Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Congratulations Workers! You Make 13 Cents More Per Hour Than You Did in 1973

Hourly Earnings for February 2021

The above table is courtesy of the BLS

February 2021 Details 

  • Average hourly earnings rose from $28.51 to $30.01, an increase of $1.50 an hour. 
  • You only saw $0.38 of that because inflation-adjusted wages only rose from $11.02 to $11.40.
  • Real average hourly earnings declined in the last two months.
  • Hooray! In January your weekly pay rose. However you had to work more hours to get that because you lost money on a per hour basis.
  • Boo. In February your weekly pay declined by a full percentage point because your real pay per hour declined and you also worked fewer hours on average.

Congratulations On Your 13 Cents!

I downloaded all the data and calculated how much more you are making today per hour, on average, inflation adjusted back to the beginning of the data series in 1964. 

Since January 1973, real wages for production and supervisory workers rose by 13 cents per hour. 

Curiosities

In nominal terms the average production and supervisory worker made $4.03 in 1973 which the BLS says was really worth $9.44. 

This has to do with the inflation index date set to 1982-1984 at 100.

Anyway, spend your 13 cents per hour increase wisely because home price are not even in the CPI. 

For discussion, please see Inflation Fears Recede After Another Tame CPI Report, Pause in the Storm?

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

35 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
drjohnnyfever
drjohnnyfever
5 years ago

Unions aren’t going to fix monetary policy. Sorry bub

inonothing
inonothing
5 years ago

Isn’t 1973 the year Joseph Robinette Biden was first elected girlyman?

Since2008
Since2008
5 years ago

Isn’t 1973 the year Joseph Robinette Biden was first elected to public office?

Since2008
Since2008
5 years ago

Isn’t 1973 when Joseph Robinette Biden was first elected to office?

PostCambrian
PostCambrian
5 years ago

There are several reasons for this. The biggest one is that the dollar is the world’s reserve currency which basically guarantees that the US will have structural trade deficits resulting in more imports and reducing the US manufacturing capacity. The second was that until Trump, Republicans felt any pushback against China (especially by Democrats) was anti-business. The logic behind Trump’s policies I don’t understand (and neither did he). The US should wean itself off of reserve currency status and aggressively defend itself against intellectual property theft by China. Where we are just out-competed by China we have to just work harder in the areas where we have a chance to compete. There are certain industries where it is unlikely that we can be competitive at least in the foreseeable future. There is a snowball’s chance in hell that this will happen.

Stump297
Stump297
5 years ago

How far have the real wages risen in China over the same period? That would be a good overlay to show where the capital has been going since Nixon.

KidHorn
KidHorn
5 years ago
Reply to  Stump297

This doesn’t go back as far, but I think it’s safe to assume wage growth in China has far surpassed that of the US.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/743563/china-average-yearly-wage-growth/#:~:text=As%20of%202019%2C%20the%20average,compared%20to%20the%20previous%20year.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
5 years ago

Obamacare’s About to Get a Lot More Affordable. These Maps Show How.

For this year and next, the stimulus bill boosts subsidies for nearly all those buying their own coverage, making insurance free for more people and giving higher-income people discounts for the first time.

Under the stimulus bill passed by Congress this week and set to be signed by President Biden on Friday, nearly all those who buy their own insurance are eligible for a discount.

KidHorn
KidHorn
5 years ago

I’m convinced Obamacare was created so drug companies could sell their absurdly overpriced drugs to people who could otherwise not afford them. Only the super rich and insured can afford to get many ailments. There aren’t enough super rich, so they needed to insure a lot more people.

grazzt
grazzt
5 years ago

Great, insurance is free. Now what’s the co-pay, deductible and limits on what Obama-Care covers?

Anda
Anda
5 years ago

Well hey, that’s 13 cents more than back then, should be considered a form of hedonism like being able to afford a roof.

Mish
Mish
5 years ago

Averages for ALL workers include CEOs and executives.
Production workers do not include CEOs etc.

shamrock
shamrock
5 years ago

This is average earnings, but as people gain experience they get better, higher paying jobs. It’s highly unlikely that individual people have gained so little.

shamrock
shamrock
5 years ago

What about the value of non taxable benefits? I.e, health insurance premiums, IRA contributions, etc.

Zardoz
Zardoz
5 years ago

I also have a house full of tools and toys that are beyond the science fiction of 1973.

Jetpacks and flying cars are still annoyingly unaffordable though.

cudmeister
cudmeister
5 years ago

I won’t live that long, I don’t believe. Didn’t they used to call it “trickle down”? Ended up being more like “trickled on”. At least Stockman was taken to the woodshed for it.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  cudmeister

Stockman was taken to the woodshed? How? By whom? I’d say he walked away scot free from a bunch of serious messes he made as a failed hedge fund manager.

I used to read him before he decided to put up a paywall. Not worth spending money to hear him make his doom predictions…….which he’s been doing now for what, ten years? Waste of time in my book.

cudmeister
cudmeister
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

Stockman will always be a hero in my eyes, but I agree, his economic forecasts aren’t worth a damn.

MATHGAME
MATHGAME
5 years ago
Reply to  cudmeister

In a “trickle down” economy, why do you think the elite denigrate “all those pee-ons”

Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago

Free Trade and Economic Liberalism work! Just need a bit more time and you will see the benefits. Another thirty years should do it.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

It’ll definitely do it for me.

RonJ
RonJ
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Like with anything else, the standard of living rises and falls over time, in any particular area. Nothing stays the same. There is no preventing it from changing.
We don’t live in a linear world. Europe went from the Roman Empire into the Dark Ages. Industrial centers grew up in the U.S., aged and declined.

We all have our own self interests. We want to gain something and hold onto it forever. Farmers don’t want to lose a local market to foreign competition. They don’t want their prices to drop. They petition the government for tariffs. Big business tries to freeze out small new competitors.

Special interests aren’t going to allow free trade and economic liberalism to work, just as those too big to fail, aren’t allowed to. But who does a manipulated system benefit? How many does it work for? Free or manipulated, there is nothing that works for everyone, all the time, as it all moves in cycles. Every boom ends in a bust.

Tengen
Tengen
5 years ago

That’s okay, houses cost 10x more. We’ll all get rich selling real estate to each other!

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  Tengen

Sell? The last thing I want to do is sell. lol.

I have agents cold-calling me nearly every day, now. Writing me fake hand-written letters telling they’re moving to town and need a place for their family. Right. They must think I’m pretty dumb.

Such silly tactics to try to shake loose some potential houses to flip or tear down.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago

I guess that decision I made to quit my job and go back to school in ’78 was a good one. I was knocking down seven bucks and change making aluminum castings for GE. . I’d probably be up to 8 by now.

cudmeister
cudmeister
5 years ago

But the workers sincerely thank you for doing this.

cudmeister
cudmeister
5 years ago

You report this data, yet you are so anti-union. So who is supposed to look out for the workers, market forces?

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
5 years ago
Reply to  cudmeister

Workers are supposed to be looking out for themselves (ie bettering themselves to get better jobs/pay).

Unions are not a panacea and in fact make everything more expensive for everyone NOT in a union. For example if steelworkers are in a union and increase the price of steel by their demands then who pays for that? Not the business owner, but instead every consumer of steel which happens to be everyone else, especially low income workers that say flip burgers or are cashiers. Those people get killed by union wages raising costs.

And if your answer is ‘everyone should be in a union’ then that’s the same as ‘no one is in a union’ because everyone’s wages will be lock-step (ie all unions would end up negotiating same raises).

Zardoz
Zardoz
5 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

Supposed to… but the dumber ones will trample each other to lick the master’s feet. When enough adopt this strategy, workers looking out for themselves pits them against other workers.

As far as I know, no ideology has been devised that takes into account the irrational quirks of the human mind. They’re all built for some hypothetical ideal human that never existed.

So far, they’ve all failed except the current batch, and none of them are looking healthy….

grazzt
grazzt
5 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

So capital is free to organize, as in the formation of a corporation, but labor shouldn’t? If everyone was in a Union, then labor would garner a greater share of the profits as opposed to share holders (capital holders). But yeah, that’s the same as no-one being in a union…
BTW you can’t expect everyone to better themselves. How many engineers do you need to design a bridge as opposed to skilled labor to construct it? You still need laborers to do grunt work, so why not pay them a living wage and have them contribute to the economy instead of serving as debt serfs? Either that or we just need to eliminate the non-productive portion of the population, per COVID or some other more precise means.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
5 years ago
Reply to  grazzt

You are correct that not everyone can/will better themselves. There will be winners and losers in life. No union or any other kind of arrangement will ever prevent that. And what’s the different between being a deft serf and a living wage. Both allow the person to live and eat. Everything else is just how well they get to do it (which is back to the original point of if you want to live better you need to improve yourself/work harder).

BTW, if everyone was in a union, we’d have communism. I thought it would be implicitly understood that’s what everyone in a union would mean. Is that how you’d like to live?

cudmeister
cudmeister
5 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

Amen to that. When the top 20% of Americans own 86% of the total US wealth, having labor unions should not have to be justified. Most of the anti-union noise is propaganda being spread by people at the bottom of pie against each other. The way it usually works, in other words.

Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
5 years ago
Reply to  cudmeister

Mish is anti-PUBLIC union. Note the enormous differences between a public and private union.

cudmeister
cudmeister
5 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple

I am not a fan of government worker unions. No limits, there. It’s real easy to spend taxpayer dollars, as we are now witnessing with this covid relief bs.

Call_Me
Call_Me
5 years ago
Reply to  cudmeister

The Fed.

(does this need /s?)

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.