Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Bear Market Reality: It’s Here. Expect Much Worse

Realistically speaking, this is just a start of a bear market. Here are some more charts to ponder.

S&P 500 Nears Bear Market

Dow Nears Bear Market

Nasdaq 100 Index in Bear Market

Russell 2000 in Bear Market

Apple Bear Market

Crude Bear Market

Nothing Magic

There is nothing magic about 20% declines. It’s simply the most widely used definition of a bear market.

Bear markets seldom stop at 20% then magically reverse.

Expect worse, much worse.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
blacklisted
blacklisted
7 years ago

What’s “much worse”, and over what time frame? What will be much worse over long period of time are pensions, global cooling, increasing taxes, govt oppression, and civil unrest.

Stocks, not so much, and 2 months max.

LawrenceBird
LawrenceBird
7 years ago

Since you are using charts to bolster gloom and doom, maybe you should be fair and post some longer term charts too? We are actually closer to support levels than to the peaks, 5-15% depending what you are looking at. Is that “much, much worse”? Probably not in most peoples books.

TheLege
TheLege
7 years ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird

Fair point … until you look at fundamentals, like umm, egregious equity valuations, business cycle on its last legs and money supply growth in decline for more than a year now.

But be my guest and pile on.

blacklisted
blacklisted
7 years ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird

Fundamentals and technicals work until they dont. What are valuations of stocks when the bond bubble pops?

Blurtman
Blurtman
7 years ago

What goes up, goes down. What goes down, goes up. Over time.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago

Look at XAU vs. the Nasdaq in 2000-2001. Basically a perfect inverse correlation.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago

Hiking rates into horrifically high unemployment? Good lord, the Fed is stupid.

Zardoz
Zardoz
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

Unemployment isn’t high for anyone but the useless.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

@Zardoz Not even remotely close to being true. Especially for STEM workers who are heavily unemployed or underemployed. Hiring has been so scarce of Americans in STEM that most of the new grads from the past 15-20 years can’t even count themselves as being unemployed as they never were able to obtain their first jobs.
If unemployment were actually low, there’d be wage inflation. There is no meaningful wage inflation.

Zardoz
Zardoz
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

That is absolutely untrue. I work in STEM. I’m over 50, change jobs every couple years, and I am making more money than ever. I get several emails from recruiters every day, as do my coworkers, from recruiters in our industry, and for industries that aren’t even closely related to what we do. I’m not particularly smart, or even all that good at what I do, compared to some, but hiring managers still bend over backward every time I decide to switch jobs. My career has been a steady climb since the early 90’s, when I got out of the pseudo-STEM IT business. As computers systems got better, the requirements to be an IT monkey at any but the highest levels basically evaporated. It’s an easy, low skill job now.

We have multiple engineering positions we’ve had open for over a year because we simply can’t fill them… and we offer a good salary, unlimited vacation, catered lunch every day, cadillac insurance, and treat engineers like gold.

But don’t listen to me… here’s something you can bleat fake news about:

Are there people with STEM degrees that can’t find work? Of course, and they fall into one or both of the following categories: Hasn’t kept up or never really acquired the skills to do the job, or too socially broken to work in a cooperative environment… and when interviewing, we will let a lot pass on the latter, if the can do the job.

So the original assertion stands. The people that are employed at this point in history are, for the most part, useless.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

@Zardoz not consistent with my experience or that of quite a few people I know. STEM hiring basically stopped of Americans in the early 2000s coincident with the tech bubble popping. Most hires since have been foreign nationals on H-1Bs and other work visas. You might be lucky because you got in early enough, but its definitely not a good nor a vibrant market for younger Americans in the sector. 2 out of 3 STEM degree holders are not able to find employment in the STEM sector, and large numbers are unemployed or unemployed. Even modestly advertised jobs in STEM are getting hundreds of applications and wages nominally are similar to levels of 20 years ago with significant real wage cuts. Top STEM grads from top schools, US citizens, report that the employers aren’t even interested in interviewing them. Employment levels in some of the more out of favour STEM fields like Physics, and Math are abysmal according to the UC Berkeley Career Center surveys. Also your comments claiming that unemployed STEM workers have themselves to blame are out of touch — a STEM education proves one is adaptable and can learn quickly — employer refusals to even interview and hire them are indicative of a huge glut. The unemployed simply are not in the position to spend big bucks to gain or update proprietary skills if they don’t have a promise of a job. The pushing of the delusional “unemployment is low” narrative is one of the reasons why the economy is in dire straits and why policy makers are unfortunately not able to respond appropriately with monetary policy. Rates should be cut to zero and even into negative rates given how bad the employment and deflation problem is. Trump was elected for telling the truth about unemployment, but unfortunately now he too has become a liar.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

@Realist Not even remotely close to being true. If there was millions of job openings, there would be severe competition for employees and rising wages. No evidence of that happening systemically which would be the case for allegedly “millions of opens”. What is actually happening is that due to the Trump immigration crackdown, a lot of firms have accelerated their Green Card applications, hence a lot of the job postings are fake. In STEM particularly, recruiters often will copy postings and re-brand them with their own branding in an effort to earn a commission. So replication rates of the fake jobs can be easily over 20X.
Again, look at wage inflation — practically non-existent. Look at the employment stats out of the Universities in STEM — many decent schools like Cornell and UC Berkeley can only substantiate 1/3rd of their grads finding post-grad employment. The employment situation is absolutely and utterly abysmal for STEM and tech employees generally. And it set to get a lot worse as the current bubble collapses.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

@Zardoz BTW, if you have openings you can’t fill, surely you wouldn’t mind posting a link to your company and the name and phone number of someone that qualified unemployed people can talk to with the view of becoming employed with your company…. A real person, not just an “apply at http://www.company.com” website.

After all, you have an audience here. And you claim that you can’t find engineers….. Put your money where your mouth is, and maybe I’ll take your comments seriously. Good engineers are tired of being ignored by employers, especially when they claim there’s a ‘shortage’.

mark0f0
mark0f0
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

@Zardoz Not even remotely close to being true, and quite a disgusting comment.

Zardoz
Zardoz
7 years ago
Reply to  mark0f0

Not true? Well I’ll admit that my decades of anecdotal evidence is flimsy, but what about this?

And this:

And this:

What is really going on here? Do we inhabit different universes? When you watch old Star Trek, does Spock have a beard? There are a lot of people like you that just don’t seem to be in this universe. Has the internet gone trans-dimensional?

gregggg
gregggg
7 years ago

Mish, have you looked into the Mark Skidmore/Catherine Austin Fitts story of the “missing” 21 trillion at the Pentagon?

I Listen
I Listen
7 years ago

Mish do you still like Goldmoney? How about MENE?

CzarChasm-Reigns
CzarChasm-Reigns
7 years ago

“Much worse” how? Great Depression-like in losses & duration? Fortunately, history shows Bear Markets are not only short-lived, but also few & far between.

Carl_R
Carl_R
7 years ago

Wow, that’s a misleading chart. To look at it, you’d think that if you were in the market between 1966 and 1982 you made a lot. Since that chart doesn’t account for inflation, the reality is that between 1966 and 1982, if you were in the market, you lost about 70% of your real worth.

Taunton
Taunton
7 years ago

Carl is right. The 70s were a bear market because the real value of your portfolio would have crashed.

domain
domain
7 years ago

Interesting how gold bottomed shortly before the peak in the Nasdaq. That is an awful lot of wisdom from a barbarous relic!

Mish
Mish
7 years ago

Trumpletantantrum – I like that – Did you coin that or pick it up somewhere?

Zardoz
Zardoz
7 years ago

Another Trumpletantrum, another 2%.

Ted R
Ted R
7 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz

That is just plain silly.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.