Unemployment Rate Hits New Low of 3.4 Percent as Jobs and Employment Jump But…

Nonfarm payrolls and employment levels from the BLS, chart by Mish.

Today, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its Monthly Payroll Report.

Initial Thoughts

  • The divergence between jobs and employment continues for the tenth month but lessened in December of 2022 and January of 2023.
  • The full time employment divergence is still huge.
  • The divergences between jobs and employment date back to May.
  • The BLS announced huge annual revisions in jobs and employment.
  • Finally, even discounting the revisions, there is still a huge divergence between jobs and full time employment. We do not know how it evolved because the BLS doesn’t say.

Payrolls vs Employment Since May 2022

  • Nonfarm Payrolls: +3,031,000
  • Employment Level: +1,893,000
  • Full Time Employment: -166,000

The internal details have been weak for ten months and I have been talking about the discrepancy for seven of them.

In the last eight months, full time employment is negative.

But… Please see revision details below because of the 894,000 rise in employment in January, 810,000 was due to annual revisions. And the BLS does not say what months were revised

In essence, the BLS admits all of its job reports are full of errors and it leaves the errors in place as discussed under revision details below.

Job Report Details

  • Nonfarm Payroll: +517,000 to 155,073 – Establishment Survey
  • Civilian Non-institutional Population: +1,118,000 to 265,962,000
  • Civilian Labor Force: +866,000 to 165,832,000 – Household Survey
  • Participation Rate: +0.1 to 62.4% – Household Survey
  • Employment: +894,000 to 160,138,000 Household Survey
  • Unemployment: -31,000 to 5,694,000- Household Survey
  • Baseline Unemployment Rate: -0.1 to 3.4% – Household Survey
  • Not in Labor Force: +252,000 to 99,878,000 – Household Survey
  • U-6 unemployment: +0.1 to 6.6% – Household Survey

Payroll Survey Revision Details

Establishment Survey Revisions From the BLS

Annual revisions were huge including a rise of over a million in population. 

The BLS explains “Establishment survey data have been revised as a result of the annual benchmarking process, the NAICS 2022 conversion, and the updating of seasonal adjustment factors. Also, household survey data for January 2023 reflect updated population estimates.”

Household Survey Revision Details

Household Survey Revisions From the BLS

“In accordance with usual practice, BLS will not revise the official household survey estimates for December 2022 and earlier months. However, to show the impact of the population adjustments, table B displays differences in selected December labor force series based on the old and new population estimates.”

Data users are cautioned that these annual population adjustments can affect the comparability of household data series over time. Table C shows the effect of the introduction of new population estimates on the change in selected labor force measures between December 2022 and January 2023.”

Of the 894,000 rise in employment in January, 810,000 was due to revisions! And we do not know what months had revisions. 

That said, no matter how you slice the revisions, full time employment has been very weak.

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls Details

Leisure and hospitality, and education and health services were the strong gainers in December.

Manufacturing has peaked this cycle. For discussion, please see Manufacturing ISM Sinks to a New Low for the Move, Repeats Recession Warning

Part-Time Jobs

The above numbers never total correctly due to the way the BLS makes adjustments. I list them as reported.

Even with revisions, everything points to part time jobs to fueling the job gains since May with divergences starting in March.

Hours and Wages

  • Average weekly hours of all private employees rose 0.3 hours to 34.7 hours.
  • Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees rose 0.2 hours to 33.6 hours.
  • Average weekly hours of manufacturers rose 0.4 hours to 40.5 hours.

Hourly Earnings

The BLS revised the December up negating its initial report showing minimal change from November.

Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.10 to $33.03. A year ago the average wage was $31.63. That’s a gain of 4.4%.

Average hourly earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Workers rose $0.06 to $28.26. A year ago the average wage was $26.88. That’s a gain of 5.1%.

Despite the gains, wages have not kept up with inflation.

Unemployment Rate

Unemployment rate from the BLS Household survey.

The unemployment rate hit a new record low this month of 3.4 percent.

However, there are 100,130,000 people age 16 and older who are not working at all. They are not employed but not unemployed.

Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Alternate measures of unemployment from the BLS, highlights mine.

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

The official unemployment rate is 3.4%.

U-6 is much higher at 6.6%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.

Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. Some dropped out over Covid fears and never returned. Still others took advantage of a strong stock market and retired early.

The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement (need for Social Security income), and discouraged workers.

Changing Employment Dynamics

There are over 22 million workers age 60 and over. Millions will retire soon which will put upward pressure on hiring and wages.

Birth Death Model

Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.

The birth-death model pertains to the birth and death of corporations not individuals except by implication.

For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.

The model is wrong at economic turning points and is also heavily revised and thus essentially useless.

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

  • The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number. It is based on employer reporting.
  • The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures employment, unemployment and other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Looking for job openings on Jooble or Monster or in the want ads does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.

These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.

Q&A What’s Going On?

Q: Hey Mish, What’s Going On?
A: People are taking on second part time jobs to make ends meet. But full time employment is stagnant no matter how one slices and dices the revisions. 

Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Rise in Unemployment

Given hiring pressures and boomer retirements, Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Unemployment Rise

While I expect the unemployment rate will not rise much in this recession, at least compared to the average recession impact, employment is another matter.

There’s a Huge Temporary Growth in Gig Work to Make Ends Meet

As noted on January 1, There’s a Huge Temporary Growth in Gig Work to Make Ends Meet

That puts a spotlight what I have been saying for months, that strength in these job reports have been exaggerated for months.

Demographically Sobering Thoughts on US Employment in the Next Five Years

Employment levels from the BLS through 2022, 2023-2030 Mish projections

In case you missed it, please see Demographically Sobering Thoughts on US Employment in the Next Five Years

Final Thoughts

All of this still fits my overall thesis in place for nearly a year now: Recession sooner rather than later but with a minimal rise in the unemployment rate.

I know of no one else who has held that view. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NaetG
NaetG
2 years ago
Hey Mish,
What’s your take on the seasonal adjustments made to the headline establishment number? If one were to look at tabel B-1, they’d see that the not seasonally adjusted numbers showed a reduction (loss) of 2.505 million jobs from December to January. However, once the seasonal adjustments were made, the only reported number that the media runs with was magically 517,000 jobs created MoM. It seems to me that there is no way seasonal adjustments created a swing of 3.022 million jobs, annual revisions or not. I’d be interested in knowing your opinion of this.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
When you control the terms of the definitions you can report any numbers you want.
The only issue left is credibility.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
just so i get the logic. BLS is bogus. but YOU rely on same government to define a “recession” ? sorry old sport, i’ll stick with the tried and true definitions which worked for centuries. when stocks and houses go down it’s a panic. when my neighbor loses her house or job, it’s a recession. if i lose my job and house, we have a depression. inflation is the old fashioned debauching of currency. ancient money clippers of greek island of sicilia, in the town of siracusa first recording of them. or countless other debauching like replacing gold and silver with lesser metal mixes. or in modernity, of past few centuries, the printing presses and ink spilled on paper currency debauching. and in last few decades, just using the zero key on a computer stroke. we have immense amounts of inflation, and no signs of depressions or recessions. yet. this is just the plain old fashioned simple truths of an old fashioned currency and stock trader.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
2 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
517K jobs pretty much blows up any near-term possibility of a recession, especially when Mish’s “thesis” has been wrong for 12 months.
The easy part is over for the Fed, et al. The most likely scenario for most of this year is a trough forms for inflation & housing between now & May. After that, both housing & inflation pick up to some extent. Neither will go great gang busters but the Fed’s job looks significantly harder as we start 2023.
We are all still dealing with distorted market, asset bubbles born from massive governmental spending. Almost everyone, and most certainly the Fed, had no idea how $13T in extra spending would affect inflation, labor, markets, etc for 4-5 years, possibly more.
And as I’ve said very often, 10M new mouths from south of the border to feed, cloth, house, provide jobs, gas, & healthcare isn’t deflationary. Far from it. We are truly into uncharted territory that readily brings economic history lesson from the late 70’s / early 80’s.
What I really want to see is for JP to start selling MBS, especially if it will prop up 30YFM rates. Housing prices have to move much lower for there to be a viable outcome that tames rent / housing inflation.
PapaDave
PapaDave
2 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
I don’t think Mish is wrong, or not by much. Employment is still increasing, while growth is slowing a bit.
Mish expected slow growth or a recession with very few job losses. Not that far from where we are. I guess because he mentions “recession” so often that he appears to be very negative.
I expect the US to keep muddling along with slow economic growth and modest job growth. In addition, the world economy as a whole will do better than the US in 2023.
Demand for all energy will keep growing worldwide. The world will keep building more renewables, but not enough to reduce our need for fossil fuels (until 2030).
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
And right on cue, the stawk market reflexively goes down.
The free money spigot hopes, aka pivot still illusive.
Esclaro
Esclaro
2 years ago
The DXY is up huge today after the job numbers came out. I guess they believe the strong job numbers mean that more interest rate hikes are truly on the way. The DXY had weakened earlier after the rate hike but now the dollar is on the move upwards.
Thetenyear
Thetenyear
2 years ago
Thanks for clarifying Mish. The way Apple took off this morning I thought maybe all 517,000 bought an iPhone and an iMac. Now I know that the jobs report is complete garbage.
Speaking of garbage, AAPL spit out it’s highest ever over sold reading this morning. The second highest occurred in December 2021 just before the ATH. BUY THE RIP I guess?
Utah and lower taxes. Now that is a soft landing. Congratulations!
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
Change in nonfarm payroll in the last 3Y disappeared, only m/m lately. Prior 12 month : construction up, mfg down. We stopped
producing real stuff, despite Churchill II booster.
CRZYHUN
CRZYHUN
2 years ago
We are in a recession now. Low grade like long covid. It will be like the time after the Great Monetary Crisis ’09 to ’11. Sub par recovery, then and now, will prevail due to de-globalization and chinese issues. Here’s hoping that there is no Black Swan.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
They took the actual number of jobs gained, -2.5 million. And then magically added 3 million jobs to it to produce a bottom line number of +500k. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.