It’s Our Dollar But Your Problem, 2022 Style

Total credit market now exceeds 90 trillion dollars.

Flashback November 1971

John Connally, President Nixon’s Treasury Secretary, bluntly told a group of European finance minsters “The dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem.”

Nixon Shock 

Connally’s statement is part of what’s now labeled as “Nixon Shock“.

The Nixon shock was a series of economic measures undertaken by United States President Richard Nixon in 1971, in response to increasing inflation, the most significant of which were wage and price freezes, surcharges on imports, and the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

Nixon said the move to end gold convertibility was temporary. It wasn’t. But it’s important to understand the background history following the end of WWII.

Background

In 1944, representatives from 44 nations met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to develop a new international monetary system that came to be known as the Bretton Woods system. Conference attendees had hoped that this new system would “ensure exchange rate stability, prevent competitive devaluations, and promote economic growth”.

It was not until 1958 that the Bretton Woods system became fully operational. Countries now settled their international accounts in dollars that could be converted to gold at a fixed exchange rate of $35 per ounce, which was redeemable by the U.S. government. Thus, the United States was committed to backing every dollar overseas with gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar. 

For the first years after World War II, the Bretton Woods system worked well. With the Marshall Plan, Japan and Europe were rebuilding from the war, and countries outside the US wanted dollars to spend on American goods—cars, steel, machinery, etc. Because the U.S. owned over half the world’s official gold reserves—574 million ounces at the end of World War II—the system appeared secure.

However, from 1950 to 1969, as Germany and Japan recovered, the US share of the world’s economic output dropped significantly, from 35% to 27%. Furthermore, a negative balance of payments, growing public debt incurred by the Vietnam War, and monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve caused the dollar to become increasingly overvalued in the 1960s.

In France, the Bretton Woods system was called “America’s exorbitant privilege” as it resulted in an “asymmetric financial system” where non-US citizens “see themselves supporting American living standards and subsidizing American multinationals”. As American economist Barry Eichengreen summarized: “It costs only a few cents for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to produce a $100 bill, but other countries had to pony up $100 of actual goods in order to obtain one”. In February 1965 President Charles de Gaulle announced his intention to exchange its U.S. dollar reserves for gold at the official exchange rate.

By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.

Nixon did not want to hike interest rates for his guns and butter policies (War in Vietnam and social spending), and as a result the US was rapidly losing its supply of gold. 

Charles’ de Gaulle’s announcement that France would redeem its trade balance in dollars was the end of Bretton Woods. 

Stock Market Cheered 

The stock market cheered the “temporary” suspension of gold redemption and so did governments around the globe.

A direct consequence of Nixon Shock was governments could and did spend at will with no checks and balances.

The US consumer then became the global buyer of last resort 

 It’s Our Dollar 2022 Style

The dollar is soaring not plunging and the Fed, unlike under Nixon, is gleefully hiking rates. 

Bloomberg reports Yuan at 2008 Low Fuels Speculation Monetary Easing to Slow

The yuan’s slump to the weakest since the global financial crisis in 2008 has fueled speculation China’s central bank will slow the pace of monetary easing to avoid adding further pressure on the currency.

The People’s Bank of China will probably delay any major stimulus moves, like lowering interest rates and the reserve requirement ratio for banks, according to analysts including from Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. and Tianfeng Securities Co.

Emerging markets who borrowed dollars expecting them to get cheaper, are in a crisis mode.

Japan is using currency intervention while the Bank of England took emergency to shore up its bond market. 

For discussion, please see Bank of England to Buy Bonds on Whatever Scale Necessary to Halt Crisis

Also note Strong Dollar Fatigue: Japan’s Yen Intervention Will Not Work. How Can It?

Ever since Nixon killed convertibility of gold there has been no checks on fiscal deficits. Countries could spend at will and did. The Fed was finally forced to hike rates, the dollar has soared in response.

Total dollar credit is now over $90 trillion and the Debt Clock shows US national debt at close to $31 trillion. There are no constraints on debt or government spending anywhere.

Meanwhile, mainstream media is devoid of any discussion of the root cause of the current problems. Nor is there any end in sight to reckless fiscal policies.

The root cause is no brake on unrestrained spending that a gold standard provided.

Gold provided a brake on recklessness. Guns and butter policies with low interest rates led to losing your gold.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

67 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
1 year ago
Bit off topic, but could someone explain why the US government “borrows” money. Assuming that “borrowed” money is never paid back, why would the outfit that can print its own money bother to offload that printing to someone else? (BTW, it would also be good to know if that “someone else” is not the Fed just bumping up their computer’s record of how many dollars they have.)
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
The bulk of US money is ZEROS and ONES!!!
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
Three words: Financial Shell Game.
yooj
yooj
1 year ago
“Ever since Nixon killed convertibility of gold there has been no checks on fiscal deficits. Countries could spend at will and did.” It is contended here that a gold standard brakes government spending.
For a different take, however, see John Tamny, A Gold Standard Would Be Great, But It Would Not Shrink Budget Deficits at link to forbes.com “[F]uture income streams in which the currencies paid out have commodity definition are logically quite a bit more trustworthy. Translated, the dollars, euros, yen, and pounds paid are expected to hold their value such that savers will be rewarded for their abstinence with greater access to goods and services. What this means is that if anything, quality money enables more, not less government borrowing.” Tamny points out that British government debt was over 250% of GDP in 1815, when the pound was trusted.
vsest
vsest
1 year ago
Reply to  yooj
Idea of GDP didn’t exist in 1815. All these numbers are invented by the same “economists” that created current mess. GB was a world policeman and its wealth could be defended by guns and fleet (the same about the US in 1960s). Thirty years later GB went to war with China because couldn’t pay for Chinese goods. So it paid the debt by destroying China. The US would like to do the same now therefore it chose a destruction of competitors like Japan and Germany.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Anyone taking notice of used car companies? One of those bell-weather thingies.
Wanna bet Ford, GM etc will need another bailout?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Yeah, I knew about CarMax a month or two ago.
I play beer league hockey with 2 guys who work there (one selling cars, the other the head of the local Carmax) and they’ve been saying for the last couple of months that sales are dead. Instead of selling 20+ cars a day they were selling maybe 8 and those 8 were only to insurance claims (ie only if your car was totaled in an accident and you had insurance money to spend). Essentially no one else was buying because prices so high for used cars and interest rates rising like crazy.
It was obvious there was going to be a big miss.
The big 3 going to be in a world of hurt of their own making because they abandoned the car market for SUVs and Trucks and rising gas prices made those undesirable to own.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The instant gas prices go down, everyone has to have a giant SUV. The funny thing is, all most of them are is a rebadged station wagon.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It is an image/ego thing for most SUV-truck owners.
The ideal ‘truck’ has a hood so high, you need a stepladder to look under it–only real men can drive a truck. The same stepladder can be used by height-challenged people to get inside the truck cabin. Don’t forget the bed-liner so your truck looks unused.
The ideal SUV pretends to be an all-terrain vehicle–again an ego/image thing since these vehicles will never leave the blacktop. My personal favorites are the ones with winches and bull-bars on the front for when you encounter angry bulls in a ravine.
The EV is the next image/ego thing. Go zero to 60mph (100km/h) in 2.5 seconds, and pretend you are saving the world from climate change.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
The Florida rebuild will apply inflationary pressure to staggering economy.
Federal Reserve will have to persevere.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
VIX at 33, stocks tumbling, cnbc talking heads saying apple could fall to $100….get ready for PANIC.
Got PUTS?
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago

Why is the
Dollar strong now?

Only major
economy which is energy independent.

The major
economy with the lowest exposure to international trade vs GDP (Trade to GDP
Ratio)

Is the currency
of the country that has the largest and best military in the world.

The only major
economy whose interest rates has the best chance of becoming real positive
interest rates.

The only
major economy which has a positive demographic profile.

The major
economy that will be touched the least by the worldwide recession.

The major
economy with a unique financial-industrial ecosystem much larger than any other
that facilitates startups and attracts talent and investment money from the
whole world.

There are
many other advantages but those I noted are the major ones. They only real problem is the trade deficit but as a percentage of GDP it is not too much of a worry.

I could list the problems with the other principal economies but I think a cursory look would dispel their attractiveness for the short and medium future.
I live in Europe and over half of my income comes from here so when I see the Euro against the Dollar I rend my vestments and cry out to the injustice of perfidious chance.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
You should just cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
zelensksy speaking about Putin invading Ukraine.
O, pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth,
That I am meek and gentle with these butchers!
Thou art the ruins of the noblest man
That ever livèd in the tide of times.
Woe to the hand that shed this costly blood!
Over thy wounds now do I prophesy—
Which, like dumb mouths, do ope their ruby lips
To beg the voice and utterance of my tongue—
A curse shall light upon the limbs of men.
Domestic fury and fierce civil strife
Shall cumber all the parts of Italy.
Blood and destruction shall be so in use,
And dreadful objects so familiar,
That mothers shall but smile when they behold
Their infants quartered with the hands of war,
All pity choked with custom of fell deeds,
And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge,
With Ate by his side come hot from hell,
Shall in these confines with a monarch’s voice
Cry “Havoc!” and let slip the dogs of war,
That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
With carrion men, groaning for burial.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
This is ‘helpful’, how? Other than an uncited quote from Shakespeare?
Specifically, Marc Antony’s ‘Cry Havoc’, over Caesar
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Marc was saying the time of talking is over. Hence the “Cry “Havoc!” and let slip the dogs of war. I though if you are going to quote it it might be better to say the whole quote to get the feel of what slipping the dogs of war means.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Interest on $30+ trillion? Add another trillion to the deficit each year.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
One liners are not very useful. If you want to make a point then write a paragraph or two to develop your idea. You gave a number without comparing it to the size of the economy, inflation, who owns the paper, liquidity and so forth so your one-liner has no value in itself without supporting arguments.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Hoping this is not a ‘one liner’
Here is the Federal deficit over time. link to datalab.usaspending.gov
Deficits are funded by Federal debt, short, mid, and long term (with endless rolling-over so the debt total increases). ‘By the end of 2021, the federal government had $28.43 trillion in federal debt.’ Now, go here: link to usdebtclock.org over $30 trillion?
Here is the Federal debt over time: link to fiscaldata.treasury.gov ( scroll down the page)
That debt is an increasing amount of GDP. See above link–and scroll down some more. It should be a wake-up call (an existential crisis for Democrats)–it is not. Instead, we throw money at global climate change, fund wars in Ukraine, etc etc.
There was a time when the interest on the debt was ‘real money.’ At near zero interest rates, the debt was cheap. At 4% the interest is not $30Tx 0.04% or $1.2Trillion per year, since some bonds/debt are locked in at lower interest rates. New and rolled-over debt goes at the higher interest rate, which will increase the deficit–not by a trillion though (a few hundred billion).
So, where does the rest of my claimed $1 Trillion increase in the deficit come from?
Well, all those long bonds at near-zero interest rates will drop in value as interest rates increase… Eg. pension funds–most of which go bankrupt. It’s BAILOUT time!!!
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Much better. I see what you mean which is that debt is a problem and I agree. In fact everybody agrees but most countries have too much debt and some like China have more than most.
SmokeyXIII
SmokeyXIII
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
He was concise. Where were your supporting arguments? You said the USA has the best military, but the USA’s military lost in Afghanistan. It lost in Iraq. It lost in Somalia. It lost to ONE ENEMY SOLDIER in Lebanon! LOL! It lost in Vietnam. The Chinese military pushed the militaries of the USA, the UK, South Korea, and around 20 other countries halfway down the Korean peninsula back when the USA had factories and the China didn’t. Now China has the factories and the USA doesn’t. Outside of Grenada, the American military is a joke. Saying the American military is the best is like saying a 1-11 football team is “the best one.”
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
There are infinite future generations to sell out to bond holders… and if there aren’t, it doesn’t matter anymore.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“Interest on $30+ trillion? Add another trillion to the deficit each year.”
I’ll one up you. Just listened to a Wealthion interview:
Super-Strong US Dollar Is De-Stabilizing All Other Fiat Currencies – When Will It End? | Gordon Long – YouTube
“The problem with that Adam is the debt. And everybody looks at the debt. Well its 30 trillion dollars in the United States, Its not 30 trillion dollars. We have 84-90 trillion of unfunded liabilities, off balance sheet social security, medicare, benefits, etc. Its a debt thats now coming due as 10,000 baby boomers retire every single day.”
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12

Come to Carousel and renew!

JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Just wait until the first US aircraft carrier fleet is sunk, then watch this admin order all ships back to US ports!!!!
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Great day to load up and ladder more T-Bills.
Maturity – 1/5/23 Rate – 3.04%
Maturity – 4/6/23 Rate – 3.90%
Next stop, higher rates.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
Mish,
After listing many things you wrote “Meanwhile, mainstream media is devoid of any discussion of the root cause of the current problems.” Well, you yourself did not concisely say what the root cause is. And that is the trouble with everyone. They point to a basket of symptoms and act like they are root cause”.
A long, long time ago I stated the root cause for subscribers of my blog. The root cause is that you, me and everyone else in the world accepted fake money as if it were real.
Without that, none of the symptoms you mentioned could have occurred. Please consider adopting a one line statement of root cause because without this concise understanding the knowledge is unactionable by 98% of the population, including those who go into the gory details. In fact, those are the worst because they are the ones who will say “the system could have worked if we had only done this” when in fact the fake money system was a con game from day 1. If you would allow posting of links then I would show you why that is true. But it is obvious that the USA began to cheat on the gold backing of Bretton Woods 1 from the day it began running.
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
The root cause is no brake on unrestrained spending that a gold standard provided.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
Incredible that it really is that simple. That said, governments voluntarily restraining spending to income received (taxes) is next to impossible while Keynes and faux debt dominate. Also, going back to a true gold standard will not happen in my lifetime. However, using gold as the intermediary for international transactions (not faux US, or other currency) might bring a semblance of responsibility and restraint back.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“Also, going back to a true gold standard will not happen in my lifetime.”
Don’t be so sure.
By now, the nothing-but-the-crassest-of-theft-with-absolutely-NO-redeeming-positive-sides which fiat has enabled; and is enabling; is ensuring that the stated goals of both the nominal Right and Left would be better served by Gold.
By freeing them from being forced to pay usury to keep negative-value-adding rabble in “money centers”; as well as other similarly pure leeches from the “entitled classes”; flush, “Labour” would massively benefit from Gold. 4 hour workdays and two months of vacation, for twice today’s purchasing power worth of takehome, can’t be THAT unattractive to people who have to work for a living……
While “Small Government” Right Wingers would, very obviously, benefit from the inability of The State to grow as unconstrained as it has today, once it couldn’t simply fund whatever nonsense it wanted for itself, by robbing people by debasement.
Indoctrination, and keeping the Naggers illiterate and pliant, has no doubt been very successful and enabling for the leeching classes over the past century. But at some point, the sheer and utter obviousness of how trivially nonsensical the pure lies and illiterate drivel underpinning literally everything is, has got to start leaking past the indoctrinators.
Russell McDowell
Russell McDowell
1 year ago
“A direct consequence of Nixon Shock was governments could and did spend at will with no checks and balances.”
Good point but at least there were bond vigilantes that prevented completely out-of-control spending. At some level, the government borrowing costs would have become prohibitive because of the higher interest rates required by bond market participants. Since 2008, that last check on the system was removed when governments started printing instead of borrowing money. Or more accurately, they borrowed money (issued bonds) and then printed money to purchase the bonds thereby putting a cap on the borrowing cost.
While we probably won’t return to the gold standard, maybe one day we can retire the printing press and allow the bond vigilantes to provide some discipline to the system.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“While we probably won’t return to the gold standard”
Complete Non Starter.
I won’t dull you with a laundry list of ‘why nots’ and settle for the simplest – it wouldn’t matter.
Congress would set some arbitrary peg … say $5000 to the ounce …and then whenever necessary just move peg (higher).
Another debt ceiling drama where you know how it ends before you enter the theatre.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Congress could, but arbitrage would stop it. The ‘best’ way is to allow gold to move in an international free market with commodities priced in gold grams. Each country’s currency will find its own level without reference to the faux US dollar. I suspect this is where Russia and China are headed.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“Congress could, but arbitrage would stop it.”
Nope. Domestic rules would be put in place to prevent. Internationally, US is the dumping ground for goods. Anyone wishing to conduct business will abide by our rules. US has 11 aircraft carriers. And your country??
“The ‘best’ way is to allow gold to move in an international free market with commodities priced in gold grams.”
You are missing the point. Congress will NEVER agree to a governor on spending. At best, they would legislate sham ‘debt ceiling’ to appear tough (when they are not).
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Given what is happening to US ‘allies’ Japan and Britain, it is entirely possible that Congress might not have a choice. Admittedly, Japan and Britain’s problems stem largely from their own making. My point is that Congress can do whatever it pleases in the US, and create as much debt as they want in the US. It does not mean the rest of the world has to pay for it. That this has happened in the past, doesn’t mean it will always be–just as the Pound and Yen are not as relevant as they once were. As for aircraft carriers and rules, good luck on that when American’s can’t buy $100 sneakers.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Those aircraft carriers would loose their status as soon as the world’s Govt’s declare all US ships persona non gratta and issue bounties on them!!!
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
A strong $US may soon have an ally.
Janet ‘no new financial crisis in our lifetimes’ Yellen (rumored) to be on the way out as Secretary of Treasury following midterms.
A candidate? Possibly none other than Larry Summers.
“I think a hard landing is substantially more likely than a soft landing,” he told the Wall Street Journal. “I think if inflation is going to come down in two or three years rather than the 10…that’s likely to be in the context of a recession not in the context of a smooth path.”

Summers, who’s been a vocal critic of the Fed, said it took too long for the institution to react to rising inflation.

“The Fed allowed itself to get way behind the curve for a long time in 2021 and early ’22, and in the process, sacrificed a reasonable amount of credibility,” he said.

When asked what he would do if he were on Fed to determine when to stop raising rates, Summers told the Journal that he’d watch what’s happening in the labor market.

“I’d be looking for evidence that signs of an overwhelmingly tight labor market were giving way to signs of a labor market with more slack,” he said.

Despite his earlier criticism of the Fed, Summers says the Fed is doing what it needs to.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to remember that a strong dollar buys more products made overseas, and sells less American-made products. Wouldn’t that mean US imports increase and exports decrease?
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
Great article Mish. I’ve always heard of Bretton Woods but I’ve never heard an explanation of it.
I have also heard a few people talk about currency wars over the past 5 years. It seems that we are now at the peak of it.
FooFooFed
FooFooFed
1 year ago
Dollar effects are now affecting developed world bond markets NOT JUST EM!!!
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
The good ole Nixon years. Today, you need to stoke the flames of war, and blow up vital pipelines to keep the king dollar.
As a side benefit, it keeps the sheep distracted. Otherwise, they would focus their attention where it should be, and figure out that the system is broken.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
I suspect president Cluster Fudge had a hand in it–he is, after all, a foreign policy expert. If it can be proven that the pipelines were sabotaged by the US (or vassal state), I’d say ‘game over’ for the US in Europe–a complete and permanent loss of credibility
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
“Ever since Nixon killed convertibility of gold there has been no checks
on fiscal deficits. Countries could spend at will and did. The Fed was
finally forced to hike rates, the dollar has soared in response.”
Forced. The laws of math do that. No mathematician has been able to use fission or fusion to cause 2+2 to equal anything other than 4. But that never stops financial elitists from inventing a new theory as to how they can ignore the laws of math. They fail every time.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
I think a lot of the reason USD has gone up is banks no longer trust each other. They want good collateral. USTs are the best there is. Maybe physical gold is better, but it’s impractical.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Carrying wads of cash was impractical, too, until credit cards….
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Blame Nixon. After Dag Hammarskjold assassination Nixon inherited Dem toxicity, blood trails, riots, Vietnam and and unlimited spending to cover their footsteps. John Connally and Paul Volcker advised Nixon to divorce gold. // Nixon II between 2016 and 2022.
dmunjal
dmunjal
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
Don’t forget LBJ who originated the guns and butter program before Nixon. In some ways, Nixon had no choice as the money was already spent before he took office.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Reply to  dmunjal
LBJ was US worst president.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago

The monetization and sterilization of LSAPs suppresses the real
rate of interest. It makes real growth more expensive than holding
existing assets. I.e., lending by the banks is inflationary, whereas
lending by the nonbanks is noninflationary.

There’s a lack of investment opportunities (secular stagnation).

Asset valuation prices are driven from the
appraisal of loan collateral, and loanable funds, which depends upon Gresham’s
law: “a statement of the least cost “principle of substitution” as applied
to money: that a commodity (or service) will be devoted to those uses which are
the most profitable (most widely viewed as promising), that a statement of the
principle of substitution: “the bad money drives out good”.

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“Nor is there any end in sight to reckless fiscal policies.”
FY ends tomorrow. Deficit for first 11 months of FY $945 billion. POTUS on multiple occasions touted about getting deficit < $trillion for current fy. We’ll know soon enough if accurate.
Once FY past (and if Ds still control Congress). Lookout!
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Biden can still say he brought the deficit under a trillion and no one in the media, outside of fox, will fact check it.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Fox doesn’t care about facts. They’ll simply repeat “nuh uh” over and over, and their idiot viewers will take it as fact. No proof is required when you run a religion.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Wanna bet the deficit will be ‘revised’ after the election to $1.4 trillion.
killben
killben
1 year ago
“Nor is there any end in sight to reckless fiscal policies.”
Pound action belies this!
Some more trussonomics then even BOE might not be able to help.
With end of war nowhere in sight and inflation continuing to bite countries chcikens will come home to roost sooner rather than later.
jiminy
jiminy
1 year ago
Guns and butter was Johnson’s program, Nixon inherited it.
Eighthman
Eighthman
1 year ago
Fixing any weakness in the yuan should be easy, as Russia showed.
Issue a directive that various strategic goods must be paid for directly in yuan, such as rare earths. Expand this directive until the yuan rises. It also would help get away from the dollar.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Eighthman
I think that’s how it works now. Everything exported from China is paid for in Yuan.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Chinese companies are paid in dollars for exports, then exchange it for yuan with the PBoC at the official exchange rate.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Eighthman
The make the Yuan rise, China must sell US treasuries (increasing their supply which will lower their value) and buy Yuan (decreasing the supply and increasing the value).
This sounds really easy. But the trick is that China has to be careful not to lose too much money when they do this.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“The dollar is soaring not plunging and the Fed, unlike under Nixon, is gleefully hiking rates.”
Yep. Furthermore, the strength of $US exporting inflation (on the flip importing disinflation).
Mark my word.
2022 Buzzword: Inflation
2023 Buzzword(s): Disinflation / Deflation
“Emerging markets who borrowed dollars expecting them to get cheaper, are in a crisis mode.”
Look no further when hunting for something to break (I lump China here, as well).
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
The foreign short-term claims that built up on the U.S. $ and dethroned gold, were entirely due to our far-flung military excursions and military bases abroad. The private sector always ran trade surpluses during the lead up to that end in the gold standard. We are following the same script militarily today, but now the private sector is in a deficit.
It was called the “communist containment deficit”.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“It was called the “communist containment deficit”.”
Sure. At inception. Started following WW2 and Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe. Past 30 years, however, US asset holders have sold out the American worker by outsourcing everything not nailed down.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett

The only solution is to sell higher quantities, of higher
quality, and lower unit costs of production, relative to our trading partners.

The Chinese first did this with cheap labor. Looking to the
future the Chinese will ultimately replace their labor advantage with a machine
tool advantage. We need much more gov’t incentivized investment in AI and
robots.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“We need much more gov’t incentivized investment in AI and
robots.”
This can’t work. The reason should be obvious but in case it isn’t, the problem is that any other country can simply use that same Robots + AI to achieve the same thing we can do here. Engineering is VERY easy to replicate. So we will never be able to sell higher quantities of higher quality if it comes from Robots and AI because everyone else can do the same thing.
The only way it gets made here is if “foreign labor cost + transportation costs” > “local labor costs”.
Esclaro
Esclaro
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Have you told this to Germany which always has been able to sell it’s high quality merchandise?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Esclaro
But it’s not coming only from Robots + AI. It’s also coming from a talented workforce which isn’t as easy to replicate.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Maybe we need to realize that ai is going to take over most work, and that “work or starve” isn’t going to be a viable philosophy.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.