What is the Best Measure of Monetary Inflation?

Monetary Definitions

M1: M1 consists of (1) currency outside the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Banks, and the vaults of depository institutions; (2) demand deposits at commercial banks (excluding those amounts held by depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign banks and official institutions) less cash items in the process of collection and Federal Reserve float; and (3) other liquid deposits, consisting of OCDs and savings deposits (including money market deposit accounts) – Revised May 2020

M2: M2 consists of M1 plus (1) small-denomination time deposits (time deposits in amounts of less than $100,000) less IRA and Keogh balances at depository institutions; and (2) balances in retail MMFs less IRA and Keogh balances at MMFs. – Revised May 2020

Base Money: The monetary base is the sum of currency in circulation and reserve balances (deposits held by banks and other depository institutions in their accounts at the Federal Reserve).

What Is Inflation?

If inflation is an increase in money supply, then which money supply?

Money Supply Measures Percent Change

Money Supply Measures Percent Change Detail

If you believe an increase in M1 is the measure of an increase in inflation, then year-over-year inflation hit 357% in February of 2021.

Let’s exclude M1 and see what we get.

M2 and Base Money Percent Change

If inflation is measured by Base Money then most of 2015-2020 was a period of deflation before soaring to 58.71% in May of 2020.

If inflation is measured by M2, the year-over-year increase was 1.61% in 2010, then hovered between 3% and 6% for lengthy period before surging to 27.1% in February of 2021.

M2 Money Supply vs the CPI

The above chart suggests there is no relationship at all between consumer prices and money supply.

But if money supply itself is the measure of inflation, there there will only be a sustained explosion in inflation if there is a sustained explosion in money supply. The past explosion being irrelevant.

Will the Fed Balance Sheet Get Spent into Circulation Causing Inflation?

The Fed’s Balance Sheet is Not Spendable Money

For discussion, please see Will the Fed Balance Sheet Get Spent into Circulation Causing Inflation?

QE does foster bubbles as part of the psychological impact and by interest rate suppression, but it does not represent spendable money nor does it constitute inflation in and of itself. Thus Schiff’s Tweet is economic silliness.

Subtracting QE

If QE is essentially meaningless from a monetary standpoint (and it is) then we should subtract QE from monetary measures.

Money Supply Measures in Billions of Dollars 

I also subtracted QE from M1 but the numbers were on occasion deeply negative. 

I am not sure if this was a result of a recent change in the definition of M1, sweeps in which money in demand deposits (checking accounts) really isn’t there, or another M1 distortion of some kind.

M2 and M2 Minus the Fed’s Balance Sheet Percent Change

The above chart explains the sudden and sustained housing collapse, the Taper Tantrum, and the weakness that predated the pandemic. 

Money Supply as a Measure of Inflation

If someone tells you inflation is about money, be prepared to fire back some questions.

  • What is your measure of money supply?
  • Is it M1, M2, M3, MZM, or what, and why?
  • Are you subtracting QE from your analysis, why or why not?

Difficult Subjects

For years I regarded inflation as “an increase money supply and credit marked to market”. I used Austrian Money Supply as a measure and that is nearly the same as M2.

However, the Fed suspended mark-to-market rules in 2009 and never reinstated proper accounting. Even prior to the rule change, mark-market accounting was really mark-to-fantasy. 

Measurement by my definition was impossible and it missed subtracting QE.

In contrast, M2 minus the Fed’s balance sheet explains much and is measurable but it misses proper loan accounting. Are the loans on the balance sheets of banks any good or not?

Milton Friedman’s statement “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” is catchy. But it sheds little light on anything especially when people confuse QE with actual spendable money.

Whatever your measure of money, it should not include QE but that does not mean QE is harmless. 

QE sponsors bubbles and central banks are addicted to it. For discussion, please see The House of Lords is Concerned Over a Dangerous Addiction to QE.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
2 years ago
Prior to 1971, money was tied to something in the Periodic Chart of the Elements.  Since then money, and monetary theories are just someone’s opinion.  Now, I can’t really say who enforces the Laws of Physics, but whoever it is, is doing a lot better job than the Federal Reserve and the monetary theorists.
dtj
dtj
2 years ago
I’ve always considered inflation to be “a decrease in the purchasing power of a currency relative to an earlier time period”. It can be measured by comparing market prices today versus an earlier time. The cause of inflation is an increase in the quantity of currency chasing goods and services relative to the supply of good and services.
ThaomasH
ThaomasH
2 years ago
Like almost everything else, it is a matter of supply and demand.  Prices rise when the Fed increases the supply of money more than there is demand for money.  The best “measure” of inflation is probably the PCE that the Fed has targeted to grow at 2% pa. on average.  Right now bond traders are buying and selling as if they expect the Fed to hit pretty close to its target.   
TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
2 years ago
Libertarian and conservative economists and pundits generally make a fetish out of “high” inflation, the “free” market and government spending. The market is not and never has been free much less free flowing and that is because 1) we live in an alternately goosed and strangled form of financially dominating chaos that has no effective, humanly sensitive or ethical means of preventing inflation and 2) the economy is chronically characterized by individual monetary scarcity and systemic austerity despite inflation. Friedman’s pronouncement should actually be: Inflation is always and everywhere a commercial decision maker’s (ethical or unethical) reaction to the chaos created by the present monetary and financial paradigm of Debt Only.
The problem is not government/fiscal spending which is probably only around 3-4% of money creation, it is the human civilization long tendency for the cost of private debt to increase and overwhelm the ability of the economy to be stable. Integrate the new paradigm of Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting into the present paradigm with 1) a 50% discount/rebate policy at retail sale, a $1000/mo. universal dividend for everyone 18 and older, a tax and regulation regime that encourages thrift, competition and innovation and that severely discourages the economic vice of arbitrary inflation….and you’d be able to completely eliminate payroll transfer taxes, severely cut individual and corporate taxes and not only eliminate inflation but integrate beneficial price deflation into profit making economic systems. You want to stabilize the economy and end socialist re-distributive taxation?….change the monetary and financial paradigm.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“Subtracting QE”
What is the effect on U.S. inflation, of all the dollars that are in foreign hands? What does that subtract from inflation?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Pithy stuff. And interesting. 
According to Peter Schiff the world has been on the brink and the dollar about to go into hyperinflation any day….for at least the last 13 or14 years. I once held him in some regard…..but nobody is or has been more wrong than he has……well, maybe Bob Prechter……maybe Harry Dent. lol.
amalagoli
amalagoli
2 years ago
It is amazing how money and monetary policy are so little understood to this day. Part of the problem is that textbook macroeconomics has gotten money wrong. Milton Friedman was wrong on quantity theory of money, but many people like to blurt his quote because it sounds simple and intuitive.
The real problem is that nobody even knows how do a) identify money and b) measure the quantity of it. MMT points out that money can be created also endogenously to the banking system, which means that the Fed has only limited ability to control the money supply. In fact, attempts to target the Money Supply in the early 80s failed miserably, thus putting a dent in the Monetarist theory. Similarly, the Austrian libertarians have a too narrow view of money and they think all can be solved by returning to the gold standard. MMT also leaves many questions un-answered and it is fair to say money is still little understood to this day.
One potential hint is to look at the connection between part of the money supply and debt. The increase in money due to debt creation can be offset by the decreased productivity of debt, which is a drag on economic growth. Hence, any potential increase in spending due to more money is offset by the decreased purchasing power of depreciated and indebted labor. 
amigator
amigator
2 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
Good Stuff.  The real problem is that money (Federal Reserve Dollars) are not tied too anything of real value, be it gold or feathers or whatever you want to use.  Therefore they can print and fill in the economic voids with minimal impact. And we as individuals have no defense and minimum ability to protect ourselves from what ever they want to do.
Mish’s comments are great and provide interesting insight but they assume that the those at the FED are not corrupted and are doing what is best for the USA not what is best for their shareholders.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.