Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

What Does China Do With a Dollar That’s No Longer Risk Free? Buy Gold?

Background

The reason for this topic has to do with the Fed’s unprecedented decision co confiscate Russia’s foreign currency reserves.

Not only was the action unprecedented, it was illegal.

The Federal Reserve Act mandates that the Federal Reserve conduct monetary policy “so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.”

Nowhere does the act give the Fed the right or power to confiscate the reserves of sovereign nations.

But that is exactly what the Fed did.

If the Fed can do this to Russia, who else?

Weaponizing the Dollar

Risking Risk Free Status 

Q&A With Michael Pettis

Mish: Will China now hold more commodities and fewer dollars despite the pro-cyclical nature of it? More Euros or Yen over dollars? More gold?

Michael Pettis:

  • “Given that so much of China’s “reserves” are now indirect and held by state-owned banks (all the increase since 2017) it’s hard to say what the currency composition of China’s reserves are.
  • “Officially the US dollar is still by far the biggest component, but it is slowly declining.
  • “I expect that this will continue as far as the official reserves go but, as you know, the hard part of reducing the US dollar component of your reserves is figuring out what the alternative should be, and with such high and growing reserves (once you include the indirect reserves at the state-owned banks) that is a very difficult question to resolve.”

Understanding the Mathematical Difficulty

Mathematically, as a direct result of having a trade surplus with the US, China has a huge influx of US dollars.

China can convert dollars to Euros, but what does the euro seller do with the dollars?

Alternatives

Suppose China buys gold. Then the seller of gold has dollars. What does the gold seller do with dollars?

And Eurobonds? There are none. The country-specific European bonds have a negative yield. One loses money holding them.

Someone must hold every dollar, every bond, every US treasury 100% of the time. Who is that someone?

That is what Pettis meant by “as you know, the hard part of reducing the US dollar component of your reserves is figuring out what the alternative should be.”

China will buy more gold, more copper, etc, but what it would really like to do is buy Boeing or a defense contractor.

The US would of course say no.

It’s likely China is slowly shifting. But because of indirect reserves at state-owned banks, no one can really say by how much.

Russia did divest of US dollars for gold but that was much easier because the amounts were also much smaller.

Unprecedented Fed Action May Have Just Started a Global Currency Crisis

I discussed the loss of risk-free status in Unprecedented Fed Action May Have Just Started a Global Currency Crisis

In one quick order, the Fed electronically rendered Russia’s foreign dollar reserves worthless, or at least unusable for now.

Now, if you were in China’s shoes do you hold dollars or gold as reserves? What about metals?

We are not at a full blown crisis stage yet. And perhaps we do not get there this time.

But when trade wars like these start, history suggests major wars often follow.

Unmistakable Message

Team Biden just sent unmistakable message to China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, well actually everyone

  • We can make your fiat reserves worthless overnight
  • Buy gold
  • Buy base metals.
  • Hoard things you have everyone needs.

As noted above it’s likely happening, but not at any identifiable speed.

But guess what happens if everyone starts hoarding things that others need?

What About the Dollar as Reserve Currency?

In case you think this means the end of the dollar as reserve currency, think again:

Note something I said above: Someone must hold every dollar, every bond, every US treasury 100% of the time.

Oil priced in euros does not change that statement. That countries hold dollars, not euros, has everything to do with reserve math and nothing to do with perceived pricing units.

The Yuan Will Not Replace the US Dollar, Nor Will It Be Backed by Commodities

Don’t confuse a diminishing role for the US dollar with it’s demise as the global reserve currency.

It’s far too early for that. For further discussion, please see the above link.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

56 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
trackback

[…] It’s easy to understand the BRIC backlash. What Does China Do With a Dollar That’s No Longer Risk Free? Buy Gold? […]

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
“China will buy more gold, more copper, etc, but what it would really like to do is buy Boeing or a defense contractor.”
Alternatively, buy Africa, and export Africans to the EU.
Ziad
Ziad
4 years ago
Mish’s question “What does the buyer do with the dollars?” implies that no one really wants to hold dollars if they don’t have to, doesn’t it? That there simply are far more dollars in the world than there are things to buy. And that the value of the dollar rests only in the fact that it is in such common use, that changing to something else is too hard…for the moment.
At some point in time, a few, then more and more, will realize that the sooner they get out of dollar the better. Those who get out sooner, will at least get something. Those too late, will be left holding the bag. China only has to choose which group it falls in.
Stocks, like dollars, have to all be held by someone all the time. Somebody was holding Enron stocks till the very end. The same will be for dollars.
Esclaro
Esclaro
4 years ago
Buy gold? What a hoot! Gold is circling the toilet waiting for the final flush. 
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
Why should anyone be surprised? Nearly 100 years ago President FDR confiscated gold by executive order, and no one challenged the theft.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
amerikans are compliant and bootlickers.    it’s been 170 years since any rebellion.   if the EU country elites did to their middlebrows what USA does,   the spanish and french and italians……..would have long long ago burned down DC and the pentagon.    amerikan ruling class knows the middlebrows here are dumb and have no spine.     i vote in amerika and EU.   huge differences.   they already revolted and put heads on pikes over there.   so the ruling class there treads lightly and gives their peasants lots of benefits.   amerikan elites give the bankers and MIC trillions and the peasants can be homeless or in prison or overdosing or foreclosed on.     twice the covid deaths here verssus rest of rich world.   lots of folks in usa don’t even go to a yearly doctor checkup over cost.     fat and dumb middlebrows begging to be clubbed like baby seals.   
Dean_70
Dean_70
4 years ago
What if China (and other nations) diversify out of the dollar by buying US assets with US dollars? Then they can sell the assets in their currency of choice. Those dollars are then parked back in the US.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Real Estate is great for absorbing huge amounts of foreign dollar excess whether it be Chinese, Japanese or Gulf Arabs. In my opinion it accounts for much of the surge in prices along with the Fed actions. Unfortunately for the buyer real estate can’t be shipped back to those countries so if there is a problem such as a war, sanctions or embargo those assets will be seized and sold off using due process of course just like the church property was in former times. Russians are trying to sell off their property in the West and the prices they get if any and very much discounted. I remember the Japanese in the 1980’s buying up all the real estate they could in the US to recycle their dollars. When their economy and market crashed they had to sell what they had bought and often to the original owner they had brought it from. I am possibly seeing a deja vu now.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
“Mathematically, as a direct result of having a trade surplus with the US, China has a huge influx of US dollars”
Not exactly right.
Should be…
“Mathematically, as a direct result of having a trade surplus with the US and the Yuan being effectively pegged to USD, China has a huge influx of US dollars”
If China decides to buy more gold, etc… . it’s true someone else would have USD to spend, but the end result will be less demand for USD and more supply. Which will drive down the value of USD.
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
The US Treasury accepted Russia’s $117M interest payment in $US.  Clearly Russia’s assets are refrigerated, not frozen.
What’s with all the vapors anyway?  Frozen assets are undeniably a consequence of aggressive war (in the case of powerful nations like Russia, China, et. al.) or policy that contradicts USG interests (in the case of lesser nations like Iran, Venezuela, et. al.)
China’s assets are as safe as possible — as long as they don’t invade Taiwan.  It’s a simple proposition.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
“China’s assets are as safe as possible — as long as they don’t invade Taiwan.”
Or are claimed, by some yahoo close to the USG, to be mean to Uyghurs, or Hong Kong protesters….
Or compete too aggressively with some money losing “startup” which some connected zerobrain is involved in…..
Or saves some Iranian kid from starving to death…..
Or, just does something which Hunter Biden claims is the reason his “portfolio” “went down….”
Or because some connected Israeli on the make tell them to do so…
Or any number of other entirely arbitrary, made up excuses a petty thief may dream up for excusing his theft.
Important thing being: The theft is the point. Stealing; whether for their own book, or in aid of useless banksters who can’t get a real job, or for the benefit of run-amuck kangaroo-court-abusing ambulance chasers; is what the USG does. It’s why they exist. It’s their sole de facto mandate. The excuses are just whatever their reliably stupid indoctrinati can successfully be suckered into cheering for, at any given moment.
As long as there is wealth in China; the USG, and it’s ambulance chasing and theft beneficiary fellow travelers, will try their best stealing it. If someone in China is bothered by that, they need to find a way to make theft at least a little harder than just arbitrarily freezing someone’s US bank account. And to do so as of yesterday…
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
I can’t control your imagination Stuki.  Let’s stick to things that actually happen for now.  The clear line in the sand for great powers is aggressive war.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
“The clear line in the sand for great powers is aggressive war.”
Just as the clear line in the sand as the US invaded Vietnam, was being Vietnamese….
Then Vietnamese and Grenadans. Then Iraqi. And Afghani…. And….
And, in a different venue; $20/oz Gold. Then $33/ox Gold. Then, convertibility at the central bank level….. Then….
And free speech. Ahem, uhh, like, ooops, except then “clear line in the sand” of fire in crowded theaters. Then N words. Then, like sexist… And then, like, what???, uuuuuh, maybe? you know, blah, blah!! But, like , you know? We’re, like Bestestest!!!! 
The only thing historically clear about actions of the USG, is complete and utter arbitrariness. Absolutely no reliable constraints whatsoever. And a capacity for rationalizing crass, self righteous opportunism, which would make a heroin addicted prostitute seem positively reliable.
Cansip
Cansip
4 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
Whatever you say or think does not matter, all other nations think they cannot trust US anymore, they will not hold more reserves in the US, genie is out of the bottle, damage is done and permanent .
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Reply to  Cansip
You don’t know that any more than I do, you’re being ridiculous.  The US and the $US and our $30T consumer economy are king of the world and no exporting nation will survive without us.
FrankieCarbone
FrankieCarbone
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
BRICs engaged in massive currency swaps, discussions of an alternative reserve currency by “The Global South” underway, Russia thriving without the USD. Dollar hegemony on the ropes, India, China buying Russian energy without using the USD (20+% of global population right there). I’d say this did not age well Mr. Purple and yes, it looks like Cansip knows more than you do. Sorry, but look back at what you said and what has happened and what is in place to happen. BTW, it would not surprise me of the dixy hit 130-140 before collapsing. All fiat ships are sinking but the last to start listing is the dixy, as its presently the best looking horse in the glue factory, for now. What happens. when there is no more safe haven the the dixy destroys the Euro and pound, and trainwrecks their debt markets and hence pensions? Think we’ll allow it to levitate forever? Think we’ll have the ability to do so? Time will tell.
Internet is forever. When you make an arrogant and condescending comment to a poster expect the ghosts of the past to come back to haunt you.
Dominic69
Dominic69
4 years ago
Well, Mish to your question “Someone must hold every dollar, every bond, every US treasury 100% of the time.” you already mentioned the answer…eventual currency crisis. At the end, it becomes a hot potato game…after all, (I know, a silly example but just to make a point) someone had to hold every Zimbabwe dollar and bond 100% of the time right??
Billy
Billy
4 years ago
I’d like to add a different point of view.
China watched as the US froze transactions from Russia because Russia tried to take over Ukraine.
In war, you make moves to see how the enemy reacts to them. You do this to learn about your enemy so you know what to anticipate.
China is watching very closely to what the US is doing to Russia.
China also knows that the US dollar is the strongest in the world and most traded too. All China has to do is slowly buy a lot of gold with the US dollars that they hold as discussed in the article. I actually think silver would be a lot cheaper to make a bigger impact. Especially with the whole
going green for the Agenda 2030.
But, knowing that China hasn’t even started this process means that their is little possibility of them taking over Taiwan any time soon.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Billy
Again, to do so would create a different problem for China. If they reduce their holdings of USD denominated assets, the dollar will fall, and that will make it harder to sell China manufactured goods in the US. China has become a manufacturing powerhouse precisely by not bringing their “profits” home, but rather leaving them in the form of USD denominated holdings, and thus allowing the the favorable exchange rate to continue indefinitely.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
“..the dollar will fall, and that will make it harder to sell China manufactured goods in the US.”
It will also make it cheaper to buy all the inputs which are currently denominated in dollars. Quite a lot so. And with the non-US world growing while the West is stagnating, ability to procure inputs is becoming a higher priority than being able to sell something to a shrinking market consisting of buyers who ultimately, let’s be real, won’t even pay you in anything of value.
The only thing going for it that the Dollar currently has left, is inertia: It is the currency used by the far and away dominant payment network/platform out there. And like all networks/platforms, payment networks/platforms derive their value from the number of nodes they have. Making it a real uphill battle, for the first guy to break out and start his own…..
But there are limits to how poorly performing even a dominant network/platform can be for its nodes, before at least some of them will try settling some trades “off-network.” In the beginning, these alternative networks/platforms will be small. But the value of networks grow exponentially with every new node while they are still small. Such that they quickly grow in value, with every new entrant. Quickly enough that they can easily entice yet more nodes to try them out. And then another few…. And this growth, in value hence new members, also ends up being exponential. Such that, when one dominant network/platform takes over from another, it pretty much always ends up happening “first very slowly, then all at once.” Almost always coming as a surprise to those heavily invested in the now deprecated network/platform.
Just anecdotally, I would not be surprised to see Americans de facto income, hence ability to bid for resources, correct downward by up to 75%, before Americans’ pay vs productivity, in aggregate, matches those of the Chinese. Of course, there are huge individual differences. But the share of resources currently consumed by the West vs what real value they anymore provide in return is enormous. Enough so, that it is only a matter of (inevitably decreasing) time, before they have it corrected for them (since they are unlikely to do so themselves) by those who are as a result stuck with less.
Cansip
Cansip
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Carl,  this is a also a problem for the US, that will make prices in Dollar terms increase, then it will create an inflation storm in US, it will destroy US economy.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Cansip
If if happens, or perhaps I should say when it happens, yes, prices will rise in the US and  the standard of living in the US will fall. On the other hand, US labor will become more competitive, and more production will return to the US.  The US economy will not be “destroyed”, but rather will face a return to normal, where consumption=production. 
For the last 40 years the US has seen rising consumption and rising standards of living, without matching production.  Some have mistakenly attributed the ability to consume as a benefit of deficit spending, but haven’t realized that the only reason we could engage in unlimited deficit spending has been the willingness of China to fund it by holding US bonds. Granted, it will come as quite a shock to some to discover that genuine high standards of living come, not from government spending, but from high production, but that lesson is neither a bad thing, nor unnecessary.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Too much is being made of whatever actions the ‘Fed’ undertook. We all know by now the Treasury and Fed are one in the same and all actions are coordinated.  It has always been this way even if some never recognized it.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Absolutely.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
They also coordinate with their subsidiary the US Congress.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“By weaponizing the banking system against enemies outside and within, advanced economies are losing their ‘risk free’ status.”
The problem with China is that Western corporations have made SUBSTANTIAL investments there.  Yes, in recent years a move to divest out of China (to some other low cost country), but still plenty.  China could easily nationalize all of it in retaliation.
Furthermore, I’m still in the camp (> 50%) that China takes Taiwan.  With TSMC in hand – and holding that club over US – China will hold upper hand.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
China isn’t going to do anything crazy. Xi isn’t willing to risk global shame the way Putin has and turn the country into a global pariah. Asian culture isn’t like Russian culture. It is worse to be embarrassed in Asia then take a risk. China is still an export driven economy last I checked.  Covid has allowed supply chains to decouple a bit from China and this provides a hedge against China. 
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
You’re (probably) right.  I’m out on a limb.  But Xi wants to change from mercantile to more consumer based economy.
Jack
Jack
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
If Taiwan resists like Ukraine (ok ok, Taiwan’s population is minuscule compared to China) and not collapses like Afghan National Army, TSMC factories may get decimated and a big brain drain will occur. 
There may be no TSMC left for China.
This scenario may not work out as well as some military planners expect.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I think if China wanted TSMC, they would just hire their engineers. Pay them 3x what they make now. TSMC doesn’t do anything special. Right now they make a lot of high tech ICs, but the US could catch up to them quickly with enough investment.
ZZR600
ZZR600
4 years ago
Breaking or broken global supply chains means the just in time business model will slowly die. That inevitably means holding excess stock, if you have the capacity to do so and the stock doesn’t deteriorate with time. I don’t know what the portion might be, but I expect more currency to be sold to accumulate stock and for stock levels to be kept at a permanently high level. Effectively, you are no longer stacking bank notes, you are stacking piles of ‘stuff’. That will devalue currency in proportion to the amount of ‘stuff’ being accumulated.
Maybe at some point there will be more bilateral bartering agreements, bypassing currency altogether? e.g. if country X can export minerals to country Y that makes finished products that country X needs, why not do a direct exchange of goods? It wouldn’t work on a person-to-person or business-to-business case, but might work for large defence related or infrastructure related projects. 
ZZR600
ZZR600
4 years ago
Reply to  ZZR600
e.g. You give me 1 million tons iron ore and I give you 10 fighter jets….
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  ZZR600
This is what crypto currency is supposed to be for.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
So how much is a ton of iron ore or a fighter jet “worth” in each of the crypto currencies?
P.S. Using dollars, yen, pounds or euros as an intermediary is not allowed.
It’s not easy establishing an accepted store of value – at this cryptos fail miserably.
ZZR600
ZZR600
4 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
At a fundamental level, all processes are converting energy into something tangible. It may be possible to work out the embedded energy of a ton of ore and the embedded energy of a finished product, thereby allowing some sort of comparison. 
dpy
dpy
4 years ago
These new events seem inconsistent with the USA in the past militarily dealing with anyone who tried to deal petroleum in anything but USDs.  Lots of trade is shifting away from dollar settlement, and the “militarily dealing” part of that concept is still in play, to put it lightly.   But the weaponizing of the dollars seems to show an acceptance  that it won’t be as desirable to hold from now on.
In other words, are they giving up on defending the dollar?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  dpy
One day we will wake up and all dollars will be digital. We are nearly there now. Once banks stop accepting cash then a lot of people holding cash are going to be screwed.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Like when banks stopped accepting gold and silver?
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
It won’t happen anytime soon. And if it does, there will be plenty of time to deposit cash into banks.
Let me know when the first country outlaws cash.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
If it is not in your possession, it isn’t yours. You can’t put digital money in your pocket.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Physical possession is only part of the story. And not even accurate at that.
In general, you own that which you have somehow managed to procure, AND are able, and willing, to defend.
Cryptos excel because they are easy to defend against most traditional attempts at stealing them. Countering that, they do present a new set of risks, some even systemic, with which people have lot less experience.
Eighthman
Eighthman
4 years ago
If 3.7% of global reserves are yuan, why can’t that grow to 30 or 50 or 60%?  China has knocked down their dollar reserves from 70+ % to 50 to maybe 30%.   They’re getting ready for something. I understand a de facto petroyuan already exists because of currency swaps with Nigeria and Angola.   China gets oil, Africa gets yuan. Then they spend that yuan on Chinese goods.  What’s the point of noting limitations in the yuan when it is contrasted with the risks of the dollar (freezing, sanctions, US theft, and inflation)
Eventually, they will demand yuan for payment for exports to the US, not dollars.  You might say, ‘that’s a long ways off’. I would reply, “see if the US keeps obsessively offending and threatening China, it could happen sooner than you think”.  
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
correct sir.  there are already a few reserve currencies.   always has been this way.   the USD just happens to be the most traded and held for past few decades.    nothing lasts forever.   
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
Math Math Math
China does not want nor does it meet 7 of 8 requirement for anyone to want to hold the damn yaun.
I believe I explained that nicely.
Eighthman
Eighthman
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I reply like Galileo, ‘and yet it moves’.  China has huge currency swap deals. Somebody – including African nations are holding yuan with Chinese approval.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
china, for at least, 2 decades now has been entering into long term installment payment plans,  using USD to purchase and/or lease and also loan,  to private and public entities……all sorts of property, commodities, companies etc……….around the world on all continents.   they have already layed off the USD.   it’s a brilliant move,  that i believe FX traders and other world wide observers understand.    the economist newspaper has had some terrific analysis hinting at this over the many years.     in fact,  they have matured and have already given debt forgiveness terms to emerging nations and companies,  who they loaned the bad dollars to.     
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
It’s called BRI. We ignore it but if everything goes to plan, China is going to control world trade in a few decades. And 80% of the world will be part of it and be allied with China.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago

“The reason for this topic has to do with the Fed’s unprecedented decision co confiscate Russia’s foreign currency reserves.Not only was the action unprecedented, it was illegal.”

Isn’t that what dictators do?
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
“If the Fed can do this to Russia, who else?”
Klaus Schwab: You will own nothing and be happy.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Zero Hedge: “DHS Collected Americans’ Financial Records In Bulk: Sen. Wyden”
The customs summonses authority only permits the government to seek records that are ‘relevant’ to an investigation,” he said.

“HSI
should have known that this authority could not be used to conduct bulk
surveillance, particularly after the Department of Justice inspector
general harshly criticized the Drug Enforcement Administration in 2019
for using subpoenas to conduct a bulk surveillance program involving
records of international phone calls.”

 
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
The problem for China is that, in order to keep the value of their currency low, they need to hold dollar denominated assets. If they avoid dollar denominated assets in favor of commodities, then the dollar will fall. If they bring the money home, their currency will rise. Therefore, I think they have little choice other than to continue to hold dollar denominated assets. The one thing that would be logical for China to change is that they would want to move to the most liquid assets possible, so that they could get out in a hurry. Thus, we may see them buying less real estate, and less businesses.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Yes, someone understands a piece of it!
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
That wouldn’t be a bad thing. But I think commodities will crash first due to the actual economy crashing  a la 2009.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Only to keep Yuan low relative to USD. What if China trades a lot more with the rest of the world and less with the US?
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
“The problem for China is that, in order to keep the value of their currency low…”
Don’t know about you, but most people prefer the value of their whatevers to be higher, rather than lower. The paper in my wallet having too high a value, is not really what I would call a “problem.”
John k
John k
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
The premise is ‘so long as China maintains a large goods surplus, they must hold some foreign financial asset’. And without the surplus, they will have high unemployment, right?
But if they see little value and/or great risk in holding foreign financial assets they would logically examine that premise.
Why not keep the surplus goods for their own consumption? Granted, Chinese wages aren’t high enough to buy them… unless their wages rise.
The state could either subsidize wages or provide other support, e.g. good retirement income (ss) thus avoiding workers need for saving. They would then buy more of what they produce… and this allows them to have a wealthy life style. If China feels a need to fund this they might tax exports, which would raise prices to foreigners but not to domestic buyers and accelerate the transition.
Imo taking Russian reserves will goad them to adjust their economy.
Certainly all assets must be held by somebody… one option is the fed, buyer of last resort. That’s who buys now when auctions have few buyers.
The important end result would be much higher us inflation and a crashing trade deficit as we slowly but painfully shift to balanced trade… and that means fewer foreign adventures/bases.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.