Jobs Expand by 850,000 with 188,000 of Them Government, But Employment Drops!

For June, the Econoday consensus was 703,000 with 600,000 of them private. The BLS reports 850,000 with 662,000 private. Leisure and Hospitality, and Government jobs were the biggest gainers. Employment fell by 18,000.

BLS Jobs Statistics at a Glance

Details from the monthly BLS Employment Report.

  • Nonfarm Payroll: +850,000 to 145,759,000 – Establishment Survey
  • Employment: -18,000 to 151,602,000 Household Survey
  • Unemployment: +168,000 to 9,484,000- Household Survey
  • Baseline Unemployment Rate: +0.1 to 5.9% – Household Survey
  • U-6 unemployment: -0.4 to 9.8% – Household Survey
  • Civilian Non-institutional Population: +128,000 to 261,338,000
  • Civilian Labor Force: +151,000 to 161,086,000 – Household Survey
  • Not in Labor Force: -22,000 to 100,253,000 – Household Survey
  • Participation Rate: +0.0 to 61.6% – Household Survey

BLS Error Rate

Since March 2020, BLS has published an estimate of what the unemployment rate might have been had misclassified workers been included among the unemployed. Repeating this same approach, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in June2021 would have been 0.2 percentage point higher than reported. However, this represents the upper bound of our estimate of misclassification and probably overstates the size of the misclassification error.

I strongly question the accuracy of the BLS assertion that 0.2% is the high end of their error rate.

Job Revisions

  • The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for April was revised down by 9,000, from +278,000 to +269,000
  • The change for May was revised up by 24,000, from +559,000 to +583,000. 
  • With these revisions, employment in April and May combined is 15,000 higher than previously reported. 

Part-Time Jobs

The above numbers never total correctly. I list them as reported.

Unemployment Rate – Seasonally Adjusted

Nonfarm Payrolls

The above chart puts a much needed perspective on the recovery.

  • Jobs are up 15,598,000 from the low in April 2020.
  • Jobs are still 6,764,000 from the February 2020 pre-Covid high.

Those numbers do not reflect increasing population nor the type of job recovered.

Hours and Wages

Average weekly hours of all private employees fell 0.1 hours to at 34.7 hours. Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees fell 0.1 hours to 33.7 hours. Average weekly hours of manufacturers fell 0.2 hours plus another 0.1 hours in a  negative revision to 40.2 hours.

Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.10 to $30.40.

Year-over-year, wages rose from $29.35 to $30.40. That’s a gain of 3.60%.

The month-over-month gains are seriously distorted by Covid. 

Average hourly earnings of Production and Supervisory Workers rose $0.10 to $25.68.

Year-over-year, wages rose from $24.77 to $25.68. That’s a gain of 3.7%.

Again, these numbers are seriously distorted by Covid. 

For a discussion of income distribution, please see What’s “Really” Behind Gross Inequalities In Income Distribution?

Birth Death Model

Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.

For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.

BLS Covid-19 Statement on the Birth-Death Model

The widespread disruption to labor markets due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential impact to the birth-death model have prompted BLS to both revisit research conducted in the aftermath of the Great Recession (2008-2009) and incorporate new ideas to account for changes in the number of business openings and closings. Two areas of research have been implemented to improve the accuracy of our birth-death model in the CES estimates. These adjustments will better reflect the net effect of the contribution of business births and deaths to the estimates. These two methodological changes are the following:

1: A portion of both reported zeros and returns from zero in the current month from the sample were used in estimation to better account for the fact that business births and deaths will not offset.

2: Current sample growth rates were included in the net birth-death forecasting model to better account for the changing relationships between business openings and closings.

BLS will determine on a monthly basis if the adjusted birth-death model described here continues to be necessary. We will disclose these changes each month in the Employment Situation news release. All months in the tables of net birth-death forecasts on this page include footnotes for any month in which a regressor was used to supplement the forecasts.

The Birth-Death model is essentially garbage but we likely will not find how distorted this is until the annual revisions next year.

Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

The official unemployment rate is 5.9%. However, if you start counting all the people who want a job but gave up, all the people with part-time jobs that want a full-time job, all the people who dropped off the unemployment rolls because their unemployment benefits ran out, etc., you get a closer picture of what the unemployment rate is. That number is in the last row labeled U-6.

U-6 is much higher at 9.8%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.

Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement, discouraged workers, and kids moving back home because they cannot find a job.

Covid-19 had an enormous impact on the labor force. Most of the recent dropouts are really unemployed but are not counted as such, said Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

I agree 100%. The stated unemployment rate is bogus.

Strength is Relative

It’s important to put the jobs numbers into proper perspective.

In the household survey, if you work as little as 1 hour a week, even selling trinkets on eBay, you are considered employed.

In the household survey, if you work three part-time jobs, 12 hours each, the BLS considers you a full-time employee.

In the payroll survey, three part-time jobs count as three jobs. The BLS attempts to factor this in, but they do not weed out duplicate Social Security numbers. The potential for double-counting jobs in the payroll survey is large.

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number, generally released the first Friday of every month. It is based on employer reporting.

The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures unemployment and many other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Looking for jobs on Monster does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.

These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.

Recovery Will Take Years

The improvements are welcome but huge headwinds remain.

This recovery is a year in the making but jobs are still 7.6 million short.

Some losses are permanent due to a surge in work-at-home and online shopping (less office space and malls needed).

Final Thoughts

Beneath the headline numbers is one of the screwiest reports ever. Jobs are up by 850,000 but employment fell by 18,000.  

Hours fell across the board and that makes sense as more workers were added.

The biggest gain was leisure and hospitality work at 343,000. It’s good that people are going back to work, but those are low-paying jobs for sure.

Government jobs rose by a whopping 188,000 and that’s not a good thing. 

Voluntary part-time work expanded by over 1.1 million as involuntary work declined by over 640,000. Full time work fell by over 400,000.

Add it all up, the numbers look great but the details sure don’t.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Belairhead
Belairhead
2 years ago
I would bet that many of those added government jobs are related to schools reopening and teachers and staff returning to in-person learning. I would classify that as a GOOD thing.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Leisure and hospitality is interesting. I know a lot of waiters, and most of them make significantly more than my employees, who are now all making $16-25/hr. I know waiters who have graduated college with accounting degrees and still wait tables because they make more money than they could bring down in an entry level corporate accounting position, even with with the CPA.
Waiting is also one of the only jobs that has a chance of paying a living wage that people with criminal records can get in this country, now that virtually every employer does a criminal background check.
I think waiting and bartending attract a certain kind of  individual….one… who is willing and able to add a lot of value to their service and profit from it. Virtually all their pay is from tips. Or a good doorman in a place like NY would be another example…..those jobs are actually coveted, as is a good waitstaff position in a high-end restaurant.
It’s one of the few places where initiative actually counts for something. In my view, taking initiative in either a government job….or in MOST corporate jobs…….is more apt to be punished, not rewarded. There are some exceptions, of course. 
It’s a bootstrap job. Before minimum wage took away  so many low paying jobs, people used to bootstrap by doing all kinds of things we’d call “gig economy” jobs now.  Working multiple jobs that could be somehow managed. Most of those jobs don’t even exist in our our world. The closest thing we have is something like Uber…which is why so many people drive for Uber. It’s ironic that the people who take the Uber jobs are trying to destroy the whole model by trying to force ride-sharing companies to change to the typical government/corporate model that supposedly “protects” workers rights.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I wonder if you know waiters over the age of 30. If the establishment doesn’t ease them out, they themselves start feeling odd in the job. Yes, it pays more for a few years, but then what?
Morn
Morn
2 years ago
Wrong side of my 30s here and have been in the food and beverage industry for 17 years now (all sides – started out in production and distribution, working for a few breweries, and now have been on the service side for the last 8).  If you’re in a major metro area $40-50/hr isn’t outside the norm and if you’ve hung in there for that long you’re probably at least in some kind of managerial role or have landed yourself in a good spot that offers a benefits package.  There is competition for talent and six-figures is possible even if you are just waiting tables or slinging drinks at the right place.
It definitely is for a “certain kind of individual” as Eddie_T said.  Good luck trying to have normal friendships, a stable family life, etc.  That said, I would never work a 9-5 again.
You are right though in the sense that if you get to the point where I’m at and don’t yet have a plan to be in an ownership position relatively soon you’re going to be miserable fast once you get into your 40s.  The wear and tear on your body and mind will eventually catch up in and if you try to switch careers then you’re looking at a massive pay cut that most people can’t afford to take at that point in their lives.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Morn
Your story is completely congruent with what I’ve observed. I do know one guy who managed to buy out an older chef/entrepreneur and get to the ownership level. His restaurant did not make it through COVID though. I expect the rent was killing him. He is still pretty young and will no doubt come back. You can’t keep some people down. 
It is a brutal business. I can see that. And you have to be able to stay away from all the temptations or you will self-destruct. 
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
You go into politics.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
I know several waiters in their forties, but I don’t think I know anybody over 50 waiting tables. I do know a few bartenders over 50.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Where I live, restaurants or pubs try to hire young, attractive chics. The last time I saw an over 50 waitress was in a place where the regular clientele was retirees. I haven’t been to fast food in the past decade or more, though.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“The stated unemployment rate is bogus.”
Baffle them with B.S.
Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
2 years ago
It’s always bad news in the employment report but this month’s stats show signs that unemployment benefits ended and that people took jobs to survive. The story of American economy continues to be the hollowing out of the middle class and the forces of globalization. Jobs will tend to be lower paying across the board unless you happen to be in a professional or technical skilled person who can retrain themselves repeatedly to compete. No wonder many Americans give up and go into the FIRE – financial services, insurance and real estate. I would add government and healthcare to this. These are all wholly unproductive fields from a productivity growth standpoint which is required for a rising standard living. The bottom line is about 20% of employed people are pulling up the other 80%. This is part of why growth has been poor overall the last two deacdes.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Bingo and well stated
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
It also shows that a bunch of dumb****s sat of their rears collecting expanded unemployment benefits thinking they’ll get a job when the benefits run out. Instead of getting decent job when they were available. Now there will be a flood of job applicants just like them. People with a giant hole in their resume.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The early bird catches the worm.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Interesting analysis but I ask you. Since the 20% are pulling up the other 80% then if by magic the 50% vanish that would mean that the 20% would all be fabulously wealthy then. Secondly do you believe that the 80% do not provide any goods and services that the 20%  would find essential? Myself I really don’t see how the top 20% cold live at all without the bottom 80%
Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Actually the 20% prospered more during covid and 80% were left behind at best because they were needed a lot less. I’m not really talking about the economy in typical terms but of productivity growth. 
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
You concluded with “The bottom line is about 20% of employed people are pulling up the other 80%.” I understood that you feel that the 20% would be better off without the bottom 80% because they we holding the 20% back. I on the other hand recognize that the top 20% would not be able to make their money at all without the bottom 80% because the top 20%’s jobs and income depend on either managing, selling to or consuming the taxes of the bottom 80%. Chiefs without Indians can’t exist and Indians without chiefs can’t exist for long either.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.