Persistent Delusion of the Far-Left Yields Inflation, Border Chaos, and Warrenesqe Policy

Progressive Bad Examples and Overreach

A blistering opinion piece by Gerald Baker in the WSJ highlights the accomplishment of Biden’s term so far.

Please consider Biden Emerges as Progressive Government’s Mr. Bad Example

Say what you will, but Joe Biden’s first year in office has one crowning achievement to its name. It has provided a real-time, data-rich, high-intensity and ultimately devastating case study in the defining conceit of progressive politics: the idea that government is the solution.

Those liberal geniuses who told us they could manage the economy like a well-honed machine have managed to create the highest inflation in nearly 40 years, eroding real wages and imperiling economic stability. The brilliant ideologues who run our cities have presided over a surge in violent crime that has reduced life for many residents to a real-life dystopia. Those omniscient technocrats who know how to devise and implement a humane and functioning immigration policy have left us with a border in name only and chaos and lawlessness to accompany it. The strategic geniuses who told us “America is back” produced a debacle in Afghanistan whose full ramifications for U.S. security we haven’t even begun to see.

It’s not too harsh a judgment to say that this is a man who has risen to the top of American public life without a trace of accomplishment. When you’ve been in national politics for almost 50 years, you ought to have achieved something, if only by accident. But this journeyman politician, when he wasn’t getting almost all the big issues wrong, was largely a bystander. He is now a husk of a leader, a dangerously debilitated figure, who oscillates between displays of vacuous incoherence and weird, angry outbursts, like a confused old man at the wrong bus stop.

A year ago a bit of wise humility about what he—and government—could achieve would have served the president-elect well. Instead, in less than a year, we have an object lesson in why progressive governance is an oxymoron.

A Word About Afghanistan

The only thing above I disagree with pertains to Afghanistan. 

I congratulate Biden for leaving even though how he went about it was a disaster. 

Let’s not conflate the correct idea with how it was delivered. Trump promised to get us out and failed. Indeed, Trump failed to get the US troops out of anywhere.

But other than Afghanistan, heck even Afghanistan for the way it happened, has been a big disaster. 

Biden’s Bank Regulatory Nominee Espouses Helicopter Money and Praises the Old USSR

Some of the things Biden planned to do were so awful not even Democrats could support them. 

On November 15, I noted Biden’s Bank Regulatory Nominee Espouses Helicopter Money and Praises the Old USSR

Under her plan, laid out in a 2016 paper, the Federal Reserve would set prices in large sectors of the U.S. economy that she deems to be ‘systemically important prices,’ . . . ‘… widely used fuels, foodstuffs, and some other raw material’ and ‘wage or salary indices,’ among others.

Peoples’ Ledger

By People’s Ledger, she wants the Fed to hand out free money. That is something the Fed cannot legally do. The Fed can only lend.

Handing out free money at will by the decision of the Fed to achieve equality is the sure way to insane inflation. 

Warrenesque Policy and Appointments

Omarova presented the biggest collection of bad ideas in one paper for any cabinet nominee in history.

No one should be surprised by this even though Biden is not bright enough to find these Marxist nut cases on his own

The Progressive wing of the party led by Elizabeth Warren finds them and presents them to Biden.

We are stuck with Elizabeth Warren and the Progressive wing trying to run policy for three more years. 

The midterms will change that dynamic but it will not change the  Warrenesque appointments and especially executive orders. 

As another case in point please note Biden Wilts Under Progressive Pressure, Extends Student Loan Repayment Pause.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren want the Administration to discharge $50,000 per borrower, which would cost the government $1 trillion, according to the Brookings Institution.

Mr. Biden in January said he doubted he had the legal authority to erase student debt. But in the spring he asked the Education Department to conduct a legal analysis and then appointed Toby Merrill as the deputy general counsel. Ms. Merrill wrote a memo to Ms. Warren this year arguing that the President has the authority.

Three More Years of Executive Overreach 

We have 3 more years of executive overreach coming.

This is despite the likelihood Democrats will be blasted in the midterm elections.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
2 years ago
That WSJ critique is just a biased hit job coming from a right wing ideology that doesn’t offer any answers either. Pols on the left and right are habituated to their respective orthodoxies. Why not try something that is the perfect integration that effects a dynamically robust profit making, deflationary Austrianism without the required pain and suffering for enterprise and the individual that its orthodoxy blithely overlooks,  and that also satisfies the somewhat more ethically sensitive leftists by making a guaranteed increase in economic democracy the reality without having to tax the sh!t out of everyone.  Wealthy and poor oppressed of the world unite! All you have to lose are your worn out and unworkable orthodoxies!   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PLNJLRN/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=wisdomics-Gracenomics&qid=1552358772&s=books&sr=1-1-catcorr
wmjack50
wmjack50
2 years ago
Prof. Walter Williams : The wealthy serve others with a skill. The poor (not handicapped ) only serve themselves. Money is ” certificates of performance ” used to prove that you have served your fellowman when you place a claim on your fellowman’s property (a purchase in a store) 
Taxes are legalized theft nothing more,
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
I see life’s getting back to it’s normal repressed state under the Taliban.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
The warlords that were supported by the US would do the same thing – with a velvet glove on.
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
2 years ago
Acountant is in the name (Masters from a Pac-12 loser).  Nixon’s unforgiveable sin was to untether USD to gold.  US Air Force, an hour south of my house would enforce the new order.  When you have enough inventory to bomb 24/7 for six weeks in a row, and then put boots on the ground any where in the world, your money rules.  When you lose the heart to do that, Get Gold.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
if you get rid of student loan debt, than college degrees cannot be a job requirement and folks who paid 50K for that degree would get govt. check for 50K..
Biden is the pale white horse, it will not end well for many, fire up the popcorn. Progressives are like ticks, clinging to you and then latching on then discharging all sorts of evil when they are removed…..
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Not only that, but it would be unreasonable to require an education. Everyone should be entitled to a diploma, regardless of their educational achievements or learning level.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Well, Biden is the guy who authored the bill that says student loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.    Get this – you could borrow 50K, blow it all in Vegas and you are allowed to file for bankruptcy, but if you borrowed 50K to study to become a dentist and then had to drop out because you got paralyzed in an accident, you still cannot file for bankruptcy.  Let that sink in.

Biden is also the guy who said he has “no empathy” for today’s students and young people.

The most one can expect from Biden would be a waiver of all interest accumulated on student loans from 2020 onward, but looking at how he and his administration are dragging their feet, even that may be asking for too much.

Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Not allowing debt to be discharged in bankruptcy has been a huge boon for Universities, and  for Professors and Administrators. For many years, they faced no financial pressure at all. They engaged in a massive building boom, and salaries rose dramatically. They could do that because there was no resistance to Tuition increases. Before the bill, student loans are hard to get, and not all that common, and tended to be small. Once student debt could no longer be discharged in bankruptcy, lendors were eager to lend to students, and student loans became easy to get, and became very large. Who cares what the tuition is? Just sign the papers, and you are good to go.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
OT:   Trudeau says western countries need to stand together against China
rojogrande
rojogrande
2 years ago
“We have 3 more years of executive overreach coming.”
Yes, if Jayapal’s op-ed in WaPo today indicates what Democrats plan to do going forward.  They must be protecting our democracy by circumventing it. 
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
I correctly called the “Build Back Better” plan dead months ago.
That said, I still expect a ~$1.75T package to pass this winter but with fewer programs included, and what will be included will be funded to match the duration of revenue collection. Child tax credit probably won’t be included as there is no way to make it last 10 years.
Dems really bungled this one… instead of negotiating in good faith with Manchin on the front end, the just pressed ahead with a ridiculous, gimmicky plan which was never gonna pass. If they keep acting stupid they risk passing no bill at all.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  QTPie
That was the plan.   Biden is the “nothing will fundamentally change” guy, you see? So, why should it be surprising that they ended up doing nothing?   Manchin and Sinema were just the “rotating villains” of this session.  The next time, it could be some other 1 or 2 or whatever number of Senators or congressmembers as needed.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
More and more people are realizing that the neoliberalism crap that was sold to them by Reagan et al was just that.   Labor is organizing and striking everywhere – John Deere, Amazon, Kellogg’s…

Also Chile, the first victim of the neoliberal experiment, has started to put an end to the legacy of right-wing dictator Pinochet now.   What is the world coming to?   All these uppity people, huh?!   

RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
The Legacy of Lenin died in Russia. The legacy of Castro will die in Cuba. The legacy of Mao has gotten something of a revival in Xi, but that will die, too.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Social democracy has nothing to do with Lenin or Castro or Xi.   In fact, present-day right-wingers (from both the D and the R parties) are the ones who love to do business with the likes of Xi.  
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
There is no social democracy. As Mish said, once a government program is created, there is virtually no removing it. We have had socially restrictive ballot measures pass in California and the the first thing Democrats do is go to court to block them. That is not democracy.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
On the contrary, there are plenty of social democracies, including Switzerland (and I think if anyone says the Swiss are not capitalists, they should not be surprised if nobody takes them seriously!)
 
“Social democracy is a government system that has similar values to socialism, but within a capitalist framework. The ideology, named from democracy where people have a say in government actions, supports a competitive economy with money while also helping people whose jobs don’t pay a lot.”
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Social democracy is what most of Europe had. Basically it boiled down to government deciding winning sectors of the economy accompanied by massive social spending, all backed by high taxes. Then, China ate their lunch, and they somewhat belatedly are backpeddling fast.
The elites on government dole are the last to catch on.
Capitalism isn’t neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is what the Anglo world peddles, which leads to deindustrialization, financialization and financial crashes.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago

ne·o·lib·er·al·ism

/ˌnēōˈlib(ə)r(ə)liz(ə)m/

noun

a political approach that favors free-market capitalism, deregulation, and reduction in government spending ; contemporarily used to refer to market-oriented reform policies such as “eliminating price controls, deregulating capital markets, lowering trade barriers” and reducing, especially through privatization and austerity, state influence in the economy.

TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Both of you are partly right. Changing the monopolistic monetary paradigm enables both of you to resolve your conflicts via a thirdness greater oneness of truths, workabilities and the highest ethical considerations of both sides of the dualism that separates you. 
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I presume you are aware that Chile has the highest GDP/person in S. America, by a wide margin. They are 50% higher than the average for the rest of South America.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Here’s a chart for GDP in Chile versus the rest of South America. Since about 1975, it has been booming, with the exception of a downturn in 1982.
One-armed Economist
One-armed Economist
2 years ago
Sure, while the GOP becomes nihilistic and the very credible David Brooks bemoans the ‘end of a once glorious and credible party” for their blind ignorant allegiance to Trump you come out and broad-brush bash the left . You’re more full of it than a South Alabama outhouse. You’ve become debased.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
The irony is that the DONORcrat Party is, of course, not even the left.   They are at best a socially moderate right-wing party, and have been for 3 decades now, if not longer.   They just want to pretend they are the left.   In reality, they are well to the right of a typical center-right party in Western Europe these days.
TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
2 years ago
You guys all want the right things and an end to all of the stupidity that has developed around all of the political and economic conflict. I admire that, but without resolving the problem that underlies and keeps all of it in suspension we’ll all just descend into disintegrative chaos. The bankers are happy to see the dems and repubs quarrel with each other because it distracts them from the deeper problem of the monetary paradigm that hasn’t changed for the entire course of human civilization. They (probably unconsciously) realize that they’ll rise from the rubble that we’re all heading for without changing the above because money IS what makes the world go round (graciousness is what makes it rewarding) even after the smoke clears. Finance and its monopolistic paradigm is the real problem. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Blame game politics.
The responsibility  for the money giveaways that sparked the inflation fall on the Congress, which passed the COVID bailouts with bipartisan support. Trump was still President when it happened. It is true that what Biden wants to do would make it worse instead of better, but so far he hasn’t accomplished much.
And…if you’re worried about the inflation, don’t forget that without bailouts we could have had millions of bankruptcies, even more failed businesses than what we saw during the first year of the pandemic, and maybe (for the first time since the 1930’s) a REAL homeless problem in this country instead of a token one, which is really what it amounts to now. 
At the height of the Depression, there were 8000 people living just in one Hooverville in St. Louis. We had 2 million homeless in a country with a population of 123M. Over 1.5% of Americans were homeless. Ten times more than now. Employment was an unvarnished 25%.
We could have had tens of thousands of people on the street in 2020…in every state in the union. Instead we printed some money and gave it away. Now we have to pay for it one way or another.
You could be a honest….and  blame inflation  on the decision to lock down businesses, since few businesses would have ever voluntarily shuttered, no matter how many people were sick….but with a mandated lockdown they had no choice, and so they (we really, including people like me) had no choice but to look to the government to provide some financial stability….and the country was already in such deep debt that no clear path was available to handle it…..except through onerous taxation and financial repression. We had no rainy day funds. We were already broke.
It’s too easy to always point the finger at somebody you don’t like, when the real truth is that there is plenty of blame to go around. How about two useless wars we ginned up post 9-11….that we stayed mired in for 20 years? You don’t think that contributed to the inflation we’re seeing today? 
I’m no fan of Biden, and I hate Warren, who is just so ncredibly dumb, for a woman who supposedly won awards for teaching at Harvard. And I am worried about where the progressives want to take us….and worried about the numbers of young people who buy into their promises of continual freebies….but the fact of the matter is that you can’t blame the inflation happening in 2021 on Biden or the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Bad as they are, the stage was set some time back, and smart people like yourself and op-ed writers for the WSJ should be able to see that.
How about the fantasy-based  program to get all our energy from renewables in the name of reducing carbon emissions? One that never addresses the really hard questions, like……can you create less carbon emissions, even with renewables, while building more cars every year into perpetuity?
It’s simple math. If you reduce auto emissions by 90% and build ten times more cars, you effectively reduce nothing. This is the kind of simple math NO politician in either party seems to understand.
BowserB46
BowserB46
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
You nailed the biggest problem in one phrase:  “…the numbers of young people who buy into their promises of continual freebies…”  A huge mistake from the recent past was rolling back voting age to 18 in the 26th Amendment.  The reason young people are so easily impressed with socialism is that they have no life experience.  They haven’t worked hard to make a living only to have their earnings taken away and given to someone else.  And that is the essence of the socialist system and the reason it always fails.  Not to be excessively wordy, let me quote Dr. Adrian Rogers (1931-2005) Conservative author and three term president of the Southern Baptist Convention.   He says simply…
“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
Agree completely, except I think the universities have become major disseminators of socialist thought. I’ve seen the effects on my own grown children.
I also think that only self-employed people really understand having their earnings taken away….those who work in the corporate world (other than in finance) really don’t…this includes many well-paid, intelligent people.
Jmurr
Jmurr
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
That is so true. The corporate elite are made ever more wealthy by the crony-fascist system. 
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Hope you found some good snow in Utah. Glad you didn’t forget about us while you were in Utah. It is so nice to get away from it all and see the spender. Best wishes.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
Thank you!
 
Report: Great snow, but VERY cold and windy.
Got out for a bit this morning. Got that awesome senior season pass in my pocket now, so, I hope to plan a spring trip.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
It has very little to do with the universities themselves.  It is just that a large group of those who are in the frontline of the ravages of end-stage capitalism happen to be the young students.  
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
I’d change that “young people … no life experience” rational. They do have life experience.
Consider that you may have told your kids, “There’s no free lunch.” You lied. From the time the universe began a decade or two earlier, there has always been a free lunch! Such is the life experience of “the kids these days”. And, such will always be the experience of those who spend the first couple decades of life preparing for the time when they will be providing free lunches.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Section 8 saves landlords and the Real Estate Industrial Complex. It allows slumlords to charge higher rents than the market would allow. This is a Trickle Up policy that allows every other landlord to charge higher prices than Section 8. Nobody who can afford to do so lives in Section 8. Covid bailouts are cut from the same clothe and allowed many landlords to remain whole. Possession is 9/10ths of the law. If liquidity were not introduced into the system, tenants in mass would own landlords. There are not enough writs that could be filed fast enough under due process to protect landlords without giving the Masses a “piece of the action” on free or nearly free money. These people would not leave their homes period. Their is very little difference between Covid Bailouts and low interest Real Estate loans except for FYCO scores. It is all Self Enrichment or Self Preservation at other peoples expense. The numbers of Boomers who buy into their promises of continual leveraging of assets and hoping others to pay for the leverage is on life support.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.