Biden Wilts Under Progressive Pressure, Extends Student Loan Repayment Pause

Another Wilt Under Pressure

After heavy criticism by Progressives, the White House Extends Federal Student Loan Repayment Pause.

“Today, my Administration is extending the pause on federal student loan repayments for an additional 90 days — through May 1, 2022 — as we manage the ongoing pandemic and further strengthen our economic recovery,” Biden said in a statement, noting that the Department of Education will “continue working with borrowers to ensure they have the support they need to transition smoothly back into repayment and advance economic stability for their own households and for our nation.”

“This is an issue Vice President Harris has been closely focused on, and one we both care deeply about,” Biden said, urging student loan borrowers to “take full advantage of the Department of Education’s resources to help you prepare for payments to resume; look at options to lower your payments through income-based repayment plans; explore public service loan forgiveness; and make sure you are vaccinated and boosted when eligible.”

Smooth Change of Direction

Last week, the Biden administration signaled that they still planned to resume federal student loan payments at the end of January, rejecting a push from progressive Democrats to extend the pandemic relief program.

Asked last week whether Biden intended to extend a payment freeze that’s poised to expire in February, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the administration has no plans to do so and is instead focused on ensuring a “smooth transition back into repayment.

Schumer, Warren and Pressley also called on Biden to cancel $50,000 in outstanding federal debt per borrower via executive order. The Democrats have maintained that Biden could use existing executive authority under the Higher Education Act to order the Department of Education to “modify, compromise, waive or release” student loans.

Surrender

Please consider the The Forever Student Loan Emergency

Merry Christmas, student loan borrowers. Taxpayers will have to settle for airing their grievances a la Festivus. That’s the result of the Biden Administration’s decision on Wednesday to extend its payment moratorium again to May 1. Unlike its last pause through January, the Administration isn’t saying this extension is final—probably because it’s not.

The Cares Act in March 2020 relieved borrowers from making payments on $1.6 trillion in federal student loans and waived interest accrual through September 2020. President Trump extended the pause through January despite no legislative authority to do so. Mr. Biden compounded the injury to taxpayers and the separation of powers by extending it through this September.

Over the summer the Administration resisted progressive pressure for another extension. But it ultimately surrendered, as it did with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s rental eviction moratorium. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren want the Administration to discharge $50,000 per borrower, which would cost the government $1 trillion, according to the Brookings Institution.

Mr. Biden in January said he doubted he had the legal authority to erase student debt. But in the spring he asked the Education Department to conduct a legal analysis and then appointed Toby Merrill as the deputy general counsel. Ms. Merrill wrote a memo to Ms. Warren this year arguing that the President has the authority.

“With BBB delayed, Child Tax Credits will expire and student loans will restart within a matter of weeks. Working families could lose thousands of $/mo just as prices are rising,” New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Monday. “That alone is reason for @POTUS to act on student loans ASAP – w/ either moratorium or cancellation.” Mr. Biden obliged.

Run, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Run

Finally, please consider Run, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Run

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the celebrated progressive, is very unhappy with Joe Manchin and the U.S. Senate these days.

“It is unconscionable the way the Senate operates. It’s fundamentally undemocratic,” she said Monday after Sen. Manchin had announced his opposition to the Build Back Better Act. “What we really need to do is crack down on the Senate, which operates like an old boys’ club that has a couple of gals in it that have managed to break through.”

If that’s how she really feels, here’s an idea: Run against Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer next year. The New York City Congresswoman has played coy for a year on a potential Democratic primary run. Why not finally drop the pretense and have the courage of her loud convictions?

Some might shudder at the prospect, but what difference would it make it this point? In January we wrote an editorial, “Schumer and His Shadow,” as the powerful Senator seemed to mimic every demand from AOC. He’s echoed her plan to forgive student loans and adopted more or less the entire progressive agenda. He supports blowing up the filibuster rule as does AOC. And he did it again Monday in calling for a Senate floor vote on Build Back Better as Ms. Ocasio-Cortez commanded.

She’s already the shadow Majority Leader, so she might as well try and make it official. 

Under My Thumb

Biden is clearly under the thumb of Progressives. 

Build Back Better was designed, written, and poorly executed by them and now hopefully has failed for good. 

Elizabeth Warren appears to be in charge of Biden’s appointments, especially at the Fed. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has morphed into a Sanders-AOC puppet, threatening him with a Senate run.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

43 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
How can you forgive these student loans and then continue to make new loans to students and expect them to pay?
KlownWorld “economics”.
KlownWorld “government policy”.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
How are they going to make a stupid decision to overpay for a house if they’re not relieved of the consequences of their prior stupid decision?
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
3 years ago

This is terrible policy, its the road to perdition and wont fix the problem.
The real question is how to create policy to corral our predatory institutions of higher education and prevent them from crippling financially our best and brightest with the deadly double whammy of a degree not sought out by employers in our primarily private economy coupled with unaffordable tuition even if it was?
Here are some ideas:
First, you require institutions of higher education to issue their own student loan debt.
Second, you allow all student loan debt to be dischargeable in bankruptcy.
Third, you prevent institutions of higher education from packaging student loans and selling them to Wall Street.
Colleges and universities must be responsible for their own defaulted loans, and high levels of defaulted debt must charged against University endowments so that Boards of Trustees will demand accountability from the curriculum.
But I have no illusions, nothing will be done.
Next in line is forgiving mortgage payments to the people because “no one should have to live in fear of losing their home” said governor Newsom, so he is providing up to $80k for household in mortgage payments to struggling homeowners.
Cant make this stuff up.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
According to Sallie Mae…
“The average unemployment rate for the over 25 year-old college graduate population improved to 2.8% in Q3 2021 from 3.3% in Q2 2021”
So, why not just make them repay the loans they took out based on the terms of the loans? They have jobs, so they should be able to.
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The face of the issue is AOC.
AOC owes $17,000 in student debt and is demanding forgiveness. 
She makes over $170,000 per year.
She drives a Tesla.
She couldn’t get a job in her field (why?) and worked as a bartender. 
She wears $20,000 dresses to expensive dinners.
She looks down on those she expects to pay off her debt. 
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
There is a much simpler solution to making, and holding colleges responsible, not just for loans, but for how they operate, offering idiot degrees, hiring incompetent faculty, having too many administrators, etc. Make each public and private college the guarantor for any and all student loans issued to attending students, including loans from parents.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
According to Sallie Mae…
“The average unemployment rate for the over 25 year-old college graduate population
improved to 2.8% in Q3 2021 from 3.3% in Q2 2021”
So, why are student loan payments being deferred again? Obviously they don’t need to be. Is this entirely because Biden caved to the squad?
IB6
IB6
3 years ago
As someone working at University, it is interesting to “follow the money”. Most of tuition is not spent on education. It is wasted on sports (nearly all schools lose huge amounts of money on that), de-luxe student housing with recreation centers, and various Associate Vice Presidents for Student Success, Retention, and Diversity with oversized salaries. On top of that, a lot of students these days prefer to get degrees in something like social sciences since it is easier, and grade inflation is rampant, helped by online “studies” with cheating in exams in last year and half. In my State, support for universities in inflation-adjusted $$$ per student has not changed since ca. 2002, yet tuitions are up 3-4 times.
I don’t know how to fix this, other than allowing student loan bankruptcies and perhaps States regulating how much % of school budget can go to non-educational activities. Throwing more money at schools and/or students will result in another cohort of Vice Deanlings and a golden bus for football team.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  IB6
The answer is supposed to be more government intervention, to fix a problem government created, in order to result in more dependency on the government. Tax payer funded College. A progressive solution. This creates other problems that then need progressive government intervention, as taxation leaves them unable to afford something else, and the government is eventually left running everyone’s life. Which suits Klaus Schwab, as he wants us to own nothing and be happy. Build Back Better- slogan of the World Economic Forum.
IB6
IB6
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
I don’t think this is a centrally managed conspiracy, just natural progression of bureaucratic apparatus development.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
The same could be said of taxpayer funded k12. Kids don’t need no teachin’ lady. Our tv preacher can read em the Bible!  
IB6
IB6
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Fair point, but why should taxpayers pony up $$$ for Junior Deputy Vice Principals, football coaches, $100M football stadiums at high schools (Tom Benson Hall of Fame), and being told that they oppress their colored classmates?
Teaching witchcraft aka Old Middle Eastern Fairy Tales aka Bible seems to be a less destructive choice. Especially since math is racist these days.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Larry Elder: “…many kids educated in California public schools cannot read or perform
math at state levels of proficiency, standards that are not particularly
high. In 2019 barely half of kids in public schools were
reading-proficient, while only 40% were math-proficient.”
I would guess that kids going to Catholic or other religious affiliated schools, in Ca., are more proficient.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  IB6
The solution is for the government to get out of the loan business. If people had to get bank approved loans, far fewer loans would be made. Resulting in colleges having to reduce costs since students couldn’t afford current costs.
conservativeprof
conservativeprof
3 years ago
Reply to  IB6
I am not sure that tuition dollars subsidize sports. In major universities, revenue sports (men’s football and basketball subsidize non revenue sports). Diversion of donor dollars to sports may take away money from scholarships and tuition reductions. Some universities have large endowments focused on infrastructure not tuition and scholarships. I agree that administrative bloat drives tuition increases. The bloat in diversity and related areas has exploded in many universities.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
It was the government that created this problem in the first place, by creating government backed student loans.
The government has made medical care extremely expensive.
The government has made this pandemic extremely expensive.
The government made the war on terror extremely expensive.
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ

Government is involved in health care in all the other developed countries, and the per capita cost is half what the US pays.   It is the for-profit healthcare “system” that has made US medical care prohibitively expensive.

RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Apparently, AOC has a college loan. Apparently some $17,000? Apparently, she wants that forgiven. But she earns $150,000 a year or whatever congress people get theses days, so she could have easily written a check to the lender by now. She has earned some $450,000 in her 3 years as a U.S. representative. Apparently.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
AOC: “It is unconscionable the way the Senate operates. It’s fundamentally undemocratic”
I guess AOC doesn’t like democracy when it doesn’t submit to her will. A vote wasn’t held, but Manchin said he would vote no in front of the whole world and Sanders, too. A vote was moot.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Student loan forgiveness doesn’t forgive the loan. It just transfers it to people who never asked for it, never agreed to the terms and will not benefit from it. It will also encourage schools to raise their tuitions and encourage new students to pay those higher tuitions in expectation that their loans will also be forgiven thus creating self-reenforcing circle of higher tuition feeding higher loans. 
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
“Unlike its last pause through January, the Administration isn’t saying this extension is final—probably because it’s not.”
Agreed.   If they do extend it again by 3 months, it will go to Aug 1, and then a further 3-month extension takes it to….  Nov 1, i.e. exactly a week before the mid-term elections.   If Biden and his right-wing DONORcrat Party buddies think they can pull it off and stop the extensions, they deserve to go even further down the tubes than they already would.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
That’s what will happen except the extension will go to Dec 1 instead of Nov 1. Dems will say if they don’t remain in control, the extensions will end in Dec.
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Yes.  That is what I said about the child tax credit – just pass it for 2022 and make it an election issue.   But that went down along with the rest of the BBB.    This is another way they can get there.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
What happens to the bond holders of Sallie Mae bonds? Do they collect no interest payments? Or does the money get paid by the government?
If the debt is canceled, how would it work? Does the FED QE a bunch of student loan backed bonds and retire them? Usually the bonds are sold  in tranches. How would they be broken out to $xx,xxx dollars per loan? Would the government or FED pre-pay each loan? if so, where would the money come from? The bond holders have to be made whole somehow.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
it is silly and obviously unfair to make one special little form of debt(which old men saddle young men with, i might add),  not legally dischargeable in bankruptcy.    note i had zero debt as a kid,  nor do any of my kids.   it’s just a banker scam with university help to scam young folks.   
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
It’s because the loans are non collateralized. If they could easily be discharged, the interest rates would have to be like credit card rates to be economical.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
and with interest rates at proper rates,  the kids might not get fleeced as much.   perhaps go to CC and pay cash.   but the banksters don’t want that.   it’s a scam.   by university and banks
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Absolutely a scam. Make student loans universally available so universities can charge whatever they want knowing the cost can be borrowed. All in the name of equity or equality or whatever humanitarian excuse they come up with while actually hurting borrowers instead of helping them.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Better to make the schools cheap enough so that you can pay your way through by working. You would have to cut all those useless programs and personnel. 
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn

They aren’t economical now.

KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Economical for the lender. Not the borrower.
Call_Me
Call_Me
3 years ago
Blanket reduction of interest rates to match the fed funds rate, simple as that.
For extra credit, have educational institutions shoulder some responsibility, since they have grown quite large on all these loans.  Permit bankruptcy or reduced balances, then have institutions liable for 5% or 10% of the discharged amount.  That should clear up some of the useless degrees being sold to students.
Call_Me_Al
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
The government should just stop the interest on the loans. That way they remain in place (no forgiveness) and can be paid back when they restart payments (which most definitely should restart in 2022).
With no interest ever charged borrowers could take their time paying back the loans (with of course diluted money thanks to inflation). A small loss to the tax payer in terms of diluted repayments but better that than no repayments or even worse debt forgiveness.
Greenmountain
Greenmountain
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
It is sad when mortgage rates are lower than student loan rates.  Make them interest free.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Greenmountain
Mortgages are backed by the house. Student loans are uncollateralized.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Since in most cases they can’t be written off in bankruptcy, their collateral is the lifetime earning power of the student so I would call them one of the most collateralized loans around.  Their interest rate should reflect that fact but it doesn’t.
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
These things are mere crumbs when compared to what  Biden had promised – that he would wipe out at $10,000 from every student’s debt burden.   He has no intention of ever doing that.   After all, he is the one who wrote the law that student debt cannot be eliminated by filing for bankruptcy. 
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I certainly agree that bankruptcy is an issue. I said so in 2005. 
President Bush signed the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 and tuitions soared. I howled. 
The problem with debt discharge is that is does not fix the fundamental problem.
I like Texas Time’s idea of 0% interest provided it is coupled with a provision to make future student debt dischargeable in bankruptcy. We need some restrictions to make that option painful to the borrower, not a first choice on graduation. I am not sure what those restrictions are yet.
But free college for everyone in degrees that make no sense, with nothing holding down costs is madness. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I think a better solution is a form of indentured servitude. A company bankrolls your education in exchange for you working for them for X years. Every company I’ve ever worked for has a tuition reimbursement program already. Without the indentured part. The US military has been doing this for decades. I was offered a deal in college with the Navy. They would cover my college expenses plus a monthly stipend and send me to graduate school at MIT. In exchange, I would become a nuclear engineer on a sub for 5 years starting as a lieutenant. I turned them down because of the submarine part. Not sure how I would like being on a sub for months on end. If it were on say an aircraft carrier, I probably would have accepted it.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
In the ‘legal’ immigration business we called these people ‘green card slaves’.
They had to remain for 3 years with the company to get their green card. During that time they were quite often treated like slaves in that they got the worst jobs to do and the least raises etc. That’s because the company knew they could not leave or they’d lose the green card. Once they got the card, they left but there was another green card slave to replace them.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I’ve worked many green card employees. They’re fine with it. They knew exactly what they were getting into.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Should be free college for top students…. It’s wasted on the rest. 

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.