The Highly Watched 2-10 Inversion Recession Indicator May Not Be the Best Signal

Recession lead times data from St. Louis Fed, calculations and chart by Mish 

All spreads are years. For example 3-30 is the 3-year to 30-year spread.  

Recession Start vs Inversion Warning

Recession lead times data from St. Louis Fed, calculations and chart by Mish

Chart and Table Notes

  • 3-30, 1-10, and 2-10 refer to one-year, 2-year, 3-year, 10-year, and 30-year bond yields
  • Inversion happens when the shorter-duration bond yield is greater than the longer-duration bond yield
  • The 3-30 inversion is very consistent in lead times. However, it did not invert prior to the Covid-19 recession that started in March of 2020.
  • Whereas the 2-10 recession signal varies from six to 33 months, the variance in the 3-30 signal is ten to fifteen months. 
  • The number of months is a date difference calculation by Excel.

A Better Indicator?

  • The 3-year to 30-year inverted on 1982-09-15 but there was no recession.
  • The 3-year to 30-year did not invert prior to the Covid-19 recession that started in March of 2020.

However, both the 3-30 and 2-10 have now inverted. 

Yield Curve Spreads Since January 2021 as of 2022-04-01

Yield curve data from New York Fed, chart by Mish

Change Since January 2021 Chart Notes 

  • A year ago the 2-10 spread was 159 basis points (+1.59 percentage points). 
  • On April 1, 2022 the 2-10 spread inverted (-6 basis points). 
  • On March 17, 2021 the 3-30 spread was 213 basis points.
  • On April 1, 2022 the 2-10 spread inverted (-14 basis points), a stunning collapse of 2.27 percentage points in just over a year. 

Yield Curve Spreads Since January 2022 as of 2022-04-01

Yield curve data from New York Fed, chart by Mish

Six spreads as shown above are now inverted. The 3-30 spread is -14 basis points. 

Yield Curve to Scale

Yield curve data from New York Fed, chart by Mish

Yield Curve Notes

  • The inversions are clearly visible. Also see the 2-year yield is 2.44% the same as the 30-year yield. 
  • The Effective Fed Funds Rate (EFFR) is calculated as a volume-weighted median of overnight federal funds transactions.
  • The front-end steepness will vanish as the Fed hikes rates. 

Treasury Yields 2021 to Date 2022-04-01

Yield curve data from New York Fed, chart by Mish

Notice the shape of the 2-year and longer treasuries a year ago vs today. Also note recent falling yields at the extreme long end of the curve (20-year and 30-year).

Dot Plot

Dot plot of Fed rate hike expectations from the FOMC committee, annotations by Mish.

Double-Edged Warning

  • Recent action is not only a recession warning, it’s a clear warning to those short the long end of the curve.  
  • If the Fed hikes to 2.0% at the end of this year as widely expected, then it’s highly likely the entire curve will be inverted.

  • If so, I expect a rally at the long end of the curve, with the yield on the 10-year and 30-year bonds falling. Those expecting otherwise are not paying attention to history.

Some have suggested a steepening of the curve. That tends to happen coming out of recessions not headed into them. 

Coming out of the next recession, treasury bulls may will to re-think deflationary forces (of which there are still many), vs inflationary forces that happen to be increasing.

I have an open mind on this but here are a few inflationary and deflationary points to consider.

Deflationary Points

  • Boomer retirements will destroy demand for things. 
  • Boomers will eventually die leaving a glut of houses. 
  • Stock market decline will destroy a lot of demand.  
  • Government spending is a drag on growth.

Inflationary points

  • Wage gains will not go away even if there is temporary demand destruction due to a recession
  • More military spending globally
  • Push for carbon and fossil fuel elimination 
  • Uptick in unions 
  • Sanction madness is backfiring
  • Just-in-time supply chains are dead
  • Commodity hoarding is underway and may stay that way
  • De-globalization

Globalization was a massive deflationary force. That tide appears to have shifted.

Nothing is set in stone yet, but President Biden has continued President Trump’s sanction and tariff madness. 

To punish Russia, commodity costs and supply chain disruptions are massive. 

Everyone First!

America First, China First, EU First, but Russia Last does not exactly work in the real world given the global need for commodities largely controlled by Russia and China. 

Spotlight on De-Globalization 

Global map from Nations Online Project, annotations by Mish

For energy supply chain disruptions and de-globalization, please see De-Globalization: New Supply Chains Are Inefficient and Will Drive Up Inflation

De-globalization is underway. A key ramification is higher inflation.

For now, the inflationary forces exceed the deflationary ones. This can change but not if every country thinks it can put itself first while simultaneously punishing Russia.

Meanwhile the yield curve is talking. Are you listening? The 3-year to 30-year spread suggests a recession sooner, not 30 months from now. 

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

38 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“Spotlight on De-Globalization”
klaus Schwab would not be happy.
AWC
AWC
2 years ago
Could be, that the old “indicators” are no longer valid, in this brave new world of MMT. The only thing that seems to matter now is, knowing when the switch will be thrown between QT and QE,,,,and back again.
We’ve apparently gone from Free Markets to a Command and Controlled regime of economics.
davidyjack
davidyjack
2 years ago
There must be economic consequences on Russia for the terrible suffering in Ukraine!
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
I think this can be explained by fed holdings.
The FED has close to $800b maturing in the next year. If their plan is to reduce the balance sheet by not rolling over investments, there’s going to be a big increase of short term maturities held outside the FED in the next year. Big supply=higher short term interest rates. I think investors are seeing the writing on the wall.
Treepower
Treepower
2 years ago
Mish, here’s a question for you. Regardless of inversions, the whole curve has been shifting up and with inflation/QT/deficits may continue to do so.
At what point does the level of rates impact on the relentless bid from stock buybacks? So far the buybacks keep rolling in, but at some level the arithmetic of cost of debt changes the equation. When does that begin, and does that coincide with a fall in free cash flow as well?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
And the screws turn a bit more on the global financial system. The last time Russia had a financial crisis, it led to contagion in Asia.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
The biggest reason I don’t think housing will collapse is it is the cleanest way to launder ill gotten money. I believe most housing gains over the last 10 years are due to money laundered from China and Russia. There was a story on 60 minutes about the amount of Russian wealth tied up in London housing. I know this is true of real estate on the coasts in North America as well. Globalization led to a lot of cash being paid for housing and banks and owners did not care. There is a $50b economy in London that just launders Russian money every year. That’s just London. Imagine how much of the global economy is simply based on laundering Russian and Chinese money.
AWC
AWC
2 years ago
Immigration will be used to keep house prices shored up. It’s the American Dream, you know? And politicians are very aware of it as well,,, especially in election years.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
There’s gonna be a recession.
There’s gonna be a recession .
There’s gonna be a recession.
Wait never mind. There might not be a recession.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
damn. mish. that is a great insight and analysis. hat tip to ya. put me in the camp of this is the bubble of all bubbles getting ready to pop. the cursor(we don’t really print) putting zeroes in everyone’s electronic bank account past 2 years since plague began is off the charts. shadow stats does a great job with this stuff. i think we might have the worst of all possible worlds for vast majority of folks not prepared and/or lucky. deflating housing, and stocks and wildly increasing costs of food, fuel and actual items we all use daily. with our banana empire run by nut jobs, i’d not be surprised if we don’t get 25% per annum, to more increase in food and fuel over the next 5 years. we might even get a year where we get hyper inflation(100%) in basics of life. the bond king was on barry ritholz show over weekend. he put out there in 1971 when nixon defaulted, us had about 1 trillion of all types of credit. credit cards .mortgages, and bonds. 51 years later we have 87 trillion. so 87x in 51 years. that’s stunningly absurd. all empires crumble. some go fast like USSR. some go slow like spanish empire. some go in between like portugal(btw an earthquake in lisbon circa 1755 was a catlyst for their crumbling empire to begin. rant off
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Hyperinflation is still silliness. It implies a currency worth nothing.
The implication is the dollar goes to zero vs the euro, the yen, and the yaun.
NOT gonna happen.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
How many years of 10%+ CPI inflation are “OK”? How many years of 15%+ annual housing appreciation?
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
i go by definition of 100% per annum as hyper inflation. as the great book, titled “this time it’s different”. will it happen. no clue. could it happen in USA. of course it could. look at shadow stats this man deserves a nobel prize. link to shadowstats.com
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
in 1933 FDR devalued the currency by 75% overnight. 20 to 35 USD to gold price.
AWC
AWC
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Controlled devaluation will continue, at mid to high single digit rates per year average, until the cows come home. It creates the illusion of “growth” which keeps the constituents scampering off to the polls to elect the incumbents who accommodate.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  AWC
As noted above 86 trillion dollars in 51 years is absolutely wonderful “growth.”
What a wonderful economy they have “built.” /s
Shrp-Blond
Shrp-Blond
2 years ago
I find it difficult to believe that Boomers dying off will leave a glut of houses. There are more than enough Millennials and Generation Z (and even X’ers) who will need these houses. We may will be in a transition however, as large companies with easy access to the capital markets buy these house and then rent them, instead of the younger generation purchasing them via a long term mortgages, but there is still a demand for housing unless the population as a whole declines.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Reply to  Shrp-Blond
A lot of those boomers own at least two houses. I know several people I used to work with who own over five, and that’s in an environment where small talk about housing never comes up.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  JeffD
When I get 4 houses on a block I buy a hotel.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
This analysis makes no sense in light of the fact that CPI is 4%+ above prime rate. All the “math” you cite is designed to work in an environment where prime rate is above CPI. The “math” behind your analysis completely breaks down in the current environment. I agree that you still capture the qualitative recession event, but all the rest is hogwash. The economy is about to fracture, like an earthquake that pushes up the ground six feet across a fault line.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  JeffD
this time it’s different, eh? you ought to read a wonderful book of scholarship by that name. link to books.google.com. so good i read it twice.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
In the past, when have interest rates been negative, worldwide? When has population growth been flat or negative across all developed economies, worldwide? When has CPI been 5% above prime, other than in collapsing countries? The rules of thumb being used simply don’t apply in the current environment. Seriously. Only an idiot would try to determine outcomes based on assumptions that no longer apply.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
From your book, “unexpected increases in inflation are the de facto equivalent of outright default”.
DennisAOK
DennisAOK
2 years ago
We simply cannot ignore Russia’s naked aggression, even if we must pay a lot more for commodities. Better contain this beast now rather than later, when the price will be greater.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  DennisAOK
sanctions drive up the price of commodities. Russia benefits – it has a buyer in China
Jmurr
Jmurr
2 years ago
Reply to  DennisAOK
Why? Russia ignored the US naked aggression in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, etc.
Jmurr
Jmurr
2 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr

Although the victims were not white Europeans, there were war crimes committed in each of those aggressions. I agree that Putin should be brought before The Hague to answer for his crimes but so should Bill and Hillary, W, Obama, Trump and Biden.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  DennisAOK
Sure Dennis. We must punish Russia until the very last Ukrainian is dead.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Deflationary points — need to add massive debt overhang. Q4 2022 saw US debt grow another $2 trillion ($88 trillion total debt). Servicing debt applying a governor on economic growth.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Yes, government debt tends to be deflationary
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Yup, we need a lot more government debt to stop this inflation in it’s tracks.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
That’s what killed the Japanese economy. People had to pay off debt instead of buying things.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Why should there be a recession?
The Fed can hike to 7% to defeat inflation, workers need to pony up double the taxes to pay for the interest on the national debt, the zombie companies just need to revolve their debts to 10% bonds and loans, and charge the consumer way more, especially with more expensive inputs, and the consumer needs to get off his chair and buy more and work harder.
Just more of everything?
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
LOL. There are serious doubts whether the Fed can even hike to 1%. And you are talking about 7% ?!
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Too much is never enough! Nothing succeeds like excess!
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
2 years ago
With all of the games the Fed is playing with interest rates i cant see inversions being a predictive variable at all. Since the markets are not setting even long term interest rates what good are rate spreads as a signal of anything
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
But…..neither are “recessions” a useful descriptive variable of anything at all.
Just a bunch of dumb people on Fed welfare, practicing 100% nonsense in, 100% irrelevance out. While proudly flaunting being stupid enough to fall for any of it.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
Yes the predictive signal, albeit a long lead time, was the rising “transitory” inflation that’s become ingrained. Without which they’d have been no hikes or talk of hikes and therefore no flattening/inverse yield curve.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.