UBS Offers $2 Billion to Take Over Credit Suisse, Valued at $8 Billion

Market Cap comparison via Wall Street Journal

Deep, Deep Discounts 

When I read the headline bid (initially $1 billion), I immediately thought this is either a purposeful lowball bid to start the auction or there is a mass of damage on the books of Credit Suisse that are not fully understood. 

Looking at the details, I wonder if Credit Suisse is worth anything at all.

In the addendum at the bottom of this post, I note the offer was raised to $2 billion and it will go through.

The Wall Street Journal reports UBS Offers $1 Billion to Take Over Credit Suisse

Group AG has offered to buy rival Credit Suisse for around $1 billion in a deal engineered by Swiss regulators to prevent a crumbling of confidence in banks from spreading, according to people familiar with the matter.

Swiss authorities on Sunday tried to make the deal happen before Asian markets opened for the week. They walked a fine line, needing to get the two banks’ boards to agree to the deal and avoiding the alternative, a regulator-led winddown of Credit Suisse, which could prove more protracted and painful for the financial system.

Any deal between the two banks would essentially be a forced marriage that is likely to leave shareholders on both sides dissatisfied, the people familiar said.

To smooth the deal, the Swiss National Bank has offered UBS around $100 billion in liquidity to help it take on Credit Suisse’s operations, according to the people familiar with the matter. Details of the liquidity offer couldn’t be learned.

The urgency on the part of regulators was prompted by an increasingly dire outlook at Credit Suisse, according to one of the people. The bank faced as much as $10 billion in outflows a day last week, this person said. The regulators feared that the bank would become insolvent next week if not dealt with, and they were concerned crumbling confidence could spread to other banks.

Credit Suisse has over $160 billion of long-term debt, some of which is classified as bail-in instruments, which can get wiped out in case regulators force the bank into a restructuring.

The $160 in bail-in debt might explain the deep discounts. Also note that it takes $100 billion in liquidity to allegedly prevent insolvency. 

Here’s the real deal, Credit Suisse is insolvent now if it takes $100 billion to make it appear solvent.

Solvency aside, it does not seem anyone will be happy with this shotgun marriage.

Addendum Deal Finalized at $2 Billion

https://twitter.com/ZappaCoin/status/1637504379610877952

“UBS has agreed to buy Credit Suisse after increasing its offer to more than $2bn, with Swiss authorities poised to change the country’s laws to bypass a shareholder vote on the transaction as they rush to finalize a deal before Monday.” 

Best part is: “change the country’s laws”

Will they change the laws before or after the merger? 

This deal is the forced merger of the two biggest too big to fail banks in Switzerland to a single too big to fail behemoth. 

Reflections on Too Big to Fail

https://twitter.com/RobMcNealy/status/1637226212832710656

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

40 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rktbrkr
rktbrkr
3 years ago
UBS grabs the tarbaby. Swiss taxpayers subsidize incompetent bankers. Thanks for all the fish!
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
I am not sure if Credit Suisse is insolvent but they definitely would be illiquid in a bank run. Why would UBS want to buy them? CS basically screwed up everything it touched in the last couple of decades. Buying CS just makes UBS vulnerable to lawsuits for all of CS’s past mistakes. I am sure that UBS got a guarantee for backing on any court losses due to negligence. Basically UBS will probably fire everyone at CS and just take over the portfolio. You don’t want CS to infect UBS with its derelict culture.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago

And one bank to rule them all! What a joke. A 2bn dollar buyout; sweetened with a 100bn dollar liquidity buffer. Always let those that fail lead the way. Too big to fail just means the consolidation and control the state loves trumps prosperity.

And speaking of Trump. Heard he wants his supporters to protest his upcoming arrest. All you trumptards should go and support him. After all, it’s only fair since he’s your savior, and look how he stood up for his guided tour insurrectionists. C’mon!
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Vagner tranquilized Libya, Mariupol and Bakhtum.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
3 years ago
Why did the bid go up to $2 billion from $1? And then stop there? Wouldn’t you expect more back-and-forth to arrive at a more exacting number?
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
because the overnight trading start at 6 PM.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
I have a real sense of foreboding, more so than at any time in my life.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Relax, it’s the taco’s you ate for lunch.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Me too, but hardly more than 2008. Then I went on vacation, and some news outlet trotted out Greenspan, and I thought the end is nigh. Wandered if the bank machine would work. But that was the time of somewhat sane banking.
Today, I am sure they will print a few trillions, inflation be damned. Yes, the dollar is on crutches.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
I think this period — right now — is a good deal more dangerous than it was in 2008. That says a whole lot, because the Panic of ’08 was quite dangerous indeed.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Makes me wonder, why didn t the Saudis buy it out ?? Because they don t want to run the risk of their money being confiscated when not abiding by US’ international ‘law’ ? Maybe ? Doesn t bode well for the US$ if you ask me …. Got Roubles ??
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
“Rules-based International Order”.
LOL…….
The “rules” are whatever we say they are.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Keep on printing then , like never before this time …..50 % inflation s only a matter of time ….and that s an understatement….
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
You have been clutching at straws ever since Russia invaded Ukraine so why stop now.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
oh yes , we are doing fine in all aspects since we decided to wage war against Russia, that s becoming more obvious by the day , my country is f bankrupt, so is France, in case you didn t know , and unless you are completely deluded, which I know you are not, you do realise that the US is falling apart too ….btw , as a moderate financially well off person I am not gloating at all about this situation ….
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
For someone who thinks everyone is bankrupt why are you are still living in Brussels then?
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I don t want to leave my dementia suffering mother behind , I have no siblings , THAT s why ….
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
To which most of the world, by population at least says: Take it and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.
The rest everywhere, at least that with brain activity says: Don’t insult my intelligence.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
“He who has the gold makes the rules.” It’s been true ever since Rome, and surely before then, and it’s no less true today. I am increasingly dismissive of the angry accusations of hypocrisy. Only juveniles fail to realize that paradox is an essential characteristic of life.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
A corollary –
He with the biggest stick just takes the gold.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
The Saudis just made a bad investment and didn’t want to compound their error. Anyway they have lots of other very profitable investments and none of them are in Russia or in Rubles.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
NOPE, Saudis do not trust our regimes any longer, neither do the Chinese, not to mention Russians of course ….THAT s the problem !
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
How much investment is gong into Russia now? Your own economist say that the amount is none. None from Europe, China nor any other country. I did however hear that Iran is investing in a factory to build medium-tech drones because Russia can’t make even make that.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Fake after fake, a pyramid of fakes. For Putin the Iranian drones are trifles. Russia produce ten times more 155mm than Scranton PA. Ukraine might run out of soldiers and ammunition by mid summer.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Why don’t you give us some figures on foreign investment in Russia instead of saying all fake? If you check you will see there isn’t any anymore? More than one country are making 155mm shells for your information. 155mm is the Nato standard so all Nato countries have them and make them and they are upping their production. Russia is counting on have more men but Ukraine keeps killing much more of them than they kill Ukrainians. Funny that Russia is depending on mass to win when before they told everyone they had fantastic weapons. Now all they can say is that we have a lot of men but there will not be enough to make up for the difference in kill rates. Clutching at straws again.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
The Saudis just got hosed – big time.
Getting a little too friendly with China and Iran?
Payback is a b%^ch.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
How so? I usually want answers in 25 words or less, but not this time.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
All the AT1 bonds were wiped out as part of the merger. As in 100% loss. 16 billion worth of loss.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Thanks. Among the current surprises is that I am now taking Zero Hedge seriously.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Their financial reporting is still top notch.
Just ignore all the click bait stuff on politics etc unless you like reading that stuff for amusement.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Credit Swiss finally found a suitor, although a reluctant one in UBS. The parents of the bride were obliged to give a very good dowry since the bride was somewhat a slut and slept with a lot of very shady characters but for the reputation of the family they married her off to a wealthily although boring husband who after cashing the dowery check will send Credit Swiss to a nunnery where she will no longer embarrass the family. It’s the Old World way.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
So that must be a bargain for UBS ? **** !, Bought UBS at 11 sf, couple of years ago, sold not so long ago at 18, …..should be worth much more now ? Always paid a nice div too, helas with a outrageous 35 % withholding tax ….
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Mish, I think it would be useful to take a second look at the dollar’s future as the reserve currency. I realize that China would have a tough time replacing the dollar with the yuan, but what alternative structures might arise to replace the dollar given what’s happening to the pillars of the West?
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
“I realize that China would have a tough time replacing the dollar with the yuan,”
It’s not about wholesale, overnight “replacing.” Just slowly, then faster, getting more of the action.
As long as China is OK to maintain a fixed USD target; it’s easier for most to just keep trotting along. The Chinese won’t for too long, though. The imbalance in what a dollar actually buys you in China and the US, is growing so enormous, that there are limits to how long the Chinese can afford the subsidisation of what is by now little more than a senile once-was with a bad case of Tourettes.
Now that China is no longer in hibernation, it’s becoming increasingly attractive for them to overnight reduce The West’s effective ability to bid for oil and other raw materials by a literal 50% overnight. Even if doing so, in the short term, shakes up many exporters. It’s simply not sustainable for long, for the average Chinese worker to, in aggregate, produce twice what his American peers do, yet still only being able to bid half as much for scarce resources. Even a bunch of commies won’t keep falling for that sleight-of-hand for too log before taking some steps to rectify the imbalance.
Then, if you are a third party: Which currency do you reckon it is prudent to hold more of, once exchange rate volatility between them starts increasing: The one which you need to pay with, in order to buy absolutely anything and everything currently made, from diapers to engineering megaprojects? Or the one in use by someone who builds nothing; but instead offers you the privilege of being shaken down to pay for “reparations?”
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
It’s not about wholesale, overnight “replacing.” Just slowly, then faster, getting more of the action.

I agree. I do not expect some overnight shift, or necessarily any shift. Look at how long it took to knock the UK pound off its reserve perch. I would like to rethink the reserve currency question, and have a significant degree of respect for Mish’s take. If I didn’t, I wouldn’t even be here much less ask. I do think dollar hegemony’s future has become increasingly questionable, but you can drive a truck through that sentiment.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
So what to you believe will happen to these centuries old counterfeiters?
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
They will have to play second fiddle to marginally less economically illiterate, and that’s saying something.., communist counterfeiters….
People have to mind China and it’s currency, though. No matter who you are, if you need something, you have to be able to pay some Chinese to deliver anywhere from a large part, to all of, what you want. China is where things are made these days. So it’s simply not prudent, nor even really tenable, to keep your “reserves” in anything which is at great risk of volatility, devaluation against the Chinese currency.
So far, China has maintained their dollar peg. But given the machinations they have to go through to do so, it’s not entirely unfair of some hotheads to label them “currency manipulators.” And it can only get worse, the more dollars are being printed in order to prop up and enrich useless idles, as well as bombing countries on every continent and then some. At some point that overstretched rubber band will snap. When it does, there is a long way down, purchasing power wise, for the Dollar and currenies “pegged” to it, before overall productivity of the US/Western and Chinese workforces comes even close to being balanced out by a floating exchange rate.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Perhaps BezosBucks or MuskMoney?
Fish1
Fish1
3 years ago
Anyone notice that oil is at $66 ? So you really think you know this market? Rhetorical question. Oil says recession.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Fish1
Recession and a buyer’s cartel.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.