Down the Rabbit Hole in Reverse Repos, What is the Fed Doing?

Repo Q&A

Repos are a cash injection by the Fed to banks. The Fed gives cash to banks in return for collateral, typically short-term treasuries. The Fed’s QE program is accomplished by outright purchases (but that is effectively the same a short term repos continually applied).

Reverse repos are the opposite. It’s a cash drain from banks. Thus, the Fed has unwound nearly $1 trillion of its QE program.

June 16, FOMC Meeting

Recall that the Fed met on June 15-16, holding interest rates at 0-0.25 and reiterated its QE program would continue. 

See Fed Will Continue QE Purchases in Search of Higher Inflation for more details including these three points.

  • With inflation having run persistently below this longer-run goal, the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for some time so that inflation averages 2 percent over time and longer‑term inflation expectations remain well anchored at 2 percent
  • In addition, the Federal Reserve will continue to increase its holdings of Treasury securities by at least $80 billion per month and of agency mortgage‑backed securities by at least $40 billion per month until substantial further progress has been made toward the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals.
  • These asset purchases help foster smooth market functioning and accommodative financial conditions, thereby supporting the flow of credit to households and businesses.

Smooth Functioning!?

The Fed has been pumping $120 billion a month into banks and has now taken back 8.27 months of QE.

Nonetheless, New York Fed President John Williams said that the reverse repo system “was working really well,” and that there were “really, no concerns about that. We expected that to happen. It’s working exactly as designed.”

Banks are So Stuffed With Cash They Tell Companies: No More Deposits

On June 10, I commented Banks are So Stuffed With Cash They Tell Companies: No More Deposits

Some banks, awash in deposits, are encouraging corporate clients to spend the cash on their businesses or move it elsewhere. It’s a strange case of “No More Cash Please“.

“Raising capital against deposits and/or turning away deposits are unnatural actions for banks and cannot be good for the system in the long run,” Jennifer Piepszak, then-CFO of JPMorgan Chase & Co., said on a call with analysts in April.

In recent months, banks including BNY Mellon have focused on moving clients from deposits into money-market funds. The money-market funds, in turn, need new places to park all that new cash and earn some interest. But rock-bottom interest rates have pushed them into storing it back at the Federal Reserve overnight, in a facility that pays them zero return and had been largely ignored for the past three years

Synopsis 

No one wants the cash but the Fed keeps cramming it down their throats. And despite a red hot housing market, $40 billion of the monthly $120 billion cram is agency (housing) related. 

To top it off, at the June FOMC meeting the Fed increased the amount it pays banks on reverse repos from 0.0% to 0.05%. It also hikes the amount it pays on excess reserves to 0.15% from 0.10%.

Those actions were all but guaranteed to increase demand for Reverse Repos. 

Working Really Well?!

Allegedly, this seemingly ridiculous process is allegedly:

  1. working really well
  2. as expected with no concerns
  3. exactly as designed 
  4. thereby supporting the flow of credit to households and businesses

Down the Rabbit Hole

Can you come up with any rational thesis to support those statements? 

I can, by tossing a single point, and that would be point #4, a blatant lie.

Jim Dandy to the Rescue

Recall that after the meeting various Fed governors discussed tapering, that is reducing its QE asset purchases. 

In response to taper talk, the market started to tank and Fed Chair Jerome Powell and NY Fed President John Williams came to the rescue. They both reiterated support for asset purchases and the market did a sudden reversal overnight.

It was a case of Jim Dandy (Fed Presidents) Halt a Taper Tantrum and Coordinate a Stock Market Rescue. Click on the link for an excellent musical video.

Working Marvelously!

The Fed’s trial taper talk balloon fell flat but reverse repos are working marvelously!

Without getting the market upset with taper talk, the Fed just took back the last 8.27 months of QE!

If that was the Fed’s goal, Reverse Repos are indeed “working really well”, “as designed”, and “as expected”. 

Lies, Hopeful Bluff, or a Plan?

Other than Powell’s statement, it all fits the picture even if Williams was making it up. Was it a big set of lies or a confidence game bluff by Williams with a lucky result, or was this the fallback taper plan all along? 

I am fond of asking the question: Are these people really that stupid or is something else going on? Fans of “something else” have a possible explanation. Occam’s Razor believers may vote for door number one with a lucky twist. 

Regardless, given that the Fed wants and needs asset bubbles to continue, it’s a marvelous result for the Fed, huge tapering with no consequences (yet anyway).

That only leaves Powell’s statement “thereby supporting the flow of credit to households and businesses” to deal with. And that’s a clear, purposeful lie.

For further discussion of bank lending, please see Charts That Should Scare the Pants Off the Fed (And Probably Do)

Addendum Tweets

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
I added this clarification
The Fed’s QE program is accomplished by outright purchases (but that is effectively the same a short term repos continually applied).
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
“(but that is effectively the same a short term repos continually applied).”
It’s not because the interest rate won’t necessarily be the same. The Fed is exposed to rising rates. They’re funding fixed rate term debt with short term variable rate debt.
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
2 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
“They’re funding fixed rate term debt with short term variable rate debt.”
The so-called debt is just reserve liabilities.  It’s not variable rate debt.  It’s not even debt; it’s just a liability of undefined duration.  At any rate, the Fed sets that interest rate (IORB – Interest on Reserve Balances; formerly called IORR and IOER) and can lower the rate or even set it to 0.  It is not subject to market forces.
Reserve liabilities can only leave the system if the Fed does something to remove them or there is heavy public demand for cash.  Otherwise they circulate within the Federal Reserve system.  Just one of numerous incentives to get rid of cash.  Eliminate cash and the Fed has complete control over reserves.  Edit:  Not totally true as what the Treasury does with its General Account will also have an effect, but generally only over short periods of time.
Price hits to their security portfolio due to rising rates isn’t going to matter unless they decide to sell.   Otherwise they will just hold to maturity and receive par.
The Fed can go negative equity and it is mostly meaningless (this is true even in the companies.  PM is an example of this).  The Fed would have to take an absolutely monstrous hit AND the public would have to rush to cash before this might become problematic under the way the system operates, which can always be changed
If the Fed does sell and take hits they can always recover the losses over time by retaining more of their interest earnings instead of remitting them to the Treasury.  To do this they might need a law change, be granted an exemption or the requirement to remit to Treasury may be ignored without anyone doing anything about it.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  RedQueenRace
Thanks for the detailed reply. Maybe I should have said “they’re funding fixed rate term bonds with variable rate liabilities”. 
The Reserve Liabilities do pay a variable interest rate. A quick look at the history of the rates shows they were at nearly 2.5% a few years ago. link to fred.stlouisfed.org
Bonds purchased are fixed rate. It’s not necessary to sell them to generate a loss. If the interest rate on the IOER rises enough, (regardless of the cause) the Fed would incur a loss over the life of the bond. I wasn’t suggesting this was likely, only that it’s a possibility.
My main point however is that purchasing bonds via QE is not the same as short term repos continually applied because they are at different terms and rates.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
don’t try to understand this stuff.  go long s&p500 and relax on the beach.  be careful of sharks, though.
thimk
thimk
2 years ago
Jim Dandy  sleeping at the wheel . Plenty of money , no one wants/needs/enabled  to borrow. 
“Jim Dandy in a submarine
Got a message from a mermaid queen(JP Morgan,BOA  et al) 
She was hangin’ from a fishin’ line
Jim Dandy didn’t waste no time
Jim Dandy to the rescue
Go, Jim Dandy”   — actual lyrics. 
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
2 years ago
“The Fed’s QE program is accomplished by repos.”
QE is an outright purchase, not a repo.
Here are the QE operations.  One took place today.
Note the “Outright Coupon Purchase.”  That means it is not a repo.
Schedules and links to the details are here: 
Here are the Repo and Reverse Repo Operations:
While you will see repos listed note that the amounts submitted and accepted are 0.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  RedQueenRace
Same thing, effectively
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
 Only if the Fed continually rolls the repos over.
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
2 years ago
Reply to  RedQueenRace
Ok.  Missed your post above that states this.  The time to edit my post and acknowledge that has expired.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
The explanation is simple. Better for the banks to collect 0.05% interest than nothing.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Why, sometimes the Fed believes as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
On the inflation v. deflation argument, my friend Dan A. has penned a thought provoking article. He is working on a new book. I always get a little depressed when I read his stuff…..but he really gets how financial repression works to rob ordinary people of their hard-earned wealth. Wonky and dense, but worth it imho, FYI, fwiw.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“…but he really gets how financial repression works to rob ordinary people of their hard-earned wealth.”
Wealth redistribution. In other wealth redistribution news, senator Diane Feinstein is putting her Lake Tahoe property up for sale at $41 million.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
I saw that. Talk about coming to do good and staying to do well. It’s fairly obscene.
When I see people like Pelosi and Feinstein, it just takes me remember how the country is really run by these powerful elites who are really the same….no matter which side of the aisle they’re on. 
Remember the shooting at city hall that made her nationally famous? When Moscone and Milk were murdered by Dan White? My friend Mike Phillips recently wrote a piece about it. I think I was a freshman in college. Time gets by.
Curious-Cat
Curious-Cat
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The country is run by people without skin in the game. Just like every other country.
Call_Me
Call_Me
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Don’t agree that the pols necessarily run things, but their positions are certainly good for their welfare and that of their entourages.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Gold and silver appear to have completed swing lows. Technically the pressure looks to be to the upside for the next several days. If I were long though, I’d be cautious.  The dollar is still in a daily uptrend, but just barely. 
In Katusa’s book, he has a chapter in the appendix that should be of interest to longer term investors in the mining sector. Mining and energy are his areas of expertise. He lays out exactly how he does his own DD. I have not read it in it’s entirety yet, but it looks interesting. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Pretty good chapter on SWAP lines and repos in Katusa’s book. Just read that last night. Not being a banker I need to review how all that works from time to time. 
Too much BS
Too much BS
2 years ago
What the FED has been doing is taking from the working class, savers, retirees, and families working to pay off mortgages & loans and funneled all their efforts to create  high rollers loaded with extreeme debt.    
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Too much BS
We may start calling it Robbin FED, or FED Hoods.
brian henry
brian henry
2 years ago
FED just tried to destroy US with lies, the author is correct, they lied!
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
It works really well for the banks. Not so much for anybody else. 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I am not sure if banks wouldn’t prefer fatter spreads. The daily return on RRP is 0.00015%, a computer rounding error.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.