of hydrogen per year, which can be fully integrated into the refinery processes, such as for the desulphurisation of conventional fuels. It will be the world’s largest hydrogen electrolyser

Tudor Constantinescu, Principal Advisor, DG ENER at the European Commission stressed the the contribution of green hydrogen to the Energy Union objectives, saying: “Renewable electricity can support decarbonisation not only of the power sector, but, through sectoral integration also of other carbon intensive industries, such as refining. Green Hydrogen is a key enabler in this process, contributing to the Energy Union objectives both in terms of emissions reductions and increased renewables share.

Ten Times the Hydrogen, Ten Times the Cost?

Euractive has some interesting details of the undertaking, allegedly Set to Multiply Capacity tenfold by 2024.

The 10 MW electrolyser, while already Europe’s largest of its kind, is a pilot project for grander ambitions.

If the pilot works out well, the partnership around Shell wants to add another 100 MW of electrolysis capacity which would complete construction in 2024. That would then be the largest electrolyser in the world.

Yet the pilot project depended on financing by the FCH JU at a 50% rate, meaning that the business case for a project ten times larger without public funding would be questionable at best.

Whether those ambitions come to fruition will therefore depend on the carbon price and the amount of additional funding available, which could come from either the EU or Germany.

It is currently unclear whether the FCH JU will again step in and provide funding as it did for the pilot project, as the application review is ongoing, a source told EURACTIV.

European Hydrogen Greenwashing

Eurointelligence looked into the details, and found still more amusing details.

We noted a strange description of how it will work in a Euractiv article sponsored by the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking, a public-private partnership between the EU and the European hydrogen lobby. According to the article, the new plant will produce around 1300 tonnes of green hydrogen annually, provided sufficient amounts of renewable energy are available.

If they are not, the alternative will be to used natural gas to produce the hydrogen. And funnily enough, hydrogen produced by the new electrolyser will be used to refine petroleum at Chemicals Park Rheinland, Germany’s largest refinery.

We thought it was strange that Laschet would tout a renewable project given his backing for coal-fired power plants and general aversion to all things green. But we wonder now whether Refhyne will be green after all. 

We think it is plausible that the EU’s hydrogen development will wind up being dependent on Russian gas.

The EU’s Stunning Green Hypocrisy

With that revealed, let’s recap my previous report, The EU’s Stunning Green Hypocrisy, At Least Trump Was Honest About Targets

If you took Green targets seriously, you would have to reform the Common Agricultural Policy. But the EU failed to do precisely that when they had an opportunity last year. Instead, the EU resorts to cheating. 

The European Commission classifies investment in terms of 0%, 40% and 100% green content, and rounds up the numbers to the next higher target. So 1% becomes 40%. 41% becomes 100%.

When the mendacity of the EU’s climate policy becomes apparent, the centre will not only have lost the victims of the economic crisis, but an entire generation of young voters.

This is the thing with smoke and mirrors: when the smoke lifts, you see clearly. 

Too Strict?!

The above snips were also courtesy of Eurointelligence. 

Here’s another amusing kicker: It also noted “the most recent set of [rounding up] guidelines, published in 2019, were deemed too strict by some member states and industry lobbyists.”

Yes indeed. Clearly there is a need to round 1% up to 49% and 50% up to 120% or whatever.

EU Tries to Convince Trading Partners Its Carbon Tax is Not a Tax

Finally, please consider EU Tries to Convince Trading Partners Its Carbon Tax is Not a Tax.

Recap

This new “Green” hydrogen project needs a 50% subsidy, likely depends on Russian natural gas, and will be used to refine oil.

This we call “Green”.

EU hypocrisy on Green Energy is endless.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Green, isn’t.
“For example, the scientists calculate that a VW ID.3 electric vehicle would “cause” 30 tons of CO2 during its “life cycle” (15 years, 220,000 km) instead of 14 tons during operation through the power grid. In contrast, the CO2 footprint of a diesel full hybrid fueled with R33 (67% fossil fuel,33% biofuel) would be even better.”
Leftist filmmaker Michael Moore even made a film, criticizing the green energy industry.
LM2022
LM2022
4 years ago
Arguably the biggest news of the last week, the US leaving Afghanistan, was not even discussed on this blog.  Biden got done something that should have been done years ago, something that Mish had been calling for – a complete withdrawal.  Credit to Biden where it’s due.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  LM2022
The Soviets retreated. The USA retreated. China will not retreat. The rest of the world will protest the extermination of millions of Afghans, but do nothing. Definitely, Biden should be credited.
LM2022
LM2022
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
You cannot pacify or nation-build in Afghanistan. The Soviet’s tried and failed, the US tried and failed, so best of luck to China.  
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  LM2022
Don’t forget the British.  They too bit the dust in Afghanistan.   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1842_retreat_from_Kabul

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
The Chinese have tried before. Genghis Khan’s grandson died in battle there in 1221.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Green is the new cool way to get money, if you happen to be in the energy sector. That’s what Katusa’s book talks about.
Green is whatever politicians say it is….but it turns out to (mostly) be one more conduit scheme whereby taxpayers funds make their way into private pockets.
The EU is not the Lone Ranger on this. All the countries vowing to make a reduction in carbon are going to do the same thing, to some degree.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Which would mean what, exactly, for Trump’s policy on green deals?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Trump went full on for fossil fuels early on, a move that surprised some people. In my view it had to do with the short-lived love affair between Trump and Charlie Koch. 
If Trump and any policies that favored green deals at all, I’m not aware of it. His policies  hammered green.
I expect to see a return to, and an expansion of, Obama era initiatives. Some of it will be an improvement. Much of it will not.
I have nothing against renewables. I just think they won’t replace fossil fuels anytime soon. A lot of it will be along the lines of this stuff the EU is coming up with…..which is phony green energy and phony-baloney carbon tax bs.
I think Realist, whether you like his politics or not, gets it. In the short run our policies will make the oil companies flow a lot of cash. In the long run the  politically favored green producers will be able to borrow money cheaper than anybody else, and they will make deals that allow them to buy up many of the FF producers. 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Why in the Hell did my comment where I talked only about a chemical process be sent to a moderator? Are chemical processes political now?
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
It might be useful  to understand exactly how converting natural gas into green hydrogen entails when it comes to energy costs of the chemical reaction. It helps if you know some chemistry. Essentially you use part of the energy in the natural gas to drive a chemical process to strip out the carbon atoms leaving only the hydrogen gas which then can be burned in various ways depending on what you want to do. When burned the hydrogen gas’s only  waste product is only water vapor and nothing else. The waste product of the stripping out the carbon is carbon  which is basically a stable brick of pure carbon and you can pack that away back underground or use it as a door stop.
Greggg
Greggg
4 years ago
Biomass is considered to be green too.   They burn trees for fuel…  Many biomass plants also burn old tires along with the trees for a hotter burn and more generating capacity.   So if you ask the “experts” about electrolysis, they’ll probably try and pass it off to the public as a miraculous perpetual energy generating plant.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.