Biden Struggles to Convince People to Buy EVs, Only 12 Percent Seriously Considering

Most Americans Are Not Completely Sold on Electric Vehicles

Gallup reports Most Americans Are Not Completely Sold on Electric Vehicles

Key Points

  • Current ownership of electric vehicles among partisans is 6% for Democrats, 4% for independents and 1% for Republicans. 
  • Democrats (22%) are far more likely than both Republicans (1%) and independents (12%) to say they are seriously considering purchasing an EV. The majority of Democrats, 54%, say they may consider it in the future. 
  • A substantial majority of Republicans, 71%, say they would not consider owning an electric vehicle.
  • While about four in 10 U.S. adults think using EVs helps address climate change “a great deal” (12%) or “a fair amount” (27%), roughly six in 10 believe it helps “only a little” (35%) or “not at all” (26%).
  • Americans who worry a great deal about global warming or climate change are most open to owning an electric vehicle now or in the future, with 79% saying they currently own one (5%), are seriously considering it (16%) or would at some point (58%). Conversely, 77% of those who are not at all concerned about climate change say they would never own an EV.
  • With four in 10 U.S. adults unwilling to even consider switching from a gas to an electric vehicle, the plans of Biden, California and auto manufacturers could be challenging to achieve.

Americans’ Ownership of Electric Vehicles by Demographic Group

EVs are Coming

Many of those who say they will never do so are wrong. And the younger the age group in saying that the more likely they will be wrong.

As a practical matter, politicians are forcing the issue whether or not it makes any sense. 

Eventually, the battery technology will get better, costs will drop, and chargers will be in more places. 

But even so, don’t expect the shift to do much if anything for the environment.  

Damn the Inflation, Full Speed Ahead

Biden’s and California’s energy policy can easily be summed up in meme phrases.

  • Damn the Inflation, Full Speed Ahead
  • What, Me Worry?
  • The world will end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.

Meanwhile, someone please tell me how we are going to reduce dependence on China, avoid protectionism, and appease the Greens with their preposterous demands to eliminate electric vehicles by 2035.

For discussion, please see The US and G-7 Allies Are Torn Over Dependence on China

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

137 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DolyG
DolyG
1 year ago
“Meanwhile, someone please tell me how we are going to reduce dependence on China, avoid protectionism, and appease the Greens with their preposterous demands to eliminate electric vehicles by 2035.”
You are not going to reduce dependence on China. You are not going to avoid protectionism. You may appease the greens, though, but get clear about the demands: it’s eliminating ICE vehicles.
Eliminate faulty assumptions, and the question is easily answered.
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Add weight to the obstacles facing wide scale adoption of EVs. A typical EV is 1-2500 pounds heavier than an equivalent car with an internal combustion engine. The recent collapse of a parking garage in NYC has brought this to the forefront. In an age where EVs are common, all parking garages will need to be re-evaluated to determine if they can handle the extra weight of newer EV cars. The added weight is also an indication that the road taxes paid by EV owners should be higher than the road taxes paid by cars with gas engines, because the EVs, being heavier, will do more damage to the roads.
oee
oee
1 year ago
that is good number It took decades before the automobile became standard. Also, Red states are increasing registration fees to thwart the their adoptions. Why you do not print that? That is intering with your “free market” that does not exist.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  oee
They are not trying to thwart anything.
They are trying to replace taxes on gas/diesel fuels.
If you drive a car, I’ll tax the street
If you take a walk, I’ll tax your feet
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Also, EVs are heavier and cause more wear on the road.
tractionengine
tractionengine
1 year ago
This might be a little picky but I don’t think the greens want to eliminate ice – they want to stop their manufacture by 2035. (Of course some would ban the use of fuel immediately). However, since when has the lack of a plan slowed a man on a mission? There’s a lot of money to be had by taking advantage of the scatter-gun approach but I can’t figure out how little old me can get my hands on some.
As for vehicle sales, they will plummet when they are all connected and driverless. (And don’t waste your time telling me it will “never happen”.) You finally won’t be allowed to endanger others by controlling a vehicle on public places and will thus not need to “own” a car when you can have one at your door in 2 minutes.
None of this matters though. Everyone wants their water from the same lake (the whole economy). The amount of water we want from the lake is ever-increasing along with the garbage we dump into it. Sure we manage to have more rain land in our lake (grow the economy) and pump up more groundwater (for now), but the levels keeps dropping. Either we take less water and pollute less, or find a way to increase the rainfall. I see no worthwhile effort or plan to do any of these – and I have no answer. Tell me where I’m wrong.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  tractionengine
Obviously you’re all wet.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  tractionengine
How will that be any different than using a car service like Uber now? Just because the car is driverless doesn’t mean the trip will be free.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
I don’t care too much about “who” is going to buy EVs.

EV passenger vehicle sales will continue to climb but its going to take a few decades before the total number of EVs exceed the total number of ICE vehicles. That is true for the US and for most of the rest of the world (with exceptions such as Norway).Meanwhile, the number of ICE vehicles being used worldwide, continues to increase every year, and this will continue for the rest of this decade at least. For example, China is selling over 23 million vehicles a year and 78% of them are still ICE. India is at just 3.8 million (almost all ICE) but growing rapidly. The world as a whole sells close to 60 million vehicles each year, most of which are still ICE. Which means continued increase in demand for gasoline and diesel for the rest of this decade.Perhaps gas and diesel prices will eventually go high enough to reduce demand for ICE and increase demand for EVs. But its going to take time.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Yet more evidence that,
a) when something becomes politicized, critical thinking stops on both sides.
b) education has become a form of progressive brainwashing
c) liberals live on the east and west coasts
d) when government is involved, there is little to no consideration of consequences
e) all of the above
Toutatis
Toutatis
1 year ago
I would be interested by an EV, but only to make short trips. So I would need another car, for the long trips. I would have then to compare prices (rent or buy the car for long trips ?). But I am sure than a unique gasoline car would be much less expensive.
The EV for long trips would be possible only if it would be possible to quickly change the batteries instead of charging them.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Toutatis
Of course the best alternative is to own a vehicle that runs on petrol with unlimited distance through fast ubiquitous refueling.
For short trips use Lyft or Uber or similar.
If your conscience troubles you require an EV from Lyft or Uber.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Toutatis
EV full charge ranges keep going up. And chargers are getting more amps. Over time, a full charge will likely be under 10 minutes.
And as EVs take over, gas stations will be in short supply. And gas will become very expensive. They’ll likely only exist along major highways.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
So for a 10 minute full charge of a 48kW battery you only need about a 600 ampere at 480 volt service.
Not your typical 100-200 amp 240 volt service.
Then there’s the 60kW and 70kw batteries.
But if you pay for it the electric company will install it.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
A car is a cost center do (almost) nothing all day. To spend 100K on a car and the sun make no sense, especially if we are heading to
recession. If u like EV buy it at half price, when WTI will be half price. When TSLA, Ford and GM beg for new orders and the gov will give buyers 15K incentive, to save the car mfg, which are FULLY committed to EV instead of an option.
Jackula
Jackula
1 year ago
Amazing how dumb Americans are. EV’s make a lot of sense in the Pacific northwest where hydroelectric power is cheap. Instead they are purchased along political lines…electric cars make sense from a lot of perspectives especially from an efficiency basis but it will take time to get the infrastructure in place to support them. The conversion will take some investment
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Jackula
The plan is for people to have solar installations. Obviously it won’t work for everyone, but it will take a load off the electric grid.
granite
granite
1 year ago
I live on the Gulf Coast south of Houston. In the 30 years I’ve been here we’ve evacuated for hurricane threats 3 times. There will always be another. What will happen when a million people need to charge their vehicles all at the same time?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  granite
Only a few will charge their car.
Considering it is Texas there will probably be a lot of shootings near charging stations.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  granite
What happens now when a million people need to fill up their tanks at the same time?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Well for one thing there’s tens of thousands of gas stations positioned based on the population.
For another thing a full “charge” of gas takes 5 minutes, not hours and hours while tethered to a meter.
phil
phil
1 year ago
good topic, Mish. I don’t have the time to read all the comments to date.
that said, if I could have concocted the survey, I would have asked more questions like: Is your approach to run your ICE vehicle until you die, so you don’t have to make a choice?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago

These 2 points:

Democrats (22%) are far more likely than both Republicans (1%) and independents (12%) to say they are seriously considering purchasing an EV. The majority of Democrats, 54%, say they may consider it in the future.

A substantial majority of Republicans, 71%, say they would not consider owning an electric vehicle.

essentially just say that rural people aren’t buying or considering electric and city people are.

That should not surprise anyone.

Mjs357
Mjs357
1 year ago
They are really expensive. But, in fact, seemingly more of inconvenience to cahrge, maintain, and the cost again for replacing batteries. They’re not very good looking, ppl are visual. Not enough ppl either care or got sucked into the Green machine and their fear-mongering of global warming. EVs are a nice idea, some find them cool to have like an accessory, and others believe they are saving the earf. I see none of the BRICS and their applicants are mandating nonsense like intolerant western Leftists. I wonder why…no I do not.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Mjs357
China has very strict mandates. EVs no longer cost more than equivalent ICE. The batteries last hundreds of thousands of miles. And they look the same. There’s no reason for them to look different.
Mjs357
Mjs357
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I’ll buy some of that. Show me a Chinese mandate, corporation or government, that mirrors US mandates that reduce their freedom to choose what type of vehicle to own or buy.
XZBD
XZBD
1 year ago
Perhaps if cars like the Aptera start being produced opinions will change. While it doesn’t solve all the problems, because of its exceedingly high efficiency, it does a lot to mitigate many of them. Its not going to replace your truck, but for commuting its going to be hard to beat. The average commuter will likely only have to charge once or twice a month. You can use their calculator to check what your estimated interval would be on the site: link to aptera.us.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  XZBD
Several years ago I was following this company out of India that made a car that ran on compressed air. A few companies like that. Were supposed to enter the U.S. market back in the Obama years. I wanted one. Never happened. Funny how we never hear about actually sustainable methods.
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Reply to  XZBD
Note that the Aptera is not a “car”. Note that it has three wheels, not four. Since three wheels inherently reduces stability, and dramatically increases the chances of rollover, why would anyone do that? Simple. It avoids safety requirements, such as airbags, that add a lot of weight (and safety) to vehicles, as well as cost.
Webej
Webej
1 year ago
Meanwhile, someone please tell me how we are going to reduce dependence on China, avoid protectionism, and appease the Greens with their preposterous demands to eliminate electric vehicles by 2035
Easy. Austerity, poverty, collapse.
For most people the question is not how postpone the end of the world in 12 years, but how to survive until then.
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
Reply to  Webej
Easy, WW3.
It will be the best escape out of our debt and real pollution that we created in China, India, and many other places.
Then for our national safety we will outlaw gold bullion ownership and create a digital currency. If we are lucky enough we will be required to prove our identity with our right hand or forehead.
Don’t worry though, you will still be able to buy gold derivatives.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
WW3 will go nuclear, so austerity will be the norm for the unfortunate survivors. Don’t worry though, the important people will live underground. Hopefully forever.
jimmym
jimmym
1 year ago
I purchased a Mustang Mach E as a retirement present to myself and took delivery in November after waiting almost a year from my order date. I love the car, but consider it a toy for well off people. I didn’t even get the tax credit as my income last year was so high. I put solar panels on my home and office and so I bought the car since I can charge it for “free”. Then the city utility from which I receive power decided to screw their solar panel customers by unilaterally reneging on their contract and charging them retail rates for power used and low ball wholesale rates for power produced by panels and supplied to the system. (Approximately 11 cents per kilowatt used versus 3 cents per kilowatt supplied.) Many of the solar users are taking legal action against the city. Prices for the same car right now are significantly higher due to price increases in many components and systems. I am not sure that I would buy the same car today at the higher prices.
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
Reply to  jimmym
First, congrats on retiring. Second, what an awesome car.
I’m in the similar boat with solar and a Tesla. I’m in California and the governor’s utility commission all decided it would be in our best interest to change the rates like what’s happening to you. Tie that along with Mish’s last article to charge electricity based on how much you earn vs. how much you use, I’m certain the Gallup poll results will be inaccurate.
I love coming up with ways around the system. So, I suggest that your office/company pay for your solar at home because your office could use the carbon credits from your home. Make sure to write ESG on the check and receipt.
Next, I suggest you look into getting a battery and possible turning your solar to off-grid if your utility company wants to overcharge you for electricity. Next will be taxing you for production of electricity.
Utilities sure have been weaponized.
DHolzer
DHolzer
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
I don’t understand that proposal, as my electricity bill from PG&E (even without a working A/C) is usually 4x-6x the amount cited for the cost to the top earners. But I am frustrated with the change to net metering to anyone who does not yet have a working solar system – it basically requires a battery system, which more than doubles the cost of the solar system over its lifetime and is bad for the environment. But I am loving my plug-in hybrid, best of both worlds (even if I do not save any money on the electricity).
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  jimmym
Well, duh. The same experience occurred in Australia. The reason is simple: solar generates during daylight. People use most energy during the dark hours. Energy pours into the grid during the daytime–without cost-effective storage. At night, power has to be generated by other more expensive means.
tractionengine
tractionengine
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Well duh. I don’t know of anyone who uses more electricity when it’s dark – especially since for most of us, it’s lighter longer than it’s dark. Most of us sleep at night and do our work during the day.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  tractionengine
During the winter, you might use more at night for heating.
babelthuap
babelthuap
1 year ago
There is a saying from a famous tycoon that It’s ok to put all your eggs in one basket. Just as long as you defend the basket. Right now the electric basket is nowhere near robust enough where it can be defended. We still need the oil and gas baskets for a long time, especially for natural disasters like a CAT 5 hurricane. When a storm like that approaches the grid is not only too weak to support that many EVs charging at the same time but the grid actually gets destroyed. No more charging anything. Now what? An all those EV’s that could not charge in time; gone with the wind. And what about backup generators for hospitals? Many will die without having oil and gas readily available. I have a couple of gas generators and stored fuel on hand at all times. I highly doubt gas generators will ever go away for this reason.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  babelthuap
I suspect most critical infrastructure will use backup batteries. Prices drop every year. Gasoline stations won’t completely go away, but their numbers will go way down.
Right now, if the power goes out, gas stations can’t pump gas. So, how are EVs any worse off? At least with an EV, you might be able to charge off solar panels or a generator.
babelthuap
babelthuap
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I’m not against EVs but I have lived through several major storms. There was no electricity for 5 days for the last one and not much sunlight either. It gets really really dark and cloudy outside before and after a major storm. Might get some charge but not enough to matter. As for gas stations not being able to pump people usually fill up before the storm and also store it in gas cans. I do believe though gas stations can pump with special gas generators if needed.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  babelthuap
Gas pumps require electricity too.
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  babelthuap

Cannot see your point – maybe me?Filling your tank of gas before the storm is like charging your car before the storm. When storm hits, electricity goes out and no way to fill either ICE or EV.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack
Can the grid handle it when everyone tops up their EV and home battery just before the storm?
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
EVs are coming no matter what anyone thinks. No car companies are doing R&D in ICE vehicles. EVs will be cheaper to produce, cheaper to own, and perform better then ICE vehicles. They’re already being heavily adopted in many parts of the world. Including China, the worlds largest car market. China is about to restrict emissions even more later this year which will be the kiss of death for many ICE vehicles. I predict in 2024, the majority of cars sold in China will be EVs. That’s > 10 million units.
Part of the problem with adoption in the US is car dealerships charging way over msrp. They can because demand is higher than supply. Try buying a Chevy bolt. if you can get one, you’ll likely pay 10%+ over msrp. The problem in the US is supply. Not demand. If we had the same buying options as the Chinese, sales would go way up.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
We have 100+ years of building cars and trucks and we know what is available and we know what things cost when scaled up. We have very little experience with building electric cars and trucks — whats REALLY gonna happen when you have to build a million of them?
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
The Chinese have already done it
billybobjr
billybobjr
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Yea, and they are building coal fired generating power stations as fast as they can to produce
electricity .
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Agree. Around here there is a 14 mth wait list for every type of EV. Essentially impossible to buy one.
Cannot wait to purchase an EV so do not have to deal with driving to the gas station every week on commute home. Also sick of routine ICE maintenance (oil changes, spark plug replacements, etc…).
I want a car that just works – like my phone just works. Plug it in at night, and it is ready the next day.
Also it is crazy how we all think that pumping hydrocarbons at the gas station is normal.
In the oil business (the industry I work in) you need full PPE when working this closely with hydrocarbons – but we all do it at the gas station with no PPE.
Strange world.
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack
Re: “I want a car that just works – like my phone just works. Plug it in at night, and it is ready the next day.”
Actually, the future may be exactly the opposite. EV’s may be used as the batteries to support the grid. Thus, you may need to charge your car during the daytime with solar energy, then use the batteries in your EV to power your house at night.
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Probably will be true as well.
All the parking spots at my employer have 110VAC outlets. This would certainly make solar a more useful energy source.
My guess there will be a mix of scenarios that play out at the same time – the answer will be grey, not black or white.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack
How long until you pay “maintenance” cost for one of those battery pack replacements?
Or do you plan to sell the car first, and pass the replacement cost down to some other sucker?
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Back in the 1970’s, I often drove a Sebring-Vanguard Citicar. It used eight 6-Volt Marine Duty lead acid batteries as a power source, in series so it could provide a maximum of 48 volts to the “powerful” 6 HP electric motor. A single bad cell could disrupt that, so battery issues were not uncommon. The brushed electric motors gave off significant amounts of ozone, which destroys natural rubber (i.e. tires). It was just a given that that you would have to have to replace the batteries and tires at least once a year, and it was just considered to be the normal operating cost. On the other hand, electricity use was low, and there were no other common expenses. On the whole, cost was not the issue. Rather it was the limited range (“up to 50 miles”, i.e. 30 miles), limited speed (“up to 35 mph”, i.e. 30-32 mph on level ground), lack of traction in snow, lack of heat or AC, plus general comfort and safety issue.
Made of fiberglass, these last a very long time, and you still see them sold on Ebay (two so far this month).
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Starting tomorrow, only six EVs will still qualify for a $7,500 federal tax credit. The
IRS list of electric vehicles that still qualify for the
full $7,500 federal tax credit are the Cadillac Lyriq,
Chevy Bolt, Chevy Bolt EUV, some Tesla Model 3 versions, some Tesla
Model Y versions and Ford F-150.
Electric vehicles mostly appeal to the freeloader class of society, and have little to do with the environment. I am sure sales will plummet.
EV Subsidies usually go to upper income bracket car owners, who generally drive cleaner eternal combustion engine cars anyway. If the concern was the environment instead of making wealthier people feel good about themselves, the subsidies would go to the poorest car owners to upgrade or fix their misfiring, oil leaking and burning high mileage jalopy.
One mandate that would really help is that when cars have an emissions code defect because of a failed sensor that the car would default to a clean burning limp mode that would still enable the car to work with reasonable lesser performance.
Regenerative braking and idle stop seem to be the most redeeming advancements in EV and Hybird vehicles. These could find there way into conventional vehicles at much lower costs.
Ev mandates are really just pressing the exhilarator pedal to the floor and heading straight for the cliff.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
A “a clean burning limp mode” would not employ enough autoworkers.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
If they aren’t already, electric cars will end up being a lot more long lived than ICE cars. Thousands fewer parts to break. The big thing is you really need a home charger to make it practical, and a lot of people can’t manage that. Sitting at a charging station SUCKS.
I got one for my wife because because she’s a drivin’ fool. 20k miles a year easy, and gas is usually $4 or more. So instead of 300 a month or so on gas, she spends about $35 on electric, and gets a ‘fancy’ car instead of a corolla… though Elon’s efforts to become King of the Incels have definitely tarnished that cachet.
I kept my old pickup for the country place, though. I put gas in it every 6 weeks or so. Might get an electric pickup in 10 years or so when this one dies, but for now it doesn’t make sense.
Everyone has a different set of parameters. It’ll take a while for everything to line up.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
If they aren’t already, electric cars will end up being a lot more long lived than ICE cars. Thousands fewer parts to break.
Indeed but you can’t expect the illiterate to look past gas vs electric to make a sound judgement decision. No oil changes, no gas tax, lower overall maintenance…yeah sign me up if I needed a car but Uber works fine for me when I need to go somewhere.
Long term it won’t matter anyway when Exxon, Shell, etc decide to stop hauling fuel to the middle of nowhere rural areas and instead focus on city centers that are far more profitable. Ironically, i think rural areas will be forced to go electric before other areas once fuel hits $8/gallon in a few years.
Topferment
Topferment
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Yes no gas tax for EVs, but soon enough your state will make you pay a road use tax! You’ll be required to send in your mileage by a connected device on your EV or by some other method.
Jeff Dog
Jeff Dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Topferment
It is done in California by an increased car tax on EVs
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Reply to  Topferment
If EV’s use the roads, they should pay a tax to help maintain the roads. Collecting a tax based on gas used was a simple method of spreading the costs of road maintenance, so long as all cars used gas.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Yup, it might happen much sooner.
As soon as urban people stop eating.
Agriculture ya know.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
A population conditioned to 2 minute fillups is gonna have a big prob with 2+ hour “fast” charging. Gonna take a lot of hand-holding.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
It’s not 2 hours. The fastest ones can fully charge in under 15 minutes.
The flip side of the argument is people can charge overnight, so they never need to waste time at a gas station.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
If you have a garage — and newer electric outlets in them
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
You can charge off a standard 120v outlet. It just takes longer. For many who don’t drive a lot, it works fine for them.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Again, if you have a garage and a decent plug.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
220 Dryer plugs work, and it cost me about $1000 for the charger and install of a plug.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
And as long as you never have to drive more than 125 miles from home.
FYI: 15 minute charging stations cost $25k to $50k and require new 480 volt transformers on the pole and matching service panel in the home/garage.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Yeah, it requires a little presence of mind to plug in your car when you get home. Many just won’t be able to handle it.
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Especially all of those in high rise apartments
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
Charging stations will make their way into the parking area eventually.
thedirtymac
thedirtymac
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Those who park on city streets can be supplied with really long extension cords.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
Big potential market for retractable heavy-gauge outdoor extension cords.
ZZR600
ZZR600
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
There may be fewer parts that fail but those that do will be very expensive and require a specialist to fix. A few years ago an airbag sensor module failed and cost me about $900 to replace. EVs have very many more complicated sensors that can’t be fixed using simple DIY. Other bits like suspension will fail as with any other car, or any other parts subject to corrosion
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
ICE vehicles have airbag sensors as well as EVs – and are not cheaper
ZZR600
ZZR600
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack
This was for a diesel car. Yes, my point is if an airbag sensor module costs $900 to replace, EVs have much more complicated electronics which will cost even more if they fail.
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
The reliability issue is typically not with the electronics but with the sensors.
Mechanical vehicles require more sensors (O2 sensors, Fuel flow sensors, etc) that EVs do not have – measuring voltage and current is easy.
These ICE vehicle sensors and their integral boards are intrinsically will fail.
My old Radio Shack programmable calculator has similar complicated electronics as an EV and will run forever.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
if your wife is spending only $35 a month to charge her vehicle she’s not driving 20K miles a year or she’s getting free electric power someplace that won’t continue much longer. $35 a month doesn’t even run my pool pump for 6 hrs a day.
As for parts breaking, that’s true there are far fewer. But the downside is that the battery replacement cost looms in the future and it’s going to be on the order of 6-10K or more. Often more than the car is worth so if you want to keep your car 10+ years you have to budget for that massive battery replacement.
The other thing people are just finding out now is that even a minor fender bender is causing insurance companies to write off the EV. So if you don’t have replacement level insurance (which costs more insurance wise) you are going to get sticker shock there. The reason they are writing off the EVs even in fender benders is because of the fear of battery fire in the future and a possible lawsuit claim.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
It’s dirt cheap at night. … something like 2-3 cents per KWH.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Muh climate change! The only science involved in that whole debate is mass psychology and political science. While I do agree that pollution is a big problem, how are electric cars supposed to address that problem? The whole problem is just such a sack of strawmen that I can’t believe it’s a part of the national discourse. But the slaves love their misery so.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
I think part of the idea is the pollution source is concentrated at the power plants instead of millions of cars. Easier to address fewer sources.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
We’ll see in 10 years and half of Florida under water if you are right! 🙂
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
I’m still ticked off that they lied about New York City being underwater by 2012. Though I should probably be happy about it since they’d have all moved down here if it were to happen.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
If it were not for Graft and Skimming, New York City would not even exist. We should be glad that there is a place in this world where those types of activities can concentrate.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
And I am! I was just hoping for a tidal surge type of flooding. I know, wishful thinking….. Though I do wish they’d quit infecting the rest of the world with their nonsense. Wall Street has convinced Main Street to self-destruct. Which makes me think Main Street is kind of dense. But, that’s just me.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Over my dead polar bear!
davidyjack
davidyjack
1 year ago
EVS will become much more attractive when US gasoline prices likely hit 6$ a gallon by 2026.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  davidyjack
EVs will become much more attractive when the Liberals give one to anyone with a SNAP card.
ZZR600
ZZR600
1 year ago
The grid won’t cope. Overall energy use is about a third each for transport, industry and domestic. If you electrify your transport, you are effectively doubling electricity use. Will there ever be the generation capacity for this?
dbannist
dbannist
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
Actually, there is.

Energy usage is very low at night. Charging cars at night will increase overall load, but it will not double it. The capacity is already there, and by charging cars at night you will be able to basically keep similar capacity to what is there now, even if you triple electric car use.

If everyone has an EV though, that will require significantly more capacity. Smarter people than me will have to figure just how high.

ZZR600
ZZR600
1 year ago
Reply to  dbannist
I suppose with the likes of California adopting EVs at full speed, we’ll know in about a decade if this is feasible
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  dbannist
We just need someone smart enough to make solar panels produce electricity at night.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
Part of the plan is an increase in solar panel use. Prices keep dropping every year. There are solar films in development that can be applied to any surface. Even cars. So at some point it might be as simple as the car charges when in sunlight.
Obviously this will help certain homes and areas more than others.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
How do I know already that you have absolutely no proof of this, despite being absolutely certain it’s true.
You need to find a church.
ZZR600
ZZR600
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Work out the calorific value of petrol and diesel used per year and convert that to the number of power stations necessary for the extra 100s of GW of generation needed. Maybe the USA with much larger land mass can cope, but it’s taken about 20 years to approve a single new nuclear reactor in the UK (that’s if it ever gets built). At peak, my household uses about 4kw, and that’s if I have the electric oven in. On slow charge, a 100kWh battery will require 10kW per hour for 10 hours. Or 20kw over 5 hours. Suddenly, my intermittent 4kw use is gone up to 14 for an extended period, or maybe 24kw. Should every household act the same, I doubt the local distribution grid could handle so much extra power down the cables
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
First, cut the calorific value of fuel in half… electrics powered by humongous generators are at least that much more efficient, end to end.
Second, the vast, vast majority of charging happens at night, when none of that other stuff is on, and power plants are ramped down or wasting the generated energy in a cooling pond.
I appreciate that you’re actually thinking about numbers though. I don’t know which one of us is correct… but my hunch is we’ll figure out how to get around any supply problems. A lot can be done if charging is centrally scheduled to manage loads, and that would be pretty easy to get going.
Power usage has been growing since the first power line was installed. I think we’ll figure something out.
ZZR600
ZZR600
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Even assuming you can do all the charging at night, you still require the fuel, which will be predominantly gas, coal or nuclear. However I don’t see any new fossil fuel or nuclear being built. Renewable generation is often just replacing stations being shut down or planning to be shut down. Add to this, the UK wants to electrify industrial heat and power. So all energy use will one day have to be electric, meaning maybe doubling or tripling electrical generation capacity. I just don’t see it happening.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
At some point the fossil fuel runs out. Burning it half as fast serves us better.
If they can make money off building power plants, plants will get built. I expect people will lose their distaste for nuclear when gas is 10 bucks a gallon.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  ZZR600
I had just remembered that the electric companies here, North Florida, always offer to supply outside lights for rural homes. That way the country looks just like the city. Of course, it’s only being used at night, but that’s energy that could be stored for peak hours. And yes, that’s possible. And has been for a while.
And let’s not forget that, though all the experts, and anyone with a shred of commonsense, say we should decentralize our electric system, we are moving in the opposite direction. Just more random ranting about how stupid our entire situation has become.
laprez
laprez
1 year ago
Now this was good for a morning chuckle – “appease the Greens with their preposterous demands to eliminate electric vehicles by 2035.”
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  laprez
It’s going to happen long before 2035. At least for new cars. China will likely sell more EVs than ICE vehicles in 2024.
Green_Squirrel
Green_Squirrel
1 year ago
Free market Enterprise has been completely thrown out the window, by being FORCED to buy EV’s.
We are being forced to pay for Wind-mills/Solar Panels/EV charging stations on our Electrical Bills,
We are being forced to pay more for Fossil Fuels, as the Democrats shutdown our Nations vastly and abundant oil supply.
We are being forced to pay more for just the Basics like FOOD! As shipping/packaging/labor prices skyrocket
due to BIDENS TAX on Americans.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  Green_Squirrel
We’ve never had a free market economy. And you are forced to buy all of these things regardless of which wing of the uniparty you support. And you deserve it.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
But, but, but… food lasts so much longer now, and it’s much faster and lighter.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Not to mention it has none of those nasty nutrients! Yech!
vboring
vboring
1 year ago
38% of Jeep Wrangler sales are the 4xe plug-in hybrid EV.
The Ford F-150 Lightning EV truck has a 2 year waiting list, despite constant price increases.
Used GMC Hummer and Rivian trucks sell for multiples of their original list prices.
Go to your local dealer. Try to buy an EV. Unless you want a hatchback or a Tesla, demand far outstrips supply.
Opinion polls are opinion polls. Market facts are market facts.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  vboring
GM could sell a million Chevy bolts every year. They’re choosing to make F150s instead. Idiots.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Silverado’s. Not F150s.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Are they still idiots nonetheless?
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
People will pay 80k for truck that costs 30k to make. The idiocy is a little further down the chain.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  vboring
The reason demand outstrips supply is because they aren’t really making very many EV’s. If you only make 13000 F150 Lightning’s in a year it’s easy to get demand to exceed supply.
So waiting lists prove nothing.
klausmkl
klausmkl
1 year ago
Tesla was fined 2 million, for it misrepresented mileage in cold weather by 50%. Thats right , by 50% tesla over stated the mileage.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  klausmkl
But, but, but… it’s an EV and will save the planet by starving plants of CO2.
dbannist
dbannist
1 year ago
I am very pragmatic.

I will buy an EV if it makes economic sense to do so. It does not.

I buy only used cars with 100k on them. Typically I pay around 5k. There is no way I’m paying 50k for a Tesla. Even with completely free usage costs it wouldn’t make sense for me to buy an electric car.

Once it makes economic sense to buy one, I will buy one.

Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  dbannist
Cannot buy used cars for 5k$ around me. 10 yr old crap boxes with 100k miles go for 10+k$.
For 5k$ more can buy new.
FirstBlood
FirstBlood
1 year ago
… as for EV’s .. having the choice to depend on China for EV, or combustion engine the Mid East.. I take Mid East every day! Besides, the EV is Not about the environment .. it’s about CONTROL. So… not in my lifetime .. FJB, Obama, and the hypocrisy 🇺🇸
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
The chart says : people in their Prime Age are likely to buy EV. The light green – might consider – dominate the charts. The groupthink says : yes we might.
PeterEV
PeterEV
1 year ago
Moved comment to reply to jivefive98.
PeterEV
PeterEV
1 year ago
I thought Republicans were supposed to be “conservative”. Knowing that we will be peaking in world oil production in the next ten years doesn’t seem to ring a bell that maybe we ought to start conserving our fossil fuels.
Ref: 4th graph down in this link:
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  PeterEV
Conservative in this context means “nothing should have changed since 1955”.
Avery
Avery
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Electronic ignition and fuel injection were the best advancements for car tech since that time, especially in winter. Cars lasting longer because rust now is more of a decades long process, as opposed to 3 -5 years.
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  Avery
Some here would have liked their carburetor and resisted fuel injection 30 yrs ago….
Dr Funkenstein
Dr Funkenstein
1 year ago
Reply to  PeterEV

The world has supposedly been peaking in oil production in a few years as far back as 1861 ,18 months after Edwin Drake drilled for oil in Titusville, Pennsylvania in

HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  PeterEV
What if there is no such thing as peak oil? Real science is never settled.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
What if there is no such thing as climate change in our future?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Which climate change? The real climate change or the political one in which a neutral gas is responsible for everything bad unless the sun and the ocean are involved? Muh Science!
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  PeterEV
It’s because they drive trucks at a much higher rate. EV pickups aren’t as powerful and cost way too much right now. Give it a few years.
denker
denker
1 year ago
Biden should lead by example. Electrify Air Force 1, the Beast and the helicopters he uses.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
You need to frame the question differently — from: would you drive an electric car vs a gas car … to: would you drive an electric car or not drive at all? Is anyone wondering why Biden is pushing electric cars? Global warming? Heck no. Worldwide oil production has peaked (2005) and future oil/gasoline/diesel extraction/production is gonna cost a LOT more. They dont say that cause they dont want to rev up the population with the new reality. Look at gasoline prices since the big dip (on Thanksgiving) of 2014. Cheap frakked oil is done. Also cant frak without zero percent interest rates. Expensive gasoline and diesel in our lifetimes?? Never!
PeterEV
PeterEV
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
2005 was the peak of **conventional** oil production. We have had a world peak in 2019 with maybe a final peak near the 2019 peak level around 2032.
Ref: 4th graph down in this link:
Interesting perspective at:
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  PeterEV
Conventional was the cheap stuff that we kings demand. Unconventional (wreck Alberta/freezing cold/super deep/impossible governments) is always gonna be available if we want to pay for it (and we dont). Worldwide “conventional” oil production has been flat since 2005.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Not driving is not an option, although I am close enough to town to make a horse a viable option.
To get enough land to feed the horse is a different problem.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
And the horse poop?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Do like the cops do and let it lie where it fell.
jivefive98
jivefive98
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Heating homes with coal and wood sounded great too, till you have to live with the grime and smog. Chicago then (look at the pics and how dark and dirty everything is — the CTA pics alone! ;)) and Chicago now are two different worlds.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Horses provide a secondary supply of fuel for cooking.
A method in use globally.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  jivefive98
Finally, another person that understands that EVs are being pushed to prevent rioting caused by dwindling oil.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.