Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

30-Year Mortgage Rates Approaching 7 Percent Again, Housing Will Suffer

30-Year Mortgage Rates courtesy of Mortgage News Daily

Mortgage News Daily reports Mortgage Rates Now at 2 Month Highs by Matthey Graham.

It may not be a death by a thousand cuts, but mortgage rates are suffering a bit of blood loss from roughly 5 cuts. Specifically, the past 5 days have seen consecutive moves to higher levels. The whole affair has been fairly steady relative to the types of volatile swings that have been all too common for most of the past year and a half.

The average lender is now at their highest levels since early March, just before the Silicon Valley Bank failure kicked off a flight to safety that helped bonds/rates improve substantially.

Despite the unfriendly movement, we’re not necessarily facing a persistent threat. Unfortunately, it’s just as fair to say we’re not expecting any persistent drop in rates for any particular reason either. That juxtaposition speaks to the rate market’s recent indecision and the fact that we continue waiting on an unequivocal case to be made for or against inflation returning to lower targets.

Technical Pattern

The blue triangle-shaped pattern I outlined on the MND chart is either a symmetric continuation pattern (same slope) or a rising wedge, differing slopes. 

If your crayon is fat enough, you can shift the blue lines to make a case either way.

The expected resolution of a symmetric triangle is higher, that of a rising wedge is lower. 

There are alternate patterns one can draw such as a channel formed by the read and blue horizontal lines. 

Clear as Mud

In short, the technical pattern outlook is the same as the “indecision” noted by Graham.

Actions by the Fed and the market’s view of the economy will determine what happens with rates. 

Lower is not necessarily good if it is accompanied by a hard recession. 

For now, rates are sufficiently high to weaken housing.

Existing Home Sales Decline for the 14th Time in 15 Months

Existing Home Sales courtesy of the National Association of Realtors via the St. Louis Fed

On May 18, I noted Existing Home Sales Decline for the 14th Time in 15 Months

Existing Home Sales Long Term

Chart courtesy of Trading Economics, annotations by Mish

Transaction Crash

Existing home sales have crashed to a level seen in the mid 1990s. Prices have not crashed but transactions have.

Many people who want to move are effectively trapped in their houses because they do not want to trade a sub-3% mortgage for a 6.5% mortgage.

The bidding wars we do see are from people who are price insensitive. They make for amusing anecdotes but the above chart shows the real picture.

This crash is likely to last longer because intertest rates are likely to stay higher for longer because the Fed fears stoking more inflation.

Home sales mean appliance sales, new furniture, cabinets, new carpet, landscaping, etc. Who doesn’t spend a lot more money when they move into a new home?

Percent Decline From Peak

Case-Shiller data from St. Louis Fed, chart and calculations by Mish

Case-Shiller Home Prices Unexpectedly Rise Adding Interest Rate Pressure on the Fed

On April 26, I commented Case-Shiller Home Prices Unexpectedly Rise Adding Interest Rate Pressure on the Fed

Case-Shiller Index Chart Notes

  • Home prices temporarily halted their slide in February
  • The 20-city seasonally-adjusted price rose 0.1 percent
  • The 20-city unadjusted price rose 0.2 percent
  • Year-over-year the 20-city unadjusted price rose 0.4 percent, down from 2.6 percent

Stalemate

For now we have a stalemate. There is little inventory because buyers want the price they could have gotten a year or two ago. 

Sellers cannot afford homes because prices have not declined enough to make up for rising mortgage rates.

So here we are, with all eyes on a Fed that is largely responsible for the problem by holding rates too low too long again. 

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
It’s a crime. The economy is being run in reverse.

link: Daniel L.
Thornton, Vice President and Economic Adviser: Research Division, Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Paper Series

“Monetary Policy:
Why Money Matters and Interest Rates Don’t”

The correct policy is to drain bank reserves while lowering interest rates. Waller, Williams,
and Logan seem to agree. They “believe the Fed can keep unloading bonds even
when officials cut interest rates at some future date.”

The FED should cut
interest rates now, and continue with QT. The 1966 Interest Rate Adjustment Act
is prima facie evidence.

The future of the United States holds that it
will be forced into (1) a high degree of economic isolation, (2) reflect an
increasingly totalitarian mold, (3) and operate under a command economy.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Visualizing The Decline Of Affordable Housing In The US | ZeroHedge
Housing prices are rising faster than incomes. Bernanke bankrupt half the home builders.
They’re not building enough houses:
New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Single-Family Units (HOUST1F) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)

It’s Gresham’s law: “a statement of
the least cost “principle of substitution” as applied to money: that a
commodity (or service) will be devoted to those uses which are the most
profitable.

Directed Energy
Directed Energy
3 years ago
All these people that want a massive home price drop are hilarious. They all think they are the only one that will pounce on this mystical deal they are waiting for.
atryingshepherd
atryingshepherd
3 years ago
I think they think there will be plenty of deals available to those who planned for them. They’re just growing impatient waiting for kickoff.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
I want my kids (27 & 23) to be able to afford a home before I hand them their inheritance, hopefully many years from now.
With all the forces pushing up inflation for decades to come, the era of ultra-low rates (which never should have happened) have passed. The only way the price problem get solved is via a big recession. Now, that could still be years down the road, but hopefully with interest rates staying above 5.5% long-term, we won’t see anything near the price growth we’ve had over the last 4 years going forward.
The most likely scenario is a car debt, credit card debt, commercial real estate debt, & home debt perfect storm that develops in 2-3 years.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago

like this exact thing didn’t happen 15 years ago…

8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Sell today like Sam Zell.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Home owners don’t want to lose their 2.5%/4% mortgages. Buyers cannot afford the high prices, the 7% mortgages and bank’s tightening.
Equilibrium, a lull. If in the next selling season we enter recession, few home owners might preempt, sell today, before the competition grow . Both owners and brokers must do what they can to complete the transaction. Banks borrow at 5% charge at 7%.
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
I don’t know about suffering houses but i did witness a healthy enough housing market in the mid-90s at that rate or a bit higher.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  Avery
House prices more expensive than mid-1990s compared to wages.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Reply to  Avery
I’ve seen historical charts showing housing affordability was at a significant low in the mid-late 90’s. Since then the Community Reinvestment Act lead to higher housing prices and a larger mortgage rate.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Greenspan’s fog a mirror, buy a house program, really got housing moving.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
Mortgage rate premium over 10 year Treasury is astonishingly high. With the typical 2% premium mortgages would be well under 6%.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
this time it’s different. /sarc
we have 70s style stagflation with no sign of abating. the residential and commercial r/e and bank crisis has just begun. give it another 5 or 10 or 20 years.
bernanke airdrop
bernanke airdrop
3 years ago
Real demand for housing is stratospheric. In my UMC professional class world, this is pretty much all anyone talks about but qualifying for a mortgage that can actually buy a ‘starter’ home in economically relevant area is a problem. Then, the payment premiums versus renting are obscene, but single family homes are a fundamentally superior lifestyle than renting multi-family properties.
Housing has turned into a token that is disconnected from incomes, you essentially trade your existing real estate assets for other real estate assets. Housing prices have doubled or tripled in just a few years in desirable parts of the country (nice areas politically like Florida or places with top jobs like the Bay Area and Seattle suburbs). We also have people selling lots of stocks for larger down payments.
I fundamentally don’t believe pricing matters, and that houses can easily be 3 – 5 million USD for a starter home 15 to 20 years from now in places with top jobs due to inflation. This may not be a significant increase in real terms, but it fundamentally means that inflation makes housing much less expensive than it looks to be. There will no real fiscal discipline in Western economies.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
“I fundamentally don’t believe pricing matters, and that houses can easily be 3 – 5 million USD for a starter home 15 to 20 years from now in places with top jobs due to inflation.”
15-20 years from now, let’s check back in here on MishTalk and see how many jobs have been wiped out by AI & robotics. These disruptions will have a massive impact on home prices. Be that as it may, I think your $3-5M starter home is acceptable seems wildly unacceptable, top jobs or not. In 15-20 years, the US dollar will have collapsed and be second to the Chinese renminbi.
America’s best days are in the past. China is the dominate empire going forward.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
80+% of the “jobs” that AI has the potential to replace probably should never have existed in the first place.
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Saw a meme video with an AI created Biden doing ‘the’ Bud Light commercial in place of Audrey Hepburn – Mulvaney, so there’s a perfect example.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
If people have to work to not starve…
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Zero Hedge headline: “Hartnett: AI = Universal Basic Income = Fed Yield Curve Control To Fund Bigger Deficits”
bernanke airdrop
bernanke airdrop
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
What do you think the loss of reserve currency status will do to the pricing of real assets in dollar terms? Please note that I specifically am not confident in massive, real appreciation like we have seen during the past decade. But in nominal terms, I would not be surprised to see this play out.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
It will crush all sorts of asset classes.
bernanke airdrop
bernanke airdrop
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Maybe in real terms, but why would it drop in nominal terms? Foreign held dollar reserves would return to the US where the USD is still used and they would chase real assets.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Let me restate: The $$$ will get crushed in both real & nominal terms.
Or put another way: crushed means crushed.
Cabreado
Cabreado
3 years ago
Just curious what you’re starting with, ie. price of “starter home” in 2023… and the math you use to arrive at:
“houses can easily be 3 – 5 million USD for a starter home 15 to 20 years from now”
bernanke airdrop
bernanke airdrop
3 years ago
Reply to  Cabreado
I’d start them at ~1 million dollars today, they are more like 1.2 – 1.5 million dollars in the Bay Area. It’s more like $1.3 to $1.8 million for something more modern in the Seattle area and maybe a 4 bed 3 bath instead of a 3 bed 2 bath from 1965.
Democritus
Democritus
3 years ago
Mish, you have buyers and sellers the wrong way around in the Stalemate paaragraphs…
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
“30-Year Mortgage Rates Approaching 7 Percent Again, Housing Will Suffer”
I really hope so. Like big time. We need at least a 25% drop.
EPB research shows via CS Index that housing is only down 2.9% nationally (skip forward to ~ 1:15). We’re 12 months (avg per EPB is 37) into a housing downturn. 2.9% in 12 months is NOTHING & is a JOKE.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.