Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Wall Street Struggles to Gain Support for Bitcoin in Congress and by the SEC

Resistance Mounts 

In the wake of yet another 40% plunge in Bitcoin, Wall Street Struggles for Congressional Support.

Major financial industry players including Fidelity Investments and Anthony Scaramucci’s SkyBridge Capital are pressing the Securities and Exchange Commission to approve their plans to launch funds on public stock markets that would let small investors tap into the rise of Bitcoin prices.

“Our country needs to take a deeper dive on how to deal with cryptocurrency before any regulations are put in,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a member of the Banking Committee, said in an interview. “The wild swings of crypto prices sound an alarm that every regulator hears.”

The SEC has long taken a skeptical view of the funds, going as far as rejecting earlier proposals by the Winklevoss twins — of Facebook fame — because of worries that the agency could not guarantee safeguards against fraud and manipulation.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said in House testimony Thursday that his company — the nation’s largest bank — was debating how to make it available in a safe way. But Dimon’s personal advice? “Stay away from it.”

Republicans Balk Too

  • “I’m not clear yet on exactly what we should do,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), who in May launched the bipartisan Senate Financial Innovation Caucus to encourage policy development in crypto and other financial technologies.
  • Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who with Lummis serves on the Senate Banking Committee, said he’s concerned about the accuracy of the underlying reference prices for the funds because crypto trading occurs on venues that aren’t regulated by the SEC. Tillis said the fund applications “have to be scrutinized, mainly from a consumer protection perspective.”
  • “We need to figure out how we deal with this,” said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), a member of the Banking Committee. “Otherwise you’re going to have a lot of people lose a lot of money.”

Be Careful of What You Wish

Bitcoin and crypto advocates are clamoring for Bitcoin ETF approval. I suspect it would be net negative for price.

Q: Net negative for price? Why?
A: Regulation

Approval for Bitcoin will come with regulation and lots of it. 

There will be regulation to stop money laundering. Congress may kill tether. Congress might increase taxes on crypto transaction.

In addition, the masses are unlikely to be staunch HODLers and if not, that could increase volatility.

On one side there will be easier access. But the downside is highly likely to be strict enforcement of money laundering and a ban on Tether. 

Ban Cryptocurrency to Fight Ransomware

Some want to ban cryptocurrency transactions as noted in New Battle Cry: We Need to Ban Cryptocurrency to Fight Ransomware

That is a possible outcome. And if government ever felt threatened by cryptos that would happen. 

Tax hikes on profits, strict money laundering rules, and mining taxes, are more likely. So is a ban on Tether.

Is Bitcoin Dependent on a $60 Billion Tether Accounting Fraud?

In case you missed it, please see Investigating the Charge “Bitcoin Price is Dependent on $60 Billion Accounting Fraud”

That link discusses the likelihood of Tether fraud and what a crackdown on Tether alone might do.

In short, Bitcoin advocates need be careful of what they seek as the other side of that coin is far more regulation.

https://twitter.com/StateCommon/status/1399076321183993857

A Winner No Matter What

Wall Street won’t care about price.

If ETFs are approved, it will make more money no matter what Bitcoin does. 

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
rogoclub1
rogoclub1
5 years ago

Why anyone would buy 92K of Bitcoin when someone unknown with zero accountability to anyone is supposedly holding 1million Bitcoin & the only I/O critical keys to an unknown endgame, Unless M.Saylor knows something the public does not have the luxury of knowing & maybe that information was shared with someone with a much different moral compass?…Allowing a digital invention from unknown creator/s with an unproven public transactional usage on publicly traded company balance sheets is egregiously wrong and should be immediately addressed by the elected officials or it will be on them if Bitcoin ends badly which already has for many who can not afford 10K – 20K haircuts every other week!…🌊🌏✌️🇺🇸 💯🙏🏾🙏🙏🏿

#BBQBitcoin
rogoclub1
rogoclub1
5 years ago
Trump wanted to 86 the FED & has 70 million sheeple and could have tweeted & touted Bitcoin to the moon easily, Why did he not back such a beautiful investment, This may have been his only beneficial decision for U.S. middle class & GenZs future betterment, But he is still most responsible along with Wal-Mart for him not 100% in/out lock down travel and Wal-Mart for cardboard transmission of Covid -19 from China…. #BBQBitcoin Neva Wong 黄妮娃 🌊🌏✌️
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
5 years ago
Crypto-currencies share an economic similarity to many collectables,  devoid of productive purpose but valued by some for their scarcity value.  However some cryptos are much more liquid than stamps, antiques, etc,.  Since collectables are largely unregulated (except subject to judicial intervention for fraud, contract breach etc.), does this constitute a  reasonable precedent, or does the usually greater liquidity of crypto (more conducive to money laundering)  warrant financial regulation?
ajc1970
ajc1970
5 years ago
Oh please give me a Bitcoin ETF.  I’ve been out of the market for roughly 10.5 years, but I’d take my first position in a while on that.  Short, of course.
RonJ
RonJ
5 years ago
“We need to figure out how we deal with this,” said Sen. Jon Tester
(D-Mont.), a member of the Banking Committee. “Otherwise you’re going to
have a lot of people lose a lot of money.”
You mean like in the burst Nasdaq bubble and burst housing bubble? How about the current everything bubble?
The current stock market is so high it is in the iCloud.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
5 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Adjust your vocabulary. Those are not bubbles, that’s the wealth effect. /s
Creating bubbles is illegal, wealth effect is not.
caradoc-again
caradoc-again
5 years ago
All it takes is banks to be told to refuse transactions to/fro exchanges.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
“Wall Street won’t care about price. If ETFs are approved, it will make more money no matter what Bitcoin does.”
Imho the only reason bitcoin is NOT illegal already is the obvious opportunity represented here for Wall Street to set up a new game in the casino. They see huge profits ahead if the ETF’s are approved. And the big investment banks have a lot of political clout. Some of the biggest players on Wall Street have been positioning themselves to profit off crypto derivatives for a couple of years already.
The fatal flaw is bitcoin itself, which is still not a decent crypto, compared to the more modern 3rd generation tokens. It has those big flaws I mentioned. It’s not really completely immune to dilution, it is hackable, and it wastes a sh*t ton of energy.
Another flaw is that it trades in unregulated international markets that allow rather blatant price manipulation.
As far as the use case for “the cash of the internet” it fails miserably because it’s too slow to ever be used at the point of sale. And that’s too bad, because everything wrong with BTC has been fixed by one or more good alt coins….and it would be very possible now to use  a good “non-sovereign” crypto to transact any kind of financial transaction. But I’m betting that will never be allowed to happen. Not for any technical reason, but because it threatens the monopoly of the international banking cartel.
The delay of crypto regs looks an awful lot like a delaying tactic tactic to me….to buy time until the countries in the West can integrate crypto into the existing banking system. There are huge vested interests and also powerful legacy institutional systems. The SWIFT  system is an obvious example.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.