Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tells the Fed to Ignore Inflation and Protect Jobs

Monetary inflation: Total credit market now exceeds 90 trillion dollars, via St. Louis Fed

Dual Mandate or Single Mandate? 

Please consider Sherrod Brown’s Letter to Jerome Powell asking Powell to focus on full employment, not inflation.

The Federal Reserve’s tools work to lower inflation by reducing demand for economic activities sensitive to interest rates. However, a family’s “pocketbook” needs have little to do with interest rates, and potential job losses brought about by monetary over-tightening will only worsen these matters for the working class. Maintaining full employment while reducing inflation is central to protecting the workers who power our economy. Congress codified this mandate in the 1978 Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act – the Humphrey Hawkins Act. 

The law makes it clear that, “Increasing job opportunities and full employment would greatly contribute to the elimination of discrimination based upon sex, age, race, color, religion, national origin, handicap, or other improper factors.”  

Monetary policy tools take time to reduce inflation by constraining demand until supply catches up – time that working-class families don’t have. As J.P. Morgan Asset Management chief global strategist David Kelly noted, “[i]n the long history of Federal Reserve mistakes, one general error stands out. They tend to wait too long and then do too much.”

We must avoid having our short-term advances and strong labor market overwhelmed by the consequences of aggressive monetary actions to decrease inflation, especially when the Fed’s actions do not address its main drivers. For working Americans who already feel the crush of inflation, job losses will make it much worse. We can’t risk the livelihoods of millions of Americans who can’t afford it. I ask that you don’t forget your responsibility to promote maximum employment and that the decisions you make at the next FOMC meeting reflect your commitment to the dual mandate.

Brown also mentions nonsense about the The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022  reducing inflation when studies show that it won’t. 

It’s Our Dollar But Your Problem, 2022 Style

To understand what’s going on with the dollar, interest rates, inflation, and credit gone wild, we need to review history.

John Connally, President Nixon’s Treasury Secretary, bluntly told a group of European finance minsters in 1971 “The dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem.”

Ever since Nixon killed convertibility of gold there has been no checks on fiscal deficits. Countries could spend at will and did. The Fed was finally forced to hike rates, the dollar has soared in response.

Total dollar credit is now over $90 trillion and the Debt Clock shows US national debt at close to $31 trillion. There are no constraints on debt or government spending anywhere.

Meanwhile, mainstream media is devoid of any discussion of the root cause of the current problems. Nor is there any end in sight to reckless fiscal policies.

Who Should the Fed Listen To?

Brown has a point about Fed policy acting with a lag.

I concur that the Fed is likely to overshoot. Yet, it is a dangerous setup when an allegedly independent Fed takes its cues from party leaders ahead of national elections. 

If the Fed pivots now, it will appear as if Democrats had a role in it. The Fed did not listen to President Trump and it should not listen to Sherrod Brown or President Biden either.

Importantly, there should not be a Fed at all listening to anyone. That’s one huge  problem. 

The Fed has actively and purposely distorted price signals. That’s what causes bubbles. And the Fed now seeks to pop a bubble it helped create. 

We have had two consecutive housing bubbles because of Fed policy. Congress had a role as well.

The solution is to end the Fed and let the Free market set rates. 

Pandora’s Box

Given the Fed always chases it tail (and tales as well), there should not be a Fed. But one thing would be worse: Letting Congress or the President set monetary policy for partisan benefit.

The root problem is unrestricted Congressional spending made possible when Nixon “temporarily” opened Pandora’s Box ending gold redeemability in 1971.

For further discussion, please see It’s Our Dollar But Your Problem, 2022 Style.

The notion that a dual mandate is possible in the current setup is ridiculous given there are no restraints on fiscal spending. 

Gold provided a brake on recklessness. There is no brake now. 

Ask yourself, “How is $90 trillion going to be paid back?”

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

56 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RichR
RichR
3 years ago
Just delete the numbers in the computer the same way they are created. No one would know, why even keep track?
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Sherrod Brown, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, sent Fed Chair
Jerome Powell a letter requesting the Fed ignore inflation to protect
jobs.”
But didn’t she vote for the Inflation Reduction Act?
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Dual Mandate or Single Mandate?”
Maybe a duel mandate. How does the FED serve two masters at the same time?
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“Sherrod Brown, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, sent Fed Chair Jerome Powell a letter requesting the Fed ignore inflation to protect jobs.”
Utterly clueless. Joins Elizabeth Warren in plea to Powell. Recession set in stone no matter policy taken.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
After the US seized Russian USD holdings and it’s clear countries that have accumulated USD reserves will no longer be doing so. And will likely be dumping much of their reserves, the FED has to raise interest rates to attract individual investors or completely finance government deficits. Something that will turn us into Japan or Italy. My guess is the FED is able to see and understand what’s coming a lot more than politicians.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
The new money #’s were contractionary. Long-term flows have fallen faster. Expect big drop in inflation numbers in the next couple of months.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Yes.
Yet 2 weeks ago you wrote:
“It’s no happenstance that it will take a 2-3 year period of zero money growth to bring inflation down to tolerable levels.”
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
I think there’s more going on than simply fighting inflation.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago

The system started falling apart in the late 90s when derivatives got deregulated. Since then the economy has been in a tailspin and lurched from one bubble to the next. Throw in globalization and it’s a recipe for civil war and global conflict. The 2020s are the end of it all. Those that die will be thankful they didn’t have to live it.

denker
denker
3 years ago
The key is Sherrod’s “especially when the Fed’s actions do not address its main drivers”. One of the main drivers is the spending orgy unleased by Congress with the lockdowns as pretext and continued into the Biden era. Sherrod can look in the mirror for the culprit and the Fed has its share of the blame by financing the spendathon with QE.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
If you consider the Gold Standard the “Gold Standard” for managing a country’s economy then every country that is on the Gold Standard should prosper and become wealthier and more performing than those countries who instead use fiat currency yet we don’t see that at all. In fact there is no country on Earth that uses the Gold Standard today. There were many in the past but today none. I would have to conclude that from a Darwinian point of view the Gold Standard just can’t compete and became extinct because it confers no economic advantages and accumulates significant disadvantages.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
There are countries that have commodities and little to no government debt. The commodities are a proxy for gold.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Having commodities does not guarantee having a solid currency. You might even say the opposite is true.
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Darwin does not apply here. The standard is set by by those in power, not chosen by the free market, and they will choose what is of most benefit to them.
The problems under gold have appeared when paper was allowed to act as a substitute. It would then be issued to excess until it got to a point that people lost faith in the paper and began exchanging it for gold and banks would be unable to meet the redemptions and collapse.
FDR forced a fiat standard on the public via XO. That was not a development that occurred naturally.
The real problem with having a true gold standard is very few want to see it because they think they benefit (edit: from what can be done under a fiat-based currency) when in the long run only those at the top of the chain do.
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
3 years ago
Reply to  RedQueenRace
I’ll also add that I am not advocating for a gold standard. At this point it is too late to return. The social fall-out from an attempt to return to one would be unacceptable to almost everyone, not just politicians.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  RedQueenRace
Paper has been used as a proxy for gold for hundreds of years because the problem is that there is not enough gold around to support growth in economic activity so people way back then had to issue promissory notes in paper.
amigator
amigator
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
It became extinct because the powers to be did not want to pay the debits they had created. So they defaulted not sure how that is Darwinian although it maybe is based on the species. The old homo Sapiens are pretty good at being over come “Greed”, now that is an economic advantage!
For an extinct system there is a lot of Gold in the coffers all over the world. Maybe it is going extinct and just getting more valuable as there is fewer oz available?
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  amigator
When is the last time you directly used gold to buy something? I bet you have never used it at all. If you own gold you are hoarding it and not circulating it. That is the problem with gold. It ends up not being used and circulated and that depresses economic activity.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
The leeches want to be bailed out, again. As always, pushing handicapped LGBTDKDG weaker sex family children from disadvantaged petting zoos in front of them……
And, as always, since the leeches now own it all; they will…… Again, at the expense of the few productive Americans still out there. All four of them.
The only thing The Fed should do, is simply disappear. Collectively jump in the Hudson and drown. To be replaced by $20/oz of gold; max-one-day-in-court-then-final BK for anyone; no further taxation on activity just on possession. That would make everyone; literally everyone; who is anything at all other than a straight up useless leech, better off. Forever. Family LGBT pets included.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Why is it the men that are the most bigoted towards trans people usually have breasts themselves?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Why is it that idiots with nothing productive to say will always jump in with ad hominem attacks? What a loser.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Ask them.
Aren’t you in SF? Pretty much the world’s epicenter for attempting to excuse every program aimed at nothing other than ever more robbing and harassing everyone else, trans or not, on the “need” for “programs” and “laws” “protecting” the LGBTHKRUYHTD….
Civilised, legitimate governments hardly, if even, know whether a person exists or not. Much less his “race”, “orientation” and other harebrained divide-and-conquer drivel. At the very, very most, government may (but only may) need to know the minimum required to determine whether a guy, or guyrl…., is a citizen old enough to vote. And that is it. Period. Anything beyond that; and you have discriminatory government per definition. All the scumbags achieve by dragging minorities into their excuse making, is taint the minorities so dragged with the mark of them being terror-state enablers and beneficiaries.
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Let me see if I understand the suggestion to the Fed. Because the Fed typically tends to wait too long, and do too much, they should wait longer?
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
“Yet, it is a dangerous setup when an allegedly independent Fed takes its cues from party leaders ahead of national elections.”
Um. The Fed isn’t independent. They’re only about 2 degrees of separation from full on Modern Monetary Theory management of the economy. In full on, I remind you, the Fed is put under Congressional control. Again, that’s about 2 degrees of separation from actually being legit.
This is probably the same moron that came up with the idea of doing nearly two years a rent & mortgage relief, most likely thinks blue masks prevents you from getting covid, and the vaccine really keeps you from getting or spreading the virus.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
About what I’d expect from democrap. Sherrod Brown has graduate degrees in Education and Public Administration from Ohio State (generally low level degrees at any university), with very limited experience in ‘banking’ beyond his committee assignments. A lifetime political hack, I doubt he truly understands the implications of inflation on the economy beyond what he reads in the newspaper. And as for free-market determined interest rates, NO WAY. I wouldn’t hire him to run a bank, let alone chair a banking committee. He might be capable of setting meeting dates.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Jerome Powell, after earning a degree in politics from Princeton University in 1975 and a Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in 1979, he moved to investment banking in 1984, and worked for several financial institutions, including as a partner of The Carlyle Group.
Apparently, rubbing shoulders with the financiers turns you into an economist. However, Krugman is an economist, so it doesn’t matter.
He and the chairman understand each other.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I wouldn’t hire this economic illiterate to run a lemonade stand.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
This also got my eye recently – https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WSHOMCB
If the Fed’s concerned with R/E inflation, where’s the QT?
denker
denker
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Obviously in no hurry to reduce their holdings. With the doubling in mortgage rates the Fed getting cold feet or just getting started (a slight decline of 40B barely detectable).
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
3 years ago
Update on San Francisco home sale, got full asking price and escrow is now closed, listed in June. Took a little longer but patience and not having to sell made it pretty smooth…
SAKMAN
SAKMAN
3 years ago
Same here in Anaheim Hills CA
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
The 90 trillion doesn’t concern me that much. After all, it seems rather small once you take a peek at our unfunded liabilities. Something like 300 trillion. This system is a joke. It’s a corrupt and unreformable system that is collapsing upon itself. Personally, I think once it goes away, so will most of our problems.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
It doesn’t just go away. Those in power want more of the same, only bigger and centralized, and more controlled.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Even if they were able to listen to Sherrod Brown, though JOLTS reported a 10% drop, there are still over 10 mil excess.
If the next drop is much greater than last month, then it might be a good idea to soften, even pivot if it’s a huge drop.
I truly hope the Fed’s watching construction and R/E carefully, they lead and can help to gauge the latent effects of current policy.
I also question the idea of restricting demand when much of inflation seems to be a supply issue, but with that many job openings it can’t hurt, for now.
One thing everyone, self included, keeps saying – I’ve never lived through something like this. We’re teasing recession and part of the problem is too many jobs.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
The problem is a giant leech that thinks it knows what is best for you is to suck out your blood and feed other leeches.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Birth rate almost identical to retiring baby-boomers, maybe spending billions on a wall to keep folks out not the best economic idea.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
That’s the catastrophe, it’s the politics of not doing anything to fix any problem while the labor force attrition’s itself to death, literally.
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Try and wrap your head around the fact we are talking illegal immigration . By all means issue as many legal work immigration visas as
they think we need and expect the people that come to go by our laws and honor the agreement THEY made !
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
The job openings are crappy part time jobs. What’s being hidden is there are a lot more people holding multiple part time jobs instead of a full time job. Makes the numbers look better than they are.
amigator
amigator
3 years ago
The Fed has performed brilliantly for its share holders. These owners have probably made more money since the turn of the century than they made in the whole prior century.
Do you really think they care at all about us working stiffs? On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the highest I would say we are about a 0.1.
xbizo
xbizo
3 years ago
Standing ovation! Let the markets do their job!
Let’s see. From the 2007 housing bubble based on poor loan underwriting we have. Cascading housing crash. QE. Low rates. Deflation. Virus. Lockdowns. Climate policy. Supply destruction. Flood of money. Lower rates. Free rent. Record low unemployment. Demand spike. Inflation. More flood of money. More inflation. Raise rates. QT. Early bankruptcies on inflated assets.
Sum it all up together and you get: a mess. disorientation. unreliable indicators. an economy that can’t get to equilibrium for years.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
3 years ago
The fed would normally not care but it’s checkmated now and so why not let congress take the fall if they want to?
Gold and silver are going to LOVE this move.
FirstBlood
FirstBlood
3 years ago
We all know the Fed is NOT independent .. and this campaign proves they’ve lost control since they stole Russian reserves in Q1. They are powerless to stop inflation as long as we are sending 1BB per week for money laundering in “nobody cares” UKRAINE. They will pause soon only to be back in ‘23 to make it up .. stocks are only half way at best to their target. Nobody alive has seen what we are living through .. “May we live in interesting times”.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Ask yourself, “How is $90 trillion going to be paid back?”
It is never going to be paid back which is why society is reacting the way it is….”quiet quitting,” unionization, socialism demands, etc. It is all an indication that society is really fed up with the current “system” and things are going to start breaking and it is going to end badly for those that aren’t prepared. Very badly.
The old America is dead and not coming back. The midterms are joke and no matter who wins, everyone in America will lose…guaranteed.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Good times make weak men. Men now days have now idea if they are a man and can’t tell the difference between men and women. I’ve never seen them this sensitive ever. It’s rare to see people think for themselves. They are being conditioned to shame those who do. Maybe what we really need is a war found in our soil to bring back family values. Unfortunately, technology has advanced to the point where the next world war could very well be the last. I sure hope you all believe in God.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
War hasn’t solved any problems anywhere. You want to see the real problem? Many people here hate “socialism” but mention cutting social security or medicare and you’ll see quite a few get ‘triggered’ around here. Socialism is fine as long as its for boomers but mention giving poor broke kids a 10k break on student loans and you’ll see the rage and outrage.
The funny thing is the cognitive dissonance that occurs when those that hate socialism don’t know how to react when mentioning cutting social security or medicare. It’s like, “I hate socialism but socialism is the hand that feeds me” type and sends them into a mental loop. The inability to sacrifice for the greater good by everyone is the problem.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
It should be obvious that you can’t make a blanket cut to social security or else you’d literally have old people on the streets and stealing from stores (there would not be enough prisons to house them all and even if there were, it would be cheaper to give them money than pay 100K a year to house them in prison).
That said, inflation is stealth eating their benefits simply by the fact they get say 2-3% increase when inflation is far higher. Personally, I think they need to move to means tested social security as in you use up all your 401k, stocks, home value etc before you get any. There is no reason for people collecting to be passing on anything to heirs so you should exhaust person wealth before you can collect.
Medicare needs to revisit the last 6 months of life. That’s where 90% of medical expenses occur for most people, trying to keep them alive just a bit longer. Society needs to accept the cycle of life and people who are terminal should no longer receive any care.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Um. Yes, a lot of doctors and nurses would be out of work and way, way less money/resources would be wasted if those who will die in the next 6 months were simply and cheaply euthanized. Easy, peezy. So easy, there must be catch in there somewhere. 🙂
BTW, it appears SS will be upping their payout by 8% this next year. SS payouts need to be tied to “inflation” or government employees’ pay going up to match “inflation” would have a real bad look.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The last 6 months is a thorny issue because if you ask someone who is dying during that period if they want the doctors to try to prolong his existence he will almost always say yes and screw the costs because hope and the will to live take precedence over everything else. The consequence is that the last three months eat up by far most of the resources. We could take that decision away from the patient and the family and leave it with the hospital but they don’t want to make that decision either. A way out is to have the patient set up a “no extraordinary measures” order while he is still healthy enough to make the decision rationally.
pemdas1
pemdas1
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Social Security is socialism that feeds me? Not so.
As a small businessman, with employer match, I spent 40 years putting about 15% of my income into Social Security. Getting some of that back hardly constitutes socialism. And yes, I understand people who rage at the thought of a cut. Student loan borrowers on the other hand have paid in nothing.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  pemdas1
Just to be clear, social security was never meant to be a 401K/Pension plan otherwise we wouldn’t have 401k/Pension plans. It was meant as insurance for those that needed it in order to survive.
If you claim that because you paid in, you are entitled to get paid out, do you also claim that because you paid car insurance for decades that you should be entitled to deliberately cause a wreck to get paid out on car insurance or start a fire to collect home insurance?
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  pemdas1
Whatever you “paid” into social security and medicare is peanuts to what you will be getting out of it in the form of income and essentially unlimited healthcare. Medicare is what is consuming a large percentage of the budget.
As for student loans – where does the money come from for these loans? Largely from the US Government. Student loans = socialism. Social Security = Socialism. So we’re arguing about different forms of socialism because you like one form over another one.
And to say these kids haven’t paid anything is absurd, they are paying for YOUR (boomers) debts incurred over the past 5 decades in the form of increased taxes and reduced services but reality won’t sink in, it rarely does for boomers set in their ways.
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Clueless as usual same old response from you . Maybe when government confiscates your money for years in social security and Medicare taxes
people expect the agreement to be honored by the government . Most all these programs were passed before these people were even in the workforce . The government had no problem spending the surpluses for all the years it had a surplus but now that it doesn’t there seems
to be a problem . I have no problem doing away with the programs as long as we reimburse everyone for the contributions they have made and missed growth opportunities. Both programs passed by Dem administrations in the 30s and 60s . You sound like typical Dem wanting someone to
bail out the mess you started !!
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
IMO, As far as SS, what ever you put in should be exactly what you receive + inflation.
If you die before you receive everything, your heirs should receive it.
Any further taxing, manipulating, borrowing, or spending is probably a sign of corruption.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Debasement of currency caused rot, never ended well.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.