Energy Crunch in Europe With New Record Prices and Wind Stops Blowing

Europe’s Energy Crunch Deepens

“If it’s a cold winter, there’s not enough supply” says Amos Hochstein, the U.S. State Department’s envoy for energy security.

And as the energy crunch deepens the U.S. Warns Europe Isn’t Doing Enough.

With about a month to go before the start of the heating season, Europe doesn’t have enough natural gas in storage sites and isn’t building inventories fast enough either. Amos Hochstein, the U.S. State Department’s envoy for energy security, said on Friday he was worried about supplies this winter.

Gas stockpiles in Europe are already at the lowest level in more than a decade for this time of year, pushing up the cost of producing electricity. The rally in European energy prices is just a taste of what’s to come for other commodities, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said in a report.

“European energy pricing dynamics offer a glimpse of what is in store for other commodity markets, with widening deficits and depleting inventories leading to elevated price volatility,” said Goldman analysts including Jeff Currie. For European gas, “demand destruction is the only option to rebalance markets,” they said.

Wind Stops Blowing and Prices Soar

The Wall Street Journal reports Energy Prices in Europe Hit Records After Wind Stops Blowing

Natural gas and electricity markets were already surging in Europe when a fresh catalyst emerged: The wind in the stormy North Sea stopped blowing.

The episode underscored the precarious state the region’s energy markets face heading into the long European winter. The electricity price shock was most acute in the U.K., which has leaned on wind farms to eradicate net carbon emissions by 2050. Prices for carbon credits, which electricity producers need to burn fossil fuels, are at records, too.

It took a lot of people by surprise,” said Stefan Konstantinov, senior energy economist at data firm ICIS, of the leap in power prices. “If this were to happen in winter when we’ve got significantly higher demand, then that presents a real issue for system stability.

At their peak, U.K. electricity prices had more than doubled in September and were almost seven times as high as at the same point in 2020. Power markets also jumped in France, the Netherlands and Germany.

Prices for power to be dispatched the next day rocketed to £285 a megawatt hour in the U.K. when wind speeds dropped last week, according to ICIS. That is equivalent to $395 a megawatt hour and marked a record on figures going back to 1999.

After the wind dropped this month, National Grid asked Électricité de France SA to restart its West Burton A coal power station in Nottinghamshire. That won’t be possible in the future: The government has said all coal plants must close by late 2024.

Praying for a Warm Winter and NG From Russia

The irony of this setup is astounding. 

The US is moaning Europe isn’t doing enough when it seems like they have done too much. 

Now Europe is praying for a warm winter and more natural gas production from Russia. 

Meanwhile, the price of power is up sevenfold in the UK. 

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? If you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

55 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jefex
Jefex
4 years ago
Thank You for sharing this useful and great information. Regards. https://techvizd.com/
PostCambrian
PostCambrian
4 years ago
There is nothing to prevent having natural gas fired power plants as backups to renewables. Someone just needs to pay the standby costs. However the situation shows the folly of the “deregulated” energy production market. California was the first to find this out in the year before Enron went bankrupt. It is much better to pay a utility a guaranteed price to provide power than to be subject to the extreme fluctuations of the supply market. As Texas found out, one week of electricity shortages can wipe out the savings of five years of electricity surplus. A well regulated utility can plan for providing power in almost all circumstances for a steady price using hedging of fuel costs and a known rate of return. If you want to rely on the lowest price then you get low when the going is good and extreme ripoff when the going is bad.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
CPI is more and more like  A TOOL TO FOOL A FOOL …
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
BUY russian Ruble, a undervalued currency from a practically debt free nation, with considerable military power, unlimited resources and a increasingly sophisticated economy… the latter thanks to US imposed sanctions btw … 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Many better places to put your money.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
It s callled diversification Doug…whether right or wrong …only the future will tell.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
You can put a bit into it just for a punt. The only thing holding the country together is Putin which makes it not very attractive.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I am not averse of taking some risk occasionally…in 1998 when Russia was allegedly bankrupt and defaulting I bought souvereign russian US $ bonds with a 12% coupon,  far below par (55%) …..dunno whether it was merely beginners luck but I sold the same bond in 2001 above pari…The same story in 2014 when the US orchestrated coup in Ukraine took place and Russia reacted with a unexpected disguised (yet fully justified) military action in Donbas  and the final(equally justified) annexation  of Crimea, events that tumbled the Ruble dramatically in a matter of weeks with russian souvereign Ruble bonds to be picked up ridiculously cheap…and that s what I did ….The Ruble kept on dwindling but seems to be stabilizing and gaining in recent months so I am quite fine still …..Btw : don t invest money you can not afford to lose …  🙂  I seem to remember  I have told this story before, maybe not to you directly but definitely on this blog, have I not ?  Well, whatever, it is the truth nothing but the truth so help me ….Putin  !  Putain …Lol !
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Back in 1990’s I had friends that bought the old bonds issued in France by the Czar’s government. They put a lot in and Russia endedd up redeeming them at a discount. They made money but not as much as they thought. Still it was a very interesting trade.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
  • I am paying the same rates for electricity and gas as last year.
  • I have heard nothing about the wind not blowing — the summer has not been particularly mild or wind-fre;
    I’m on a bicycle daily, so I do notice.
  • Not a word about the Dutch shutting down Slochteren/Groningen, the biggest traditional source of natural gas.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Russia has been fulfilling its contracts. Lot of media already trumpeting that his is Putin putting pressure on the West, ignoring trivial facts such as contracts.
CristiC
CristiC
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Let’s not waste a single lie to bash Russia. I refuel at Lukoil and I’m happy to show the finger to liberals.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Ben jij nederlander ? …if you don’t mind me asking.. not everbody’s whereabouts are as obvious as mine …well, with a 20 kms ‘lying margin’ let s say, but the name of my village would not ve sound a bell(gium)   That being said, gas exploration in my neighbouring country is causing serious landsubsidence and subsequent liabilities, which might explain the shutting down of dutch natural gas resources, I think.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
A long term effect of global warming is going to be lower winds. Contrary to popular belief, there will be less weather. Not more.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I have never seen anything like that. More energy means generally more wind and moisture. It means shifting circulation patterns, and more drought (evaporation!) as well as more rainfall, but not necessarily in the same places! One of the more prominent effects is interruption of the polar vortex, causing cold air to swoop down in temperate zones periodically and hot air to push up in the arctic, as well as stalling out weather systems that normally move along from the south west with prevailing winds.
Think of it like a pan to boil your eggs. What happens if you turn up the heat? More steam and more vigorous action in the water.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
The driver for some winds is the difference between the arctic and equatorial temperatures. As has been pointed out, the arctic is heating up more than the tropics, so there is less of a temperature difference driving weather systems. And the biggest effect will be in the north, like Europe north of Spain. 
The northern US has been seeing weather systems stall in place for extended times more recently as well. 
Going back, SE Washington has a large area of loess hills, (the Palouse)  which are dirt piles blown in place during the last ice age when winds were notably stronger than at present. The arctic was colder then, but the tropics were not really colder than now, so the temperature difference was larger, driving more winds. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Winds are driven by pressure differences. Our atmosphere behaves like an ideal gas, so temperature and pressure are proportional to each other. If there’s less of a temperature difference between 2 air masses, there will be less of a pressure difference. Which means less wind. Global warming will result in more uniform temperatures across the globe. Particularly at night.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
And the US is adamantly opposed to Nord stream 2. Why should the US care what route European gas takes? Does it matter if the gas goes through Ukraine or under the Baltic Sea? The Bidens were paid a lot of money by Burisma. A big Ukrainian gas company. Must just be a coincidence. Trump was also opposed. He wanted to protect US gas exports. Which is a better reason IMO.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“The US” doesn’t care at all. Some US politicians, and fellow traveling profiteers, like to appear opposed to whatever Russia does. Ditto Russian politicians wrt the US. In both cases, the goal is simply to scare their captive indoctrinati into granting them more power; in exchange for protection from yet another in the endless stream of imaginary hobgoblins.
Also, Israel don’t want competition for, and wants greater European dependence on, East Med gas…
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Marin Katusa has some intereting takes on oil companies and renewable enegy ones. 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
In France we have lots of nuclear energy and the lagest eslectricity exporter in Europe and its output doesn’t depend on the weather. When the wind drops and the sun doen’t shine EDF make a mint selling at the spot rate.
CristiC
CristiC
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
“An analysis by energy consultants Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Smith, forecast that the emissions from nuclear power could ultimately rival those from natural gas. But this high estimate is a clear outlier among the results shown in the IPCC assessment, and this was largely because it assumed that uranium mines will need to be fully restored to “greenfield sites” – something that most analysts have not considered necessary.”
CO2 from the nuclear power is not as green as some would like to paint them. It is equal to gas. Which is fine, but I prefer gas and combined with hydrogen instead of nuclear. is much safer. Much safer.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  CristiC
Personally I prefer generating electricity by millions of hamsters running inside wheels. It’s much more ecological.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Good time to buy a Bolt. Chevy has ‘em for sale in my market for 11K off sticker for 2021’s….and you might beat that, since Chevy has recalled ALL year models…and some people are very pissed. It looks like a minor issue to me, and one that will get fixed.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Hehehe. I checked and the dealers are not being allowed to sell the cars in stock because they can’t get the LG batteries to replace he defective one. Supply chain issue. lol.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Europe doesn’t have an energy problem.  They have an energy storage problem.

Nearly all great scientific advances came as a result of stress on the system.  Then people got busy and innovated their way out of the problem.  This will prove to be no different.  

There is an energy revolution happening now and there are some bumps along the way.  Europe’s problem with not being able to store wind and sun for later is solveable and I believe it will be fixed.  High prices will provide some motivation along the way.  A few riots and smashed buildings over high energy prices will also provide some impetus.

Capitalism works when allowed to.  All we are seeing is the beginning of capitalism at work: Motivation.  Let’s hope Europe doesn’t squish it.

There are many promising energy storage systems, I look forward to the future development of them.

CristiC
CristiC
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
Maybe, but I think it is also true that the cheapest form of energy for heating is burning wood. Centuries have passed and this is still the cheapest, despite outstanding innovation in the other forms. This should give you a template for how things will evolve. Yes, some problems will be fixed (like the storage). The cost however will be huge. Be prepared.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  CristiC
Would it still be the cheapest if we all started using it? I seem to remember timber became very expensive a few months ago.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  CristiC
I heat with wood.  I even sell firewood out of my driveway.

There are some serious problems with everyone using wood.

There isn’t enough of it.  If everyone burned it you also have massive pollution.  There’s a reason you can’t burn wood in downtown San Fran.  
I live in rural NC, so no problem with wood supply and venting here.

It’s completely free heat to me (minus the labor to gather, cut, split, stack, move inside, actually burn, dispose of the ashes….never mind, it’s extremely expensive time wise.)

CristiC
CristiC
4 years ago
Reply to  CristiC
Agreed with both of you. I think it is not fair to compare world population from 100 years ago with the one today and the industry.
So we should compare individual costs for those who buy wood for heating vs those that use electric power or gas for the same purpose, individuals, not industries. The wood is cheapest.
Unfortunately, the industry is in the forest already. Most of the renewable energy in EU is from biomass.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  CristiC
Burning wood is not a cheap source of energy if you have to meet clean air standards.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
There’s no cheap and easy way to store electricity. And there won’t be for several decades or longer.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
You don’t store the excess electricity directly. Instead you store as future energy on demand. You can currently do that via:
1) Batteries
2) Water (pump water uphill and then later allow to flow downhill to generate hydro power)
3) Hydrogen (separate water via electrolysis then later recombine to generate power)
There will probably be other similar technologies developed in the coming decades.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Normally I agree with you.  You are completely off base here.
There’s tons of ways to store electricity.

Some have already been mentioned.  Also hydrogen fuel cells are better than ever (but dangerous still).  There’s also some really cool, innovative weight movement things being developed (like a giant rock being pulled up and down to store power).  These things are practical and cheap now.  I expect to see them be commercialized soon.  In some places they already are, especially when geography helps them (like natural depressions to store water).

StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
“like a giant rock being pulled up and down to store power”
There are very little (not NONE. Little) in the way of “economies of scale” regarding the size of rock (once past a fairly small one). If this was an efficient means of storing energy, People would swap out their backup generator for one of those rock elevators…. In reality, losses from mechanical to electrical energy are pretty bad at any scale. Mostly mechanical drag, which is often discounted by those who claim crazy high efficiencies for hydro turbines etc. If wind or solar energy were cheap enough, that wouldn’t much matter. But they aren’t cheap at all, compared to what goes into one of those little Hondas.
Eventually, that will change: Fossil fuel gets scarcer, and wind/solar more efficient. But for now, the two are quite far apart (At least outside of Lebanon….)
The low hanging fruit, is better insulated buildings (and clothes…). And increased freedom, for everyone, to live where it makes sense. But that would require knocking down, and replacing with something remotely decent and competently built, the junk which the Fed’s favored useful idiots have been told to uncritically regurgitate is their “smart investments.” Which we can’t have in our little by-idiots-for-idiots financialized dystopia, now can we?
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“After the wind dropped this month, National Grid asked Électricité
de France SA to restart its West Burton A coal power station in
Nottinghamshire. That won’t be possible in the future: The government
has said all coal plants must close by late 2024
.”
I’m sure the government can change their mind on that, if a push comes to a shove.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
“I’m sure the government can change their mind on that, if a push comes to a shove.”
Can, and will.
Hence why only the truly dumb and naive, pays even the most rudimentary attention to “climate goals,” bans on real cars and similar drivel. People competent enough to can, do. Leaving only the not so, to stand around making grand proclamations about all the PC things other people must do, sometime in the future.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Allocating huge amounts of resources to clean  energy output modalities that, per se (word of the day) are highly  dependent on  ideal  weather conditions and subject to  climate change puts my mind into a loop . I need to  abend the program and reboot.  /s     
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
The resources are being allocated to consumption by the Fed’s army of useful and well connected idiots. Not anything else. And that’s the whole point of the exercise. “The Climate” is just the currently fashionable dogs and ponies for accomplishing that redistribution.
vboring
vboring
4 years ago
Yeah, if you want to eliminate emissions and not force people to die in the cold, the list of options is 1) nuclear energy, 2) see option 1.
“Nuclear is expensive” – that is a choice. Expensive regulations are expensive. Korea and China have safe, affordable nuclear power because their regulations are more rational. Talk to anyone who has ever worked at a nuclear plant. 5% of the regulations provide all of the safety. The other 95% just add cost.
We can choose to do better.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
CPI is lower than expected…..fancy that….and when you take out food, energy, and rent, things are just downright affordable. Party on.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
France will sell power to the rest of Europe and clean up, at least financially speaking. They’r 70% nukes and the world’s largest net exporter of electricity.
They have pledged to reduce their nukes 50% by 2035. Fat f***kin’ chance of that. It will not happen.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I’m all for nuclear power plants in the US too – as long as the nuclear waste is stored in a “secure” facility in the richest zip code in the state where the power plant is located.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I am for the new generation of nukes….but we still need to phase out the old ones. which represent a real threat long term
Hopefully we will soon be burning much of our old waste inside new reactors. I think that is possible and desirable. I don’t fault France for pursuing an energy policy that made perfect sense for them, but the fast breeder reactors gotta go. They were never a good idea to anybody but the US Congress, who gave them to us.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Those fast breeder reactors were always to ensure there was a ready supply of material for making Atomic bombs.
Other countries like Canada built reactors that were not designed to make bomb material. The US definitely needs to move to that model of reactor.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“I am for the new generation of nukes….but we still need to phase out the old ones. which represent a real threat long term”
Only in fantasies are “the new generation” safer than proven ones. How safe something is, is largely a function of how much experience one has with it.
If you mean reactors with decades of proven reliability, in great numbers, abroad; then fine. But some new-new magicum reactor; from a “venture funded” startup by refugees from Musk’s self driving team, and the usual assortment of dilettante offspring of Fed Welfare Queens paying “visionary” with money stolen from their betters by The Fed, not so much…. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Store it in the mountain in Nevada and tell the environmental wackos to go bleep themselves. Not perfect, but way safer than storing it on premises.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
We can put a giant windmill in your backyard if you prefer to be green.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Or under the state Capitol.
Dutoit
Dutoit
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
France in on the bad way, because the development program for nuclear energy based on thorium has been stopped. In the same time China is about to develop and commercialize thorium reactors.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
Sorry to hear the thorium project is off. It would be huge if somebody got one built that works. I have no idea how likely that is ,but my guess is that it’s a hell of a lot more likely than fusion.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Indeed
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
Would you buy a nuclear reactor built in China? Perhaps it would be better from a security point of view to have control over the whole construction process yourself. China can build some good things but in others there have been grave quality errors such as in the medical area that have killed not only their own people but Americans as well. 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

They won’t reduce nuclear but they do also build a lot of
wind farms and solar so in principle that could drop down to 50%. In my mind
that won’t happen. The government is planning to split EDF into two, the
nuclear and the renewables which EDF is also a major world player. The nuclear
part will be nationalized and the renewables will be split off and quoted
allowing it to have the valuation of that sector. In any case we do not have
brownouts and the prices are much less than in other European countries. 

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.