Good News, Progressives Causes Smashed in Multiple Places

Vote 95% In 

The Right Message 

Youngkin neither wanted nor needed Trump.

What About Turnout?

In 2020 many Republicans stayed home knowing Trump would lose. High election day turnout suggests the opposite.

Rethinking Turnout

Tweet of the Day

“Condolences to VA on becoming radically racist again according to the media…by electing by electing a black female lieutenant governor and a Cuban-American attorney general, rejecting racial essentialism in schools, and replacing a Dem governor who wore an actual KKK outfit.”

Minneapolis Voters Resoundingly Reject Measure End Police

NPR reports Minneapolis voters reject a measure to replace the city’s police department

Approximately 57% of voters rejected a ballot question that would have removed the Minneapolis Police Department from the city charter, replacing it with a “public-health oriented” Department of Public Safety.

Nationally, the vote was seen as a test of the political movement to “defund” traditional policing, as it ran up against concerns about rising violent crime.

Backlash in San Francisco

MSN reports Even in San Francisco, Progressives are Seeing a Backlash.

Parents are outraged by the state of public education. Citizens are tired of property crime and theft. Their combined frustration has turned San Francisco into an unlikely sign of where American politics is heading as the congressional midterms near.

Grim conditions on the city’s streets led voters, late last month, to resoundingly endorse a recall of District Attorney Chesa Boudin, who will face an election sometime next year.

Also headed to a recall are three members of the San Francisco Board of Education: Alison Collins, Gabriela López and Faauuga Moliga. Parents charge that they didn’t do enough to open schools during the pandemic while devoting months to a contentious and ultimately failed attempt to rename schools that had been named after purportedly objectionable figures like Abraham Lincoln and George Washington.

“Our school board chose to put ideology over the needs of students,” a local Democratic political operative, Joel P. Engardio, recently wrote on his website to explain why he wanted a school board focused on the basics of education, not the abstract notions of social change some progressives say are at least as important as those basics.

Progressives “haven’t made a case for their perspective,” said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political scientist at the University of Southern California and a longtime observer of the state’s complex politics, in an interview with Yahoo News. “I am knocked back on my heels by what I am seeing these days.”

538 Comments 

It’s really fascinating how critical race theory and education issues writ large have become huge issues in the Virginia governor’s race. I thought it was interesting enough that Youngkin pledged to ban CRT in schools on his first day in office, if elected, but recent reporting suggests that Republicans elsewhere are playing off of conservative parent’s fears, too. According to the Associated Press, which cited data from Ballotpedia, there are 76 school districts in 22 states where candidates took a stance on either race in education or critical race theory. I wonder some of these races — Virginia especially — will test the extent to which these fights really animate voters? I could see Republicans during the midterms really doubling-down on this strategy of attacking CRT if Youngkin is successful tonight.

Unreal Comments

CRT isn’t real. What a hoot. 

Congratulations to Glenn Youngkin for his well-deserved victory over CRT in Virginia.

Republican Majority in Virginia

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

69 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
Voters also spoke loudly against Progressives in Buffalo NY where the AOC Squad backed Democrat mayoral candidate ran unopposed, but lost to the present mayor she beat in the Democratic primaries This is THE biggest story this elections because Republicans had to cross political lines and make the effort to write in a Democrat candidate. SMH, LMAO
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“Grim conditions on the city’s streets led voters, late last month, to
resoundingly endorse a recall of District Attorney Chesa Boudin, who
will face an election sometime next year.”
I haven’t heard anything about the recall effort against L.A. county D.A. Gascon, yet. At least 13 city governments gave him a vote of no confidence, but it may take a San Francisco like situation for a recall effort to succeed. No Walgreens are closing in L.A., yet.
 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
CRT isn’t real? That’s a new one. Usually the proponents state it’s no different than teaching history. Equally idiotic IMO.
What last night showed was even if you have huge advantage by having a (D) next to your name on the ballot, if you’re grossly incompetent, you can still lose.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Two white guys ran, Blacks mostly didn’t vote. White people showed up. 
The Republican won. No late arriving bags of fraudulent Democrat votes, as half the commenters here yesterday predicted. Did anybody really believe that was gonna happen? I didn’t.
I will say the MSM held off as long as they could before reporting the Youngkin win.  It should have been called for Youngkin by 10 pm.
With CRT, the liberals have finally crossed a line, and elections like this one show that there are limits to how much fair-minded people will go along with the false narrative of identity politics and special rights for special people. 
As Doug said the Democrats won’t learn anything. They’ll just double down with the same losing platform. They deserve to lose. They alienate too many of the people who actually show up to vote in elections that aren’t major referendums on fitness to serve, like 2020 was. 
I can’t seem to find the article, but last night I read somewhere that some overwhelming number of voters were fully vaccinated….but they still voted for the guy who promised no vaccine mandates. I’m not sure that was a big issue for VA voters. 
I do think it was a big no-confidence vote for Biden and his socialist agenda.
I don’t like the Republican incumbents in Texas, but I expect the Democrats to lose here next year, for the same reasons Macauliffe lost. They’re completely tone deaf to the center.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Of course there were ‘No late arriving bags of fraudulent Democrat votes’. After 2021, it would be plain dumb to try the same thing twice, in an election so closely contested. If cheating was found, it would reopen the 2020 election for review.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Points for creativity, but no cigar.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Even if they reopened 2020 and found lots of cheating, what do you think would happen? Absolutely nothing other than a ‘we’ll do better next time’ in preventing it. There is no scenario of 2020 being reversed at this late date.
Also, how come they didn’t rig the voting machines to flip votes from Rep to Dem? I seem to recall the Dominion machines were programmed to do that 🙂
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Who exactly is the center ? I think its still some white guy in most places in the US. Until that changes, nothing will truly change in most places like Virginia. There is no big bad socialist agenda I see from Biden himself. He is quietly celebrating because he is that centrist white guy.  CRT is nothing but teaching truth imo. If white people can’t handle the racist history of America, it is their ego that’s bruised. 
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“CRT is nothing but teaching truth imo.”
CRT is racism.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Let’s teach CRT, but not leave out the inconvenient truths, 
1) how blacks were enslaved for over 7,000 years, often by other blacks,
2) that Muslims, the predominant owners of black slaves, castrated (or had others do it) the vast majority of their male slaves,
3) that science has studied intelligence by race, and the results are such that anyone who reports them is immediately labelled a racist….
BTW, there is a socialist agenda, if you care to do some research.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
I understand how you can believe that, but it’s really NOT the truth. It has a grain of truth, like all good lies.
CRT is a rather clever kind of revisionist history that ignores the last 65 years of progress in race relations in a country that was in apartheid when I was a kid. Not having lived through it, you are going with the Cliff’s Notes version of racial injustice, as explained by the new Black intelligentsia…..and some of their pet white “scholars”.  For those of us who actually lived under apartheid, we can clearly see the progress, which        the new Black “racial justice experts” want to pretend hasn’t happened.
It’s this rather ridiculous idea….that “white people” (as if all white people acted the same) are completely responsible for all the failure-to-thrive problems in the Black community…..this idea is the brainchild of opportunistic, communist leaning graduates of illegitimate,  social-science curriculums that ironically began as efforts to respond to social injustice 45 or 50 years ago. They deserve to be outed for what they are, scam artists who can now get published, given a bully pulpit, and influence policy….. because it’s now trendy to hate on white people.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Certainly it would be preposterous to believe that all the responsibility for failure to thrive rests on white people, or on any one specific cause, for that matter. The US is a wonderful place, a place where anyone that has a goal has a chance to succeed at it. People from a variety of cultures and races have come to the US and thrived. Why have some individuals not thrived? Certainly, the US has done some systematic things that have adversely affected the ability of some groups to thrive. For example, when the “Great Society” programs started paying more for single parents, and more on a per child basis, they incentivized the breaking up of families, which led to disastrous results. Nevertheless, some individuals have thrived anyway, so while we can try to fix that, we can’t lay sole blame on it any more than any other single cause.
We, as a country, and as a culture have improved things a lot in the last 60 years, and we are by no means done.There are ways to improve things further, but certainly the answer isn’t teaching people that they are evil because of the color of their skin. Most of my ancestors came to the US between 1860 and 1920. Am I evil? Does it matter that all my life I have treated people based on their accomplishments, not their skin color? So, if not that, what do we need to do? We need to continue to emphasize that people bear the responsibility for their own outcomes. If they want to succeed, they can. They can study hard, and work hard. We need to glorify positive role models. There are plenty of people like Obama or Clarence Thomas that show that success is possible, and it is can be had in either party.
We also need to create a system where everyone can have a job, because a job is more than a way to earn money. It’s a place where you succeed by working hard, where you learn to work with others, and where you develop a sense of community and a sense of worth. Number one, in my mind, would be to completely overhaul the welfare system. Eliminate the minimum wage, and replace it with a system of wage supplementation. It’s stupid to say “you have to be able to produce $15/hr of output, or you are worthless, and undeserving of a job”. Instead, if they can produce $3/hr of useful output, allow them to be hired for $3, and supplement their wage with the other $12. They get the same money, but they also get the other benefits, a sense of accomplishment, a sense of community, and a sense of worth. Instead, we keep going the other way, and the problems will continue to get worse.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
BTW, Cliff Hillegass was a long time friend of my father, and a very nice man.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
He revolutionized literature by allowing students to write a report on a book without ever reading it. Comic book versions of the classics soon followed. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Nobody needs Cliff’s Notes now. Students just plagiarize something posted on the net.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Don’t you just love Psychobabble? I see you are a firm disciple of this favorite cocktail party witty banter of the 70’s when Pelosi was young or more correctly early middle age. 
bayleaf
bayleaf
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
It’s ridiculous to imply that Democrats didn’t cheat. We simply don’t know (yet), but in all likelihood they probably didn’t cheat enough this time.
amalagoli
amalagoli
4 years ago
So much obsession about progressives, so little attention to radical racists and bigots. This says a lot about the fabric of American society. I am far from liking progressives, I think they are out of touch with reality, but is this a reason to embrace racists, vote suppressing, democracy destroying causes? Not a pretty picture of what American society has become, or has always been.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
Progressives are generally aware of the reality – that both the major parties in the US are right-wing, with one being less extreme on social issues than the other.   It is when they join the so-called “lesser evil” party that they start losing touch with reality and start comparing Biden with FDR and other such nonsense.  
amalagoli
amalagoli
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I can agree on this point.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
“but is this a reason to embrace racists, vote suppressing, democracy destroying causes? ”  I’ve always wondered if folks who say things like this really believe them.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
Since Biden took office, how many BLM/Antifa riots have there been? That, amalagoli, is proof of which side uses ‘radical racists.’
amalagoli
amalagoli
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
An how many assaults to the Capitol Have there been?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
The assault on the Capitol might not be what we have been told by the MSM. The ‘jury’ is still out. There are any number of reasons why the tapes of the ‘riot’ have not been released, and why the stories of ‘rioters’ conflict with the official narrative. The same is true of the communications among the various authorities. That many people (some guilty of no more than walking into the Capitol after being waved on by a guard)  are still in prison without a trial is very troubling.
1933, the Reichstag fire, started a month after Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor, was attributed to communists. Likely a false flag, a key step in Hitler’s suspension of civil liberties, and gaining full control.
You cannot not know history.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
Unfortunately, by building a platform based primarily on identity politics snd special rights for special people, the Democrats have alienated the people in the center, which makes it easier for racists and bigots to get plenty of political traction. You’re only seeing half the picture.
The Democratic Party machine made a decision some time back to get any kind of minority vote, any way they could, essentially making a conscience decision to abandon working class whites because they were too expensive to keep happy. 
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
“but is this a reason to embrace racists, vote suppressing, democracy destroying causes?”
No. But it’s a reason to throw the progressives out.
If available alternatives aren’t all that either, then replace the progressives with nothing. So people can keep their earnings, and take care of themselves. 
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
“…but is this a reason to embrace racists, vote suppressing, democracy destroying causes?”
Just who is embracing racists or suppressing the vote or destroying democracy? Without election integrity, there is no democracy.
CRT is racism. Democrats support it.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
But President Clu$ter Fudge had a plan? Next up, a return of BLM and Antifa.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Funny how all the riots ended just after the election. I guess blacks decided their lives matter just enough now.
Democrats treat blacks like a coupon that expires on election day. As soon as the election is over, they have no value. They’re yesterdays newspaper.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
What is far more likely,  BLM and Antifa were told by their leaders (Pelosi and friends) that  their work is done until 2022. Anyone who knows history realizes the similarity of BLM and Antifa to the Sturmabteilung (SA–aka Brownshirts). The trick in 2020 was making the riots seem random and unorganized, yet justified by white supremacy.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago

 

There is nothing good that can be seen for Democrats in
these deep blue areas turning red. It is not a one-off and is a rejection of
the woke philosophy and mindset which dominates the Democrat Party except for a
few, very few holdouts. After this I do not expect the Democrats to moderate,
they will double down not realizing that their message is revolting to most
people. Throwing more money into the election is as about as effective as celebrity
endorsements. They cannot overcome a flawed perspective. 

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
What he said.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I think the reaction we are seeing now is akin to the North’s reaction to the Fugitive
Slave Act of 1850. It made something that before was an abstraction into a deeply personal reality by forcing them by law to become complicit with a social institution they detested. The
consensus solidifies into the attitude that you cannot treat with these people.
The Democrat Party will perhaps go the way of the Whigs and for the same reasons, incompatibility
between the members making the Democrat “big tent” no longer possible. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
They can no longer run against Trump, even thought they tried and failed in Va. Now, they’re judged on their policies. Which are universally unpopular.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I wouldn’t go that far. I agree that if Trump can resist getting back into politics, they can’t run against Trump, but I’m not convinced that Trump can stay out.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Side note: It is interesting to see more full or part Asians winning mayorships in cities like Seattle, Boston and Cincinnati. As an Asian, I finally see our sensibilities of governing from a place of reason and technocratic government emerging.  This is for sure a big development in America and positive for governing from the center. 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
By “governing from a place of reason and technocratic government” do you a mean top-down autocratic government making all the decisions?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
No, I mean exactly what I said. Most Asians are socially moderate, fiscally conservative. This is where the center of America is. So its not surprising to see them elected anymore after what’s gone on the last several years in some of these cities. 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
OK, I can buy that.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
4 years ago
As someone who thinks ancestry is the least important part of who you are as a politician, I just want people who uphold core American values to win office.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  threeblindmice
If you understood Asian culture(s), you’d realize that their intelligence, values, and work ethics will likely do more to uphold American values than most of today’s generation of white Americans.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Exactly. Asians have the highest per capita income of any ethnic group because of their intelligence, values and work ethic. America could do worse than being governed by centrist Asians.  
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Where I live (not in the US) bigger turn outs always favor the left.
Why?
People on the left turn up when it’s sunny and when the polling stations are open at night and easy to reach but if they’re not int the mood…
Conservative people go in the morning, rain or shine, out of a sense of obligation.
By the way, it is not parents’ fears, but parents’ concerns.
‘Fear’ is just another leftie framing tactic.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
That’s a bit of revisionist history about 2020 and Republicans staying home. Trump got the most votes of any Republican presidential contender but also lost the most % of Republicans. Enough Republicans and Independents voted for Biden. Curious that Youngkin distanced himself from Trump in recent weeks. This was a win for the governing and not the insurrection wing of the Republican party. McConnell, Romney, Cheney and others are breathing a sigh of relief tonight.  Of course you can’t mistake a state like Virginia or New Jersey for the deep red south where Trump is still loved. Insurrection is still backfiring on Trump as McConnell tries to take the party back. If Trump becomes more vocal in 2022, it won’t turn out well like today did for regular Republicans. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
There is no insurrection wing of the republican party. Stop watching CNN and listening to only the democratic side of events. Jan 6 was a simple peaceful protest that got out of control. Not as bad as many BLM riots. There was no insurrection or attempt to overthrow democracy. The claims by the left are absurd.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Why, in your opinion, did the Joint Chiefs of Staff  feel the need to make the unprecedented public statement that they would respect the outcome of the election, and that they considered Biden to be the duly elected President? Can you ever recall a similar statement from the Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding any other Presidential election?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
I’m seeing residents of San Francisco also wanting to take back their city from these forces of crazy. Limousine liberals who don’t want to leave want their city back and I predict will soon get it back. I see non-lawyers or politicians running for office but more technocrats. You know that’s not normal in San Francisco. Sometimes things have to get bad first.  I see more signs of sensibility in late 2021.  I think people are figuring  it out. Today is a good day for Chuck, Nancy, Joe and Mitch. It’s a bad day for AOC, Trumpers and those in the crazy wing of both parties.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
How is today a bad day for “Trumpers?”  You misunderstand who Trump voters are.  They only like Trump because they see him as the only vehicle to attack the Left.  They know that he is a blowhard and very flawed.  But he’s a fighter, and he has changed the dynamic for other Republicans to now fight, instead of standing there like high-minded wimps and absorb the constant culture attacks from the Left.
The Left hates Trump because he fights them back and he fights dirty.  They’re not used to that, and being the self-righteous elitist scolds that they are, they react by screaming every epithet in their playbook.  The Left looks like deranged kooks, and them taking their eye off the ball to self indulge in their own worst traits is a win for us.
For the record, I think Trump should move on for the sake of the party, but I am happy that he has helped squishy Republicans get a backbone and finally understand that you have to fight like a warrior, not act like you are making final arguments in moot court in law school.  No one cares how polite you are — they want and need to win to prevent the Left from overtaking our culture and destroying everything that we love about this country.  Trump was just a convenient wake up call to help get us there.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
Well said. People on the left are so insanely brainwashed, you can’t reason with them. They think Trump is the same as Hitler because some moron on CNN said so. They have no idea of who Hitler was.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“They have no idea of who Hitler was”, or that the Left has appropriated many of the same tactics.
“You cannot not know history.”
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
I see this as the end of progressives as well as the end of Trump. Somewhere Biden is happy because he can now say the progressive wing of the Dems means more losses for the Dems. He will have no qualms about governing even more from the center and moving towards Manchin and Synema. Overall I see these developments as positive for Biden and bipartisanship. I find it hard to believe Biden and McConnell didn’t see this coming. They have both neutralized the extreme wings of their party for now. It will be interesting to see if they can keep it up.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
I respect your view, but I think this is wishful thinking.  Biden is not going to take a stand on anything; he is doing what his handlers tell him.  He doesn’t have the cognizance or strength to stand on his own and lead — he is a frail old man who is tired.
As to the future, Progressives do not know how to compromise or moderate.  They will double, then triple down until they get what they want.  I think they sense that their “power” moment is exactly that — a moment and a fleeting one.
Progressives never acknowledge that they might just be wrong…they always blame “messaging” or “optics” or some other phony political science reason.  “You see, if everyone just understood what they are trying to do, everyone would agree with them.  But the rest of us haven’t caught up to their esteemed wisdom yet.”
And, finally, Biden hasn’t “neutralized” anyone in his party.  If he did, they would have passed the “infrastructure” and the “human infrastructure” bill by now.  The Progressive Caucus is not giving in, so they are all just spinning their wheels.
I hope that for America’s sake, they continue to spin until election day 2022.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
The trouble with ‘compromise’ is no grand idea will ever be carried out. A ‘meeting of the minds’ is by nature, mediocre.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
You nailed it on Biden. His job was simply to unseat Trump which he did (because Sanders who was the early primary leader had no chance of beating Trump). After that the goal is just to tread water for 4 years until a more viable candidate appears to replace him since he’s borderline senile. I don’t expect much of anything to be done during these 4 years which is normally the best outcome we can get regardless of which party gets into power.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Stop trying to put lipstick on a pig. There is no bright side for the democrats.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Well, this will help the establishment D-crats to blame all their defeats on the progressives and then pass the infrastructure boondoggle bill along with their Republican buddies, while letting the BBB bill just die on the vine.    
Proof?   The progressives have already folded in anticipation of this and have agreed to pass the infrastructure boondoggle in the House, just as Manchin had demanded.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
“..bipartisanship..”
AKA, circling the wagons.
dbannist
dbannist
4 years ago
No way does the NJ governorship go Red.  Too many mail in ballots.  Does anyone actually believe that Bergen county went red this election?  The far more likely explanation is a large quantity of voters will be mailing in ballots, which are Blue, 2 to 1.  However, the surprising closeness of the vote indicates that there has been a significant shift away from Blue ideals. 
It doesn’t, of course, mean that they embrace Red ideals, but at least are rejecting the status quo.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
Yup, people are getting fed up all over America with how things currently are (covid lockdowns, CRT, rampant inflation etc). This is the beginning of it showing up in election results with incumbents getting the blame (as normally happens).
I agree NJ won’t go Red this time but the message has been sent and if things don’t change then next time it will be sent louder.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Terry McAuliffe, a progressive?!  Mmmmkay.  LOL
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Exactly. He’s a Clinton acolyte which means he knows how to lose elections he should win. 
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Yeah, McAuliffe was the right hand man of BJ Clinton for many years if not decades, yes, the same BJ Clinton who made most of Reagan’s economic wet dreams come true.     Calling McAuliffe a “progressive” is kind of like the DONORcrats calling anybody they don’t like, as a “Russian agent”!   
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I don’t see that many differences between a guy like McAuliffe and Youngkin. McAuliffe turned a win into a loss like Hillary in 2016. His gaffes should be a book on how to lose an election. Youngkin did a good job of capitalizing and distancing himself from Trump. This may be the playbook more Republicans use as they try to take their party back from ReTrumplickans.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Revisionist history is so easily rebutted.
When Clinton was elected, in 1993, he enjoyed one year of Democratic cluster fudge, including signing  NAFTA in early 1994. Then, the Republicans took control of both Houses (2022 will likely be the same BTW). Gingrich’s Contract With America was what got the US economy on track and changed the social welfare state. Clinton went along. The alternative was for his already-well-known sexual history to come to light–any number of women in Arkansas, and even a rape in Merrie Olde England. The ‘war’ in Bosnia was Hillary’s doing, an attempt to divert the media.
Clinton was re-elected in 1996, but he still could keep Little Bill zipped. Monica’s relationship was also ‘well-known’ in some circles, starting in 1996. The news broke in 1998.  At this point, Clinton was a puppet. 
Also, as Clinton’s ‘right hand’, McAuliffe KNEW all along.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Agreed.  NOT a progressive.  But, in the end, he fell back on that tried and true Dem argument, “Vote for me, the other guys is a vicious racist.”  Lucky for the country, fewer people believe this every day.  
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  threeblindmice
The DONORcrats are right-wingers.  There is very little differentiation between them and the Repubs on foreign policy, wars, antitrust, trade deals, healthcare, campaign finance and on and on.  So, they have to fall back on social issues.   
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
FYI, the vast majority of donorcrats are not right wingers. Big money supports liberals for two reasons.  First, is a long-held political view  by one particular religious group. Second, they know that Republicans will not do anything to substantially damage big business since they realize its important contribution to the US economy. Corporate heads are fully aware they have the most to fear from Democrats (from minimum wage to sharing the wealth)–ergo they give money to Democrats. The worst offenders: Wall Street.
This is why there is “very little differentiation between” the parties.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.