Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Congress Howls as Biden Kills Trump’s Sanctions on Russia Gas Pipeline

Biden Ends Trump’s Sanctions

Bloomberg reports U.S. Calls Effort to Halt Nord Stream 2 Pipeline a Long Shot

The Biden administration said stopping Nord Stream 2 is a long shot now that the gas pipeline from Russia to Germany is more than 90% complete, a shift in tone that came as the U.S. held off on sanctioning the company overseeing its construction.

In a report to Congress on Wednesday, the State Department said that Nord Stream 2 AG and its chief executive Matthias Warnig are engaged in sanctionable activity under U.S. law but that the administration will waive penalties for national security reasons.

Nord Stream 2 Q&A

Q: What is Nord Stream 2?
A: A natural gas pipeline between Russia and the EU. It will bypass a Ukraine bottleneck and instead go under the Baltic Sea. 

The pipeline was 90% complete with Trump objecting every step of the way while placing huge obstacles. 

The irony is that instead of EU contractors building the pipeline, Russian contractors built it and got paid for it.

National Security Nonsense

Trump placed the sanctions on Russia over the pipeline citing national security.

In reality, his primary focus was to get the EU to buy US liquid natural gas at a much higher price than the EU can get from Russia. 

Biden reversed Trump’s national security lie with a lie of his own, also based on national security concerns. 

Curiously we placed and removed the same sanctions out of national security concerns.

Opposition Unwavering? Security Threat?

“Our opposition to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline is unwavering,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement Wednesday.

“Completion of this pipeline poses a threat to U.S. security interests and the stability of our partners in the region,” Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire said in a statement. “The administration should uphold its commitment to Congress. Every option available to prevent its completion should be utilized.”

Biden Under Fire

NBC reports Biden under fire from Congress for waiving sanctions on Russian gas pipeline company.

The Biden administration has decided to waive sanctions against the company overseeing the construction of Russia’s Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to Germany, despite bipartisan opposition in Congress and appeals from Eastern European governments.

Republican lawmakers immediately accused the administration of handing Russian President Vladimir Putin a major political victory. Democrats urged the White House to reconsider, and the Kremlin called the news a “positive signal.”

Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, denounced the decision in a scathing statement.

“I am opposed to the decision by the Biden administration to waive sanctions on NS2 AG and Matthias Warnig. I urge the administration to rip off the Band-Aid, lift these waivers and move forward with the congressionally mandated sanctions,” Menendez said.

Conflicting Nonsense

  1. The decisions “demonstrate the Administration’s commitment to energy security in Europe, consistent with the President’s pledge to rebuild relationships with our allies and partners in Europe,” Blinken said in a statement. 
  2. He added that the administration would continue to oppose the completion of the pipeline: “Our opposition to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline is unwavering.”

We have an unwavering opposition to the pipeline but we removed sanctions to support the EU’s commitment to energy security. 

Does that make any sense?

Not Our Decision

Can someone please cite genuine national security concerns?

Please don’t tell me Russia might invade Germany. 

Even if one can mumble some nonsense, the fact of the matter is this is the EU’s decision to make.

What Biden Should Have Said

  • We removing the sanctions because Trump had no business placing them in the first place. 
  • Merkel argues that it is a commercial matter for Germany and we agree.
  • The US will no longer attempt to dictate policy for the entire world by force.
  • We stated our objections, but ultimately this was not our decision any more than it be the EU’s decision to object to the US buying oil from Mexico. 

Instead, Biden fabricated a bunch of conflicting nonsense and in the process took it from both sides.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
numike
numike
5 years ago
Washington is rushing to regulate crypto. It’s a mess. https://www.protocol.com/fintech/bitcoin-cryptocurrency-regulations#toggle-gdpr
numike
numike
5 years ago
The (public) Irish healthcare system was just hit by a ransomware attack that is directly causing major problems for patients:
    The Irish Association for Emergency Medicine urged people not to turn up at hospital emergency rooms unless they had a genuinely urgent need. The association said electronic ordering of blood tests, X-rays and scans was unavailable and clinicians had no access to previous X-rays or scan results.
    Many hospital telephone systems also were not working because they are carried on computer networks, it added. The attack has also shut down the system used to pay health care workers.
Webej
Webej
5 years ago
There are two geopolitical reasons for the US to want Ukrainian transit of Russian gas export:
  • Their Ukrainian gnat on Russia’s underbelly needs the transit fees
    Of course the US tax paper could take over these lost revenues. Ukraine needs it to keep from collapsing completely
  • The US effectively controls Ukraine and can cause disruptions of Russian gas exports, pressuring the EU and Russia at the same time.
    They have no similar ‘jurisdiction’ over a Baltic route. The whole point of the pipeline is to skirt the Ukraine and reroute the gas via reliable lines.
Rbm
Rbm
5 years ago

Hey mish.  No more ask mish.  Was gonna ask if anyone saw the new article about the net neutrality fraud.   

Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Since Biden now likes pipelines maybe Keystone will come back. It does make economic sense and pipelines are much more efficient and safe for transporting oil than truck or rail. Shale oil has to be mixed with heavy crude anyway for refining and that has to come by ship, rail or truck anyway so why not from Canada?
Zardoz
Zardoz
5 years ago
Sanctioning that pipeline makes about as much sense as Wyoming suing other states to force them to buy coal.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
5 years ago
Thanks for your interesting articles again Mish……yet I think the layout of the previous blog was much better… 
Cocoa
Cocoa
5 years ago
Both parties wanted to kill off this pipeline because they want Saudi and Qatar gas to go through Turkey into Europe so they can steal the business. The whole thing was a stupid business model. Syria Iraq turkey all that stuff is about natural gas and stealing the business from Russia
thimk
thimk
5 years ago
Biden removes sections on Russia gas nat pipeline BUT re-sanctions Keystone XL oil pipeline ?? total schizophrenia at the executive level . Congress legislated  too  much authority to the executive branch .   The US business climate suffers from abrupt , unilaterally policy changes.             
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
OT, but this kinda blows me away. Austin median home price now at $550K, according to this.
In January of 2015 it was $238.5K. Up 130% in 6.5 years. My back-of-the-napkin math puts that at 21.6% per year. 
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Portland Oregon home prices are up 25% over same time last year. Real estate is not my strong point but I winder why the two cities have the same increase in home values when they have very different economic and social situations. Who are the buyers?
LostNOregon
LostNOregon
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Could be new people moving in. I see plates from TX, VA, NC, TN, CA, NJ, NY, FL all over the place. Intel is building fabs like crazy. The intersection of Evergreen and Brookwood must have almost a dozen new fabs going up right now.
But it could also be hedge funds as lots of sales are total cash according to the locals.
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  LostNOregon
Perhaps enough people believe that the current chaos there is temporary. After all Portland is not a megacity like New York or LA and if Portlanders become motivated then the situation could become reasonable again quickly especially if the suburbs have been spared and the tax base still intact.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I believe we now have a lot of Chinese money coming into both these markets although I have no proof. I do get cold calls all the time from Asian real estate agents looking to buy various places of mine that aren’t even on the market.
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
You remember in the 80’s the Japanese were buying anything real estate in sight? When their economy tanked they had to sell them back sometimes to the original owners at heavy discounts. Could history be repeating? I wonder.
LostNOregon
LostNOregon
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Sorry about the delay in replying.  We are on the road coming back from a week in Yachats, OR. Great little place on the coast. 
I think the anarchists will leave soon.  Either that or even Portland’s famously laid back liberals (and I am one of those) will get tired enough of their BS and allow the police to clean them out.  We are all tired of their destruction. Their “protests” aren’t helping anyone and they seem to be a bunch of destructive little brats who don’t have anything positive to contribute. 
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  LostNOregon
I hope it comes soon.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Do you have property in Austin? Would or should  you sell now?  These are all FED BUBBLES, that much is obvious…..BIG question : how long will this rat race to the moon  continue….?  That being said, I am glad the MT blog functions again, couldn’t read nor write comments for a couple of days….had to vent my spleen on RT….go figure 🙂
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
My Austin RE was bought with an eye toward creating a steady flow of income in retirement, not on speculation….not at all. This has been a good growth market for years…but not crazy like now.
But yeah, now the temptation is to cash out while the getting is good. But that is not my plan, and I believe in ALWAYS working the plan…..and not making rash decisions. I think the market will survive this speculative bubble and get back to a new normal at some point. I might sell my primary residence, because that was always part of the plan…..the timing is good. Houses are better than stocks because they have tangible value. And now my properties could lose half the current estimated value…..and I would NOT be underwater. That’s the beauty of keeping the leverage modest.
njbr
njbr
5 years ago
The Middle East suppliers of LNG were the real push behind sanctions.  Those countries had unprecedented pull during the previous administration. They want the market and are funding the LNG terminals.  “National security” was a convenient call.
njbr
njbr
5 years ago
Test??
Rbm
Rbm
5 years ago
Only security threat i see is russia could use cutting off gas to germany as leverage on some issue.   Say in the winter.   Think they used that in the past on Ukraine or poland. Cant remember details. 
Remember when oil companies wanted to frack for  American energy independence.   Then about a year later proceeded to get the law changed so they could export gas to Europe.  
Humm How the wheels turn.  
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
5 years ago
Reply to  Rbm
 Lemme fresh up your memory : Ukraine did not pay for its gas(2007), leading to a conflict between R and U, with Ukraine cutting off supply to Europe, N2 is EXACTLY about not depending on the goodwill of a unpredictable(US sponsored) basket case name Ukraine…capiche?
Webej
Webej
5 years ago
Reply to  Rbm
It is the Ukraine that many times cut or threatened to cut the supply, never the Russians.
Ukraine pilfers gas and charges transit fees.
Russia has always been dependable and wants to eliminate routing it through the Ukraine.
The amount of gas sourced from Russia will not change and they are therefore not in a better position now than before to cut off gas supplies.
njbr
njbr
5 years ago
Sanctions on Nord Stream were pushed by the LNG suppliers in the Middle East.  Remember the glowing ball conference?  The Middle East is funding the building of LNG terminals in Europe.
Better to be at the mercy of the Middle East countries or Russia?
njbr
njbr
5 years ago
You seem to forget that the Middle East LNG suppliers (friends of the Trump/Kushner graspers of the glowing ball) were the ones behind the “national security” issues with the Nord Stream project.  They’re funding the the building of LNG terminals in Europe.
Thugocracy is right for both the Middle East and Russia.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Another little turf fight for the empire we lost and now we’re saving face by reversing the sanctions, which never worked. The pipeline was always going to be built, and the sanctions were stupid. But we can never just speak the truth. It’s always about saving the appearances.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
…giving up on a dominant global position must be tough…..History shows empires rose and eventually fell,  a fact of life….In a globalised world though Empires are next to finished altogether, the entire world is now in the hands of a couple of billionaires some of which almost  trillionaires, calling the shots….for the time being anyway….
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
5 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
In the history of the worlds, there has never been so many hungry mouths to feed. So worrying about dominant position should logically be secondary. Unless you’re top clown so insulated from the reality on the ground, you have to rely on expert advice and statistics.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
5 years ago
Yeah, mostly agree, it’s none of the US’ business.  Question is… why do we support NATO (protect Germany) against a defunct USSR with US taxpayer funded defense while Germany becomes energy dependent on Russia?  Not every thugocracy (Russia) requires an alphabet multilateral funded by US citizens.  Let Germany have its pipeline and defund the (NATO) police.
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
I wouldn’t look for any type of consistency in this on the surface. There is evidently a quid pro quo involved but I don’t know what it could be. Given the importance of the pipeline I would expect an important concession on the German position involving the Ukraine. Could it be that German objections to closer NATO-Ukraine cooperation could be softening? 
PostCambrian
PostCambrian
5 years ago
Your logic on this one is impeccable. I think that in times of crisis that it will prove to be a mistake for Europe but that is their mistake to make. We make plenty of our own.  We definitely wouldn’t like it if the rest of the world placed sanctions on us for invading Iraq under a pretext that was proven false.  If I was Europe then I would be a LNG receiving facility and connect it to the Nord2 pipeline in order to be able to receive natural gas by ship in case of emergency. Not that it would be able to replace the full amount of gas immediately on a shutdown by the Russians but there would be some available plus it would be a big bargaining chip against future increases to already have it in place.
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  PostCambrian
Europe has been expanding its number of liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals these last few years. Most countries there except for Germany do not want to be subject to a possible Russian gas embargo. LNG imports have been jumping by leaps and bounds into Europe. In a sense an additional Russian pipeline coming now doesn’t necessarily mean increased dependence because more LNG terminals means kit is much easier to use imported natural gas in a pinch which was less true before.
Webej
Webej
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
There is no additional dependence on Russia. They already buy Russian gas, but they do no want it to go through the Ukraine anymore, since it has proven unreliable in the past and leeches costs. It is not an addition, no matter how many pundits repeat it. It is rerouting the gas.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.