German Prosecutor Hints Ukraine Blew Up the Nordstream Pipeline With C4 Explosives

Who Blew Up the Pipeline?

The New York Times comments Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Pipelines, U.S. Officials Say

New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines last year, a step toward determining responsibility for an act of sabotage that has confounded investigators on both sides of the Atlantic for months.

U.S. officials said there was much they did not know about the perpetrators and their affiliations. The review of newly collected intelligence suggests they were opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, but does not specify the members of the group, or who directed or paid for the operation.

Officials who have reviewed the intelligence said they believed the saboteurs were most likely Ukrainian or Russian nationals, or some combination of the two. U.S. officials said no American or British nationals were involved.

European officials have publicly said they believe the operation that targeted Nord Stream was probably state sponsored, possibly because of the sophistication with which the perpetrators planted and detonated the explosives on the floor of the Baltic Sea without being detected. 

Early last year, President Biden, after meeting with Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany at the White House, said Mr. Putin’s decision about whether to attack Ukraine would determine the fate of Nord Stream 2. “If Russia invades, that means tanks and troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2,” Mr. Biden said. “We will bring an end to it.”

When asked exactly how that would be accomplished, Mr. Biden cryptically said, “I promise you we’ll be able to do it.”

Mats Ljungqvist, a senior prosecutor leading Sweden’s investigation, told The New York Times late last month that his country’s hunt for the perpetrators was continuing.

“It’s my job to find those who blew up Nord Stream. To help me, I have our country’s Security Service,” Mr. Ljungqvist said. “Do I think it was Russia that blew up Nord Stream? I never thought so. It’s not logical. But as in the case of a murder, you have to be open to all possibilities.”

500 Pounds of C4 Explosives

Eurointelligence comments on 500 pounds of C4 Explosives 

Boris Pistorius [Germany’s Defense Minister] said yesterday that we don’t yet know whether this was a Ukrainian commando that acted with the knowledge of the Ukrainian government, a pro-Ukrainian group that acted without their knowledge, or whether it might have been a false flag operation. Until we know, we can’t speculate on the consequences.

What we find interesting in this comment is that he includes the notion of official Ukrainian involvement in the list of possibilities. From the information that has now been uncovered by the German public prosecutor, leaked to German media, is that this is was without a doubt a professional job. When people use professionally forged passports, and use 500 pounds of C4 explosives, you can pretty much rule out climate change protesters, who normally rely on super-glue as their weapon of choice, or hobby terrorists who watched too many James Bond or Die Hard films. What still baffles us about the information is that prosecutors were able to trace the rented yacht to Ukrainian owners. There are no shortages of yachts to rent in the German and Polish waters of the Baltic Sea. Why leave such an obvious clue?

There is still a lot we don’t know. In addition to the possibilities mentioned by Pistorius, there is also the possibility of a no-fingerprints operation: government agents that act on outside the direct line of command. But politically that would not make much difference. In other words, if this attack was not carried out by Russia, then it is very bad news for the western alliance.

With our knowledge of the German political systems, we doubt that it is possible to influence the investigation of the public prosecutor, in the way that this is possible in the US or the UK. It also makes us wonder why this information was leaked to the press. This is not something German prosecutors usually do. 

If it became known that a Ukrainian commando, or a US unit, were responsible for this, the political implication would be massive. Public pressure would grow to stop supplying arms to Ukraine. If the US was responsible, it would endanger the recent renaissance of transatlantic relations.

Surprised?

None of this is surprising to me. I didn’t think Russia was responsible in the first place. It never made sense that Russia would do this. 

Then again, no one knows how twisted minds think. Perhaps it is a Russia false flag operation.

Nothing would surprise me given US meddling everywhere including tapping Angela Merkel’s phone, CIA plots to kill Julian Assange, and of course the Gulf of Tonkin incident that got the US involved in the Vietnam War.

What is C-4?

C-4 or Composition C-4 is a common variety of the plastic explosive family known as Composition C.  The Naked Scientist reports, “You can’t find Composition 4 at your local hardware store, but it’s easy to make your own.”

I read the instructions. You are likely to get yourself killed if you try to make it at home.

After someone acquired or made 500 pounds of this stuff, they then had to get it to the bottom of the sea, set a detonator and then get away. 

Speculation

Assume for a minute it was Ukraine. Did they have outside help? 

Somehow Eurointelligence knows professionally forged passports were in play. That’s nothing that appeared in any US reports that I could find. 

All we know for sure is this was not done by amateurs. 

Other than that, we only know what they want us to know, assuming of course the details they tells us are even accurate. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

98 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mjs357
Mjs357
3 years ago
Benghazi and the Arab Spring were started because of an anti-Mohammad video; The virus came from bat soup; We are in the strongest economy in US history; Jan 6 was an insurrection; I have a million of these…..We’re not sure if what we shot down were UFOs
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
“Pro-Ukrainian group”? Isn’t NATO a group that is (supposedly) supporting Ukraine?
John k
John k
3 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Why, yes. Nato is a pro-Ukraine group. As is the us state dept (including Nuland, who sent the message ‘it’s done’), White House, us military (including navy seals) etc.
They’re just trolling us. My guess is that if anything in Hersh’ story is false, it’s that Norway is involved, granted they made maybe 100 billion in additional profit selling gas to eu.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Important to note “Pro-Ukrainian group” is not Ukraine.
Sifting through the comments below, and of course, all kindsa whacky conspiracy theories.
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
This is wrong. NY Times writes that there is no information YET.
“U.S. officials said that they had no evidence President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine or his top lieutenants were involved in the operation, or that the perpetrators were acting at the direction of any Ukrainian government officials”
Get your act together…. start learning to read.
“US officials have said that there are no firm conclusions about it, leaving open the possibility that the operation might have been conducted off the books by a proxy force with connections to the Ukrainian government or its security services.”
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Charlie_
That’s my point exactly.
I think it was Russia, an oligarch at least, it would make sense that they’d leave behind cookie crumbs to make it look like Ukrainians, the E.U. or U.S.
An Oligarch could easily place massive positions in natural gas futures ahead of it, fund an experienced mercenary to do it, then make billions off the spike.
michiganmoon
michiganmoon
3 years ago
It seems like the US did it and is trying to point fingers. People in the Biden Administration said Russia blowing up the pipeline was an act of war. So why wouldn’t Ukraine doing it be one? Unless we’re just obfuscating our own culpability.
A Dose of Reality 5
A Dose of Reality 5
3 years ago
The broken window. A net loss to the world and European society as a whole due to the decisions of a few elite. Many will suffer.
Dr Funkenstein
Dr Funkenstein
3 years ago
Pro-Ukrainian group. In other words Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Victoria Nuland and Lloyd Austin. The 21st century’s Gang of Four.
Tedwardspharmd
Tedwardspharmd
3 years ago
And….this whole media coverage is the oldest play in the playbook. Ukraine couldn’t blow up a straw out of a 7-11 big gulp
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
Reply to  Tedwardspharmd
Here is a question….. Why would Ukraine blow up a pipeline in the EXCLUSIVE waters of Sweden, pipeline that was owned 50% by Germany who was begged to donate tanks and heavy weapons….. when they could have simply turned off their own land pipelines. The MSM really thinks their readers are all stupid. It is far too easy to bomb a land pipeline in Ukraine and blame it on Russians. Then, the war would delay the repairs. Than to dive at 100 m under the sea , in uncharted waters, under the sonar of NATO countries and in the exclusive zone of Sweden, nearby another pipeline from Norway to Poland….. MSM really thinks the Westerns are stupid.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Charlie_
The MSM isn’t reporting it as anything more than you just did., just what we’re talking about here, a “Pro Ukraine group” did it.
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Why would not the “pro ukrainian” partisans attack an easier target? They had 100s of Javelins to attack the land pipeline. And nobody would knew who did it.
Tedwardspharmd
Tedwardspharmd
3 years ago
This is laughable! Ukraine blows up pipeline! We blew that pipeline sky high. We are the only ones with the means and certainly the motive. Hell, Biden said he was going to blow it up before we blew it up: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FVbEoZXhCrM
It was the only way to take the energy blackmail of Germany off the table and, with that, NATO fully aligned. With Germany afraid of Nuclear, Russian oil was going to be too much of a political risk for the U.S. We said we were going to do it before we did it!
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
If this were actually true, we would have every detail. We would have had every detail the day it happened. It’s just another anonymous source NYT propaganda campaign.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
There are no leads. None of this disinformation can even be entered as evidence in a court.
The whole MSM including the NYT has assiduously ignored (not even mentioned) the Sy Hersh story.
None have even questioned the Putin-did-it mantra, but suddenly the mantra evaporates.
So after a secretive Biden-Scholz summit we see German and American “intelligence” pursuing the same strategy with regards to Nord-Stream and the Hersh story: They have suddenly come up with various leads sourced from anonymous intel, and the whole MSM is atwitter with excitement at new leads, though nothing conclusive.
This is all co-ordinated BS, deflection, and misinformation
But there are some take-aways:
  • The whole MSM is still aboard, nobody is asking any questions, like how this all could have been imputed to Putin the past half year, all in consummate agreement that the canonical narrative must come from official investigations by anonymous intel assets. O, and they’re still talking about how vulnerable all this infrastructure is and how we have to shore it up against attacks by Russia/China, even if it’s the Americans that are doing it.
  • Scholz is in on the plot, but feels threatened by the narrative ungluing.
  • Rather than have NATO blown up by this act of war and international terrorism, Ukraine is getting thrown under the bus, the sacrificial lamb to ‘save’ NATO, but also setting the stage to justify withdrawing the infinite support for Ukraine because they’ve now supposedly been shown to be unworthy bad guys for the ‘international rules-based order’. Expect more in this vein.
It’s like the Skripal tale (Pablo Miller, Christopher Steele’s partner at Orbis and MI6 Moscow ex-bureau chief, neighbor and handler to Skripal in Salisbury, censored from news by D-notices from those on high): For insiders, a test of loyalty; For the rest, an IQ test or alternatively, a supercilious, contemptuous, humiliating taunt from those with the power to establish the narrative, regardless how incredible and impossible.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
It is a social experiment wrapped in a psyop. You can neatly figure out what portion of the population has no two functioning braincells between their ears.
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
The synchronized manner in which US, Germany and UK launched three articles full of smoke, no names, low credibility investigations is similar to Colin Powell in the UN Assembly meeting raising a small bottle full of “chemical weapon of mass destruction”. Did anyone thought about “really, will anyone bring a toxic powder inside UN Meeting”? No, none…. Same here…
Hersh investigation is where the truth should be searched. US, Biden, Nuland and Norway are the criminals.
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
Reply to  Charlie_
Remember this?
“September 29, 2022 – Former CIA Director John Brennan on Wednesday told CNN he believes the leaks were a result of sabotage, most likely by Russia. Gerhard Schindler, the former head of Germany’s federal intelligence agency, told a German paper this week that Russia is the most likely the perpetrator of the leaks.”
The same people that now put the blame on Ukraine.
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
Reply to  Charlie_
Remember this?
“But the fact remains that two undersea pipelines have been ruptured in a 24-hour period. They are designed to be tough: each section of the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, the company’s literature says, has a steel case 27 to 41mm thick, in turn surrounded by a concrete coating of 60 to 110mm.

One of the explosions measured 2.3 on the Richter scale, which Danish experts described as in line with a powerful bomb from the second world war. It is not therefore an entirely trivial incident, whose consequences were tellingly being talked up by senior Russian figures on Tuesday.”

POWERFUL BOMB multiplied by four, and carried on a small yacht….. this is even more silly than Collin Powell showing white powder to the UN without wearing gloves and HAZMAT suit.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
Remember that a “Pro-Ukrainian” group is not necessarily tied to the current Ukraine government. Think of it like a political Super PAC here that can collect unlimited money and run ads on behalf of a candidate that the candidate may not necessarily approve of.
——-
Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Pipelines, U.S. Officials Say
New intelligence reporting amounts to the first significant known lead about who was responsible for the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines that carried natural gas from Russia to Europe.
Published March 7, 2023
WASHINGTON — New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines last year, a step toward determining responsibility for an act of sabotage that has confounded investigators on both sides of the Atlantic for months.
U.S. officials said that they had no evidence President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine or his top lieutenants were involved in the operation, or that the perpetrators were acting at the direction of any Ukrainian government officials.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
pro-Ukrainian group includes any group aligned with the mainstream West. They would all be pro Ukranian. Even if not Ukranian.
Regardless, the interesting question isn’t really exactly who did this one. But rather whether blowing up a highly contentious, closely watched, close to the shores of 2 on-alert “developed” pipeline, can in fact be done by 5 guys in a yacht; instead of requiring Mossad involvement.
If the former: Offshore pipelines were, I suppose, another one of those quaint dreams held by the same naifs who also thought “social democracy” and fascism somehow differed because, eh, because what????
If the latter, the Mossad was involved. The rest of them don’t possess the combined competence to tie their shoes by now. And even if they, against all odds, should have lucked out; they’d be running around babbling about it on “social media,” while bragging about a “book deal” on Oprah.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
500 pounds of C4 explosives
Up until now I’ve continually been reading half a ton, 500 kg, so close to 1000 lbs
Charlie_
Charlie_
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
It is impossible to carry this kind of explosive in what is NATO Baltic Sea…. Have you tried to approach an american naval base with that much load?
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
There were two detonations detected seismically, 17 hours apart.
Estimated by NORSAR to have explosive force of respectively 190-320 and 650-900 kg TNT (divide by 1.18 for C4).
Three of the four strings were ruptured. There were 4 plumes, wildly divergent in radius.
Whole sections of the pipeline (250m) were destroyed, which means there were two explosions at some distance on the same pipe.
The pipelines were destroyed at the last point where they still ran parallel in deep water, before diverging and going to shallow waters.
The pipelines were buried in a trench, varying in depth depending on the location and geology.
At the point of destruction, the pipelines were buried and covered about 1½ meters deep.
To cut the steel, you need shaped charges (hence C4) placed on the steel.
This means removing the 4.3″ concrete mantel which is buried in a trench, then placing the charges.
The charges need to be placed at 8 points to destroy the intervening section of pipe.
In total, we are looking at quite likely more than a ton (1000kg) of explosive charges.
»» This is not some sort of scuba diving (need decompression and suits for the cold water) exercise you do on a lark (digging out 4 pipelines at 8 points, remove the concrete, attach the charges and detonators). ««
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Thank you very much.
My only quibble is that some shaped charges should cut through concrete then steel just fine.
Typical stand-off distances are more than 4.3″.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
And a water jet can remove the mud in no time.
Thetenyear
Thetenyear
3 years ago
Joe Biden: “There will no longer be a Nord Stream 2”.
Also Joe Biden: “We will bring an end to it”
A grinning Joe Biden: “I promise you we will be able to do it (bring an end to the pipeline)”.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Thetenyear
And I thought that Putin had a big mouth.
Like the Russkies, the US now has its own Uncle Joe.
And in the wings – Bid’n Harris.
Thetenyear
Thetenyear
3 years ago
Reply to  Thetenyear
Hapless Mainstream Media: Couldn’t have possibly been the United States.
Thetenyear
Thetenyear
3 years ago
Reply to  Thetenyear
Should we believe Tony Blinken who awarded a woman’s medal to a man yesterday?
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
German Prosecutor Hints Ukraine Blew Up the Nordstream Pipeline With C4 Explosives
Boris Pistorius, Germany’s Defense Minister, leaked some details of the Nord Stream pipeline explosion. One of the possibilities is the Ukrainian government.
Your clickbait headline is discordant. The first sentence sounds like a proven statement but then the 3rd sentence states this is only a “one of the possibilities”.
This is how misinformation gets propagated on the internet. Someone will only read the first sentence and then start posting this unproven statement. If you’re not part of the solution, then you’re part of the problem. You can do better Mish.
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Mish does this nudge nudge wink wink thing all the time, but always leaves himself wiggle room to say he never made the claim. “I’m just asking questions” etc. It’s pretty transparent.
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Russia relies on useful fools in the US media (and right wing) to buy their disinfo. Don’t be one, Mish. Zero hedge will rot your brain… How do you justify publishing with them to yourself?
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Cataldi
Just stick with the Deep State imposed CNN narrative then and everything is hunky dory….at least for you anyway ….not for people with a couple of braincells cells left though ….or even with a half one, like me ….
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
Sure, comrade 😀
Toutatis
Toutatis
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Cataldi
The Russian disinformation about Hunter Biden’s laptop is enough. You are right
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Cataldi
Who are the names of the useful idiots Russia relies on?
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
….the US of A is at this very moment orchestrating another ‘Maidan’ revolution ….in Georgia this time , ….there was also a thwarted car bombing in Transnistria …..The US of A is one f hell of a sacred , exceptional demockratic example for the f world , ain’ t it ….?
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
Sure they are, comrade
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Cataldi
Do you work for the CIA or DOD?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
People love these ‘whodunnits’ especially when it’s never 100% clear who did it.
Look at the MH17 flight that got shot down over Ukraine. We still don’t know for sure if it was Ukraine, Separatist Forces or Russia who did it. The best part is that you can make a case for any of them doing it and spark a lively debate.
Now we can do the same over Nord2 (Russia, US, Ukraine etc).
My guess is we never get the truth just like we never got it for MH17.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Like JFK, the origin of the term “conspiracy theory”.
Obviously Ukraine did it. On the last day of the trial, US satellite photo’s were presented (without prior announcement to the defense or the judge), proving that evidence had been withheld, proving that there was satellite evidence contrary to the claims, proving John Kerry had lied when he said the US had “seen” it, and supporting with extreme prejudice that exculpatory evidence was being withheld because it would indict Ukraine.
Toutatis
Toutatis
3 years ago
it is a ridiculous attempt to make forget the revelations of Seymour Hersch. This demonstrates above all where the Western press has fallen, which is no more than an appendage of the powers in place
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  Toutatis
Hmm, interesting grammar friend
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Which countries did not lose any invested capital and future cash flows?
Asking for a friend.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Qatar for example. Russia is obviously the one who loses the most but honestly invading Ukraine was a very bed decision also so Putin’s ability to judge risk/reward is already in doubt. He just could have made another very bad decision.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
The US had no skin in the game, except for maintaining imperialism and payments to well-connected “gas consultants.”
Should the pipeline have gone online Ukraine could have lost cash flow big time.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Obviously, the US and Ukraine had no skin in the game.
Russia would have simply closed the valves at the Russia end.
Germany could only watch.
Dave
Dave
3 years ago
This made me laugh. Crazy old Biden spilled the beans and now the US is pretending to be puzzled about who could have done this. I imagine the US military taking some Ukrainian soldiers into the ocean and guiding them through the entire process. “We didn’t do it.” Russia is really going to blow up their insanely expensive pipeline and go completely undetected?
nrm
nrm
3 years ago
Another 9/11. CIA.
Inside job by the world’s terrorists.
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  nrm
Sure comrade
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Germany did it.
LawrenceBird
LawrenceBird
3 years ago
Don’t drink the cool-aid Mish. Seriously this fable is even worse than Hersh’s. Take a look at far apart the explosions are for just one thing.
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird
Anyone who posts on zerohedge is gulping buckets of Kool aid already
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Cataldi
At least they’re not dumb enough to believe anything the NYT posts with ‘New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials’ in it.
LM2022
LM2022
3 years ago
Nato are unified against an external threat and are fully supporting Ukraine. Makes no sense for the US or the Ukrainians to do this.
But Russia? It fits their pattern to a T. They escalate, trying to drive a wedge between NATO allies, trying to damage the European economy right before winter and then they turn around and sell their oil elsewhere. Putin had no problems bombing apartment buildings and killing his own citizens, what’s an oil pipeline?
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
3 years ago
Reply to  LM2022
Exactly, show me a former kgb current dictator who poisons critics with polonium and I’ll show you a guy not to trust.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Cataldi
You are apparently gullible for stories planted in the MSM by nefarious intel agencies … no proof Putin ordered polonium.
The giveaway of any false flag is the use of unusual sure to be misattributed methods instead of a run of the mill accident.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
This is as nice a psyop as it gets. The question of the day is: if they can gaslight with such a simple and obvious story, what to think of other stories they cook up, and disseminate through regular outlets?
Who would have suspected the fingers of the CIA are so deep in the German establishment.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
From the article “the saboteurs were most likely Ukrainian or Russian nationals”
Not sure where you got your headline from that…
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
What the hell. They were Slavs, ok, untermenschen, not one of the master race.
dpy
dpy
3 years ago
The smoking gun of the US-led naval operation in the exact area involving subs and divers and what-not, just before the explosion, is being memory-holed by these new un-attributed conspiracy theories.
Dean2020
Dean2020
3 years ago
Reply to  dpy
And the fleet of US helicopters hovering over the area immediately after and blocking any others from entering the area as they removed debris.
WATERWIZ
WATERWIZ
3 years ago
Brandon already admitted the US did the deed….
ThePeej
ThePeej
3 years ago
Per Eugyppius, on Twitter, the story about Pistorius is mis-reported, is a nothing-burger.
Nonplused
Nonplused
3 years ago
Well, Ukraine is the only other party besides NATO (US) that has a strong motive. But it doesn’t pass. Unless the Ukrainians are children, they probably would have thought through the idea that if they blow up German pipelines, it isn’t going to help them get German tanks and other equipment. They could turn a very important ally against them. But I also have trouble believing the Ukrainians could have gotten in that area and done that thing without NATO noticing. If a dolphin swims through there they know about it. Either that or you have to conclude NATO is quite incompetent. So if Ukraine did it, they did it with NATO assistance or at least a blind eye.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
Haven spent some 10 years in the service, I’ve learned to expect incompetence from any military force regardless of the state power they serve. It sounds like the US seals to me. We’re longtime proponents of false flag operations.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Doesn’t really matter anymore. The pipes are gone and never coming back. Who and why will be for future history books like the Kennedy assassination.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
The system will be repaired and put into production at some time in the future.
If only to finance “reparations” for Ukraine.
The sunk costs are too great and the pipeline is too logical.
Putin will have nothing to do with this.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
It won’t happen soon and the pipes would have to be replaced since they have been in seawater too long now. Even with Putin gone it is very far from sure that the Europeans would trust Russia again to supply much energy to them haven been bitten once too much.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Aren’t the pipes always in the sea water???
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Not the insides. They are very delicate and a couple of weeks in seawater ruins them.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
They are surrounded by 3″ concrete, which protects them from both seawater and getting hit by things like anchors.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
4.3″
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
But now they are open to the sea at one end so that protection protects the outside and not the inside. They will have to be re-laid. Of course that depends on if there are customers willing to buy from Russia.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
When you come to think, of it , Europe has NEVER been ‘bitten’ by Russia in recent history. Europe, Nato=USA in particular has been ‘biting’ Russia big time ever since the fall of the iron curtain, if the EU now feels ‘bitten’ then it is merely a consequence of a bunch of puppies trying to bite a bear merely because its master, USof f* A told them to ….We ll see how it all pans out , not good anyway, as the situation does nothing but escalate thanks to the US of A with its deep state psychos in cahoots with its worthless UK vasal of course , the latter notoriously known as a f warmonger throughout history, especially so this time around with a social financial system on the brink of collapse and with war still being a socially acceptable excuse to send all liabilities through the cr*pper and have a reset at one point …..under the cover of a nuclear winter it will be this time , not so long from now, unless common sense still prevails. However, common sense is already a goner if you ask me ,so there goes our last hope….Bonne merde , je dirais .
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
You know that Belgium, the Netherlands, Catalonia and northern Italy were officially part of France under Napoleon I. Additionally they were part of the Charlemagne’s empire before him so you are actually French and that your French heritage has been ripped from you through foreign influence probably British if you ask me. One day France will gather you back into her ample Bosom and you will become happy Frenchmen again. That is your destiny.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I think I am a viking rather …..Well, anything better than the depleted EU ‘bossom’ with its artificial woke milk …..
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
A viking? Really? You must be into role-playing.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Unlikely to be a Ukrainian state in the future … they are in the grips of a death cult that will continue until the cool-aid runs dry.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
It’s unlikely that you will be correct – as usual.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
If Ukraine will get reparations then it would make sense for them to get their cut from the pipes running through their territory rather than re-laying the undersea pipes which is much more expensive.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Obviously Ukraine’s pipelines have seriously limited capacity.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
True but they are already there and usable. At 1.6 million barrels a day capacity they are not exactly miniscule. Anyway the Russian funds blocked in the West’s banking system are already earmarked for reparations so additional reparations will not be necessary.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I’ll take the other side of that bet.
History has shown that when war ends and peace breaks out former enemies become fast friends when there is a buck to be made. Germany wreaked havoc in Europe with 2 World Wars and within a generation they were best of friends and happily doing business with all their former foes that they did unspeakable things to. Same for the US and Vietnam or the US and Japan or Korea and Japan and countless other examples.
When the Ukrainian conflict ends and the embargo is lifted some country will import Russian gas the second it’s cheaper than coal or US gas etc. That will then make their economy more efficient than their neighbors and the rush to do business with Russia will be on. It’s just good common sense.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
First of all it has to end and then we will have to see who and what is in power and even then I doubt if Europe would trust Russia for as much of their energy imports as before. Europe imported a lot of Russian oil and gas before Putin but never in enough quantities that would have given Russia much leverage until Merkle changed it all and upped the imports. After Putin Europe could go back to buying Russian energy but like it was in the ’70s, ’80s and ’90s. That is to say moderately. For the moment the war is far from over. Putin and his minions are still in power and Russia hasn’t changed for the better unlike many of the countries you cited.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
You are forgetting that Europe has exhausted its own sources of gas (Slochteren, North Sea), and that gas has largely supplanted coal & nuclear. Civilization requires energy. Energy is scarce and fungible. Russia will continue to export energy, but Europe is embarking on a non-competitive future with inadequate & expensive energy and deindustrialization on the horizon.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Well oil and gas are not the only sources of cheap energy and as I have pointed out before, Russian energy is expensive because it comes with added costs such as having to acquiesce to your neighbor being invaded by Russia in order to keep the oil and gas flowing. If you price that in, and Europeans do, then Russian energy is definitely not worth it. Europe is and will restructure to the new energy reality and will do well. This is not the first crisis they have gone through. Far from it in fact and they have always bounced back. Some industries will lose out but others will gain but that is life.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
What other sources are there in the dead of a winter night when you’ve shuttered nuclear?
It was’t Russia that stopped the flow of oil/gas, it was Europe itself that refused to buy.
Russia did not ask or force anybody to acquiesce.
They had suggested talking about mutual security before stationing NATO and its offensive missiles on it back door.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Is Europe freezing? No. You can get energy in a lot of places. Europe decided to no longer buy from Russia and did it within one year. Putin has turned out to dumb and maybe you are starting to realize it.
pimaC
pimaC
3 years ago
I’ll go with Sy Hersch’s explanation: The US blew it up. It was obvious then, and it’s more obvious now since he posted his article about HOW the US did it. You can read the article on his substack.
So what’s happening now? If it’s obvious that US did it–and it is–then Germany just may pull out of NATO. If the US can deflect blame to Ukraine, then Germany may decide to withdraw support for Ukraine instead of pulling out of NATO. For the warmongers in Washington, either of these things is bad news, but if they have to choose, they would rather have Germany pull out of supporting Ukraine than to have them pull out of NATO. Germany should do BOTH in my opinion. NATO is a joke. It exists solely to badger Russia, and yet it doesn’t have the strength or commitment from its members to actually do that.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  pimaC
NATO exists primarily to fill the coffers of our death merchants. It’s a modern version of tribute. Germany has little wiggle room. Remember, we have troops there already.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
Reply to  pimaC
Who blew up Nord Stream?
There are lots of theories. They’re all full of holes.
By Charlie Cooper
March 8, 2023 8:21 pm CET
Nearly six months on from the subsea gas pipeline explosions, which sent geopolitical shockwaves around the world in September, there is still no conclusive answer to the question of who blew up Nord Stream.
Some were quick to place the blame squarely at Russia’s door — citing its record of hybrid warfare and a possible motive of intimidation, in the midst of a bitter economic war with Europe over gas supply.
But half a year has passed without any firm evidence for this — or any other explanation — being produced by the ongoing investigations of authorities in three European countries.
Since the day of the attack, four states — Russia, the U.S., Ukraine and the U.K. — have been publicly blamed for the explosions, with varying degrees of evidence.
Still, some things are known for sure.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
For the MSM and the connected, it is a loyalty test.
For people like you it is an IQ test.
The only thing full of holes are 3 of the Nord Stream pipeline strings.
mrutkaus
mrutkaus
3 years ago
I think there was a ferry sunk during the operation, killing hundreds.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  mrutkaus
Primarily flounder and skate.
mrutkaus
mrutkaus
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Got the sinking of the ferry “Estonia” in that area mixed up in this as there was a cover up there also.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.