Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Money Supply Is Headed for 6th Month of Contraction

ODL and M2 aggregates from St. Louis Fed

ODL vs M2 Chart Notes

  • Other Deposit Liabilities (ODL see description below), is a monthly average.
  • M2 is a monthly measure through February.

A Better Definition of Money

The main difference between ODL and M2 is that ODL does not include currency or retail money market funds.

Currency is accepted at an increasingly fewer number of business establishments and simply cannot be used for very large sized transactions. Retail money market funds never became an important medium of exchange. Both are becoming a far less used medium of exchange.

ODL has the additional advantage that it is the main source of funding for bank loans and investments, making ODL both a monetary and credit aggregate. Friedman would not be surprised that the need to change the best definition of what constitutes money would change over the years. 

The above three paragraphs from Lacy Hunt at Hoisington Management.

Chart from the Fed’s H.8 release, highlights mine

Don’t confuse ODL with the Fed’s H.6 Money Stock Report line Other Liquid Deposits. 

The Biggest Collapse in M2 Money Supply Since the Great Depression

ODL and M2 aggregates from St. Louis Fed

My ODL numbers do not match the H.8 report because the St. Louis Fed (Fred) uses a Monthly Average calculation whereas the H.8 report is weekly.

The Fed appears to average complete weeks that fall within the month but Fred (the St. Louis Fed download) doesn’t. 

ODL is headed for a 6th consecutive decline, every month starting October.

Constraints on Bank Lending

The contraction in money supply coupled with a rise in interest rates has reduced the desire of banks to lend and the desire of businesses and individual to borrow. 

The key constraint on bank lending is not reserves or deposits but rather capital impairment. 

If banks are not capital impaired, they will lend if they believe they have good credit risks who want to borrow. 

Three Bank Failures

Since my last report on ODL, three banks,  Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank, collapsed and were taken over by the FDIC because of duration mismatch losses and runs on the banks. 

In addition, losses at regional banks are mounting due to implosions in commercial real estate. 

The bank failures, commercial real estate woes, and recession risk all inhibit lending.

MishTalk Video, What’s the Real Risk Now, Is it Inflation or Deflation?

Given the obvious inflationary forces, that may seem like a silly question, but please consider this video discussion: What’s the Real Risk Now, Is it Inflation or Deflation?

The short answer is Credit Freezes Are Highly Deflationary. See the above link for details and discussion. 

 This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Perplexed Pete
Perplexed Pete
3 years ago
Whan a bank issues a loan it creates new, digital money that didn’t exist before the borrower signed the loan contract. When the borrower repays the loan principal, this money is “extinguished”, meaning it ceases to exist. Because the entire money supply is created as loan principal created by bank loans, there is never enough money in existence to repay all loan principal plus interest. (proofs at bank LIES d0t 0rg)
When banks reduce or stop new lending (lending = new money creation), the money supply shrinks as loan principal is repaid and extinguished. This is like a river drying up that powered a hydroelectric dam; the river is bank-created money, and the hydroelectric dam is our economy. We should expect a wave of loan defaults in the coming year or two due to a decrease in bank-created money creation.
Mish is correct if he is calling for a near-term deflation (just like he was correct in 2008). But the long-term picture is steadily growing debt levels and ever-increasing prices due to the snowballing effect of interest payments built into all prices. (See chart at St. Louis FRED “total debt all sectors” “TCMDO”). Ten years from now, this deflation will look like a short decline in a trail leading straight up a mountain.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Perplexed Pete
Perplexed – do not confuse a stock of money with a flow of money that is used to pay interest.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
How does the money supply decline when the Fed backstopped banks with $400B in low interest loans?
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
BINGO. mish and some of the commenters here are very confused with just occurred. mish is great at r/e analysis. the best out there. but his currency trading and analysis is flawed. i’ve been trading FX for decades. it’s a deep market and takes decades to master the twisted game of electric currency creation in an untethered fiat world. i’ll be walking past the FED RES NY today. i’ll tip my hat to the private scam artists that own it. they have only one mandate. the middlebrows will never catch on.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“The key constraint on bank lending is not reserves or deposits but rather capital impairment.”
Yes. If you dive a bit deeper the problem resides in smaller to medium banks (big banks are doing fine). The facilities Federal Reserve recently opened cater to what the big banks own. Eligible collateral for usage includes gse mbs and treasuries (big banks have lots of) … meanwhile small / medium banks chock full of CRE loans (not eligible). Recent moves by Treasury / Federal Reserve will have enhanced dampening effect on lending.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
good points. would love to see a r/e crash the next few years.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Unfortunately, CRE can crash while RE can stay lofty.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
i’m impartial to commercial or residential r/e crashing. just look forward to cap rates rising to the level i bought at in the last debacle……circa 2011 and 2012 low points in city i was living back then.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Good. It means inflation will come down fast.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
You get a gold star. Well done.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Real or fake gold? I accept cash too.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Of course so-called “inflation” all depends on exactly what arbitrary “Basket” The Fed feels suits it’s needs next month.
BUT: For specifically “consumer” (:rolleyes but still..) prices: ODL is unlikely to be as good an indicator as M2. Those are exactly the sort of transactions where, in particular currency, plays a big part. M2 is declining as well; but most of the decline comes from ODL components; which aren’t necessarily what drives decisions whether to buy, or not buy, a can of soup.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
When large CDs spike, there will be a recession. An increase in TDs/savings accounts, is contractionary. There is virtually no money turnover in investment type accounts at commercial banks.
Banks don’t lend deposits. Deposits are the result of lending. All bank-held savings are lost to both consumption and investment, indeed to any type of payment or expenditure.

See: “Should Commercial banks accept savings deposits?” Conference
on Savings and Residential Financing 1961 Proceedings, United States Savings
and loan league, Chicago, 1961, 42, 43. By Dr. Leland James Pritchard, Ph.D.,
Economics, Chicago 1933, M.S. Statistics, Syracuse.

“Profit or Loss from Time
Deposit Banking”, Banking and Monetary Studies, Comptroller of the Currency,
United States Treasury Department, Irwin, 1963, pp. 369-386

Secular stagnation is simply the deceleration in the velocity of
monetary savings, income not spent. It’s stock vs. flow.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
also M1 which was conveniently redefined for covid Trillions, is tracked still by some folks. it’s a hockey stick up. we have stagflation at best. seems like price inflation for essentials in life, and perhaps asset depresssion on it’s way in r/e out west and the impending commercial sector which will take years to unwind. smells like the late 1920s when price inflation was raging but farm defaults were already happening starting in 1926 if memory serves. most were 5 year balloons. dicey stuff.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
There is no “Fool in the Shower”. Without a continued contraction in the money stock, there will be no recession this year.
Contrary to economic theory, & Nobel laureate, Dr. Milton Friedman and Anna
J. Swartz (“Money and Business Cycles”), monetary lags are not “long &
variable” (A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960, published in
1963).
The rate-of-change in short-term money
flows, the volume and velocity of money, the proxy for real output in American
Yale Professor Irving Fisher’s truistic “equation of exchange” needs to fall for 10 consecutive months to start a recession.
But the FED reversed course in March:
Assets: Other Factors Supplying Reserve Balances: Total Factors Supplying Reserve Funds: Wednesday Level (WTFSRFL) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
The transaction’s velocity of funds also increased in March due to the shifting of deposit balances.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
honest question mish. how do you account for the new 400 billion the FED is showing on it’s balance sheet with new facility to take in underwater bonds at par. nice deal for bad bank managers. this is an honest question and would love your comments. https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Yes, the FED has reversed course, injected new money, erased part of its QT.
A large part of its unwinding stems from the transfer of bank deposits to financial intermediaries (nonbanks). This activates existing savings.
It’s no happenstance that stocks have resumed an uptrend.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
thanks for your comments. much appreciated. i believe james grant and shadow stats when it comes to counting money inflation. as james grant said to us personally a few short weeks ago, money supply and inflation is cumulative. last time i did my daily reality test, the 100 USD in my wallet buys me bubkis, compared to a short few years ago. forget a decade or two ago. i’d love money deflation, but ain’t happening.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“Yes, the FED has reversed course, injected new money, erased part of its QT.”
Recent balance sheet expansion has nothing to do with QE (“printing”) … in fact, QT (assets OWNED run off) has continued.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
You don’t get a rise in stocks and bonds without an increase in liquidity.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Not necessarily. A change in preference of assets held would do the trick.
Anyway, liquidity is global. Federal Reserve represents only one person at the poker table.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Yes, if you change the composition of assets, then there could be an easing. Also, if you look at the currency component, you’ll see that it has accelerated.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
you think the new 400 billion on fed balance sheet which bought in bonds at way over priced to market, with no haircut is NOT part of “electronic printing” of our money ? seriously? of course it’s new currency. that’s inflationary. they just conjured it up and called it a new facility. yea. a facility of brand new spanking currency.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
No.
For starters, securities not bought, but posted as collateral for loans. Yes, no haircut on collateral, but 1) only already fully guaranteed by US taxpayer eligible and 2) loans made with recourse (beyond collateral surrendered). Blanket recourse. ANY asset owned by borrower fair game. Borrowing from Federal Reserve has a stigma (no one else with trade with you) + at ABOVE market rate. This INFLATIONARY?
Rather than QE which most seem to think … Federal Reserve is your neighborhood loan shark … with brass knuckles.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
posted as collateral at face value, for loans, is the free money. you got that part correct. they got bailed out with the ability to keep lending on junk paper. they would have been kaput
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
….this all keeps the $$$ sloshing about.
You nailed it – there is too much money in the system for a crash. This $400b just keeps the party alive.
Art Fully
Art Fully
3 years ago
Well after the concepts of M1, M2, etc. were formalized, a complex parallel structure of government capital requirements arose, intended to secure the shadow banking activities of bank holding companies. The capital controls appear to have completely eliminated the need for bank reserve requirements (that’s why the Fed is comfortable eliminating them). So as the growth of non-bank banking activities continues, it’s simply not clear what role traditional measures like M2 play in restraining the availability of credit. It’s interesting to note that Cayman Islands (pop. 68,136) financial institutions hold about $2 trillion in US long term securities – more than any other country except Japan. These are almost all structured securities (CLOs, CMOs, etc) created by US banking subsidiaries in the Caymans. Increasingly banks originate loans, reap the fees, and get them off the books as quickly as possible by bundling them into structured securities. Most of this activity is outright evasion of US credit controls enabled by the friendlier climate of the Caribbean.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Fully
M1 and M2 are mud pie. See: “The Riddle of Money Finally Solved” by Dr. Philip George
“For nearly a century the progress of macroeconomics has been stalled by a single error, an error so silly that generations to come will scarcely believe that it could have persisted for as long as it has done. It is an error that has been committed by John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman, John Hicks and James Tobin, Franco Modigliani and Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard and Paul Krugman, and continues to be taught to every economics undergraduate today.”
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Do I have to buy the book to see what error he was alluding to?
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

“When interest
rates go up, flows into savings and time deposits increase” ( the ratio of M1
to the sum of 12 months savings ).

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Thanks. Now I don’t have to buy the book…..but maybe I do. Why did all the great economists miss that but the author did not?
Eighthman
Eighthman
3 years ago
As to the money supply and its value, has anyone ever offered evidence that Treasury auctions are partly a hoax? Is the Fed secretly supporting them by hidden purchases to fend off market failure? Maybe weird purchases from Belgium or the Caymans? Or hidden entirely?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Yet another comparison to the Great Depression.
Directed Energy
Directed Energy
3 years ago
M2 just getting back to the linear trend line. Not much to see here, seems like a nothingburger.
Stores are still full of people, hotels still expensive and camp sites booking up for the summer travel days.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
I’m in North Florida (the Gateway to Florida according to those fancy road signs), the restaurants here aren’t full at all. And everyone is hating the prices in the grocery stores. This has been an increasing trend.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“M2 just getting back to the linear trend line.”
You do realize the almost the entirety of trend shown occurred during a period of balance sheet expansion or neutrality … let’s see what happens under sustained QT.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Agree. Too much money still sloshing around. Still cannot buy vehicles – 4 mth wait lists still normal. EVs are 12-14 mths. Used cars almost same price as new. New car prices ridiculous – PDI fees are 3x what they were until recently. People still lining up to buy. Tons of great jobs still coming available- people still jumping to better opportunities. Restaurants full.
People who bought RE last year are worried and some in trouble. Everyone else sitting on houses bought for 100k, now worth 500k. They are feeling rich.
Maybe quiet before the storm, but things still booming.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.