Jobs Grow by 372,000 but Employment Shrinks by 315,000

Payroll and employment data from the BLS, chart by Mish

BLS Jobs Statistics at a Glance

Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 372,000 in June, and the unemployment rate remained at 3.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.

 Notable job gains occurred in professional and business services, leisure and hospitality, and health care.

Details from the monthly BLS Employment Report.

  • Nonfarm Payroll: +372,000 to 151,980,000 – Establishment Survey
  • Employment: -315,000 to 158,111,000 Household Survey
  • Unemployment: -38,000 to 5,912,000- Household Survey
  • Baseline Unemployment Rate: unchanged at 3.6% – Household Survey
  • U-6 unemployment: -0.4 to 6.7% – Household Survey
  • Civilian Non-institutional Population: +156,000 to 263,835,000
  • Civilian Labor Force: -353,000 to 164,023,000 – Household Survey
  • Not in Labor Force: +510,000 to 99,812,000 – Household Survey
  • Participation Rate: -0.1 to 62.2% – Household Survey

Revision Details

  • The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for April was revised down by 68,000, from +436,000 to +368,000
  • The change for May was revised down by 6,000, from +390,000 to +384,000.
  • With these revisions, employment in April and May combined is 74,000 lower than previously reported.

Economists’ Estimates

  • Nonfarm Payrolls: 270,000 expected vs 372,000 actual
  • Unemployment Rate: 3.6% expected vs 3.6% actual
  • Manufacturing Payrolls: 23,000 expected vs 29,000 actual
  • Hourly Earnings: +0.3% expected vs 0.3% actual

The above estimates from Bloomberg Econoday.

Payrolls were stronger than expected. The unemployment rate and hourly earnings were as expected. There’s another divergence between jobs and employment.

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls from the BLS

For the second month we see strength in lagging sectors: Leisure and hospitality, and health services. 

Despite these gains, Leisure and hospitality employment is 1.3 million lower than in February 2020.

Part-Time Jobs

The above numbers never total correctly. I list them as reported.

Unemployment Rate – Seasonally Adjusted

Unemployment rate data from the BLS, chart by Mish

That’s 4 consecutive months of 3.6 percent unemployment.

Nonfarm Payrolls and Employment Levels

Payroll and employment data from the BLS, chart by Mish

Recovery Synopsis

  • The employment level and jobs have nearly recovered all losses.
  • Employment is down by 755,000
  • Jobs are down by 525,000
  • The numbers do not reflect increasing population or the type of job recovered.
  • The red and blue dotted lines show the still significant impact Covid has on the economy.

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls Since February 2020

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls from the BLS

Leisure and Hospitality is still down by 1.3 million workers. Education and Health Care is down by 259,000 workers. 

Professional services and transportation are humming. Expect the latter to weaken soon.

Hours and Wages

Average weekly hours of all private employees was unchanged at 34.5 hours. Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees was unchanged at 33.5 hours. Average weekly hours of manufacturers fell 0.1 hours 40.3 hours.

Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.10 to $32.08

Year-over-year, wages rose from $30.52 to $32.08. That’s a gain of 5.2%.

Average hourly earnings of Production and Supervisory Workers rose $0.13 to $27.45.

Year-over-year, wages rose from $25.81 to $27.45. That’s a gain of 6.4%.

Despite the gains, wages have not kept up with inflation.

Birth Death Model

Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.

For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.

The model is wildly wrong at turning points but otherwise means little. It is also heavily revised and thus useless.

Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Table A-15 Alternative Unemployment from BLS

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

The official unemployment rate is 3.6%. However, if you start counting all the people who want a job but gave up, all the people with part-time jobs that want a full-time job, all the people who dropped off the unemployment rolls because their unemployment benefits ran out, etc., you get a closer picture of what the unemployment rate is. That number is in the last row labeled U-6.

U-6 is much higher at 6.7%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.

Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. Some dropped out over Covid fears. And still others took advantage of the strong stock market and retired early.

The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement, discouraged workers, and kids moving back home because they cannot find a job.

Changing Employment Dynamics

Covid-19 had an enormous impact on the labor force. Some job losses are permanent, millions of other other people now work from home.

Stimulus provided incentives to not work and some of those workers are returning to the labor markets now.

As of January 2022, there were 22 million workers age 60 and over. Millions will retire soon which will put upward pressure on hiring. 

Strength is Relative

It’s important to put the jobs numbers into proper perspective.

In the household survey, if you work as little as 1 hour a week, even selling trinkets on eBay, you are considered employed.

In the household survey, if you work three part-time jobs, 12 hours each, the BLS considers you a full-time employee.

In the payroll survey, three part-time jobs count as three jobs. The BLS attempts to factor this in, but they do not weed out duplicate Social Security numbers. The potential for double-counting jobs in the payroll survey is large.

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number, generally released the first Friday of every month. It is based on employer reporting.

The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures unemployment and many other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Looking for Job Openings on Jooble or Monster or in the want ads does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.

These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.

Recovery Not Complete

This recovery has been fast, but it was also the deepest on record. Some job losses are permanent.

Leisure and hospitality still has huge job needs.

Divergences

Once again we see a divergence between jobs and employment. These divergences have resolved in the direction of jobs. One of them likely won’t. 

  • March employment level: 158,458,000.
  • April employment level: 158,105,000.
  • May employment level: 158,426,000.
  • June employment level: 158,111,000.

That’s four months of heading nowhere or down as jobs have soared. Change since March: -347,000.

In expanding economies, discrepancies tend to resolve higher. At turns, discrepancies tend to resolver lower. 

Rising Rates and Fed Tightening

This may be nearly as good as things get before rising interest rates and mortgage rates start impacting jobs. At best, things will slow looking ahead.

Yet, the overall trends are far below where they should be. Some of that is retirement, some the result of lingering free money handouts.

The decline in the hospitality and retail sector employment stands out.

This ties in nicely with the warnings from Target, Walmart, and Amazon on building inventories and slowing consumer discretionary spending.

Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Job Losses

Given hiring pressures and boomer retirements, Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Job Losses

The stock market is another issue. For discussion, please see Artificial Wealth vs GDP: Why Earnings and the Stock Market Will Get Crushed

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago

None of this looks recessionary. The Fed can continue their hikes.

shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
“Jobs Grow by 372,000 but Employment Shrinks by 315,000” What does that mean? 687,000 people took on a 2nd or 3rd job?
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
When the boomers are gone there are not enough Zoomers to replace them. Higher wage, higher health benefits, higher whatever
to unproductive useless arrogant workers might cut net income, because we are entitled to get benefits from
businesses and the gov.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
… but, but, they Deserve it!
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
In my book, a million new jobs added as inflation is shooting higher is a strong signal that the labor market has a long way to go to turn.
If a REAL recession is looming out on the horizon, how long will it take for the monthly jobs report to go negative? That’s the question no one can answer right now.
IMO, I think 90% of the guru’s and armchair quarterbacks like myself are underestimating how long the labor market holds up, how much higher the FFR will have to go to lurch us into a real recession, and whether or not it’s going to be a glancing blow, short or long, or deep or shallow.
Every month provides a few more clues, but right now NOBODY has a clue what’s lies ahead. It’s still a clown show.
There’s so much traffic on the roads in my area it makes my head hurt. In North ATL, there’s absolutely zero slowdown. It’s balls to the wall and looks like it’s going to stay that way through the end of the year. GA is fully open for business, including its schools and our great Governor Kemp has given us a $0.29 a gallon freebie until November.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
We have two surveys that are saying different things. Payroll is good while household is bad. Why not just look at income tax withholdings? I would trust that over the surveys. It reflects not just the number of jobs, but also the income amount.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Withholding doesn’t cover a lot of jobs, i.e. self-employed, under the table. Also, the withholding amount depends on how many exemptions are claimed. The decline in U-6 is, to me, a major confirmation of a tight labor market. But I’d welcome a study that looks at non-particiation. Not hard to separate the effect of retirements from other factors.
U-6 is now 6.7%, the lowest in 10 years. The last time it was this low (6.9%) was in late 2020 and early ’21, just before the viroids. I focus there because any changes won’t be materially affected by population growth or retirements. We weren’t hearing about companies unable to fill jobs three years ago. Look at the tables, and they suggest a lot of labor force droputs. Thus, I don’t think U.S. labor markets have returned to normal. I suspect that it’s not a baby boomer retirement phenomenon doing this, but rather people who banked their stim checks, and who are living on savings and credit cards.
I can’t post the tables because the links don’t work. Look for Tables 15 and 16, historical.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I did find a labor force participation graphic. We’ve only retraced half of the covid loss. Today’s tight labor market is tight because a lot of people haven’t come back. I expect that to change, and as it does change the unemployment numbers will rise.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Unemployment will rise because of people sending out resume’s and having interviews? Remember, you can’t be unemployed unless you’re “actively” seeking work.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
“As of January 2022, there were 22 million workers age 60 and over. Millions will retire soon which will put upward pressure on hiring.”
Thank you greatly for adding this to your standard reporting, this particular problem will grow yearly thru the next decade. I hope that it will finally lead to some type of immigration reform because there is no easy way to replace 60 million boomers over the next 8 years. Robots, anti-abortion, and dreaming will not fix this problem.
“However, if you start counting all the people who want a job but gave up, all the people with part-time jobs that want a full-time job, all the people who dropped off the unemployment rolls because their unemployment benefits ran out, etc., you get a closer picture of what the unemployment rate is.”
In addition to acknowledging the “boomer problem” you should also consider that the health of the workforce is now in question too. The explosion of autism, auto-immune diseases, long covid, and the aging of the population also contribute to overall “disability” in the workforce.
Almost everyone I know that is over the age of 50 has some level of health problems from prostate issues, diabetes, knee/hip/shoulder problems, etc. and don’t get me started on the perpetual health problems women have because that list will run pages long.
If not addressed, this will lead to the “end stage” of society as we know it in the U.S.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
  • Health is gonna keep getting worse. You can see it coming in how much difficulty the military has finding people that can pass the fitness tests. Computers and the internet are really doing a number in our species.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Are you referring to so called land whales?
Lots of them, and not just oldies.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
I prefer the term “hambeast”. Seems like half the kids I see are little porkers. In the 70s there was one fat kid in my whole school, and he had a thyroid problem.
kansasdude
kansasdude
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Im 53. Hard labor all life. Still going at it 6 and sometimes 7 days. I fall into the hip/shoulder/knee category lol. My craps paid off ill work while I can and stack cash. Nothing a few ibuprofen cant fix for now.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
“Given hiring pressures and boomer retirements, Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Job Losses.”
Who would comfortably retire at the time of surging inflation, and unknown outlook?
I suppose, there is a class of perma optimists or maybe it’s the wealth effect from forever printing.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
A lot of them are forced to, since their technical ability extends only as far as the fax machine.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Valid point, but if they can talk vapid nonsense, they can become managers.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Does Unix or Solaris count?
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
JOLT bs. US gov cont to shed jobs since Feb 2020. States and gov are loaded with cash, collecting higher taxes, cutting
capex, paying negative dividends, cutting debt in real terms.
That might change. We will build our supply chain in US and boost our the infrastructure in the next few years.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.