Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

The Eviction Moratorium Will Soon Come to a Screeching Halt, Who’s to Blame?

Warning Ignored

In a 5-4 vote in June, the Supreme Court allowed an eviction moratorium to remain in place but only through the end of July. 

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion stating stating that action by Congress would be required to extend it further.

In my view, clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation) would be necessary for the CDC to extend the moratorium past July 31,” wrote Kavanaugh.

This was a huge warning shot to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Biden Administration to get their act together. Neither took heed.

Biden Caves Under Pressure

President Biden repeatedly and accurately cited the Supreme Court ruling as a reason he could not extend the moratorium.  

But under political pressure from progressives, Biden extended the moratorium anyway, slightly rewording it so that it only applied to about 90% of the nation as determined by the CDC instead of an outright ban.

Legal Battle Looms Over New Eviction Moratorium

Amid preposterous cries of “Cancel Rent“, a Legal Battle Looms Over New Eviction Moratorium.

The Biden administration’s latest eviction moratorium is set to face an immediate and possibly fast-moving legal challenge that could present high hurdles for the White House.

A group of property managers and realtors lodged objections in a Washington federal court to the new moratorium late Wednesday. The same plaintiffs, supported by the National Association of Realtors, challenged the previous moratorium, alleging the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lacked legal authority to issue it.

Rather than file a fresh lawsuit challenging the new moratorium, the plaintiffs submitted an emergency motion in their previously filed case, asking a judge to apply a ruling against the last eviction ban to the new CDC effort.

Case To Be Quickly Heard 

Rather than file a new lawsuit, the Alabama Association of Realtors and its Georgia counterpart argued the CDC’s order is essentially an extension of the previous moratorium.

That was a smart move given the clear instructions by Justice Kavanaugh.

In response, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich Indicates She’ll Move Quickly to Consider Case.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has until Friday morning to submit a response to the motion filed by landlords seeking to block the latest eviction moratorium, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich ordered on Thursday. The landlords then have until 9 p.m. ET on Friday to file their response.

White House Briefing on Constitutional Question

On Tuesday, in announcing the new moratorium by the CDC, President Biden said legal experts he had consulted were of mixed opinion but the “bulk of the constitutional scholarship says that it’s not likely to pass constitutional muster.”

Please consider this August 2, 2021 White House Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki and White House American Rescue Plan Coordinator and Senior Advisor to the President Gene Sperling (emphasis mine).

PSAKI: The President has long fought for an eviction moratorium. He actually proposed extending the eviction moratorium until September 30th when he came into office, and I believe that was not possible due to reconciliation rules. 

To date, the CDC Director and her team have been unable to find legal authority, even for a more targeted eviction moratorium that would focus just on counties with higher rates of COVID spread. 

On January 19th, the Trump administration left by putting in place a completely unworkable, high-documented — high documentation guidelines that would have never worked. So, immediately, Treasury cleared up those guidelines and got the remaining funds out.

He also is calling on utilities and landlords to use the funds that Congress has made available to them — the emergency eviction funds, but also other funds in water and heating that they can use before they move to evict. 

MR. SPERLING: Well, I would say that on this particular issue, the President has not only kicked the tires; he has double, triple, quadruple checked. He has asked the CDC to look at whether you could even do targeted eviction moratorium — that just went to the counties that have higher rates — and they, as well, have been unable to find the legal authority for even new, targeted eviction moratoriums

An Amazing Success Story

Psaki argued that the Treasury cleared up the unworkable procedures of the Trump administration on January 19 and they “cleared up those guidelines and got the remaining funds out.”

The Biden effort was so successful that as of the end of June, an amazing $3.0 billion of an allocated $46.5 billion in rent assistance funds was distributed.

If that’s not success, what is?

Hooray for Blue Leadership!

Rep Cathy McMorris Rodgers

Democrats should stop refusing to work in a bipartisan way so help gets to renters in the most need and landlords don’t lose their livelihoods.”

Constitution Be Damned

Meanwhile, the constitution be damned, “the President has not only kicked the tires; he has double, triple, quadruple checked” the legalities but Biden went ahead anyway.

 Many of those who were against every Trump executive order they did not like were suddenly urging Biden to take a unilateral.

The key difference this time is the court already ruled against the move Biden took!

Where’s the Progressive objection? There is none. 

Hiding Behind Reconciliation

Psaki mentioned the resolution process. Yep, it true there was no Republican support. And a direct moratorium ruling is not a budget item which means Democrats could not do it alone by the resolution process.

But many Blue Dog Democrats did not support an extension. If they did, a bill would have cleared the House even if to die in the Senate. 

That makes Psaki’s resolution comments more than a bit disingenuous.

Finally, it would have been easy enough to turn eviction into a budget item simply by mandating better procedures for direct payment to landlords. That could have easily passed under resolution.

Democrats failed to do anything responsible about evictions because they had other priorities.

Priorities, Priorities

Q: What Priorities?
A: AOC Goes After Senator Krysten Sinema With a “No Climate, No Deal” Threat

New York State Has Spent $0 to Halt Evictions

In More on the Eviction Crisis, Bad Ideas in Congress I went over the distribution numbers. 

“Some 49—including New York state and major metropolitan areas—had not spent anything” according to the Washington Post.

Evictions Start With Nancy Pelosi and the House on a 7-Week Break

Every step of the way the Democrats ignored warnings to get to the crisis point we are at now. 

And here we are: Evictions Start With Nancy Pelosi and the House on a 7-Week Break.

12,712,935 people in 4,859,440 households fear eviction. Those numbers are hugely understated.  (See above link for charts and details).

States certainly did nothing to help, led by New York. 

However, the 2 people most to blame for where we are today are none other than President Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
I did a little searching in the federal register, and it wasn’t hard to find. There it is, issued on August 8, 2020, with Donald Trump’s signature at the very bottom, the no eviction moratorium Trump signed that led to the CDC preventing landlords from evicting renters for non-payment. Clearly, a violation of private property rights…

It’s not hard after this to point the finger. The erosion of private property rights is Marxist.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/14/2020-18015/fighting-the-spread-of-covid-19-by-providing-assistance-to-renters-and-homeowners 

Mcklaipm
Mcklaipm
4 years ago
I am telling my landlords to issue 1099C for the people who do not pay. Let the IRS collect some tax revenue on the forgotten payments. In Virginia yoy can kick out the none paying and take possession of the property just cannot go after back rent.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“The Eviction Moratorium Will Soon Come to a Screeching Halt, Who’s to Blame?”
All the governors who shut down their economies, in response to Neil Ferguson’s very faulty fatality projections out of Imperial College.
AIER, 7/30/21″Modelers desperately tried to scare Sweden into locking down. One https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.11.20062133v1 of 96,000 deaths, with a maximum of 183,000. Total Swedish Covid deaths at this writing: 14,461. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=swedish+covid+deaths.
killben
killben
4 years ago
Constitution Be Damned – It is called lawlessness
Where’s the Progressive objection? There is none – Why object?   After all if people want it free they should get it for free. Damn it how else do you think I will get re-elected?
Democrats failed to do anything responsible about evictions because they had other priorities – Why point at Democrats, Republicans are no saints.
After all it is the tax-payers who will be left holding the bag.
If you want change you should hit where it hurts.
Change the earlier ‘No taxation without representation’ to ‘No taxation without accountability’
e.g. You follow the law, pay  off your student debts, your neighbour gets it written off – how does it look – it is the law-abiding citizen who ends up looking like a goddamned fool!
Lawlessness is the name of the game. With all actors in the same bed what else can you expect. 
The game is the same, keep peasants happy with crumbs, screw honest law-abiding citizens. Show a great picture with booming markets and avoid revolt. By the time ‘go and eat cake’ moment arrives we will all be long http://gone.In the meanwhile for those who can game the system it is ‘Game on’
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
Reply to  killben
I was curious where the conservative objections were when Trump issued the executive order last year. I guess Trump’s MAGA movement are closet progressive socialists…

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/14/2020-18015/fighting-the-spread-of-covid-19-by-providing-assistance-to-renters-and-homeowners

killben
killben
4 years ago
Reply to  Bungalow Bill
Eviction moratorium is simply daylight robbery of the home owners by the Government. Whether it is  Trump or Biden it does not matter.
Eviction moratorium is another case of Lawlessness that is on full display.
Eviction moratorium should be accompanied by home repayment moratorium. But then, what happens to the bank?
It works like this
Between renters and homeowners – homeowners be damned
Between banks and homeowners – homeowners be damned.
So any which way homeowners get it. Who decides who gets it ? Government. Courts appear  to be mere bystanders.
What should happen now is Supreme Court should fine the government heavily for any eviction moratorium extension. Paid from their salaries (not tax-payers money). 
What will happen – some wishy-washy stuff that will be amount to just talk, a knock on the knuckles may be with a sorry as SC has to be seen to be doing something.
Lawlessness. That is what it is all about.
CzarChasm Reigns
CzarChasm Reigns
4 years ago
Did Kavanaugh pick the end of July to coincide with Trump’s highly anticipated August Resurrection?
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote “in a few weeks, on July 31, and only because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution of congressionally appropriated the rental assistance funds”
They only needed a couple of weeks? Apparently, 3rd branch blind to the ineptness of branches 1 & 2.
QTPie
QTPie
4 years ago
Oh, geez… Folks have had plenty of income from the govt. to pay their rent if they were unemployed. Anyone who wants a job nowadays can get one in five minutes, and anyone who wants the vaccine can get it for free at every street corner drugstore. In other words, not paying rent nowadays is a personal choice, not an externally-imposed circumstance.
It’s way past time for the govt to stop rescuing people from their own bad choices.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Who’s to blame?
I vote China. Make them pay the back rent. They almost certainly caused this whole mess…..which is why they go to such great lengths to deny it.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Squatters rights is the new thing on the socialist Left. 
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Boohoo.   If a stock cuts its dividend and you are a dividend income investor, you sell the stock.   If the property doesn’t generate rental income and you depend on the income, you sell the property, just like a normal investor would do.    
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
If a squatter won’t pay rent he won’t leave if you sell the house either. Potential buyers know this and won’t put down a bid on the house or if they do it will be a low one. Over here there it takes at least a couple of years to recuperate your RE if a squatter moves in. Myself I do not own rental property because I prefer liquidity in my investments so I don’t have to Boohoo for that however I am sympathetic to rental owners because I see it the same as if same as someone took possession of all your bank accounts and I see it as is theft. Socialists like you see it differently unless of course it touches their own goods.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Real world facts.  Housing investments has its risks, especially in the midst of the ginormous income and wealth inequality that we are seeing now.   The investors had a warning that is 40 years in the making.   They made the bed.  Let them lie on it.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Real world facts: Every investment has its risks. Marxists such as you have ruined more economies and killed more people since Genghis Khan and each time try to justify it by claiming inequality. Real world fact. We are on to you.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Keep seething, dude.  The pitchforks are coming.  The ultra-super-rich have their bunkers in New Zealand and the AI-based robot “dogs” to defend them from the masses.    Better get hold of those before it is too late!   
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
So I see you proclaim your loyalty to marxism openly now and your aim to overthrow democracy by violent means. 
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
LOL.   The oligarchs won’t save you!   To them, you are pretty much the same riffraff as the rest of the “unwashed masses”.   Not sorry to be the bearer of bad news.   

You are welcome!  

Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
You have internet access but probably have nothing else so I can understand your rage. Being surrounded with ways to prosper and not having the smarts or will to grasp them is indeed a reason to feel inferior. Good thing antifa has a place for you to feel wanted.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
LOL.   That’s too much fun for one day.   See ya!   ROFLMAO.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
ROFLMAO is so early 2000’s but in the circles you live in you probably think it is still cool.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
In reality the whole argument is a tempest in a teacup. The vast majority of landlords are minimally affected by the rent moratorium, in terms of their personal net worth…and any good investor has reserves to deal with interruptions in cash flow.
I can assure you that gains in equity this last year and a half have far exceeded any loss in cash flow for RE investors, on the whole. But nobody wants to sell cash flow properties because the owners have to worry about the recapture of years of depreciation, and because they will have to pay capital gains tax, which is not a problem ordinarily.
But it’s a problem, not a predicament.
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
With both parties eroding away private property rights combined with both parties now redistributing wealth at an unheard of level, can we honestly say there is a major party in this country that is not pushing Marxist philosophy?
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
Reply to  Bungalow Bill

“can we honestly say there is a NOT major party in this country that is not pushing Marxist philosophy?”

whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Bungalow Bill
Last time I checked, Marxist philosophy does not advocate for huge tax cuts for the corporations and the rich, and the shoveling of hundreds of billions of dollars to the oligarchs….   which is what both parties have been doing for at least 40 years now.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
Whose fault it it?  100% the governments fault for implementing it to begin with.
You cannot propose massive stimulus to help people pay their bills and get through COVID and also be for evictions and be taken seriously.  If you don’t give stimulus it makes sense to ban evictions.  If you don’t ban evictions it makes sense to give stimulus.  But to grant stimulus and also ban evictions?  That’s insanity and probably the most abusive use of government power I have ever seen.
So I blame the government for enacting the policy to begin with.  You were talking about blaming someone for the initial policy, right? 
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
“… for enacting the policy to begin with”.  

Which policy?   The ones that cut taxes for the rich and raised them for the poor and the middle-class?  The so-called free trade policies that exported our jobs abroad?   The policy that made corporate market manipulation (aka stock buybacks) legal?   And on and on.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.