China’s Puts Export Curbs on Minerals US Needs for Weapons and Technology

In a warning shot to the Trump administration, China tightens export controls on some dual-use minerals.

Nikkei Asia reports China to Tighten Export Curbs on Critical Metals Ahead of Trump’s Return.

China plans to tighten export controls on key “dual-use” technologies and items in two weeks, including raw materials and metals such as tungsten, graphite, magnesium and aluminum alloys used commonly in tech supply chains.

Paywalled.

The rest of the above article is paywalled, so consider the Semafor article China targets critical metal exports in anticipation of further US tech, trade curbs

Beijing will expand export controls on critical minerals like tungsten, graphite, and magnesium needed to make electronics, a move analysts say is in anticipation of expected sweeping US tariffs on Chinese goods and increased curbs on advanced semiconductor chips and AI technology to China following the re-election of US President Donald Trump.

The restrictions also apply to specific technologies that can be used for both civilian and military purposes.

China controls more than 80% of the world’s supply of tungsten and about 90% of global magnesium production, according to one official estimate; the minerals are indispensable in building defense technology, weapons, aviation equipment, and spacecraft.

Washington has pushed to delink the supply chain from China by sourcing from other countries, primarily Latin America. But Beijing’s current export controls on critical minerals don’t appear to have significantly decreased their trade with the US, according to one analysis, while US export controls on semiconductors also don’t appear to be stopping big Chinese firms like Huawei from accessing cutting-edge technologies, The Washington Post reported. 

Critical Materials Risk Assessment by the US Department of Energy

Please consider a Critical Materials Risk Assessment by the US Department of Energy

According to the analysis, there are six critical materials in the short term, which include cobalt, dysprosium, gallium, natural graphite, iridium, and neodymium. The uses for these critical materials are spread across rare earth magnets, batteries, LEDs, and hydrogen electrolyzers.

There are nine near-critical materials, which include electrical steel, fluorine, lithium, magnesium, nickel, platinum, praseodymium, silicon carbide (SiC), and uranium.

Finally, there are seven noncritical materials including aluminum, copper, manganese, phosphorous, silicon, tellurium, and titanium.

There are 12 critical, six near-critical, and four noncritical materials in the medium term.

The US Department of Energy has placed some of the rare earth minerals we need for weapons systems, windmills, batteries, and aircraft on a critical materials list.

China Declares Rare Earths Belong to the State

On June 30, Politico reported China Declares Rare Earths Belong to the State

In a list released by the country’s State Council on Saturday, Beijing declared that rare earth metals are the property of the state and warned “no organization or person may encroach on or destroy rare-earth resources.”

From Oct. 1, when the rules come into force, the government will operate a rare earth traceability database to ensure it can control the extraction, use and export of the metals. China currently produces around 60 percent of the world’s rare earth metals, and is the origin of around 90 percent of refined rare earths on the market.

China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology

On January 8, CSIS commented What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

China announced a ban of rare earth extraction and separation technologies on December 21, 2023. This has significant implications for U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security. Rare earth elements—a group of 17 metals—are used in defense technologies, including missiles, lasers, vehicle-mounted systems such as tanks, and military communications. They are also used in computers, televisions, and smartphones, along with various clean energy technologies central to decarbonization.

At present China produces 60 percent of the world’s rare earths but processes nearly 90 percent, which means that it is importing rare earths from other countries and processing them. This has given China a near monopoly. Benchmark Minerals Intelligence has flagged that the United States is particularly exposed to processing restrictions for heavy rare earths, given China separates 99.9 percent of them. 

In December 2023, the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party published a report titled Reset, Prevent, Build: A Strategy to Win America’s Economic Competition with the Chinese Communist Party.

It recommended that “Congress should incentivize the production of rare earth element magnets, which are the principal end-use for rare earth elements and used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, wireless technology, and countless other products.” Specifically, it advocated that Congress should establish tax incentives to promote U.S. manufacturing.

The rollout of major export restrictions for graphite, gallium, germanium, rare earth extraction, and separation technologies in less than one year should be a powerful signal to U.S. policymakers that although they are late to the critical minerals game, there is a significant need to both build domestic capabilities and leverage international cooperation to facilitate rapid sourcing and developing of processing capacity.

Note the above article says China bans a technology export. The setup now is blocking export of the minerals themselves.

Why China’s Rare Earth Dominance Persists

NewSecurityBeat reports Mine the Tech Gap: Why China’s Rare Earth Dominance Persists

In 2019, at the height of the trade war with the United States, Chinese President Xi Jinping visited a rare earth magnet factory in Jiangxi Province. At the time, the visit was interpreted as “muscle flexing” by China’s leader to remind Washington of its dependence on Beijing for the supply of rare earths. Rare earth elements (REEs) – a group of 17 critical metals – are indispensable components in military defense systems, consumer electronics and renewable energy technologies. Despite more than a decade of sustained efforts by Western countries and companies to loosen China’s grip, Beijing, by far remains the top player in the REE global mining, processing and refining sectors. 

Though its global production share dipped from a staggering 97% in 2011 to around 70% in 2022, it still controls over 85% of processing capacity. China has an effective monopoly over processing major heavy rare earths – Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb), and Light Rare Earths – Neodymium (Nd) and Praseodymium (Pr).  

Environmental impact is often cited as one of the main reasons for China’s emergence as a rare earth powerhouse, but the technological aspect is less discussed. From 1950 to October 2018, China filed over 25,000 rare earth patents, surpassing the US’ 10,000. Over decades, Chinese engineers perfected the solvent extraction process to refine REEs which plays a critical role in ensuring China’s primacy. Though the technology originated in the United States, environmental and regulatory concerns made domestic rare earth development unfeasible

China has mastered this process, while Western companies lack the expertise to achieve similar results. The two biggest rare earth mining companies outside of China, MP Materials and Lynas, have struggled to expand refining capacity despite huge US government investments. Given the US reliance on China for heavy rare earths used in defense applications, the Department of Defense has provided millions of dollars to both companies and others to fully indigenize “mine to magnet” REE supply chains.  

The U.S. Army is Now Desperate for Antimony

Yahoo!Finance reports America’s Shortage of Antimony Keeps Trump Awake At Night

Antimony (Sb), a critical metalloid, is a key element of the American war machine, essential for communication equipment, night vision goggles, explosives, ammunition, nuclear weapons, submarines, warships, optics, laser sighting and more, according to U.S. Army Major General (retired) James Marks.

The U.S. Army is Now Desperate for Antimony

China produces an astonishing ~70% of the world’s rare earth minerals and controls nearly 50% of the global antimony supply.

Then, at the height of the trade war, China threatened to restrict the export of some rare earth minerals. It made good on that threat this year, and last: First, with Germanium and Gallium in 2023, and then with antimony in September this year.

Now, the U.S. Army has found itself short on an essential element of its military production line, just as war beckons from Europe to the Middle East. And it will need large amounts of antimony to succeed with a new push to ramp up production of artillery shells at newly launched manufacturing facilities after years of destocking.

Trade War Showdown

I have been warning about this for years

China controls more than 80% of the world’s supply of tungsten and about 90% of global magnesium production

China has an effective monopoly over processing major heavy rare earths – Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb), and Light Rare Earths – Neodymium (Nd) and Praseodymium (Pr).  

If Trump increases tariffs on China by 60 percent, China could easily shut down rare earth exports.

It takes decades to get a mine up in the US and mining is one thing. Processing is the second. China controls about 90% of global rare earth process.

No other county has the technology.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

72 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Todd
Todd
1 year ago

Hence why the West cares so much about Ukraine that we are willing to go to the edge of Nuclear conflict

Larry
Larry
1 year ago

Chinese are delivering the FO while we’re still talking about the FA.

Alex
Alex
1 year ago

Hi Mish,

I read your posts and appreciate your thoughts and comments.

I also know that you think Trump’s tarrifs are going to be highly inflationary. I came across an opinion to the contrary (link below) and wanted to hear your thoughts.

https://realinvestmentadvice.com/resources/blog/trump-tariffs-are-inflationary-claim-the-experts/

Thank you in advance.

Alex

Webej
Webej
1 year ago

Ah. But Russia has lots of titanium & tungsten…

If the US would stop bullying everybody and instead build up strong relationships with countries that are mutually interdependent, they would be ahead of this game. The degree to which US Defense and the US economy is dependent on China should preclude the kind of belligerence we are wont to see. The Chinese are quite willing to enter into agreements where the interests and vulnerabilities of both sides can be addressed. But not with an enemy.

Not all the control of metals and rare earths is focused on exports either. The Chinese are also concerned about reliable safe and controlled access to such inputs for their own purposes, and have so far been pretty restrained at just sanctioning other parties outright.

Ben
Ben
1 year ago

The only new mining in the US is in Wall Street. They treat the actual miners like criminals.

Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago

What goes around, comes around.

We need to work with China.

Kevin Sears
Kevin Sears
1 year ago

Buy through third parties. Sanctions seem to be ineffective these days.

John A Wright
John A Wright
1 year ago

“Over decades, Chinese engineers perfected the solvent extraction process to refine REEs which plays a critical role in ensuring China’s primacy. Though the technology originated in the United States, environmental and regulatory concerns made domestic rare earth development unfeasible.”

Imagine my surprise! The EPA and the myriad bureaucratic regulations (US and State) have screwed us. We invent, the state blocks, and China steals and wins.

DAVID CASTELLI
DAVID CASTELLI
1 year ago
Reply to  John A Wright

your last sentence is true of so many American made creations

Larry
Larry
1 year ago
Reply to  John A Wright

They win a toxic hellhole to live in. Yay!

David Heartland
David Heartland
1 year ago

Let’s not forget that Pharmaceuticals are provided by the BIG POWERFUL Xi!

rinky stingpiece
rinky stingpiece
1 year ago

How about that WW3? We’re all waiting for members of the Senate Ethics Committee to show us what stocks to pick.

NextShoeToDrop
NextShoeToDrop
1 year ago

Mike: “China’s Puts” ??

HMK
HMK
1 year ago

History is replete with the disasterous consequences of trade wars. Here is an interesting article on this: https://images.mauldineconomics.com/uploads/pdf/20241121_OMS_China-Gave.pdf

Don’t trade wars generally lead to hot wars, or is that the real intention?. Vivek recently in a podcast seemed supportive of trade wars and he laid out his reasoning. I am not sure if I agree with him but I generally like his ideas. The real issue is we need to be more competitive and maybe insure critical materials and items are either produced here if economcally possible or by a realiable allly.

Anon1970
Anon1970
1 year ago
Reply to  HMK

The US Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 was devastating to the Germany economy. Two years later, German voters gave the Nazi party a plurality of their votes in two national elections. The Nazi party formed a coalition with one of the smaller parties and was asked to form a government by Germany’s president in 1933. How bad would Germany’s economy have to get for its voters to give a plurality of their votes in Feb. 2025 to the AfD party?

Jackula
Jackula
1 year ago

This is what happens when our corrupt big tech, big pharma, big military, Wall Street etc monopolies have too much power and control over our government combined with a lot of years of poor leadership at the federal level. With a focus on short term profits by financial engineering mining is too much work and too dirty environmentally for too little return. Having our existing government do it..well we all know how that turned out with EV charging stations..

Anon1970
Anon1970
1 year ago
Reply to  Jackula

My Internet speed is still under 20 mps. I thought a ton of tax dollars were going to be spent to give everyone access to high speed Internet.

JayW
JayW
1 year ago

Almost there, everyone!

$35.992T

Next week maybe?

Flavia
Flavia
1 year ago

There’s no point worrying about the DoD’s problems. The people who were voted in certainly don’t care. All they want to do is cut staff.

Maximus Minimus
Maximus Minimus
1 year ago

And just like that, WTO isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.
But I am not worried, the US still leads the world in litigation industry by a wide margin, not to mention experimental social studies.
Maybe that explains why it lags in industrial research?

David Heartland
David Heartland
1 year ago

That’s the Ticket: let the NY ATTORNEYS SUE CHINA AND TRUMP simultaneously!

Perfection in ZERO DIMENSIONAL CHESS!

Neal
Neal
1 year ago

Day One of Trump should be to start a Manhattan Project level of work to get rid of any impediments to the mining and processing of critical minerals. Lots of mothballed mines and already studied potential sites exist to mine those minerals. Get construction and engineering crews working 24/7 to get mines, mills and refineries up and running to stop China having the US by the nuts and having free rein to invade Taiwan, the Phillipines, the Japanese disputed islands etc.
And ramp up the tariffs on China to wean US consumers off Chinese crap products as well as deny China the trade balance funds that they are using to build up their military capabilities. Other than in subs and nuclear deterrence the US military is now inferior to Chinas (and aircraft carriers don’t count as they are relics that will become artificial reefs).

Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
1 year ago
Reply to  Neal

“Day One of Trump should be to start a Manhattan Project level of work to get rid of any impediments to the mining and processing of critical minerals.”

Which won’t happen. Since THE far and away MAIN impediment, is that EVERYONE who currently has ANY wealth, hence ANY power, in the entire US, without any exception; owes it ALL specifically to The Fed wholesale robbing everyone even remotely competent enough to tie their shoe laces, much less be part of a Manhattan Project; in order to hand ALL that wealth and capital to 100%, complete clinical imbeciles dumb enough to “make money from my home and pootfooioo.”

To catch up with China; in ANY area; within the next 50 years, would require: No Fed; $20/oz; No federal, nor really any other, debt (not too hard once it has to be repaid at $20/oz…); ALL of the fraudulently, solely Fed facilitated, “ownership” transfers to rank idiots which has taken place since ’71 (18- as well as 19..) tossed out and effectively randomized; NO activity (meaning NO income AND NO consumption) taxation, with all revenue instead coming by way of property taxes and perhaps tariffs; no more “department of OFFENCE”, instead just DEFENCE, interpreted in the narrowest possible way; no more kangaroo courts, instead reverting to due process whereby only criminal courts and procedures can establish wrongdoing while civil courts ONLY referee disputes over voluntarily entered into contracts.

ALL of those (and no doubt several more progressive era pathologies.) THEN, given a few generations for Americans and American organizations to again build up sufficient skills to be firing on most cylinders, we’d be back where we once belonged, vs the world’s commies. But until/unless, we will forever remain nothing more than an ever faster receding speck in their rear view mirror. As it currently stands, they really are THAT superior to us.

Anon1970
Anon1970
1 year ago
Reply to  Neal

Day 2: The environmentalists would be in court to scuttle this project.

Boneidle
Boneidle
1 year ago
Reply to  Anon1970

And that’s the rub. Rare earth materials are not scarce in friendly countries around the world. No first world country will get a production plant up and going without years of environmental regulatory headaches.

JayW
JayW
1 year ago

GREAT! This just means we’ve got to find other sources, including here in the US.

This is the exact model we want to use for our domestic production of all sorts of strategic goods.

China is our global peer adversary. Just after them are Russia and then NK & Iran.

The faster we come to terms with this and start shift every single strategic need we have away from these 4 countries, the faster we get to MAGA!

Last edited 1 year ago by JayW
Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
1 year ago
Reply to  JayW

“GREAT! This just means we’ve got to find other sources, including here in the US.”

The reason China dominates in this, is not happenstance. It’s not just because Biden didn’t want to. It;s because

—WE DO NOT HAVE THE SKILLS.

—And: WE DO NOT HAVE ANY ORGANIZATION CAPABLE OF EVEN BEGINNING TO KNOW HOW TO TRAIN ANYONE TO HAVE THOSE SKILLS.

—And: NOONE IN AMERICA WITH ENOUGH BRAINS TO HAVE ANY HOPE OF FOUNDING ANY SUCH ORGANIZATION, WILL EVER HAVE THE MONEY/CAPITAL TO DO SO.

— Because: ALL THAT MONEY HAS BEEN STOLEN. FROM ANY SUCH COMPETENT AMERICANS AND THE ORGANIZATIONS THEY ONCE RAN; IN ORDER TO FACILITATE HANDING IT ____ALL____ TO ___ONLY____ THE DUMBEST OF THE DUMB. SO THAT THOSE CAN PREEN AROUND PRETENDING TO HAVE “MADE MONEY” FROM “MY HOME” and “IN THE MARKETS” and “FROM MY POTFOIO” and FROM SPECIAL-ED-LEVEL MAKEWORK in “FINANCE”, “LAW”, “REAL ESTATE” AND OTHER ZERO-INTELLECT-REQUIRED PURE WELFARE RACKETS. IOW, FROM ANYTHING OTHER THAT ANYTHING REQUIRING ANY SKILLS NOR BRAINS, INCLUDING RARE EARTH MINING, PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION. INDUSTRY IS HARD. ITS NOT SOMETHING TRIVIAL WHICH SOME ILLITERATE ON “WALL STREET” (NOR ON FOX NEWS) WILL EVER BE ABLE TO COMPREHEND.

There is no “Trumps gonna this, Vance gonna that.” China vs us, in ANY HARD field, is not even Michael Jordan vs a middling high school player. It’s, literally, Michael Jordan vs an infant. Who just lays there screaming. And does nothing else. Because he does not have any ability to do anything else. And he won’t for decades, even in the very best case of him being raised 100% right, as he’s so far behind Mr.Jordan in his current infant state. And, even worse, “raised right” also looks insanely unlikely, considering how singularly imbecile his current “parents” are…

JayW
JayW
1 year ago
Reply to  Stuki Moi

Stu, you use way too many words.

DAVID CASTELLI
DAVID CASTELLI
1 year ago
Reply to  Stuki Moi

That might be the most intelligent rant I have ever read. I would have rather been there in person when you were ranting for the special effects alone.
Seriously, that sums up most? of the problem facing America.
When I go on rants its well, infantile lol.

Larry
Larry
1 year ago
Reply to  Stuki Moi

…and we’re about to destroy primary and secondary education for the kids of working people. Winning!

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago

And the reason that no one in Washington D.C. couldn’t see this coming is?
My understanding is that the US is almost completely out of unobtainum, which is essential for Government contractors.

Last edited 1 year ago by Lisa_Hooker
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

But we have lots of handwavium so we are OK.

Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

“And the reason that no one in Washington D.C. couldn’t see this coming is?”

Same old. #DumbAge.

“My understanding is that the US is almost completely out of unobtainum, which is essential for Government contractors.”

Unobtanium is effectively what The Fed prints. For as long as The Chinese are willing to play along by de facto pegging to it, that’s all well nominally. But since it’s so “powerful”, it has had the predictable effect of completely shutting down any desire, hence ability, anyone in America once had for doing anything other than just sitting there like chicklets sceeching for The Fed to give them more of it. After all, why take risks, work hard and bother learning how to count and read, if all outcomes will be solely dictated by whom The Fed arbitrarily decides to hand Unobtanium to?

Such that now you have a China which produces everything. And possesses all knowledge. And an America which neither produces nor understands anything.

Augustine
Augustine
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

The reason is that because money can be printed on demand, DC thinks there’s no problem that cannot be solved by throwing money at it.

Anon1970
Anon1970
1 year ago
Reply to  Augustine

Who needs printing? The programmers at the Treasury Department just need to add a few zeros to the Government’s account balances.

CzarChasm Reigns
CzarChasm Reigns
1 year ago

Be cool: “trade wars are good, and easy to win.” — Trump.

We can cut China off of all Trump merchandise & that will teach them.

No bibles, gold watches, NFT trading cards, gold sneakers, t-shirts, mugs, hats, coins, wine, cologne or the latest & greatest $10,000 guitar

Trump unveils latest $10,000 guitar merchandise for sale | CNN Business

Please open your wallet in support of the Shopping Network Of Trump.

Ask SNOT what you can buy for your country…
not what your country can buy for you.

Sentient
Sentient
1 year ago

I’d buy a Trump Bible if it had all 73 books. If China cuts off stuff the military industrial complex needs to build weapons, we’ll be at serious risk of peace breaking out. We may even have to put our regime-change color revolutions on hold – leaving Hungary, Georgia, Armenia, Myanmar and Thailand free to run their own countries – and we obviously can’t have that.

Last edited 1 year ago by Sentient
DAVID CASTELLI
DAVID CASTELLI
1 year ago
Reply to  Sentient

mic drop moment

DAVID CASTELLI
DAVID CASTELLI
1 year ago

“Yahoo!Finance reports America’s Shortage of Antimony Keeps Trump Awake At Night
Trump would end the Ukraine War tomorrow. Biden trying to start WW III
Trump Derangement Syndrome continues.

RandomMike
RandomMike
1 year ago

I’m not surprised that dysprosium is almost gone.

Thetenyear
Thetenyear
1 year ago

The chess match continues….looking forward to Trump’s next move.

I think we have all watched Trump long enough to know that Trump’s 60% tariff increase is just a negotiating ploy.

In the meantime, we need to add “Dig Baby Dig” to “Drill Baby Drill”

Avery2
Avery2
1 year ago

Have Nate Silver create a version of Risk or Monopoly with these materials and war-game the whole damn thing.

Last edited 1 year ago by Avery2
Sentient
Sentient
1 year ago
Reply to  Avery2

BTW, the Center for Strategic and International Studies has war-gamed (computer modeled) a war between China and the US over Taiwan multiple times. Every time they get the same result: the US loses.

robbyrob Im back!
robbyrob Im back!
1 year ago

Resentment is building as more workers feel stuckhttps://www.axios.com/2024/11/20/american-workers-stuck-jobs-resentment

Midnight
Midnight
1 year ago

People are tired after these four years.

JayW
JayW
1 year ago

Axios

Get used to it, people.

matt3
matt3
1 year ago

This is good news. Rare earth minerals are not rare and the US has everything we need. We can mine and extract minerals in a more environmentally friendly way than anyone.
We don’t need China. US can be self sufficient.

Sentient
Sentient
1 year ago
Reply to  matt3

So our plan to run the world can continue unabated? Yay!

JayW
JayW
1 year ago
Reply to  Sentient

How about just hold off China, Russia, NK & iran?

Your sarcasm sounds like a Liz Cheney neocon.

Anon1970
Anon1970
1 year ago
Reply to  matt3

We have a shortage of rare earths and a surplus of environmentalists.

Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago

I am starting to think that Mish is no longer an avocat of free trade.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78

Do you mean “free” as in beer?

Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

No, as in sex.

Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

Men prefer sex over beer…most of the time…sometimes…..or maybe occasionally. That is a really tough question.

Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

Sure I can think and I remember your past posts.

Bill
Bill
1 year ago

And of course the list of national security interests being controlled externally doesn’t end there. We discuss the super high-tech chips in Taiwan, we discuss the rare earth elements key to techonology and weaponry. What percentage of our medicine is produced there? Granted the latter has a much shorter barrier to entry to restart but the pandemic supply chain issues should have been reframed entirely from a national security preparedness perspective. That is, our government should think a bit like a prepper.

Lots of moving pieces by very sophisticated, dangerous national entities at the moment. The temperature, like the debt clock, is juuuust a bit too hot.

KGB
KGB
1 year ago

Rare earths are not rare. Canada, USA, Australia, Norway, and South Africa have large deposits. These deposits are not exploited because the mining and processing are hazardous to employees. China has no qualms about sacrificing employees for profit. And the world is comfortable sacrificing Chinese as well. The good news is Tesla robots and automation can safely mine and process rare earths when the need arises. There will be a time delay of five years to bring new mines and processing facilities on line. The delay would be much less if a man with Elon Musk’s talent managed the project.

Neal
Neal
1 year ago
Reply to  KGB

You don’t have 5 years, China might be ready to invade Taiwan and other countries within 2 years. So you need the whole supply chain of rare earths done in less time than that as even when the minerals have been processed it takes time to turn them into weapons.
Musk needs cloning as he will be busy cutting government waste, running SpaceX and Tesla and then somehow have time to sort out the whole rare earth problem.

Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
1 year ago
Reply to  KGB

“The good news is Tesla robots and automation can safely mine and process rare earths when the need arises.”

The solution to all the worlds problems is to snort fairy dust. If at first it doesn’t work, keep snorting.

Flavia
Flavia
1 year ago
Reply to  KGB

He’s going to be too busy cutting American jobs.

Walt
Walt
1 year ago

You’d be surprised how fast alternative sources for almost anything can be found if there’s enough money at stake.

Augustine
Augustine
1 year ago
Reply to  Walt

Unlike money, minerals cannot be printed on demand.

1KoolKat
1KoolKat
1 year ago

FYI, the US delayed nuke modernization now they are under intense pressure to make it happen before the legacy stuff breaks down. Strategic materials are vital and the Chinese KNOW IT The US is in deep trouble

Luke Winstrom
Luke Winstrom
1 year ago

“It takes decades to get a mine up in the US and mining is one thing. Processing is the second. China controls about 90% of global rare earth process.
No other county has the technology.”

Relying on China for these materials seems oddly foolish.

Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Luke Winstrom

The technology is freely available and the long time it takes to set up a mine in the US comes from bureaucratic delays and authorizations and not from it being hard to build. If necessary they could be up and running much quicker than you think.

Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78

Get a shovel and demonstrate for the class, please….

AndyM
AndyM
1 year ago

Idiotic and corrupt voters voted for the most corrupt administration ever. Now s-it up to the consequences. Anyone surprised at the outcome must have been asleep at the wheel or complicit. Did the voters really think this is not another oligarchy financed by deep pocket billionaires who want to take it all away from the common folks?

Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
Reply to  AndyM

The decision was made years ago by Clinton, Gore, and Babbitt to use environmental laws and the endangered species act to close down American mining so that the urban elite could have high quality low cost vacations.

That is still policy. How many new copper mines has Biden approved to support the electrification required by the green new deal? None.

Patrick
Patrick
1 year ago

Corrupt US government + idiocy + greed for short term vig = up the creek without a paddle.

RichardF
RichardF
1 year ago

This may be a conspiracy theory, but wasn’t there an election held recently in …I think a country called USA which was supposed to address these sort of situations?
They had a four letter word for it MAGA , yeh that is it,
I understand the candidate, some guy named Trump won it in a Landslide, but there are factions in same country attempting to undermine election results.

Can’t be true cause everyone in their Capital is referred to as Honorable. So only tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theoristys would believe some people in Washington are undermining USA security.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.