Tom McClellan says "Gold COT Data Call for More of a Drop"
McClellan claims "The commercial traders are generally speaking the smart-money, and when they get to a big skewed position it usually pays to bet with them, at least in the long run."
He also notes "their current big net short position is a pretty compelling message that gold prices are too high at the moment, and that an appropriate adjustment is coming."
McClellan objected to my use of his chart. But the same data is available in many places.
So rather than rebut McClellan's statements with his chart I replaced his chart with one from [Barchart](https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/GC*0/technical-chart?sym=GCG20&data=MN&density=X&pricesOn=1&indicators=COTLC(13369344,26112,153%29;COTDLC(13369344,26112,153,16750848%29&studyheight=100&height=375&width=1060)).
The "long run" shows gold blasted higher with smart money shorts most of the way.
Moreover, gold collapsed from roughly $1600 to roughly $1100 with relatively low "smart money" short positions.
The miners sell their output via futures. There is nothing particularly smart about this alleged smart money. Miners mine gold and sell it. It's what they do.
Understanding Commercial Traders
McClellan fails to point out that commercial traders also include the broker dealers like JPMorgan. Those commercial traders take the other side of bets put on by hedge funds and small traders.
Although they have been proven to be manipulators, it's important to note that gold rose from $250 to over $1900 with the allegedly smart commercials short the entire way.
The broker dealers hedgers must take the other side of trades. In the futures world, for every long there is a short. Much of the short position is involuntary and hedged.
Thus, there is nothing particularly smart about the hedgers either.
Moreover, it's important to note that the hedgers like JPM are not even net short. Rather, they will be long gold in some other way to balance they books. In general, they do not care which way gold moves but if and when they do is when the manipulation is likely to happen.
Direction and Movement
Note how gold got hammered for years without the alleged smart money being hugely short.
On the other hand, commercials being net long is rare (note the small blue box). And I did write about that at the time.
It's not so much that the smart money is particularly brilliant (again the hedgers simply take the other side of the bet and somehow hedge it).
Rather those were signals of extreme indifference by the hedge funds to own gold. Sentiment wise, it can mark great buying opportunities.
But gold was already up huge off the October 2008 low of roughly $600.
Where to From Here?
There may be a pullback or not. I don't know nor does anyone else.
Ideally, we would see long liquidation, typically misrepresented as "commercials covering their shorts", accompanied by a small price movement.
Regardless, tops are made when speculators are net long. We do not know when that will be, nor will we know the price except in hindsight.
Bottom buy points are easier to spot, but I highly doubt we will see commercials net long any time soon. Thus, spotting the next time to add may not be easy.
I believe the fundamentals of gold are in excellent shape as I noted in How Does Gold React to Interest Rate Policy?
So, be my guest if you want to time gold finely to alleged "smart money" positions.
Regardless, it is irksome to see reports that misrepresent what the "smart money" really is all about.
McClellan objected to my use of his chart. I believe it was fair use. But I found another chart, it was easy enough and many sites have COT data, and I also reduced my quotes of his two a couple sentences.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock