The US is Falling Behind China in 5G Wireless, Guess Why

Trapped Pawns    

Two days ago AT&T and Verizon refused an FAA request to delay their 5G launch. 

In a Letter to Pete Buttigieg the phone companies had these comments, emphasis mine.

As you know, the U.S. Government’s auction of the C-band spectrum almost a year ago was heralded by this Administration as a major policy victory and one of the most successful auctions ever conducted in the United States. From a financial perspective, the auction raised more than $80 billion for the U.S. Treasury. Moreover, the U.S. Government had determined that the United States was “lagging behind China” and other countries in 5G deployment and that a major cause for this was “the lack of some carriers’ access to the radio frequencies best suited for 5G coverage.”  

AT&T and Verizon spent most of 2021 preparing to put the C-Band spectrum into service. In addition to the tens of billions of dollars we paid to the U.S. Government for the spectrum and the additional billions of dollars we paid to the satellite companies to enable the December 2021 availability of the spectrum, we have paid billions of dollars more to purchase the necessary equipment and lease space on towers. Thousands of our employees have worked non-stop for months to prepare our networks to utilize this spectrum. Thousands more have been trained to engage with customers as the new spectrum is put to use.  

 Amid all this activity, we were told for the first time late last year that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and parts of the aviation community had concerns about the timing of our use of C-Band under the FCC’s February 2020 order. 

As a result of this inaction, the U.S. Government approached AT&T and Verizon in November to ask us to delay using the C-Band spectrum in order to avoid potential disruption to the aviation industry, which had been in its own power to avoid.

 Now, on the evening of New Year’s Eve, just five days before the C-Band spectrum will be deployed, we received your letter asking us to take still more voluntary steps – to the detriment of our millions of consumer, business and government customers – to once again assist the aviation industry and the FAA after failing to resolve issues in that costly 30-day delay period, which we never considered to be an initial one.  

 At its core, your proposed framework asks that we agree to transfer oversight of our companies’ multi-billion dollar investment in 50 unnamed metropolitan areas representing the lion’s share of the U.S. population to the FAA for an undetermined number of months or years.  Agreeing to your proposal would not only be an unprecedented and unwarranted circumvention of the due process and checks and balances carefully crafted in the structure of our democracy, but an irresponsible abdication of the operating control required to deploy world-class and globally competitive communications networks that are every bit as essential to our country’s economic vitality, public safety and national interests as the airline industry.

 As you know, U.S. aircraft currently fly in and out of France every day with thousands of U.S. passengers and with the full approval of the FAA. As a result, France provides a real-world example of an operating environment where 5G and aviation safety already co-exist. The laws of physics are the same in the United States and France. If U.S. airlines are permitted to operate flights every day in France, then the same operating conditions should allow them to do so in the United States, as we propose in the technical details attached to this letter. 

AT&T and Verizon Agree to New Delay of 5G Rollout

Yesterday AT&T and Verizon Agree to New Delay of 5G Rollout Emphasis mine.

AT&T said late Monday that the company had voluntarily agreed to an additional two-week delay, at the request of the U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. Verizon also said it had agreed to a two-week delay that would ensure the new service would go live in January.

The sudden turn of events on Monday came as the Federal Aviation Administration was preparing to soon issue flight restrictions that U.S. airlines worried would significantly disrupt air-travel and cargo shipments around the country, people familiar with the matter said.

Airlines for America, which represents major passenger and cargo carriers, had planned to ask a federal court to block the 5G rollout slated for Wednesday, people familiar with the matter said.

The threat of a federal court action caused ATT and Verizon to cave in to the request of the FAA and Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

Buttigieg’s 5G Crash Landing

With that backdrop, please consider Buttigieg’s 5G Crash Landing emphasis mine.

Biden Administration officials are crowing that they prevented a collision over 5G wireless spectrum between airlines and wireless carriers that had threatened to ground flights across America this week. But they created this problem, and the mess could endanger U.S. 5G leadership.

Usually spectrum interference involves transmissions on the same frequencies, not in different bands. Airplane radio altimeters that measure the distance from the ground occupy bands in the same region but are still a safe distance from C-band. Think the distance between Trenton, N.J., and New York City.

The FCC nonetheless included a 220 to 400 megahertz buffer between the two bands, which was more than twice as much as what engineers deemed sufficient to prevent signal interference. Nearly 40 countries operate 5G on C-band spectrum—many at higher power levels or in closer spectral proximity to airplane radio altimeters than what the FCC had proposed—with no instances of interference. Two Navy radars also operate in frequencies much closer to altimeters at power levels that are 10,000 times greater than 5G base stations without any reports of interference.

Politicians complain the U.S. is falling behind China in 5G, but dysfunctional government is a big reason.

Spectrum Wars

Flashback February 22, 2021

The Verge reports 5G In the US is Disappointing Now But Will Get Better

To understand the complicated 5G situation in the US right now, you first need to know that there are low-, mid-, and high-band frequencies that carriers can use. Low-band is slower but offers widespread coverage. High-band, often called mmWave, is very fast but extremely limited in range. Mid-band sits in a sweet spot between the two, with good range and better-than-LTE speeds. 

If you were building a 5G network from scratch, you’d probably want a bunch of mid-band spectrum, right? The trouble is, spectrum is a limited resource. Sascha Segan, lead mobile analyst at PCMag and a wealth of 5G knowledge, sums up part of the spectrum problem.

Our government did not make the right channels available to the carriers,” he says. “Verizon and AT&T have basically just been using leftover odds and ends of their 4G spectrum… putting the 5G encoding on these leftover bits and bobs so they can pop a 5G icon on the screen. And the performance is meaningless.”

The technology Verizon and AT&T are using to get nationwide 5G coverage is called Dynamic Spectrum Sharing (DSS), which allows 4G and 5G to coexist on the same spectrum. That helps carriers make the transition from one technology to the other, but it comes at a cost. Michael Thelander, president and founder of wireless industry research firm Signals Research Group, sums it up this way: “It’s kind of like having that super fast sports car and you’re stuck on the Santa Monica freeway. You can’t experience the full capabilities.”

Despite networks constantly waving their “5G Mission Accomplished” banners in TV commercials over the past year, 5G is very much still a work in progress. It’s going to get better, but how soon that happens for you depends on a lot of factors: which phone you have and what bands it supports, which network you’re on, where you are, and what you’re doing. It seems clear now that there never really was a “Race to 5G” — just technological progress as usual, which is often slow, confusing, and uneven. That’s a little bit harder to sell in a keynote or a commercial.

China Knows the Power of 5G. Why Doesn’t the U.S.?

Flashback July 17, 2021

Please consider the ForeignPolicy.Com article China Knows the Power of 5G. Why Doesn’t the U.S.?

5G is an easy tool to weaponize. As demand for it grows worldwide, citizens and infrastructure are becoming increasingly reliant on it. As of February, 131 countries announced plans to invest in 5G, which will be foundational for future internet technologies. Like the internet and social media, 5G promises greater access to information. But it also allows more data to be gathered than ever before, and any 5G-backed technology can expedite and expand the scope and scale of what people—and governments—can do with that information.

But that doesn’t mean 5G is inherently dangerous. Democracies have every reason to pursue the technological promise of 5G, as increased data capacity can make states more efficient and help governments deliver on services. Public utilities, for instance, could be made greener through automated regulation with 5G technology. Perhaps the greatest promise of 5G, though, is that it enables more people to access digital technologies. By delivering 5G to marginalized communities, which face a growing digital divide that especially affects women and rural areas, countries can increase opportunity for greater information flow, access to education tools, and other societal benefits.

The good news is that Biden’s B3W plan makes clear that he understands the importance of technology in shaping the norms of the international system to embrace human rights and putting decision-making in the hands of many stakeholders. But the clock is ticking.

But here we are with the third delay.

Hopefully, it’s the last. But don’t count on it. 

And certainly don’t rule out the real threat that ATT and Verizon mentioned in their letter to Buttigieg.

At its core, your proposed framework asks that we agree to transfer oversight of our companies’ multi-billion dollar investment in 50 unnamed metropolitan areas representing the lion’s share of the U.S. population to the FAA for an undetermined number of months or years.”

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports?

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
Some more information:
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
marginalized communities, which face a growing digital divide that especially affects women and rural areas
I understand how lack of digital access disadvantages rural communities.
I understand that people with no money have less access to everything.
Could somebody please explain why 5G or lack thereof specifically targets women or marginalized communities?
This is a property of 5G that I find hard to grasp, how it targets women/marginalized people.
I understand that men and women have ways of targeting each other, but I have never witnessed the ability of bandwidth to distinguish men from women. Can it also distinguish the pretty girls?
MrGrummpy
MrGrummpy
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
“but I have never witnessed the ability of bandwidth to distinguish men from women.” –
Perhaps the bandwidth has a degree in gender studies.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
This article discusses the issues nicely:
——-
Why AT&T and Verizon are feuding with the US government over a last-minute delay to 5G
A long-brewing battle between wireless carriers and airlines
Jan 4, 2022, 3:22pm EST
The day after New Year’s, the CEOs of the two biggest wireless carriers in America sent a very angry letter to Pete Buttigieg. The companies had been working for years to launch a new portion of their 5G networks, a launch that had been scheduled for December and then unexpectedly pushed back due to vague air safety concerns. Now, the Department of Transportation was asking for more time, just days before the scheduled launch.
“In addition to the tens of billions of dollars we paid to the U.S. Government for the spectrum and the additional billions of dollars we paid to the satellite companies to enable the December 2021 availability of the spectrum,” the CEOs wrote, “we have paid billions of dollars more to purchase the necessary equipment and lease space on towers. Thousands of our employees have worked non-stop for months to prepare our networks to utilize this spectrum.”
As of yesterday, the spectrum launch is back on — pushed first to January 5th, then two weeks later to January 19th — but it’s been an unusually rocky road for US wireless carriers, bouncing between regulators at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and increasingly vocal unions for pilots and flight attendants. At the heart of all of it is a nagging fear that the latest round of 5G spectrum will pose a threat to commercial airlines and their passengers. But it’s such a complicated issue that it’s best to unpack it one piece at a time.
dmartin
dmartin
2 years ago
Falling farther and father behind China in 5g. We need more racism and more BS sanctions and more complaints about human rights. Yea, that will show them! Lol
Cocoa
Cocoa
2 years ago
5g…awesome way to microwave your nuts. 
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
Toasted nuts?
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
2 years ago
“By delivering 5G to marginalized communities, which face a growing digital divide that especially affects women and rural areas, “
Now there is an interesting sentence. 4G radio waves apparently selectively avoid women. And a 5G tower with a range of a quarter mile is somehow going to matter when houses are a mile apart. 
4G has only existed at my place for two years. And the low frequency 5G is no faster than 4G due to physics, data rate being directly proportional to frequency and all. In the city or even more so in an apartment building 5G will make a difference. Out on the wheat fields, not so much. 
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“The laws of physics are the same in the United States and France.”
But Democrats ignore science for politics.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
I got a 5G phone about a year ago. Sometimes when I’m out and about, the 5G indicator pops up. I check it out to see if anything is faster. Nope. I don’t notice any difference.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I have a 5G phone (Google Pixel 5a) on T-Mobile.  I see 5G also in the notification bar.  I haven’t spent any time trying to measure speed at this point.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
The US has fallen way behind China in anything. The Chinese added more hospital capacity in the first few months following COVID detection, than the US has done since the 70s/80s. “They” built more freeway miles last week than “we” have done since Eisenhover. More, and more advanced, rail just to serve the Winter Olympics, than we have since the westward expansion. More chip fabs, and labs, yesterday; than we have since back when there were engineers living in Silicon Valley. More net new housing last month, than the US has since 1971.
The US is like Russia now: We still have huge piles of big guns left over from back before applied illiteracy became our national pastime. So we, like the Russians, are limited to running around trying to force others to listen to us, by militarizing everywhere and everything, and stirring up conflicts and pointless animosity. All in an effort to keep the ever dwindling number of Americans still able to do anything useful, sufficiently scared of imaginary hobgoblins to keep toiling away to pay for it all.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Read some story earlier on Monday that the FCC was very upset with interference in their bailiwick by Biden and the the FAA.  I’ll look for it tomorrow.
The FAA and the airlines are always looking for ways NOT to have to spend any money on upgrading the systems on their planes because that can get expensive as it requires renewed certifications and check-off’s.  
GodfreeRoberts
GodfreeRoberts
2 years ago
Last month, China installed its one-millionth 5G base station.
Tibet (yes, that Tibet) now has broader, faster 5G coverage than the San Francisco Bay Area.
By the time our coverage matches Tibet’s, China will have moved onto 6G.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  GodfreeRoberts
“By the time our coverage matches Tibet’s, China will have moved onto 6G.”
And for the exact same reason that “we” once rolled out things faster than the Soviet Union: “We” used to live in a freer country than Russians (and others) did.
Naphtali
Naphtali
2 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
We used to live in a manufacturing country. China became that and we moved on to become the latte capital of the world. We are poised to cap that with the most successful service culture ever – serfdom.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Naphtali
It’s not a manufacturing issue. We can buy what we need from abroad if necessary.
It’s a government red tape issue. We are drowning in it here but China is not because they have a ‘benevolent dictatorship’ (lol) that can order anything at any time with no red tape.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
In order to buy what we ned from abroad, we first have to have something to offer foreigners in return. Meaning, we have to produce something valuable.
Or, back in the actual real world, we have to at one time have produced something valuable. Which we did. And by now have very little left of.
The reason Chinese business is not drowning in red tape to the same degree “we” are, is because China is a much freer country that the US by now. Not to say they’re in any way free (ask Hong Kongers); they’re communists after all. But compared to us, they are still much freer. Including freer to efficiently allocate their limited capital, which is what maters. Along with having much stronger ownership protection of what they create and build, such that those who create value, are also the ones who then get to decide how that value is later allocated. As opposed to the US, where The Fed, Junta and kangaroo courts, rob every value creator out there, in order to hand the loot to the dumbest of the dumb, who then get to allocate it. With entirely predictable consequences.
If “benevolent dictators”, or whatever the silly slur du jour is, somehow allocated capital more efficiently than supposedly “freer” processes, the Soviets would have won the cold war. Instead, the Chinese are more efficient than us, because individual Chinese are freer to allocate resources optimally than individual Americans. The Chinese have to cut it the local Communists, which no doubt serves as a drag. But compared to having to cut in the armies of ambulance chasers, rent seekers, “investors”, FIRE racketeers etc. that any American attempting to create some value has to, Communist China is a veritable Galt’s Gulch. Hence why the Chinese are able to create valuable stuff. While “we” are stuck burning through the stock of value previous generations built up.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
Interesting. Somebody is throwing a wrench in the gears, but the quoted articles don’t say who.
T-Mobile and Sprint? Seems unlikely. And, where are they in this, anyway? What spectrum (“bands”) are they using for their 5G?
Governments of NK or Cuba or the like? Makes some sense, maybe. People who deal in, let’s say, “active defense”, in any number of countries might get their pictures on a wall-of-heroes if they get a little win like this. They’d have to financially enhance some people in the FAA/FCC/USG. But that can’t be hard nowadays.
Airlines? Maybe some kind of last-ditch, hail-Mary effort. But they knew long ago what, if anything, they needed to do.
Keep in mind the radio guys all know who is using what electromagnetic spectrum. And this possible collision is old news to them. Spectrum collisions like this would be hashed out during the buying process. Really, much earlier, in the 5G design phase. Which makes the seller, in this case the US Government, look like a scam artist.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
The NSA is likely the reason the government wants to keep control of the 5G networks for the forseeable future. Makes their job of spying on us all that easier if they control the backbone.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
The problem of interference only applies in proximity of airports, so it can be dealt with by localized restrictions.
That said, I have no need for it at the moment, but could provide some competition to cable/telco providers.
IMHO, it will be used to create more expensive cellular packages. 
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Through some private circles, I recently discovered most of 5G technology was stolen from Nortel Networks by a hack that occurred in the 2000s by Huawei.  It turns out to not mean much in the grand scheme because technology has to be shared via ITU-T anyway. Also a couple of years ago I posted how most of the critical 5G technologies and patents were mostly in the hands of Ericsson (via Nortel asset acquisition) and Nokia along with Sony. The other piece of this of 5G isn’t some revolutionary technology. Additionally people are less mobile because of Covid so mobile technologies in general don’t matter as much in the covid decade.  It is probably more important to have 1G fiber connection to your home. Finally I read an article today how cloud technologies along with high speed wireless (802 11ax) will obviate the need for 5G. I predict the 5G investment won’t pan out for carriers. There are already signs of this. 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Nortel went bankrupt at least ten years ago. What was the going technology at the time? Maybe 3G.
Huawei surely copycated some technology, and gave away network infrastructure for free as a strategic investment.
However, it is also undoubtedly a proof that you can have a successful company lead by technologists rather than weighed down by MBAs.
The patent system with its patent trolls is also an dead weight on any tech industry.
Stan888
Stan888
2 years ago
Xiden is a genius

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.