Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Consumer Inflation Expectations Jump 7th Straight Month to a New Record High

Belief in the Transitory!

I created the above chart from the New York Fed Survey of Consumer Expectations.

Not once in 8 years did consumer expectations dip below 2%. Indeed, the lowest 1-year look ahead rate is 2.33%.

My key observation is that consumers believe inflation measures under 2% are transitory given they never predict such events looking ahead no matter what the starting point, even negative.

The New York Fed key findings do not mention my key observation but they do note that inflation expectations are now at record highs.

Survey Description 

The SCE is a nationally representative, internet-based survey of a rotating panel of approximately 1,300 household heads. Respondents participate in the panel for up to 12 months, with a roughly equal number rotating in and out of the panel each month. Unlike comparable surveys based on repeated cross-sections with a different set of respondents in each wave, our panel allows us to observe the changes in expectations and behavior of the same individuals over time.

Inflation Data Description

  • Median one-year ahead expected inflation rate: Respondents are asked for the percent chance that, over the next 12 months, the rate of inflation (deflation) will be 12% or higher; between 8% and 12%; between 4% and 8%; between 2% and 4%; between 0 and 2%. A generalized beta distribution is fitted to the responses of each survey participant and the mean of this distribution is calculated. This is the respondent’s “expected inflation rate”.
  • Median point prediction: Respondents are asked what they think the rate of inflation will be over the next 12 months. This is a point prediction (a single-value forecast).

The three-year forecasts are for three years instead of one.

Reported Key Inflation Findings

  • Median one-year-ahead inflation expectations increased by 0.6 percentage point in May to 4.0%, the seventh consecutive monthly increase and a new series high. Median inflation expectations at the three-year horizon increased from 3.1% to 3.6%, the second-highest level in this series, behind only the reading from August 2013. The increase at both horizons is particularly pronounced among respondents age 60 and over and among those with a high school degree or less. 
  • Median inflation uncertainty—or the uncertainty expressed regarding future inflation outcomes—increased sharply at the short- and medium-term horizons. Both measures are well above the levels observed before the outbreak of COVID-19. 
  • Median year-ahead home price change expectations increased by 0.7 percentage point to 6.2%, substantially above the 2020 average of 2.3% and marking a third consecutive month with a new series high. The May increase was driven mostly by respondents who live in the “West” and “South” Census regions. 
  • Expectations about year-ahead price changes increased for all commodities in May. The median one-year-ahead expected change in the price of food and rent increased by 2.2 and 0.3 percentage points, respectively, to new series highs of 8.0% and 9.7%. The median one-year-ahead expected change in the price of gas and in the cost of medical care rebounded by 0.6 and 0.3 percentage point, respectively, to 9.8% and 9.4%. Finally, the median one-year-ahead expected change in the cost of a college education increased by 0.2 percentage point to 6.1%.

Inflation Expectations vs Year-Over-Year Inflation Measures Detail 

After drifting sideways near the 3% mark, consumers started penciling in higher inflation expectations in March of 2021 and higher point predictions in December of 2020. 

Parroting the News?

One has to wonder how much of this is real opinion vs constant news recently of higher prices. 

I suspect a bit of both as prices have gone up, but either way it’s irrelevant, because:

Inflation Expectations Are Meaningless

Contrary to widespread belief that inflation expectations matter, they are actually meaningless and the above charts show just that. 

For most of eight years reported inflation was under 2% and often under 1%, and briefly negative. Yet, the look ahead median point prediction was never below 2.9%. 

If expectations mattered, why did the CPI and PCE stay below 2% so long? 

Normalization Flashback

On March 8, 2019 in a speech called Monetary Policy: Normalization and the Road Ahead Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated “Persistently weak inflation could lead inflation expectations to drift downward.”

Other than the humorous idea the Fed was about to normalize, the key question is “So what?”

A look at CPI components shows how silly it is to believe in inflation expectations.

CPI Percentage Weights

I highlighted inelastic items. 

Perhaps a portion of education is elastic. But a portion of other housing is inelastic as is a portion of communication and other goods. 

Recreation is elastic and so is apparel (assuming one does not ruin one’s only coat or shoes). 

Somewhere between 80% and 90% of household purchases are inelastic.

Inelastic Item Questions

Q: If consumers think the price of food will drop, will they stop eating? Will they eat twice as much if they expect prices will rise?

Q: If consumers think the price of gas will drop, will they stop driving? 

Q: If consumers think the price of rent will drop, will they hold off renting until that happens? Will they rent two apartments if they expect the price to rise?

Q: Will consumers delay medical services if they think prices will drop? Will they have two operations if they think prices will rise?​

Elastic Item Questions

Q. Better deals on TVs and computers are always around the corner. Does that stop TV and computer purchases?

Q. If someone wants a new refrigerator, toaster, or stove will they wait two months if they think prices will decline?

Asset prices are a different matter, however.

Asset Price Expectations

  • People do buy stocks it they believe prices will rise. They avoid stocks or sell them if they expect prices will drop.
  • People will stretch to buy a home if they expect prices to rise. They wait if they expect prices will drop.

Note that every member of the Fed talks about expectations that don’t matter ignoring those that do matter.

And not only does the Fed ignore asset price expectations, they ignore asset prices totally. That’s how you get three enormous bubbles in 20 years.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
swingintimber
swingintimber
4 years ago
Whatever happened to Sechel?  Cancel culture?  I almost miss him.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Added a bit more SLV on the dip. I have a little dry powder if there’s more downside. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
These Fed announcement always come in when I’m busy…..looks like the dollar really popped and gold and solver dropped enough to catch anybody with a tight stop. The DXY  tagged 91.25. The interesting thing will be to see if the dollar holds the new uptrend or it’s a fake-out. If the dollar goes higher from here, I’d expect more downside in the metals. I’m expecting another reversal….but we shall see.  
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Consumers are the wrong people to ask. As you point out, consumers do little that causes inflation. If they think the price of gas will fall, they might buy a faster or bigger car, and they probably will drive more. If they think the price of food will rise, they might stock their larder (and freezer).  Mostly, though, they are the tail that wags, not the dog. It would be more interesting to see what the results would be if they asked business people who actually set prices. I can tell you that in the last month my wages have gone up 10%, and each and every one of my supplies have gone up 5-13%, and as a result, my prices are going up 10% at the end of the month. I will be surprised if I do not at least one more price increase in the next twelve months, though it will probably be smaller. Of course, as we learned in the pandemic, small business no longer matters as it has little impact on the economy anymore.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
If the consumers are traders sitting home trading commodities they aren’t taking delivery of, then they are partly responsible for the inflation they see. 
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Around here prices on basic necessities are falling rapidly. Food is cheap and getting cheaper.  I wonder if that’s due to Lidl moving into town and increasing competition.  Chicken breast (the boneless kind) is 1.29/lb, and that’s the non-sale price.  Eggs are .54 cents a dozen.  A loaf of bread is literally 69 cents.  Ham is less than a buck a pound.  Every week it seems to get cheaper.  What’s not cheaper is anything electronic, used cars, houses and other non-perishable items.  I see inflation and deflation everywhere, depending on the product.  What is interesting is the inflation I see is only in products that are having trouble either being manufactured (houses, cars etc) or in products where there are known bottlenecks that will clear.  In other words, I do not believe this inflation is a new normal.  It is a temporary blip due to the disruption from COVID.
xbizo
xbizo
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
where are u?
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  xbizo
Eastern NC.  It’s rural here and there are a lot of farmers which at least partially explains the cost of food here.  I don’t think it’s the total picture though.  Certain kinds of food are getting cheaper.  Pre-packaged food is getting more expensive.  I don’t buy that junk and cook nearly all my food from scratch.  Ingredients are cheap and getting cheaper.  Transporting it, processing it and packaging it is not getting cheaper.  Very much the opposite.But for a person like me who makes their own meals from scratch, food has never been cheaper during the 20 years I have shopped for myself.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
Eastern NC …..if only I knew where that was …..
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Where is Brussels?
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
North Carolina and Belgium have about the same number of people. It also has a higher GDP than Belgium.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
Those are incredible prices and as you mentioned clearly tied to an abundance of local sources of food.
In south Florida, eggs are about 1.50 a dozen and a loaf of bread is 1.69. Both those are the store brands (Winn Dixie / Publix). Ham was on sale for 99c/lb this past weekend so we got a 10 lb ham to cook but otherwise it’s at least 50% more (1.50-1.75 a lb). Not sure on the boneless chicken breast costs because I haven’t bought chicken in a few months (freezer is full). Beef is the pricey meat item at the moment.
xbizo
xbizo
4 years ago
When rent, gas, health insurance, child care, education and food prices have been rising 5% per year for decades, the idea of 5% overall inflation is just recognizing the obvious.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
I think gas and transportation are somewhat elastic, within limits. I’ve probably cut my driving by half over the last decade. I started from a level of excess, for sure.  Most of my air travel is optional, too, and I’ve only flown once since COVID hit.  But generally I agree with your take.
I just read an article about rising rents, but it seems to be in places that might have been lower than average before the various stimuli. Rent articles are usually misleading , because the only thing that gets accurately tracked is apartment rents. Here, the article showed a rent drop of 6.3% y.o.y., but I can assure you that single family home rentals are headed up substantially at the moment.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
OER is the single largest item in the CPI – supposedly it tracks what houses rent for
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
So my understanding is that OER comes from a survey of homeowners who are asked for an “equivalent rent” number? Is that more or less correct?
My question there is HTF would they begin to have any idea about what that would be?  I’m a rental investor and I need help from pros to figure that out.
A homeowner has NO data to base that on. They can only give a number they pull out of the air….and I would guess it’s close to their monthly house payment. That’s the only handle they have on it. You can understand how that would start out wrong and get more wrong over time, depending on how long they’ve been in residence. 
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

A tried and true rental method is to charge 1% of the purchase price as the monthly rent.So if the home would sell for 150k, you charge 1500 a month in rent.This holds true only for homes in Class B neighborhoods.  In higher end, class A neighborhoods you get far less than 1% of the purchase price back in monthly rent.  I let the foolish investors buy those houses.  They have a nice rental, but they aren’t getting good returns on it.Class B neighborhoods should always always rent for 1% (or if you are lucky, MORE!) of the purchase price.  People may say, well, you can’t find that in San Fran or NYC, which is true.  That’s exactly why one should NOT invest in property there as a landlord.  Those are speculative investments.When one buys properties to invest in as a landlord it requires the discipline to raise rents with whatever the market will bear.  If similar homes to yours are going up in value your rent also needs to go up to match the 1% rule.  It’s really quite simple to determine rent if you only own Class B homes, which yields the highest returns.  Where people go wrong is in their reluctance to raise the rent to match the rule, or their unwillingness to buy Class B properties and avoid the Class A like the plague.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
So..that one percent rule is fine for estimating cash flow. I do that for a back-of-the-napkin approach to seeing if some property is likely to flow cash before I buy it.
But I’ve been in my house for 28 years…and I can tell you that the purchase price is now irrelevant to estimating OER.  Nowadays digitally savvy people can look at Redfin to make a guesstimate about their home value, and I do that too…but I don’t think my house would rent for anything remotely close to 1% of the current highly inflated Redfin estimate. If it would, I’d rent that sucker in a heartbeat.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I’m betting your home is a class A home because it’s your home, right?

But, theoretically (you’d never do this) if you sold it and used the proceeds to buy 3-4 more Class B rentals you’d get way more rent from those lower valued (but still nice)  homes than from one big nice home.  

Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
1% seems very high…been renting different places for a long time, and have typically paid between .2 and .3 % of the purchase price, monthly.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It’s not high.  That is, or used to be, standard.  You will not even approach that rental return in big cities.  Smaller cities (200k or less) in most places in the USA you can fairly easily get that return.  Again, these are Class 2 homes.  You are not going to get 1% on a class 1 home, that’s why I never, ever buy a class A home, neither would I even look at one unless it was mispriced, in which case I’d buy it and resell it.  That’s not going to happen in this market. 
If a 100k home rents for 1k a month it does not compute that a 200k home will rent for 2k a month in the same area.  A 200k home would rent for 1500 a month in my area.  That means I’m better off buying 2 100k homes and renting each for 1k.  I get more rent relative to the purchase price.  You also generally get more appreciation.
My last deal just 2 months ago I bought a 3/2 rental for 100k, in excellent condition.  1225 square feet in size.  I financed 75k of it at 3.5% for 30 years.  Total PITA is 490 a month.  I rented it for 1050, easily.  Gross profit is 560.  This home is in Wilson NC.   To only get .2 or .3 percent…wow.  That’s nothing.  I’d only get 300 a month on a 100k investment?  No thanks.  I’d walk away from any deal with returns like that.  I’ve talked at length with dozens of property managers and most of those low returns are in high appreciation markets, which are highly speculative.  The profit is hoped to come from appreciation, not just from rent.  As 2008 revealed, that is not a very safe bet.  But….if nothing else is in the area, what choice do you have?  I think I’d flip a home rather than be a landlord in a place like that.  I can’t do that here, not enough profit motive, but in other areas, yes.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
Gowd, the US is a exceptional nation indeed! I just found out NC is North Carolina and I didn t know german Lidl was present in the US,  btw, don t expect a European to know each and every abbreviation of all your 50 something states….That being said, you expect to fetch 60K/year on a 500K property ??? You americans ARE a spoilt bunch, here in Flanders, one of the most prosperous regions in Europe, one might be VERY VERY lucky to fetch 20K/year and even that would be extremely abusive… Really amazing, so I can hardly believe it…..unless of course the renter takes your property for one year, half destroys it and then is off to somewhere else …. All that glitters is not gold!  I am old enough to empirically confirm this ages old proverb…. 
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
If you only got 20k on a 500k property gross income you’d lose money each and every year you owned it unless you paid for the thing cash up front.
Your normal person on the street cannot compete with the rich folks there unfortunately, if that’s the case.  No one has 500k just sitting around.  If you financed some of that 500k you’d put 120k down, finance 380k and have a 2000 a month payment to the bank.  You’d go in the hole 4k a year.  
60k a year on a 500k property?  No.
I’d get 12k each on 5 separate 100k properties where I’m at.  A 500k property, unless it was multi-family, would gross maybe 30k a year, just about half of what 500k invested in 5 different properties would gross.  I much prefer to get 60k out of 5 different 100k properties.

Yes, you can get 60k from 500k investment.  I’m pretty close to doing it now here in NC.  I apologize by the way about the abbreviation.  I should have read your name and figured that not every person in Europe has every US state abbreviation down pat.  I certainly don’t know every city in Belgium.  lol

And that 60k I’d get from 5 properties would be gross….mortgage, taxes, insurance and maintenance would be taken out of that.
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Nor would one expect an American to know the states and abbreviations of Germany, for example, but neither is germane to what some entity may post in the comment section of this site because they are not obligated to spell everything out for every possible reader. 
Fortunately, as you found out, there is a useful tool for researching information.  Another means of discovery would be to directly ask the original poster – doing so in a courteous manner may increase the odds of a reply, but does not guarantee one.
As for RE (real estate) in the U.S., Zardoz’s stated experience would fall below your high-end Flanders example (15k/yr rent 500k home), but that seems like a low return for an investment considering the liabilities associated with being a landlord and how much capital is tied up in the residence.  Is there some additional benefit to renting out a home in your region that would that make RE a more appealing option that a non-Belgian might not be aware of?
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
4 years ago
Reply to  Call_Me
apartments are more profitable ….buying price+- 250 K ,  +- 10K rent/year… don t know how it works in the US,   water, electricity etc are not included ….
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
Individual apartments, at least standard ones (not lavish suites or high-end buildings), aren’t generally options as investment vehicles, but buildings are.  However, I suspect some knowledgeable posters here would say that such buildings and individual landlords are becoming less common.
Can’t speak to whether this is a cultural reason (greater land availability and automobile use in U.S. push the single-family home preference) or maybe a structural one (apartment stock more recently developed and financed by large entities, who deal in buildings/complexes rather than selling off individual units).
Water/refuse are generally included in apartment rent, but electricity and natural gas usually have individual meters per unit and are paid by the renter.  If one is earning about 10k/year does that mean there are few additional expenses like taxes on the property, insurance, and fees for building maintenance?  I think those items in the U.S. would consume a good deal of the 10k.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.