We are moving away from being a rule of law country. The consequences are showing and in the long term will be horrendous.
RonJ
2 years ago
“It is not within the bounds of the law to lie to Congress.”
That law doesn’t matter. I don’t expect to see Fauci prosecuted. He is one of the protected elites.
Doug78
2 years ago
Never used it. Never saw the need for it. So advertising revenue moved from local papers to FB and this is what we end up with?
anoop
2 years ago
do you want people to be able to share your blog on facebook?
Webej
2 years ago
Problem with prosecuting perjury and lying to congress is the same as always: Some are prosecuted, others get off scot free.
The same applies to Facebook policies.
And social media companies are always crawling behind their algorithms to pretend it’s all machine glitches when they are taking highly individual and personal actions.
People like to stress that the law=the law, or policy=policy, but those are the most brain dead tautologies possible.
Nothing but a way to make others shut up. The discretion that goes into who is prosecuted and who is not is in many respects more important than the laws themselves. Just as editorial bias is not so much in false news, but in what is ignored and what is promoted.
[I am against taking anything down that is not illegal and cannot be contested by judicial process.]
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
I don’t know anybody or visit blogs where Facebook isn’t shunned. Most people I interact with know it’s stolen goods and a serious data harvesting operation.
What does it say about the billions of Facebook users?
I still remember how my grandfather used to say occasionally, while judging situations, that 80 % of the population are plain idiots, the poor man died too early in 1974, the way things have evolved in recent decades, I d say we must by now have reached a 90% level(and ticking) of banal brainless fools… most of them FB users…
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Facebook is a symptom of our national disease…..but I fully expect it to continue to do exactly what it does….which is nothing good, particularly. But people love FB and they will have their FB. And Zuckerberg will mostly get whatever he wants out of government. Because money.
DennisAOK
2 years ago
Why not let anyone post anything? The reader can judge the veracity of each comment.
I’d argue that the government presence on those platform amounts to endorsement of it and as such should make it bound by free speech law, regardless of whether they are a ‘private platform’ or not.
Totalitarian governments have “presence” everywhere. It’s what totalitarian is all about.
All that these silly posturing achieves, is help Facebook maintain the illusion that it has any credibility whatsoever. Government, to the extent they have “presence” there, should leave. Not just Facebook, but every other piece of private media as well. Stick to .gov sites if they want to inform people of something. Then the private actors can spin and lie about what’s written there, to their hearts’ content.
None of the rest have any a priori credibility. They should all be assumed to be complete 100% useless liars. From Facebook to NYT to Pravda. And no government should make any effort whatsoever, aimed at de facto reassuring people that any of them is anything at all aside from full blown peddlers of nothing but self serving lies. Since self serving is their entire mission. And that does not change just because some totalitarian government and its kangaroo courts pretend to “police” them, hence give them some veneer of credibility.
Dude, all he “has done” is help create a Website……
Bungalow Bill
2 years ago
My problem is not with Facebook. It is what it is. If you go there, you agree to the terms to use their product. I have a bigger problem with the small government crowd who wants to crush this and other social media companies using the power of big government to do so (as they push for a Fairness Doctrine for social media after years of crying over the Fairness Doctrine) rather than close their accounts and allow the free market to shape the future of these platforms.
I closed my accounts last year and have found peace; although, I did enjoy the occasional conversation with authors like Mish.
There’s no possible way to maintain a presence on every single social media platform in order to give it the semblance of being fair – it’s just infeasible.
I would argue that no government entity or government-related entity should have accounts on these platforms because doing so implies endorsement of that platform by the government. That endorsement amounts to an unfair competitive advantage because the government is in effect playing favorites.
I have a bigger problem with the small government crowd who wants to crush this and other social media companies using the power of big government to do so (as they push for a Fairness Doctrine for social media after years of crying over the Fairness Doctrine) rather than close their accounts and allow the free market to shape the future of these platforms.
I closed my accounts last year and have found peace; although, I did enjoy the occasional conversation with authors like Mish.