Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Judge Orders Trump to Pay Jean Carroll $5 Million Damage Plus $800,000 Interest

The Supreme Court refuses to hear the case triggering the payout.

Congrats to E. Jean Carroll

The Wall Street Journal reports Judge Orders Trump to Pay E. Jean Carroll $5 Million Damage Award

A New York federal judge on Wednesday ordered President Trump to pay the $5 million in damages a jury awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll after the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal of the defamation and sexual-abuse verdict.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan granted Carroll’s request on Wednesday for the damages plus interest, and Trump’s lawyers quickly notified the court that they would appeal.

In a court filing Tuesday asking the judge to hold off from distributing the funds, Trump’s lawyers said they had asked the Supreme Court to reconsider their petition. They said he faced an “unrecoverable loss” since the money likely couldn’t be recouped even if he eventually prevails.

A federal jury in Manhattan in 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll and ordered him to pay $5 million in damages. Carroll, an author and former Elle magazine columnist, testified at trial that Trump had raped her in a Manhattan department store nearly 30 years ago. The jury found him liable for sexual abuse but not rape.

Trump called the verdict a disgrace and said he had never met Carroll. After the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, he said he would continue to “fight against this Weaponization and Lawfare Case against me, including the ridiculous claim of Defamation, with all of my power and strength.”

The case is one of two civil lawsuits filed against Trump by Carroll. During a 2024 trial, a separate federal jury ordered Trump to pay $83 million for defamatory comments he made during his first term in the White House, in which he accused Carroll of fabricating the assault to generate publicity for her book. Trump denied wrongdoing.

A federal appeals court upheld the $83 million judgment. Trump’s lawyers have said they intend to ask the Supreme Court to hear that appeal as well.

Appeal Beyond Stupid

Jack Hopkins has the details on a totally stupid appeal in his report She Waited Seven Years for a Check That Cleared in Three Hours

Today a federal judge ordered the release of $5 million…PLUS nearly $800,000 in interest…to E. Jean Carroll.

The money had been sitting in a court-controlled escrow account for three years… deposited by a man a jury of twelve found…in under three hours…had sexually abused her and then defamed her by calling her a liar. The Supreme Court declined to touch his appeal on June 29. And the money moved.

They argued collection couldn’t begin while “proceedings remain pending.” They argued he should be repaid if some future reversal materialized. They filed late Tuesday night, the classic move of a man hoping the referee’s already gone home.

And the judge looked at all of it and pointed at one thing. The agreement he signed himself.

Back in 2023, Trump’s OWN lawyers agreed…in writing, signed off by the court…that the money would be released to Carroll if the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. Paragraph 8. Their signature. Their terms.

Carroll’s lawyer put it perfectly: “This is the end of the line.” Because the line had been drawn…in ink…by the very man now standing on the wrong side of it.

Carroll went public in 2019. Do the math…that’s seven years. Seven years of being called a hoax…a con…“not my type.” Seven years of appeals…immunity fights…delays…and every procedural stall a bottomless legal budget can buy. Most people quit at year two. Most people settle for pennies at year three just to make the migraine stop. She didn’t.

Every stall costs him money…interest…and credibility…while every day that passes proves the creditor isn’t going anywhere. Eventually…the delays run out of road. They always do. The interest alone…nearly $800,000…is the toll the man paid for three years of “no.”

That’s not just her win. That’s a receipt…framed and hung on the wall…for anyone who’s ever been told the little guy can’t outlast the big one.

There’s a second verdict in the $83 million defamation case still grinding through appeals. He’ll fight that one too. He’ll file at midnight…invoke every doctrine his lawyers can dream up…and wait for everybody to lose interest.

Bet on the mousetrap. Bet on the woman who doesn’t quit.

The powerful can delay a debt. What they can’t do…is delay it forever…not when the deadline is one they signed with their own hand.

P.S. Note the one move he couldn’t make: he couldn’t say the debt wasn’t real. Twelve jurors settled that in under three hours…the appeals court affirmed it…and the Supreme Court declined to disturb it; three justices he appointed himself among them…not one noted dissent. When even the referees you hand-picked…won’t throw the flag, the game is over. The only question left was the date on the check. She just cashed the answer.

Questions of the Day

Just how stupid is an appeal when you agree in writing to pay off if the Supreme Court refuses the case?

And how stupid was it in the first place to think think the Supreme Court would even take the case.

Finally, instead conceding and paying out, Trump stretched this case out, losing another $800,000 in the process.

In doing so, Trump resurfaced the case just in time for the election.

And how stupid is that?

Congrats again to E. Jean Carroll for a hand well played.

Musical Tribute

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

111 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Sentient
Sentient
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

No, you just have to understand that the purported victim had zero evidence and million$ of reasons to lie and that a Manhattan jury would have convicted Trump of kidnapping the Lindbergh baby. Trump is a cad and the Epstein files almost certainly implicate him in crimes. That doesn’t mean he was guilty of doing anything to this particular accuser.

Neil
Neil
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

So Trump installed judges left and right, but still the case against him stands despite appeals. As Mish points out, it is congruent with everything we know about him too. The man brags about sexual harrasment and clearly is in the Epstein files, just to name two things.

This is aside from the court conviction. How on earth would you consider Trump more credible than the accuser here?

todde
todde
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

the court ruling means he is guilty of doing what he is accused of, nothing else.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  todde

To be fair, it’s a civil verdict, so it is not “guilty” verdict. That said, yes, a jury found that a preponderance of evidence supported Carroll’s case.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
15 days ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

Don’t forget in civil cases the burden is on the accused rather than the accuser. So Trump would have to prove innocence rather than Carroll proving guilt.

Its far easier to get wins in civil cases.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

No, the burden of proof remains on the one making the claim, just the standard of proof is lower in a civil case.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

And yet, a jury determined otherwise. That’s the way the law works.

Neal
Neal
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

The Manhattan jury conviction is as unsound as the OJ not guilty verdict. In addition the level of damages doesn’t make sense.$83 million for defamation is excessive in the extreme even if there was actual defamation.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Neal

She was actually a famous columnist and lost her job as a result. And the cruelty of a man mocking a woman whom he raped? She deserves every penny, and he deserves prison.

Last edited 15 days ago by Phil in CT
Neal
Neal
14 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

Are you implying that her lost job was purely because he accused her of lying and that lost job would have paid her anywhere near 83 million between when she lost the job and her likely retires in a few years? Plus the evidence supporting her claimed assault is weak. The jury wanted to get Trump. Had this been Bill Clinton for his alleged rapes would they have found him guilty, Trump is as much a cad as Clinton but there is far more evidence that Clinton is a rapist

Jon
Jon
14 days ago
Reply to  Neal

“Trump is as much a cad as Clinton but there is far more evidence that Clinton is a rapist”

BS.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

When Trump said “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters,” he was thinking of people just like you.

Avery2
Avery2
14 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

I had one of the last Chrysler Fifth Avenues, made in Kenosha.

JCH1952
JCH1952
14 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

There zero evidence that she had zero evidence.

Tenacious D
Tenacious D
13 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

Agreed.

MMchenry, CFA
MMchenry, CFA
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

Trump is proof “Rock Bottom has a basement!”

JCH1952
JCH1952
14 days ago

In the classic “she says, he says” rape case, guess what? He does not automatically win; she does not automatically lose. I know, it’s hard to believe a duplicitous woman like her is allowed to win on her word alone, and it is especially hard to believe an honorable, truth telling man like him could lose despite giving his word.

Webej
Webej
14 days ago

Trump needs to be convicted for war crimes.
Possibly a lot of other transgressions.

The circumstance that he is an obnoxious liar and a toxic narcissist does not prove the facts of this case [there are none]. The standard of proof that surfaces here could result in absolutely any accuser winning a case against anybody. The findings of the jury reflect only political sentiments.

Not defending Trump here, who should go to hell.
That’s not what this is about.

Last edited 14 days ago by Webej
JCH1952
JCH1952
14 days ago
Reply to  Webej

There are no facts in this case that prove there were no facts.

Greg
Greg
15 days ago

ABBA came up with a song to give us an idea about how to take a rest from Trump’s tawdry scandals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQy8D8APo9E

tom
tom
15 days ago
Reply to  Greg

Part of me expects to get Rick Rolled here.

cocoa
cocoa
15 days ago

This is all he said she said stuff. Maybe defamation is worthy Totally not worth the post kilobytes to discuss since Trump has probably made this money in spades insider trading with his kids on oil futures

Curtis
Curtis
15 days ago

Any guy who condemns Trump for saying you can grab women by the pussy is a total asshat. He was joking. When I was a teenager, we would say much worse things about women when hanging out with other men. How about the old saying; “Why do women have legs? So they don’t leave a trail like a snail.” None of would repeat that around other women and we knew it was crude and wrong but we were high testosterone young men. Nothing wrong with being a man. Trump just didn’t mature and stop saying stupid shit like that.

Neal
Neal
14 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

We do see a pattern. You like to attack Trump on anything you think the TDS types like

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
14 days ago
Reply to  Neal

Defending a rapist… What a winner.

The contrast between Democrats reaction to Platner and Republicans with trump could not be more stark

JCH1952
JCH1952
14 days ago
Reply to  Neal

It is just astounding. Again, the only people with TDS are Trump’s supporters. He is a sociopath. The normal response of a normal person to a sociopath is repulsion. The abnormal response is to defend the actions of a sociopath at every turn. We don’t have TDS; you people do. Sociopaths always have followings.

curtis
curtis
14 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

Ever since Joanne passed, you’ve been a bitter man. Not sure you realize that.

Avery2
Avery2
15 days ago

Trump would have been better off roaming the changing rooms at Goldblatt’s Bargain Basement.

Curtis
Curtis
15 days ago

I can’t believe anyone would buy the story concocted by this woman. Every man should condemn these cases of women coming out of the woodwork to accuse someone of sexual assault many years after the fact. It makes it impossible to defend yourself. This trend started back during the Me Too collective lying about past impropriety. Any man who dated girls in their youth is vulnerable to these false accusations. Too many cucks supporting these liars.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Curtis

You know she is lying? Anyway, tell the jury.

JCH1952
JCH1952
14 days ago
Reply to  Curtis

Hilarious. E. Jean Carroll told friends about Trump assaulting her when it happened.

Frosty
Frosty
15 days ago

The larger question is payment/justice for the victims of the long suppressed Epstein/Trump sexual abuses. One has to ask why congress and the DOJ are protecting the political class ~ selectively. The victims should be the priority of justice and the perpetrators being shielded from justice is beyond contemptible in the Epstein situation.

This case should give other Epstein/Trump victims cause for hope that justice can prevail against a wall of attorney costs and lengthly delays.

Last edited 15 days ago by Frosty
Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Frosty

One has to ask why congress and the DOJ are protecting the political class ~ selectively.”

I am not sure what is so selective here. A five year old boy in ICE custody has spent more time in lockup than the entire Epstein black book, combined.

For that matter, Epstein was not an attorney, nor was he affiliated with a law firm. That means that Leon Black (who paid Epstein $158M for “tax and estate planning”, lol) and Les Wexner (who gave Epstein over a billion dollars, either transferred, provided in the form of stock, or given directly) can be deposed under oath, and they cannot refuse to answer questions on grounds of attorney client privilege.

Those are just two prominent names. If nothing else, I am sure there is a money laundering or similar charge in there. At least make them plead the Fifth.

Far as I can tell, the FBI has not given either Black or Wexner so much as aisngle phone call.

Arthur Orwell
Arthur Orwell
13 days ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

Obviously this is secret agency stuff. Secret agencies can commit murder, torture and rape. Is it against the law to say this or something?

Rickmensworth
Rickmensworth
15 days ago

The problem with Trump is he only cares about is money and he sees the case as a transaction ie she gets the money, he’s a guilty rapist. What the jury decided is irrelevant in Trumps gold fish head. Please America, write into your constitution that any future presidents have to be fit for purpose.

I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
15 days ago

All the lawsuits that are going to come down on DT when he is out of office. DT best be grooming someone to replace him in the white house who is as un-restrained as he he is with that pardoning pen.

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
15 days ago

Stupider and stupider… there is no bottom.

Moi
Moi
15 days ago

I’m not a Trump fan but she is an absolute nut job. I saw her do an interview on CNN with Anderson Cooper on 2 occasions, on both occasions Anderson Cooper couldn’t cut to commercial fast enough. The one occasion she was with her lawyer, they had just won the huge judgement, she starts smiling and blabbering to Cooper, “let’s go shopping” she couldn’t start spending that money fast enough. She never came across even slightly credible.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pRDl8DXRC3Q

Neil
Neil
15 days ago
Reply to  Moi

Being a nutjob does not mean you can now be raped without consequence. And so she’s happy she won the settlement: what else should she have done? Be raped and then mourn about the settlement? I don’t think it’s up to you how she processes what happened to her.

These are non-arguments.

Webej
Webej
14 days ago
Reply to  Neil

How do we know she was raped?
How do we know Trump was in the store?
How do we know Trump ever met her?

We don’t. The fact that Trump may well be guilty of similar stuff and that he has no credibility does not amount to evidence. Anybody could have brought this case. A rape in the changing room of a department store and nobody noticed a thing — it is not a credible story to begin with.

JCH1952
JCH1952
14 days ago
Reply to  Webej

In a court of law, the jury decides those questions. They decided she was assaulted based upon testimony. They decided Trump was in the store based upon testimony. They decided Trump met her based upon testimony. If a judge makes an error in giving instructions to the jury, Trump would have won on appeal. He did not win any of his appeals. Even to courts when his own judges were on the panel, which is telling. The evidence of “her story” about Trump’s assault of her was significantly better than you realize. His own judges voted against him. That’s a hint of how far off you are.

Last edited 14 days ago by JCH1952
Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Moi

The jury apparently believed otherwise.

Creamer
Creamer
15 days ago

Hey Mike I’d love to hear your thoughts on what appears to be taxpayer funded subsidies on gas.

https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia/philadelphia-freedom-fuel-stations-trump-gas-price-20260707.html

A White House spokesperson said the Freedom Fuel Network was a private company and not a government program, adding that the company was not purchasing gasoline at a discount and that the administration has not provided funding.

A bunch of gas stations are mysteriously rebranded with AI art and are handing out gas at a ~40 cent loss while Trump brags. El Presidente much?

Creamer
Creamer
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

http://archive.today/Gncep
This should work then. Utter insanity.

While a nearby Citgo, about five minutes away, prices regular gas at $3.79 a gallon, and a Gulf offers it at $3.85, Freedom Fuel offers it at $3.47 a gallon.

Avery2
Avery2
14 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

Mish, one of the worst refineries for watered- down contaminated gasoline was the old Clark Refinery in
Blue Island, next to Eisenhower High School.

cambeiu
cambeiu
15 days ago

Trump: Iran just called. They want to make a deal very badly. 

Reporter: If they want to make a deal, why did they attack commercial vessels?

Trump: Because… they’re sort of crazy. But they want to make a deal badly.

Straight out of a Zucker Brother’s comedy movie (i.e. Airplane, Naked Gun, etc…)

Sentient
Sentient
15 days ago
Reply to  cambeiu

He reportedly called it the Islamic Republic of Japan.

cambeiu
cambeiu
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

Yep. They are using Godzilla to keep the Strait closed.

Webej
Webej
14 days ago
Reply to  cambeiu

Listen to what he said: “They fired missiles at our ships.”
Purportedly 111 missiles were fired at USN assets.
That’s why he’s so upset.

Why did they fire? Because the US has no intention of sticking to anything they have said.

strongGnu
strongGnu
15 days ago

Some unspecific time 20 to 30 years ago in a dressing room at Bergdorf’s Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll. It must have been when they were open but a busy store in New York had 1) No Witnesses 2) No Camara Footage 3) No Police Reports 4) No Physical Exams or evidence 5) Allegations like a Law-and-Order TV episode. 6) NY law changed and Trump sued under the Adult Survivors act on Day 1. 7) Funded by Reid Hoffman (Democratic Operative All Over Epstein files) 8) Carroll perjured herself about Hoffman funding and judge ruled immaterial.9) The dress she was wearing did not exist because the pattern and design were not created during the wide-ranging unspecified time.

All of this from a woman who is clearly about as mentally capable as Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell. She paints her trees blue and has a cat named Vagina. Go watch the after-trial TV interviews. Even the jury could not find Trump guilty on the first and major charge. They had to use the secondary charge.

The democrats used this woman and changed the law so they can sue. A New York jury with a bias judge and rigged trial made this happen.

And we all wonder why ambulance chasing attorneys vote overwhelming Democratic. This is exactly the reason the founders of the country designed the president to only be responsible to the Senate through the house. Shame on anyone who thinks this is justice because they will do it to you. 

Mark
Mark
15 days ago
Reply to  strongGnu

So do you think Graham Platner should have stayed in the race?

moparsully
moparsully
15 days ago
Reply to  strongGnu

I think you meant Kamara and the Saints running back was not alive then so you lose

Mike
Mike
14 days ago
Reply to  strongGnu

+1,000 Just a NY Kangaroo court and politics at their very worst.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago

That rape cost him a lot, but he should have gone to prison for it. These kind of people belong behind bars.

Last edited 15 days ago by Phil in CT
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

As i said above. He wont personally pay, people who buy his crypto are the ones who will. Or others who need a pardon etc.

So she will be responsible for pardons given to criminals.

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

You saying he wouldn’t pardon them if he didn’t have to pay her?

He made 2 billion off crypto alone last year. Nothing will ever be enough. He will always take more.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
15 days ago
Reply to  El Trumpedo

No, im saying pardon money paid by criminals will be used to pay her.

He’d likely pardon anyway but if he needs 83 million it just makes it more likely he’ll pardon a lot more to cover that cost. So in effect she will be responsible for some pardons occurring.

john smith the third
john smith the third
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

This is ridiculous. She isn’t responsible for him being corrupt.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
15 days ago

No but she will be responsible for more pardons being given out.

Which do you think Trump is going to do?
1) Pay 83 million of his own money
2) Pay 83 million in pardon money

He can generate lots of cash from pardons and access to himself via crypto. It’s been going on now since he was back in office.

pokercat
pokercat
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

So you are stating as a fact that tRump is selling pardons?

86/47 25th, impeach or god whatever works.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
15 days ago
Reply to  pokercat

Current price is 1 million.

Neil
Neil
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

Of course she is not responsible for corrupt pardons. Trump is the one doing that, not her. Is it your fault if someone pays off a debt to you with illegally obtained money because you are owed something in the first place?

Of course not! It would mean I am now free to rob someone because the store claims cash for the goods I bought from them. That would be the store’s fault. I don’t think it could get much sillier.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

To be fair, I don’t know the evidence was strong enough to support a guilty verdict in a criminal trial.

Webej
Webej
14 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

What rape?

Jeff Larry
Jeff Larry
15 days ago

That he applauds anything this vile woman has done in regards to this lawsuit is definitive proof that Mish has lost his fucking marbles.

My God….

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Jeff Larry

What kind of trash defends a rapist…

Hmk
Hmk
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

Go f yourself. That woman is a lying pos.You morons believe anything that is anti trump. how pathetic . No fucking common sense. I can’t believe how pathetic this blog has become.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Hmk

This kinda trash 😂

MMchenry, CFA
MMchenry, CFA
15 days ago
Reply to  Hmk

“She’s a lying POS?” Really, how? Actually she’s been very principaled and just jumped through the hoops that Trump always does to beat creditors.
Did she have her “hotels and casino businesses of his [Trump’s] have declared bankruptcy six times between 1991 and 2009 due to its inability to meet required payments and to re-negotiate debt with banks, owners of stock and bonds and various small businesses (unsecured creditors).

Neil
Neil
15 days ago
Reply to  Hmk

Why do we even have courts, when we could just let you decide who’s guilty and who’s not? Even the Trump controlled supreme court did not want to touch this, which is strange since she is “a lying pos”. At least, according to your amazing truth sensor.

Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Hmk

People keep tossing the R word around, and it’s got absolutely nothing to do with this case. NO Charge for anything, but sexual assault, which is miles away from rape.

I don’t know or care if he’s guilty, this change is like petty theft is to a bank robbery. No prison time, and just a cash settlement, or money grab depending on how you personally view the story.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Stu

The judge himself said it met the common definition of rape. Be honest, you don’t care that trump raped women. You voted for him and that’s all the information you need.

Last edited 15 days ago by Phil in CT
Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

The judge himself said it met the common definition of rape. > No Charges for any such thing.

– Be honest, you don’t care that trump raped women. > I despise such atrocities, and if Trump was charged and convicted he would be a Scum Bag in my eyes. I have not seen this occur as of yet. Just lots of speculation so far. I care about honesty too.

– You voted for him and that’s all the information you need. > Because Biden or Auto Pen Man was the other option. Thanks, but no thanks, and I am still very happy with my choice, after seeing what Biden didn’t accomplish. That’s the only reason why.

Let me guess, you voted for and carried water for Biden and Kamala, just be honest now…

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Now your weasel words and mealy-mouthed bullshit… the judge said what Trump did meets the common definition of rape. You voted for a rapist and continue to defend it. Abhorrent. Morally corrupt people like you allow all this to go on. You might as well be a rapist yourself since you endorse it.

Last edited 15 days ago by Phil in CT
Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Hmk

The jury determined she was credible. Deal with it.

Arthur Orwell
Arthur Orwell
13 days ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

Aren’t juries chosen as far as possible from among people who are mentally retarded, or as near to it as you can get on the street?

Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

The worst as it’s indefensible and horrid on every level imaginable imho!

Green Mountain
Green Mountain
15 days ago
Reply to  Jeff Larry

How many times does Trump have to be accused of mistreatment of women before you believe it? He has cheated on three wives, two while they were pregnant. Boasted how he likes to use and abuse women, there is evidence in the Epstein files of his strong sympathies with Epstein’s style.(Just release the files) At some point something is going to stick. This is what having some moral code looks like.

Sentient
Sentient
15 days ago
Reply to  Green Mountain

The issue isn’t whether Trump is a POS. It’s that this civil judgment against him had no evidence relating to this particular accuser. StrongGnu (above) states it well – and I rarely agree with him.

todde
todde
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

when a person testifies in a court of law under oath, that is evidence.

if the jury finds that evidence credible, a judgement based on that evidence will be rendered.

that is what happened here.

pokercat
pokercat
15 days ago
Reply to  Green Mountain

It doesn’t matter if his cabinet or congress won’t act. The stupidity of American voters is his life line.

Bill Meyer
Bill Meyer
15 days ago

Sorry, but I still think this was a bullshit case and decision. L.A. psychiatrist and New York native Dr. Carole Lieberman tells me and insists that there is absolutely no way, given the layout of the “rape store”, that Carrol’s story held water. Claims deep familiarity with the store as a long time customer. Undoubtedly this will be unpopular with the TDS posters, but I’m up to here with “I was raped 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60 years ago and I want Just-Us” stories. Trump has undoubtedly done a lot of things over the years but this one always smelled.

JCH1952
JCH1952
15 days ago
Reply to  Bill Meyer

A psychiatrist who believes the tens of millions of completely normal people who are totally repulsed by Donald Trump – it is normal to be repulsed by an extreme sociopath – have a mental illness. She’s completely off her rocker. 100% looney.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Bill Meyer

Be honest, you’re not bothered that Trump is a rapist.

Sentient
Sentient
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

Oh fer fuck’s sake, grow up. Can we move beyond Team Red and Team Blue? How a commenter feels is beside the point. Trump may be the rapeyest of rapists. He probably is. That doesn’t mean this civil case proved anything.

Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

I feel the same way about the Epstein Files. If there was anything at all, that was worthy of charges, it would have been done a long time ago, like in the last election for starters. Nothing to see or prove there either, and lots of people were involved. It’s a dead story with no leads, no proof, no evidence, so no story. Unless something new pops up, this should be accepted for what it was. A story with no proof.

todde
todde
15 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

its over. Trump lost. pay him some money if you feel so bad for him.

Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

He is only charged with “Sexual Assault” It’s important to get the charges correct. The implications are very different, as is the potential punishment. It’s up to a jury to decide, if it goes that far, or only a settlement could be in play. Not sure what will be the final outcome, but rape is not in the picture or related to this particular story.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Trump is a rapist ( the judge said so) and you’re the sort of person who tries to excuse rape.

Tony Frank
Tony Frank
15 days ago

Taco is getting off light. Of course, he is still seeking avenues to avoid this payment.

Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Tony Frank

The fact that the SJC denied to hear it the first time around, echos a similar ruling this go around. The money has been paid already, but is in Bond Form. No way around having to pay, eventually, but it’s silly because it was already so…

Mike R
Mike R
15 days ago

Perfect, sounds like she’ll get the $5M this week.

Let’s hope she lives long enough to see the $83M too. I’m guessing that is what drumpf is hoping for, that he will outlive her and not have to pay either sum.

Jeff Larry
Jeff Larry
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

And that seems reasonable to you? For something that never happened?

Good grief, man.

Hmk
Hmk
15 days ago
Reply to  Jeff Larry

Mish has lost common sense endorsing this type of bullshit. Time for me to unsubscribe

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
15 days ago
Reply to  Hmk

Noooooo! Don’t go! We neeeeeeeed you here!

Stu
Stu
15 days ago
Reply to  Jeff Larry

Legally speaking I do believe, that Trump was only found civilly liable for sexual abuse. That’s it.

CzarChasm Reigns
CzarChasm Reigns
15 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Just the standard pussy grab.
Not unlike the grip he has upon Congress…
since they lack the balls Jean has displayed.

Stu
Stu
15 days ago

The story doesn’t need opinions, but rather facts. None available so far in regards to rape, and she isn’t asking for it either. No story there to be told according to the woman’s as well from the looks of it. A money grab and probably warranted, but that’s it…

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
15 days ago
Reply to  Stu

You’re a giant piece of shit dude

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike R

He’ll just fleece some more people in his crypto to pay her off including the 83 million.

Won’t cost him personally a dime.

syncopatient
syncopatient
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

Scripture says, as it will for anyond else, it will cost him even more if he wrongs/fleeces people to try and pay his penalties.

“And the record [of deeds] will be placed [open], and you will see the criminals fearful of that within it, and they will say, ‘Oh, woe to us! What is this book that leaves nothing small or great except that it has enumerated it?’ And they will find what they did present [before them]. And your Lord does injustice to no one.” 

todde
todde
15 days ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

Trump uses people who trust him. that is for sure.

pokercat
pokercat
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike R

If she dies before the payment it would go to her estate. It will be nearly impossible to get out of this judgement.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
15 days ago
Reply to  Mike R

If Trump were to tip over, Carroll would still have a claim that could be satisfied against the estate. Her claim would not just go away.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.