Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Another “Last Ditch” Effort to Stop Russia in Repetitive Groundhog Day

Macron and Putin hold “last ditch” talks, image Reuters via Aljazeera

Another ‘Last Ditch’ Effort 

Biden held last ditch efforts, then Germany, now France gets its turn to stop Russia from invading Ukraine.  

France24 reports Macron Holds ‘Last Ditch’ Talks with Putin, US Warns Russia ‘Poised to Strike’ Ukraine.

French President Emmanuel Macron had a phone conversation with Russia’s Vladimir Putin on Sunday in a “last ditch” diplomatic bid to avert an invasion of Ukraine as US President Joe Biden convenes a rare Sunday meeting with his national security team amid White House warnings of an attack “at any time”.

Macron’s last ditch diplomatic bid came even as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called on his country’s Western allies to stop “a policy of appeasement” towards Moscow.

The telephone conversation between Macron and Putin lasted 105 minutes, after which the French president briefed his Ukrainian counterpart, said the Élysée presidential palace without providing details of the talks.

Agree to Work for Ceasefire   

In a different different slant on Macron’s effort. Aljazeera says Macron, Putin Agree to Work for Ukraine Ceasefire

French President Emmanuel Macron and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin have agreed to work for a ceasefire in eastern Ukraine, with the foreign ministers of the two countries set to meet in the coming days.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is willing to meet Putin to find out “what the Russian president wants” and seek a “peaceful settlement” amid growing concern over a possible imminent invasion.

It does not take a meeting to understand what Russia wants. Putin does not want Ukraine in NATO with NATO missiles on its border. 

This is not much different than the US not wanting Russian missiles in Cuba. 

Meanwhile, in Belarus

The Wall Street Journal reports Russia Extends Belarus Drills for Thousands of Troops as Ukraine Violence Escalates

Shelling across the cease-fire line in eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region intensified in recent days, with Russian-installed authorities in areas controlled by Moscow since 2014 ordering the mobilization of fighting-age men and urging the evacuation of women and children. Kyiv and its Western partners say these moves are part of a Russian propaganda campaign to justify a full-fledged military invasion of Ukraine, which President Biden has said he expects to happen within days.

Mr. Macron said that Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany will resume talks in the so-called Normandy format based on proposals presented by Kyiv in recent days. He and Mr. Putin agreed on the “necessity to favor a diplomatic solution to the crisis, and to do everything to achieve it,” according to the French account of the conversation.

The Kremlin, in its statement Sunday, blamed Mr. Zelensky for refusing to implement the so-called Minsk agreements that ended major combat in Donbas in 2015, and that—in Moscow’s interpretation—could give Russian proxies a significant say in Ukraine’s new setup, potentially halting the country’s alignment with the West.

Still, the Kremlin said Mr. Putin agreed to “intensify the search for solutions through diplomatic means,” including by holding another meeting on the Minsk accords between the four nations’ senior advisers in the Normandy format. While the first such meeting in Paris in January led to some progress, the second in Berlin earlier this month ended in failure.

US Repeats False Flag Allegations

On CNN’s “State of the Union,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that the continuation of Russian military exercises and massing of troops on the Ukraine border is part of the predicted groundwork Moscow has been laying for a Russian invasion of its smaller neighbor.

“All of this, along with the false flag operations that we’ve seen unfold over the weekend tells us that the playbook we laid out is moving forward,” he said.

What About Ships in the Baltic Sea?

Hey, I’m glad you asked.

On Friday, six amphibious ships from Russia’s Baltic and Northern Fleets repositioned near the port of Chornomorske, on Crimea’s western cape, roughly 40 miles from the coastline of Ukraine’s southern Kherson region, according to Andrii Klymenko, a defense and maritime analyst with the Black Sea Institute of Strategic Studies, a Ukrainian think tank. Supporting the landing craft are a corvette, a missile boat, a minesweeper and rescue tugs, Mr. Klymenko said.

The lack of activity relative to previous Russian exercises on the Black Sea left Ukrainian officials to speculate about Russian intentions.

Lack of Activity Increases Speculation

Please note that both the lack of activity and activity increases speculation about what Russia will do.

It’s entirely possible if not likely that all these efforts by Putin are nothing more than psychological ploys in an effort to achieve diplomatic gains. 

China Warns Russia Against Invasion

Please note that China wants in on the last ditch savior act too. 

“After strongly supporting Moscow’s standoff with the West over Ukraine, Beijing aligns its position closer to Washington’s” says the Wall Street Journal in Behind China’s Warning Against a Russian Invasion Is a Desire to Protect Ties With the U.S.

China’s more explicit warnings in recent days against a Russian invasion of Ukraine show how Beijing is walking a tightrope, trying to build up a partnership with the Kremlin while preventing its relationship with Washington from becoming outright hostile.

A shared interest in confronting the U.S. has driven the China-Russia relationship to its closest point since the early years of the Cold War seven decades ago.

But since Chinese President Xi Jinping this month gave his Russian counterpart his strongest support to date in Moscow’s standoff with the West, Beijing has been calling for a resolution of the crisis through diplomatic channels, aligning its position closer to that taken by the U.S. and its allies.

The shift in tone, say Chinese diplomats and advisers to the Chinese government, comes after days of closed-door deliberations by top leaders and reflects Beijing’s desire to avoid an even more adversarial relationship with Washington that could cause China to be isolated from the West and hurt the country’s development in the long run.

Groundhog Day Will Continue!

  • Ukraine will meet with Russia hoping to figure out what Putin wants although it is perfectly obvious.
  • Macron will meet with Putin so he can position himself as the hero who got Putin to see the light.
  • China is the most recent “me too” entry in the diplomatic shuffle.
  • Germany held one last ditch meeting with Putin already but I expect another. 
  • The US repeats its groundhog day effort with continual, yet idle threats against Russia. Then if invasion does not happen, president Biden will surely take credit for Putin backing down. 
  • In an effort to regain center stage, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken wants to meet Russian counterparts next week. 
  • More Minsk talks! Heck, if those get started, they could go on for months if not years.

Add it all up and Groundhog Day will continue with the US repeating the same “imminent threat” message every day. 

It’s All Propaganda

Nothing anyone says stands out as being more believable than rest.

In case you missed it, please see Ukraine Says Major Escalation Probability is Low, US Says Russia Will Attack.

Meanwhile, the US, China, France, and Germany all want to be the hero that prevents the invasion while conceding nothing to Russia in the process.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

54 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Ron Cataldi
Ron Cataldi
4 years ago
Biden was right. You should have listened.
William Janes
William Janes
4 years ago
I smell “defeatism” in here.    There is no equivalence in the moral order between Russia and United States.  It is unnecessary and dangerous to reveal your true intentions to the Russians, if the U.S. desires to use propaganda in regards to “inter”  communication with a foreign enemy than that is legitimate foreign policy.  It is not required that the U.S. government reveal its sources to the proprietor of this blog.   There are so many similarities in the situation to the Munich Agreement by Chamberlain who stated that Czechoslovakia  was of no concern to Britain or Europe.   The again illustrates the vacuity of the philosophy of libertarianism.
Quagmire
Quagmire
4 years ago
This didn’t age well.  It seems Russia was not just sabre rattling.  Diplomacy be damned, the battle is engaged.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
The most absurd part of this whole thing is how the CIA is trying to create a false false flag operation. And if you question them on it, they’ll accuse you of trying to create a false false false flag operation.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
When you come to rationally think of it, there is only ONE party that should NOT be involved in this ongoing situation, caused by them and now being  pushed to the edge by them :  THE fn US OF A !  When THEY are involved it NEVER ends well, recent history shows …
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Why are the Ukrainians not fortifying their border and their territory?
Why does nobody notice is that Ukraine has 150,000 actual troops poised to invade on the Line of Contact in the LPDR?
Why is Ukraine not worried about their entire army being pincered/contained in a ‘cauldron’  from which none will escape?
Why is no one worried about a Ukrainian invasion?
Why is no one worried about Russians civilians being killed (most civilians are on the Donetsk side) on account of Western interventions for the first time since WW2 !
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
If Ze and Putin agree, perhaps we should listen: they are for sure not cooperating or conspiring together!
The Europeans have also expressed a lot of doubts about American assessments, though less publicly.
Europeans have satellites and intel agencies too, but they are seeing, well, nothing.
Americans are refusing to give them any raw data or evidence.
How about US advance knowledge of a false flag by Russia, but with no details or specifics (like when, where, what kind of incident)?
This is a painfully transparent evidence-free fibbing. If there is to be an incident, the US would most likely have advance knowledge if they were the party planning it, something that seems an incredibly obvious possibility given American intel’s historical performance and involvements.
So far no evidence of any kind has been shown, so my money is on the American fib.
There is no evidence for these troop numbers. Full Stop.
(100-200k on the border, but also 150-400km from the border, but also in barracks, and also taking part in exercises, and also prepositioned in April 2020 and also have been building up since 2014, and have been about to invade for going on 8 years now).
Rbm
Rbm
4 years ago

Follow the money.   If putin and his cronies are moving their investments back to russia putin will invade.  Actually this may all be some ploy from putin to make money with his investments at russia tax payer expense. 

vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
listening to CNN or CNBC or financial pundits wax idiocy about a war that has been raging for decades now,  is a spectator sport like watching the old monty python nit wit olympics.   
kiers
kiers
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
yes! but take note: Biden is “neck deep” in Ukraine first hand!  He’s neck deep in CIA planning, Cofer Black served on the Board of Burisma while Joe Biden was actively intervening on behalf of founder of Burisma, and Burisma is key to funding the neo nazi Azov army.    Lots of spooks, lots of skull duggery.  Funny how Biden became the president and Ukraine comes to front of headlines!  (hmm……sort of like Bernanke, depression era rescue specialist, became Fed chair just perfect man for GFC 08).   
Given the penchant neocons have for war, I’m predicting this is our next 20 years down the drain!
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
BREAKING: Biden and Putin accept French proposal to meet
Foreign ministers of US and Russia will meet on Thursday to prepare subjects of Biden-Putin summit
THE WHITE HOUSE HAS NOT CONFIRMED THE PROSPECT OF SUCH A SUMMIT -CNN
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
isnt’ this idiotic.   w the dumber and obama and trump and now biden have been funneling billions of MIC arms and our money into Georgia and Ukraine for almost 20 years now.    as Putin nibbles and nibbles and cuts gas deals with the heartland of EU,  as amerika is dyiing on the vine of vile worlwide imperialismt.      this war started in 2004 when we sent dough to country of georgia…………
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
So far, the best historical summary of the situation I’ve read is by Asia Times.
The editor/owner is D.Goldman (an American) and Jack F Matlock Jr was the last American ambassador to the USSR (1987-1991).
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
EXCELLENT TAKE.    
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
I learned more from that article than a year of European history in high school.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
It’s off topic, but somewhat relevant.
James Dobbins is the director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center at RAND Corporation. He served as the Bush administration’s special envoy for Afghanistan: Negotiating with Iran: Reflections from Personal Experience.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
Maybe a demilitarized zone would be the best solution. Obviously Russia doesn’t consider NATO members Latvia and Estonia to be threats even though they are about the same distance to Moscow as the Ukraine border. But should Ukraine join NATO, 2/3 of Russia’s western border will be with NATO members. Another negotiating point I would make is NordStream2 is dismantled in exchange for Ukraine not becoming a NATO member.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
There already is a demilitarized zone according to the Minsk accords.
  • But the parties (France, Germany, Ukraine, LDPR) refuse to implement.
  • In fact, Ukraine has passed laws contrary to the accords, and offers no services to LPDR citizens (except for shelling their homes).
  • A demilitarized zone between Ukraine/Russia would mean nothing … the entire Ukr army (150.000) is poised for an invasion on the Line of Contact with the LDPR. The rest of the border has no military stand offs. The Russian army is highly mobile and is not less effective at 150km distance (their artillery has a longer range).
Doing away with Nordstrom 2 is meaningless.
  • There is already a Nordsteam 1, so it’s just a matter of the volume of gas going through Nordstream.
  • It was a German project.
  • They find gas imported directly is more secure than taking the circuitous route through Ukraine, with its tendency to pilfer and shut down the pipelines.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
It is simply a question of “Which pathological, compulsive liar is telling the truth?”.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
That is an excellent way of describing the setup. 
kiers
kiers
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
get used to it.  This is the era of perpetual surrogate warfare.  Electronic social media is part of the toolkit too.  And who is a bot and who isn’t….alan turing test as life.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
And in the meantime more and more lethal arms are surging into Ukraine and more air assets are moving into Europe.
kiers
kiers
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
mark my word….these arms will “leak” for dollar hard currency, into the balkans, and we can kiss the foot of europe goodbye too….just give it 4-5 years…..this is for the long haul…..How funny the Brits decided to breaksit.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Putin’s goal is to take territory with minimal consequences. So far he is succeeding. 
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
He hasn’t yet taken more than he already took in 2014. To succeed he either has to invade or obtain concessions.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
He didn’t take any in 2014 either.
He just revised the terms of the lease.
The Russians leased Crimea and were permitted 25,000 troops, a number that was never exceeeded.
He did manage to thwart NATO’s latest expansion plan, which was to incorporate Sebastopol and the Black Sea fleet, ‘San Diego on the Don’.
No really, there are lots of documents outlining NATO’s plans.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
He revised the lease to make it permanent with no rent payments. Legal title hasn’t been transfered but it is one of Putin’s demands. Don’t try to sugarcoat it. Everyone knows what it is.
Dean_70
Dean_70
4 years ago
In 2014 the US supported the neo-nazi overthrow of the Ukraine government. The Russian puppet president fled to Russia. A new president (US puppet) was then elected. He also had strong neo-nazi ties but tried to publicly distance himself from neo-nazi agenda to preserve credibility. Russia almost immediately took back Crimea, which is a strong military location on the Black Sea. 
Two eastern Ukraine territories have voted to become independent with a date effective Feb 2022. Ukraine does not acknowledge their independence while Russia is recognizing it. 
The fight will be over control of these 2 territories, not Ukraine as a whole. Russia is accusing Ukraine of genocide in these 2 territories and claims to be on a humanitarian mission as they evacuate 100s of thousands of people to Russia to prevent genocide.
Only few know that truth behind this conflict. 
I do know that the US economic indicators are beginning to flash red and the Fed is backed into a corner. Biden NEEDS a conflict immediately to shock the markets and deflect responsibility of a severe economic downturn from his administration and the Fed.
If Russia does not comply and invade Ukraine the US will do anything possible to somehow start the conflict and drag Russia in.
Rbm
Rbm
4 years ago
Reply to  Dean_70
I thought the economic downturn is the result of covid and printing money etc.  so that would have started under trump.   The original recession we were in before covid lock down.   Just my thoughts.  Everything is connected.  
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Reply to  Rbm
it was the best economy in 40 years before Covid…..more blacks were working than ever before…..For all of Trumps faults he did more in 4 years than Obama did in 8….plus he was pro American and not pro illegal alien leeches. Trump lost because of his stupidity about twittering at 1AM at night…..normal folks just don’t do that……Biden by far is the worst president we have ever seen…..demented lost evil soul he be with his handlers obama and clinton so scummy and corrupt you die if you get to close……
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Pardon me if this has been said before, but the situation seems to be:
1. US unwaveringly predicts Russian aggression.  US desperately wants peace and doesn’t care about looking foolish as long as peace prevails.
2. Russia aggresses and the US is correct.  Global sanctions are imposed on Russia.  No one wins.
3. Russia refrains from acting and the US is wrong.  Peace prevails and NATO expansion halts.  Both sides win.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
Pretty close until you remember that Russia expands territory like they did in Crimea and will in the 2 territories now in Ukraine.  Biden and Trump and Obama  are and were weak when it comes to Russia. I believe the generals have selected Clinton as their 2024 candidate which is why her name has come back to the fore. Clinton would have had American forces in Ukraine by now and Zelensky would not be complaining. At some point the US will have deal with Putin in a more offensive way. Consequences be damned.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“I believe the generals have selected Clinton as their 2024 candidate which is why her name has come back to the fore.”
So much for the U.S. being a democracy. The elitists are supposed to choose who we are allowed to vote for. In 2016, Goldman’s choices were JEB and Clinton, to continue the Clinton/Bush presidential dynasty.
Trump wasn’t on the list, so he had to be prevented at all cost. Bernie was prevented- twice, after the Democrat party said they wouldn’t do it again. Say it ain’t so Charlie Brown. Ron Paul was prevented, by changing the party rules. In 2020, election rules in certain states were unconstitutionally changed. Can’t have the wrong person winning.
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Gee I sure hope you’re wrong.  A land war in Eurasia is not winnable.
kiers
kiers
4 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
this is gonna be our next 20 years…..like 9/11 was.
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Reply to  kiers
The salient difference is the support of Americans.  Right or wrong, Americans supported the Bush Administration post 9/11 all the way through Iraq II until the WMD lie was exposed.  And people didn’t grumble en masse about Afghanistan until a few years ago.  I see no such aquiescence for Ukraine.
I mean, everyone over the age of 45 grew up with countries like Ukraine as part of the USSR.  Still seems natural.  Didn’t affect my life one iota as an American.  I could not care less if the situation reverted back, especially if it meant the US being less of the world’s police.
I suspect hundreds of millions of Americans agree with me.  Of course, history has proved our opinions meaningless at times.  But committing ground troops in 2022 is not the same as in 1965 or even 2002.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
American forces in Ukraine
How many?
That number would be the number of casualties on the American side.
It’s actually NATO that is expanding its territory, and which has a lot of plans for the harbour in Sebastopol.
SmokeyIX
SmokeyIX
4 years ago
It could be that Russia is just doing this to artificially drive up the price of natural gas and oil in order to greatly increase their revenue with rather little effort.  
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  SmokeyIX
Putin is definitely playing 4D chess. He was the smartest KGB agent at the time thr Berlin Wall fell. 
kiers
kiers
4 years ago
Reply to  SmokeyIX
US Benefits too…Russia pivots all EU gas to China, US pivots its poisonous shale gas to EU…a $30 billion market per annum (at normal pricing).
KingLion66
KingLion66
4 years ago
Russia is not going to ‘invade’ Ukraine or anyone else for that matter. The entirety of the west bloviating about ‘imminent invasion’ is just that, bloviating. Why NATO wants Ukraine has nothing to do with global security. It is about money and little else.  The neocon and democrat war profit machine needs a conflict. Why else keep beating the drums of war? They have to start firing off and selling replacement missiles at someone, as the entirety of the western governments need a distraction for their citizens to keep people’s minds off the great reset under way and rampant inflation with a sprinkling of woke policy just for good seasoning.  
With all this pounding of the war drums of the west, I have yet to hear a single argument of where Russia would benefit in any way for any sort of kinetic conflict. As far as the Donbas region and supposed separatists firing missiles at Ukrainian forces or people for that matter, it would not surprise me in the least that those firing off the missiles are being told to do it by NATO and western governments.  The west absolutely must have a war to try and rally citizens around a perceived yet non-existent threat.  Their continuation of their power absolutely depends on it. Don’t buy the fear. Don’t buy the ‘intelligence’.  Its propaganda folks and nothing more. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
I give an invasion about 60/40 odds. It started as political gamesmanship, but I somehow doubt it ends that way. I agree with those who say that putting military assets into Ukraine is wasting energy and  money on the wrong side of the globe. Europe is going to disintegrate no matter what, and it isn’t our fight.
However, I am reading the comments here on your blog (mostly pro-Russia) and ironically noting that if Zero Hedge is a Russian asset, it’s a successful one at that. I’d say 90% of the commentariat reflects what ZH has to say.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
dpy
dpy
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Dont’ conflate someone being “Pro-Russian” with them having more information and from different sources than you and CNN.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  dpy
I don’t watch CNN, and unlike you, I linked to my sources. Piss off.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  dpy
What’s CNN?
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

ZH does
have a Russian bent these days. More to the point I would say that there is a disbelief
at what is happening. Many people are coming up with fairly convoluted arguments
as to why Russia is justified in invading Ukraine conveniently forgetting that
the foundation of peace in Europe rests on the principle that territorial rededications
are a thing of the past. That is a central tenant of Nato and the EU. We talk a
lot about Nato’s expansion to the East but seem to forget that the EU expanded
to the East quicker and more extensively than Nato did. Ukraine is in fact a manifestation
of the EU’s economic and cultural might. Consequently Ukraine wants to be in
the EU and sees its future in the West. The goal of the EU is to expand to the
Urals. That ambition has been periodically affirmed in public by many EU
leaders going back to the beginning days. In a way the EU used the US the cop
that protects the neighbourhood allowing the businesses there to expand
eastwards and we do it for a cheap price because we profit too. Now the EU is
faced for the first time by military threat to their eastward expansion and
they are and will react to this disruption as businesses do. They go for the
jugular is. Nato is its military arm but the real fight is economic and they have
the means and they will use it all the time protesting in high voice that it’s
not their choice and forced to do it by circumstances but underneath they are
sharpening their knives.

This is
what I see from the European perspective which differs from that of most
US-centric ones. When I say the EU I am not really talking about the Brussels democracy
but about the diffuse collection of states and companies that make up the EU
itself.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Thanks Doug. I appreciate your unique and well founded POV.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Brussels bureaucracy I meant to say
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
“Many people are coming up with fairly convoluted arguments
as to why Russia is justified in invading Ukraine conveniently forgetting that
the foundation of peace in Europe rests on the principle that territorial rededications
are a thing of the past.”
Problem being that Yanukovich was overthrown. Outsiders overthrowing governments should have been a thing of the past, too. It throws monkey wrenches into systems. It changed the dynamic of Crimea, for one, in this case. It voided the warranty.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Look at Ukraine as a hinderland of the EU in the beginning stages of being absorbed and here comes Putin and screws things up or at least that is what he thought. What really happened is that he accelerated the process of absorption and his only tool left is brut force since he has no economic nor cultural carrots to use. Unfortunately for him brut force won’t be enough.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ

Ukraine was
lost to Russia ever since the Orange revolutions. Putin tried to turn back the
clock and backed one his toadies but it didn’t work and he was kicked out.
Putin in frustration invaded thereby compounding the error. Now Ukrainians hate
Russia and will never reconciliate with Russia as long as Putin is in
charge and he isn’t going anywhere soon unless it is in typical Russia fashion
which means in a box. If I were the CIA and I wanted Russia and Ukraine to
definitively split I would make a situation in which Putin panics and invades
Ukraine and guess what happened? He did, got stuck and now thinks by invading
more of Ukraine it will solve the problem. It will exasperate his problems. He
can invade but cannot hold and if he cannot hold he will lose. His game isn’t
chess, it’s judo. He looks for an opening, strikes but is incapable of looking
at the long game. He is a loser.

Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Have you forgotten Kosovo? With your comments on sacred borders and sovereignty … or Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan.
The jugular is not Swift or money, it is energy.
If Europe shoots itself in the foot to play poodle to Uncle Sam, it will be facing secular decline.
There is no GDP without energy. Russian is selling it to the Chinese instead…
This is all a ploy for America to remain boss of the world and keep its toehold in Eurasia.
Without NATO expansion plans for Sebastopol, Ukraine would not be in the spot they are.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“Zero Hedge is a Russian asset, it’s a successful one at that.”
Bill Clinton was a Russian asset. There is probably a back story of how Clinton meddling in the 1996 Russian election, resulted in Putin later coming into power as Yelsin resigned.
There was also a time when Greenspan sent pallets of hundred dollar bills to Russia. What a Russian asset he was.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.