Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

New Home Sales Jump an Astonishing 28 Percent in August

New home sales data from commerce department, chart by Mish.

The Commerce Department’s New Home Sales Report for August was a huge upside surprise.

New Home Sales

  • Sales of new single‐family houses in August 2022 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 685,000.
  • This is 28.8 percent (±18.3 percent) above the revised July rate of 532,000, but is 0.1 percent (±16.5 percent) below the August 2021 estimate of 686,000.

Sales Price

The median sales price of new houses sold in August 2022 was $436,800. The average sales price was $521,800.

For Sale Inventory and Months’ Supply

The seasonally‐adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of August was 461,000. This represents a supply of 8.1 months at the current sales rate.

Supply is more than a bit misleading. It includes homes for sale that have not even been started.

New Homes For Sale By Stage of Construction

Of the purported 461,000 homes for sale, only 49,000 are complete. 

106,000 thousand homes for sales are not even started. 306,000 are in some stage of construction other than complete. 

Astonishing Report 

The commerce department revised July lower, but the number was a shocking blowout.

The Econoday consensus range was 400,000 to 522,000. I highly doubt this number will survive revisions.

That said, the chart of sales is still in a major downtrend. Before looking at the numbers I noted bond yields. The 30-year bond yield is up 13 basis points as I type, to 3.83%. 

The 10-year yield is up 9 basis point to 3.98 percent, closing in 4.00 percent. 

These numbers will not help anyone looking for a Fed pivot.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Existing home sales down in August. So either the new homes number is bogus or for some reason there was a huge preference shift for new homes over existing.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
30YFRM dropped about 1.2% during that period. Obviously, this caused a spike in sales coupled with modest price reductions and incentives from builders to buy down mortgage rates. And, there’s still a lot of money chasing housing. Let’s see what happens this month with MND showing the 30YFRM at an eye popping 7.08% today. NICE!
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
For sale isn’t sold. Bad news : more supply, more competition, less demand : prices and mortgage rates are rising vertically.
The 2006 peak might be breached.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
“Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more…”
“God for Harry, England, and Saint George!”
Eric89011
Eric89011
3 years ago
Fear of missing out?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Eric89011
TINA 2 FOMO
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Reply to  Eric89011
FOMO lower interest rates, and expecting currency debasement to pay for higher home prices with cheaper money. Looking back, this was the correct strategy for the 1970’s. There are several distinct differences this time. More people own homes now, personal debt ratios force people to wait longer to buy a home, a higher percent of national debt is held by foreign countries. I see a saturated housing market with no more fools to sell to.
hmk
hmk
3 years ago
I am wondering about whenever the inflation rate reaches the feds target rate, so what. We are still screwed. Home prices will still be unaffordable at todays prices for most, food will still be outrageously inflated, etc. So we will have reached a higher unaffordable price level plateau that doesn’t increase more than 2 percent per year. If wages go up so the average person can afford to buy this stuff costs go up also and thus prices again. Like a dog chasing its tail. My old neighbor just sold her existing home a week ago at such an inflated price that only an idiot would pay for. Something implausible and unseeming is going, on I don’t get it.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  hmk
The trick is not to simply create a perpetual motion machine but to harness useful power from it.
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
The increase in sales likely reflects the 5% interest rate in August, after a 6.25% interest rate the month before. This is likely a real, one time blip, not to be repeated after “lock-in” rates from August expire.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Chicago Federal Reserve President Charles Evans spoke today … FOMC sticking to their guns (for now):

Reducing inflation to a level consistent with the Fed’s 2 percent objective will require a period of restrictive financial conditions. These will generate below-trend growth and some softening of labor market conditions and restore better balance between supply and demand conditions in the U.S. My FOMC colleagues and I are acutely aware that this slowdown will, unfortunately, cause difficulties for some households and businesses. Yet, failing to restore price stability would result in far greater costs.

So, with this in mind, what comes next for monetary policy? Last week, the FOMC voted to raise the federal funds rate target by 75 basis points to a range of 3 to 3-1/4 percent and indicated that further rate increases will likely be in order. Also, as previously announced, in September we stepped up the pace at which we are reducing the size of our balance sheet.

How much more tightening might be necessary? One way to gauge this comes from the Committee’s quarterly Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) released last week, which presents FOMC participants’ forecasts of key economic variables over the next three to four years and for the longer run. The median SEP projection is for the federal funds rate to be in the range of 4-1/4 to 4-1/2 percent by the end of this year, though I would note almost as many FOMC participants wrote down 4 to 4-1/4 percent for their end-of-year numbers. So most think we’re looking at something like another 100 to 125 basis points of rate increases this calendar year. The median projection then has rates rising a bit further, to 4.6 percent at the end of next year, and then declining to 2.9 percent over the subsequent two years. My own viewpoint is roughly in line with the median assessment.

Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
People keep talking about interest rates. Watch the money stock. M2 is stalling. But our “means-of-payment” money supply is rising. And the “demand for money” is falling. The FED’s in trouble.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
In more ways than one. Federal Reserve paying interest on reserves (at meeting last week raised rate from 2.4% to 3.15%) means less remitted to US Treasury. I think at current burn rate (and interest raises at next couple of meetings) they’ll have an operating loss by early next year.
What will Mr Market (and Congress) think of “deferred assets” then?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
The FED is fine. Everybody who didn’t load up on assets before the FED everything-bubble is screwed.
Hope they will know who is the culprit in due time.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I am always surprised when Mr. Evans manages to find his way down from his office to LaSalle St. unaided.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
“My FOMC colleagues and I are acutely aware that this slowdown will, unfortunately, cause difficulties for some households and businesses.”
What the illiterate clown is obviously not “acutely aware” of; is that for every household and business which experience a loss from this “slowdown”, another will experience an offsetting gain.
Printing dead guys faces on paper pieces, nor adding zeros to numbers, does not create any wealth. Ergo, NOT printing dead guys faces on paper pieces, does not reduce wealth. Ergo, total wealth remains the same either way. That truism will hold until The Fed starts doing something productive with their pathetic, illiterate little lives. Such that some of what they do, actually starts creating any real wealth. Until that day, nothing they do changes total wealth. Hence; inevitably and obviously so; all they are engaged in, is pure redistribution: Taking from some, in order to hand the loot to others.
Hence, any “gain” someone experiences as a result of Fed printing; as well as any “loss” someone experiences as a result of the Fed’s temporary slowdown in printing; will ALWAYS, inevitably, be offset by someone else’s opposite and equal loss and/or gain. Kind of sad to repeatedly see such basic arithmetic being so obviously hard to grasp in some quarters….. #DumbAge, by now in its advantage stages, I suppose.
It’s not as if the monkeys piled high at The Fed and on “Wall Street” haven’t bee taught exactly the above. It’s no more than just another rehash of Bastiat’s age old Broken Window fallacy: Dimbulbs running around breaking windows while patting themselves on the back for doing such a great job of “stimulating the economy” by “creating” window fixing “jobs!” Without having the brains and literacy to see beyond that.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“New homes sales were an upside shocker in August, whomping even the most optimistic estimates.”
Two things (remember new home sale counted at signing … not at closing)
1) per MND … average 30yr mortgage 5.05% on August 1st … 5.99% August 31st
Today? … Blew thru 7% to 7.08%
2) “Nationwide, roughly 64,000 home-purchase agreements fell through in August, equal to 15.2% of homes that went under contract that month. That’s up from 12.1% a year earlier and is comparable with July’s revised rate of 15.5%. The percentage has now hovered around 15% for the past three months—the highest level on record with the exception of March and April 2020, when the onset of the coronavirus pandemic brought the housing market to a near standstill. Before the pandemic, it was consistently around 12%.”
lamlawindy
lamlawindy
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I saw that MND number: incredible! Hard to wrap my head around the fact that rates have about doubled in the past 52 weeks.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Apologies for the delay – I was out hiking this morning hoping to see moose.
No moose, just beavers in Northern Utah.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I guess you’ll have to try again. Apparently there are moose in northern Utah.
I thought they were all in Canada or the northern US states like Montana. Whenever I’ve seen them in Canada (and I’ve seen them countless times), it’s always been in/next to a river/swamp. So if you are hiking looking for them stay close to the water.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
HEEEEE
Where do you think beavers reside???
I’ve seen a single moose while traveling through the mountains in Northern Utah a few years ago.
Most the time watching hunting shows, and when their hunting in Utah, they show a lonely moose!!!

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.