Bond Yields Dive After a Poor ISM Report Showing a Plunge in New Orders

Yield curve data from the New York Fed and Investing.com, chart by Mish

The 2-month yield and the Effective Fed Funds rates are from yesterday. The 20-year yield is my estimate. My starting point is yesterday’s number and I assume a similar reaction as the 30-year long bond. 

Today’s Bond Market Change 

  • 2-Year: -0.11
  • 3-Year: -0.13
  • 5-Year: -0.13
  • 7-year: -0.12
  • 10-year: -0.10
  • 30-year: -0.13

The last time I wrote about the yield curve was on June 12 in Yield Curve Inversions Return, Signaling Another Recession Warning

Here are the yields from June 14, when the 10-year yield peaked.

Yields on June 14

  • 1-Year: 3.15
  • 2-Year: 3.45
  • 3-Year: 3.60
  • 5-Year: 3.61
  • 7-year: 3.60
  • 10-year: 3.49
  • 30-year: 3.45

Yields on July 1

  • 1-Year: 2.70
  • 2-Year: 2.81
  • 3-Year: 2.86
  • 5-Year: 2.89
  • 7-year: 2.93
  • 10-year: 2.89
  • 30-year: 3.10

Change Since June 14

  • 1-Year: -0.45
  • 2-Year: -0.64
  • 3-Year: -0.74
  • 5-Year: -0.72
  • 7-year: -0.67
  • 10-year: -0.60
  • 30-year: -0.35

Multiple times in and out of inversions followed by a sudden sustained decline in yields is a strong signal that recession has started. 

ISM

What triggered today’s reaction was a poor ISM report in which new orders plunged 5.9 points from 55.1 to 49.2 to contraction.

Holy Grail of Stock Jocks Shocks

Employment as Well

Aluminum

Fed Will Sacrifice the Economy

The Fed Misunderstood Inflation

ISM New orders are contracting. The Fed has no choice but to continue to sacrifice the economy in the name of inflation. Quite the trap they put themselves in last year because they ‘misunderstood’ inflation.”

Musical Tribute 

Powell: “We understand better how little we understand about inflation”

In reference to misunderstanding inflation, please see Powell: “We understand better how little we understand about inflation”

The above link offers many quotes from the Fed, ECB, and Bank of England that show  central banks are clueless. 

On June 22, I commented I’ve Seen Enough, the US is in Recession Now, Q&A on Why

Forget about a soft landing. Recession has already started. The questions are how deep and how long? 

I will address those questions in another post. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Lets look at the politics again.

Near term, I expect the Fed to soon face pressure to back off of tightening that’s barely even begun. If they yield, we get prolonged stagflation at best. If they don’t buckle, we could see a crash that’ll rattle everyone’s teeth, both in the markets and the real economy. Having shot their wad with QE from 2008-2022, their flexibility is quite limited. Keep in mind that, any blah blah to the contrary, the Fed’s tools are blunt. They almost always overshoot in one direction or the other.

Now step back and look at history. In 1893, there was a Panic that rattled everyone in this country at the time. In the 1894 off-year election, more congresscritters were dis-elected than in any other congressional elections in American history. People quite literally danced in the streets. One third of Congress turned over, almost entirely from D to R after a histiory of no particular dominance by either side. In 1896, the robber barons’ handpicked candidate, William McKinley, crushed William Jennings Bryan, ushering in nearly 40 years of Republican dominance broken only by Woodrow Wilson, 1912-1918.

Congressional districts are much less competitive now than they were then, so we’re almost certainly not going to see one-third of Congress get tossed out this year. But the shift is on, and it could be a lot bigger than expected. Abortion? Bah, it doesn’t matter. Guns? Nope. To quote James Carville: “It’s the economy, stupid.”

Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
“Near term, I expect the Fed to soon face pressure to back off of tightening that’s barely even begun.”
Possibly, but after the mid-terms the government would want them to sort the economy, get inflation down and all the bad stuff out of the way as quickly as possible before 2024. November’s not far away so might as well KBO as Churchill would say.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Scooot
That would be market timing, and government functionairies suck at it even worse than you or I might.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
You can see that the market has already priced in some weakening in the Fed’s resolve and improvement in inflation expectations from the yield changes Mish has pointed out.
On the near horizon we have this month’s hike and probable comments re-emphasising their resolve. More earnings data, inflation data etc but out of left field I think there’s going to be an increase in Covid talk. Covid is getting rife over here and we’re in the middle of summer. The two new strains aren’t very pleasant. There’s going to be lots of lost days through sickness to add to the troubles and it will start to pick up in the US shortly. You could read this as a cause for the Fed to ease up but on the other hand it’s Covid that got the inflation ball running. So lots of uncertainty ahead.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Scooot
Covid-wise, take zinc (30 mg), Vitamin C (1000 mg), Vitamin D (6,000 IU), and L-Arginine. Your big task is to keep it out of your lungs. If you’re coughing a lot, bring a small pot of water to boil. Move it off the heat, then quickly add a bit of camphor or eucalyptus oil (a little goes a long way). Form a tent over your head, and breathe in the steam for as long as you can stand it to clear out your lungs.

I’ve said several times that I think the Fed is in a tight spot. The first QE was necessary, but they never sterilized it before launching the second and much larger round. That, plus the stimulus checks here, launched inflation. If they tighten as fast as they theoretically should, they could kill finance and the real economy. If they don’t tighten fast enough or far enough, inflation will by itself deeply damage the economy.

Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
“HOLY GRAIL OF STOCK JOCKS SHOCKS”
Someone hide Danielle’s copy of Fox in Socks before someone sprains their tongues. 🙂
LostNOregon
LostNOregon
1 year ago
Maybe they should have listened to Tom Hoenig! He seems to have been the only one with enough sense to pour pi$$ out of a boot with directions on the heel saying “This end up”!
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Y chart ISM update : June 2022 was 54.90. // Up 40.60 from Apr 2020 low @27.50 to 68.10 in Mar 2021, down 14.5 to 53.60 in Mar 2022.
We don’t know if 53.60 is the low. ISM retraced 14.50/ 40.60 = 35.7%, which is minimal. Thanks for the Animals video.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
If ISM reach a lower low, below 63.70, it might tank to the low 40’s, to 44-45 area.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
ISM peaked in Mar 2021. In Mar 2021 WTI was in the 60’s, Ukraine wasn’t carved and the housing market went vertical. ISM is not about now.
It’s down sharply from 63.70 to 53. In Apr 2020 ISM was 41.70. // 22 up, down 10.70, or about 50% retracement. The trend is strong, it will easily exceed 63.70.
Esclaro
Esclaro
1 year ago
Yet the USD was up strongly today taking no prisoners.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Esclaro
Interest rate differentials, pretty much. I wonder about the BRICs.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Something to remember. I think everyone knows that the Fed can’t create supply. There’s something else the Fed cannot create, and it’s even more important. The Fed cannot create solvency. No one should overlook that.

When the Fed adds reserves through the NY open market desk, it creates money for banks to lend. That’s where it ends. The Fed cannot create the ability to service the debts. That happens through the real economy, critically aided by economic growth and finance’s role in efficient capital allocation, among other things. Similary, the Fed cannot create or destroy demand, at least not directly. Its actions have a major impact on demand by the impact that monetary policy has on the real economy, but it’s the economy and its players who create demand.

I think it’s critical to understand these fundamentals. The Fed is a critical player, but the Fed is not the instigator of 5-year economic plans, and thank God for that.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Jack, having the money to meet your debts is the definition of solvency. That’s why Paulson told everyone in the room on that Sunday that they would take the money, whether they needed it or not, and sign the paper or they weren’t leaving the room. Appearance of solvency was everything.
Matt3
Matt3
1 year ago
I listened today to people discussing how to tame the inflation we are seeing. On way is for The Fed can dramatically increase rates likely putting supply and demand back in line through demand destruction. This is basically the only tool the Fed has as they cannot impact the supply side.
Another way to try to lower inflation would be through the supply side of the equation. Some of the supply side constraints have been self imposed through sanctions. If we could negotiate and end to the Ukraine war and lift sanctions, that would be a boost to the supply side. Additionally, we need to move productivity. Reduce regulations (like the trucking in CA) and put in place more incentives for work (cut the benefits to the healthy).
I don’t see our policy makers doing anything on the supply side that will help, so the Fed is left with demand destruction. Hopefully in will be a quick and shallow recession.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Matt3
Inflation is strictly a monetary phenomenon. In the absence of excess money creation, supply shocks (whatever the cause) are either limited to this or that sector, or if widespread enough (or interrupt a critical input like energy), they will raise prices in the affected sectors while reducing output throughout the economy.

I keep repeating some version of this here. People need to understand that price increases are the result of inflation of the money supply beyond economic growth. Inflation itself is 100% monetary. Thus, if someone snapped his fingers and oil supply rose and I could buy diesel for $1.97 rather than $6.70, inflation would be unaffected unless the money supply was reduced. This seems counterintuitive or overly scholastic, but neither is true. People equate inflation with price increases because it’s a measurement shorthand. Inflation necessarily precedes a rise in the general price level.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
If that’s true (inflation is just a monetary phenomenon) then inflation must not have existed prior to the US going off the gold standard.
Yet I find countless places talking about inflation in prior decades. Either they mean something else or inflation isn’t just a monetary phenomenon.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Keep in mind that the gold standard ended for domestic purposes in 1933. Gold tends to retard inflation, but there are ways around it. The Romans debased the coinage with base metals. It goes on.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
There was definitely inflation after the California gold rush started. More gold chasing the same amount of goods, inflation. Eventually supply caught up, but it took awhile.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
Same thing happened when Spain brought all that looted gold back from South America. Too much money chased too few goods, but at least it made for some amazing cathedrals.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago

Forget about a soft landing. Recession has already started. The questions are how deep and how long? I will address those questions in another post.
I will read that one with very close interest. I’m all over a few threads giving you well-earned credit for calling the recession early. That’s credibility. I believe you’ve been suggesting that this recession won’t be all that bad as recessions go, but maybe I’m mistaken. The 1981-82 rollercoaster almost left the track, and the Panic of 2008 was even worse. If this one’s more like 1990-91 or 2001, I’ll be very relieved. Even something in the middle, like 1937-38, 1958, or 1973-75.
Suggestion born of experience: Give your base case and worst-case and best-case. It’s how direct investments are analyzed. Be fearless. Be hopeless. Be cold blooded. Tell it like you think it’ll be, and let the chips fall where they may. No spin.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
GDPNow no likey:
Latest estimate: -2.1 percent — July 1, 2022

The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the second quarter of 2022 is -2.1 percent on July 1, down from -1.0 percent on June 30. After this morning’s Manufacturing ISM Report On Business from the Institute for Supply Management and the construction report from the US Census Bureau, the nowcasts of second-quarter real personal consumption expenditures growth and real gross private domestic investment growth decreased from 1.7 percent and -13.2 percent, respectively, to 0.8 percent and -15.2 percent, respectively.

JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I wonder what the dispersion is. The very recent swings seem wide, but are they?
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Powell: “We understand better how little we understand about inflation”
Reading between the line:
Powell: “We FOMC members were more interested in trading our personal accounts to boost our wealth … than tackling inflation.”
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Your cyncism and paranoia is not evidence.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
WASHINGTON — In a rare moment of ethical controversy for the Federal Reserve, two top officials resigned Monday in the wake of revelation about their financial trading that exposed potential shortcomings in the Fed’s rules on investments.
Eric Rosengren, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, said he would step down this week for health reasons. Meanwhile, Robert Kaplan, the president of the Dallas Fed, said he would resign Oct. 8 to avoid becoming a “distraction” from the Fed’s broader mission.
The two officials’ financial disclosures sparked criticism from government watchdogs after they revealed extensive stock trading in 2020, when the Fed was spending trillions of dollars stabilizing financial markets and boosting the economy. Because of their trading, the two officials could potentially have profited from the Fed’s actions.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Because of their trading, the two officials could potentially have profited from the Fed’s actions.
I “could potentially” be the emperor of Saturn, here on earth to observe human craziness. I do recommend that someone at least try to prove it.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
If you are comfortable with your response … all I need to know.
I do my research. I knew about these 2’s actions + the fact Powell not a trained economist. A lawyer who has worked at banks / investment banks / private equity … with a net worth close to $100 million. Furthermore, Powell’s next appearance before Senate, Elizabeth Warren said she would speak to him privately on this matter (no doubt dressed him down. But no way would it be done publicly).
So yeah, precedence for my comment.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
The gist of it was that a couple Fed presidents bought muni bonds. I’m way, way, waaaaay against corruption, but for now I think that one has the moehill-mountain problem. I could always be convinced with actual evidence that it’s worse than I perceive it to be. By the way, when it comes to ethical questions, I don’t think the Fake Cherokee Princess has a lot of credibility. LOL
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“The Fed has no choice but to continue to sacrifice the economy in the name of inflation.”
Oh, I get it … “We had to destroy the village to save it” … did it work in Vietnam?
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Yeah
That was Lebowitz’s comment, not mine, but Powell seems to agree.
  • Lacqua to Powell: Paul Krugman said on Friday that the number one risk is the Fed could overdo it. Is that really possible?
  • Powell: “Is there a risk we would go too far? Certainly there’s a risk. The bigger mistake to make, let’s put it that way, would be to fail to restore price stability.”
Clearly there is a choice, but it has been made.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
Too many people think that the Fed is God, when in reality they’re a lot closer to the Wizard of Oz. The economy is headed down no matter what they do. To me, the question is degrees of freedom. The longer they wait, the less room they have to squelch inflation without triggering an economic collapse. I say forget about the talking heads on the market channels; they’re either talking their book or they’re economists, neither of which cohort knows much of anything.

Remember, these are the same people who, within the past week, have clung bitterly to their guns (QT, fed funds hike) and religion (faith in a soft-landing fantasy.) One day they shout the the Fed’s not doing enough. Now they’re starting to suggest, and soon will be shouting, that the Fed has done too much. America has seen them before; their grandparents whistled past the graveyard from 1929 to 1932. The day’s coming when the soothsayers will be mocked from sea to shining sea.

killben
killben
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
IMO, focusing on inflation would be the right course of action. Unfortunately it can only do much and no further. If they can call out the politicians for their silly actions his life would ahve been easier. Also credibility is another issue at this moment for the Fed. If it pauses or cuts and inflation goes higher they will get the blame. At least by hiking it can say it tried
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  killben
I think the Fed should try very hard to stay in their lane. Hard enough to run monetary policy, let alone anything else.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.