Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Biden Struggles to Fill Open Regulatory Positions at the Fed, Why?

SEC accused of doing Elizabeth Warren’s dirty work. Image from a Tweet.

The best aspect of the Biden administration is that other than by executive order, the president struggles to get much of anything done. 

Fortunately, Biden’s Fed Nominees Failed to Win Approval in the Divided Senate.

The three main bank overseers—the Fed’s top banking regulator along with the heads of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.—all lack Senate-confirmed leaders more than a year into Mr. Biden’s administration.

The Fed’s vice chairperson for supervision—the government’s most influential banking regulator—is likely to remain unfilled for the foreseeable future, even after the Senate votes on Jerome Powell for a second term as the Fed’s chairman, likely later this month.

Sarah Bloom Raskin, tapped in January for that job, withdrew last month in the midst of opposition from Republicans and Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, citing her views on addressing climate change.

Saule Omarova, an academic tapped to oversee national banks at the OCC, withdrew in December in the midst of objections from Republicans and moderate Democrats. No one else has been tapped for the role. At the FDIC, a Democrat is now serving as acting chairman, though he is serving in a board term that technically expired more than three years ago. The White House doesn’t plan to nominate a new leader soon, according to people familiar with its thinking.

Who’s to Blame?

The White House blames Republicans of course.

But It should be an easy process to find someone else to nominate after these well-deserved failures. Yet, we are stalled. 

The reason things have stalled is the progressive party is in full control of Biden’s agenda.

Any person acceptable to Elizabeth Warren will have trouble being confirmed in the Senate. 

All of the failed nominees have at a minimum Elizabeth Warren’s major support. It’s likely that Warren is the one who made the picks outright. 

Spotlight on Saule Omarova

Biden’s Bank Regulatory Nominee Espouses Helicopter Money and Praises the Old USSR

The issues with Saule Omarova don’t stop with those Tweets. 

Please recall my November 15, 2021 post Biden’s Bank Regulatory Nominee Espouses Helicopter Money and Praises the Old USSR

In a White Paper, she proposed giving everyone free money accounts at the Fed in a “people’s ledger”. 

She also proposed having the Fed set “systemically important prices”. 

Spotlight Sarah Bloom Raskin

On March 14, Senator Joe Manchin released this statement: I am Unable to Support Nomination of Sarah Bloom Raskin to Federal Reserve Board

“The Federal Reserve Board is not an institution that should politicize its critical decisions,” said Manchin.

Everyone of these failed nominations have Warren’s handwriting on them.

Liz’s Pet

Biden Doing Everything Possible to Drive Up the Price of Oil, Some of It’s Illegal

On March 22, I commented Biden Doing Everything Possible to Drive Up the Price of Oil, Some of It’s Illegal

Despite claims of wanting to hold down the price of oil, President Biden’s actions speak louder than his lies.

If Biden insists on kowtowing to the extreme progressives, then expect Democrat Senators Joe Manchin and sometimes Krysten Sinema to object.

Good News 

That Biden has not found replacements for the failed nominees is good news. 

If we can just hang on with no approved appointments until the midterms, Biden will likely be a lame duck unable to do much of anything for the remaining two years of his term. 

We still have to fear executive orders, but those can be challenged in court. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
oee
oee
4 years ago
There is a simple. The finance industry wants people who will do the bidding for banks and their sock puppets in the Senate are following their lead. They want incompetnents so they can do whatever they want to do.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Actually it’s not good. Derivatives need to be more regulated. This would bring down the price of commodities if the those speculators who never take delivery of commodities were rooted out. I estimate around 50% of the price of all commodities is based on speculators. If we went back to the regulatory framework of the early to mid 1990s we would be better off. Remember deregulation in the late 1990s and early 2000s is what caused the great recession and everything since.
tbergerson
tbergerson
4 years ago
Are you talking about the futures markets? And who will take the other side of the trades with the hedgers who do take delivery of those commodities (and of course the other hedgers you do not mention, those that MAKE delivery of commodities)? If you think a market limited to hedgers would work you are sorely mistaken. Now if you want to reinstitute rules that prevent Commercial BANKS or Investment BANKS from participating in these markets, I could get behind that. It was the removal of those restrictions that had the worst effect.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
Maybe potential nominees are declining because they know the rot is so bad and they don’t want to get blamed.
Robbyrob
Robbyrob
4 years ago
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  Robbyrob
Very insigtful. Worldwide free trade, European integration already existed before WW1, which ushered in the era of hostilities, and the beginning of decline of Europe. Today, a mere puppets, confused look for ideas elsewhere, and cannot even manage a propaganda of their own.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
sounds like a plan . Is this case stall is good . But it will be interesting to see how Biden/Elizabeth responds to the border situation. It seems that midterm elections be damn , they are pushing ahead with their agenda no matter what the consequences are . ALL or nothing, so to speak.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
Unless he’s lucky enough to run agains trump, Biden will lose the next election. There are no consequences.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Don’t these jobs entail doing something? It seems interesting that, apparently, they can go unfilled. And scary, if they are meant to counterbalance other, filled jobs. Try to operate your arms without both triceps and biceps.
Jmurr
Jmurr
4 years ago
I find it interesting that the Biden and Trump administrations are quite similar in that they both lacked basic competence and did not accomplish anything except spending and borrowing trillions of dollars. I don’t know which libertarian said it but it is so true. “No matter who you vote for, you get John McCain.”
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr

There’s a reason people generally retire before 70…

oee
oee
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
Your speaking nonsense. The Trump admin let the plauge run wild. This admin has nearly ended it. This admin is creating jobs the Trump mal-admin ended with a net loss of 2.4 million jobs in 48 months.
You are full of it.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Checks and Balances at work as was intended.
Dr_Novaxx
Dr_Novaxx
4 years ago
Biden chose to keep Powell because it gives him political cover to continue with a Trump appointee. It gives him the option to lay the blame for any perceived failures on his predecessor’s doorstep. There’s only one word to describe all this, it’s about wandering in the foothills of the Himalayas with his masters in the CCP.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
“The reason things have stalled is the progressive party is in full control of Biden’s agenda.”
LOL. Saying it again and again does not make it true! If the so-called progressives were really in control of the agenda, they would have succeeded in forcing a vote on BBB ahead of the bipartisan infrastructure boondoggle.
Besides, anybody that is picked for the Fed job, whether it is by Warren or X or Y or Z, is likely to be as ridiculous as any other. So, what’s the big deal?
Dr_Novaxx
Dr_Novaxx
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
No whirlaway, Mish is accurate to say progressives are controlling the agenda, it’s just that they don’t have enough political clout or power to bring that agenda to fruition. Let’s not confuse agenda with reality.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr_Novaxx
They claim to have an agenda but when the rubber hits the road, they cower before the right-wingers who lead the party. How many progressives are really anti-war? Hell, I find more libertarian Republicans opposing sending arms to Ukraine, for instance. The progressives in the DONORcrat Party are all lined up behind their warmongering party leadership. The so-called progressive vice-chair, Ro Khanna is more like Ro Neoconna now.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
“…right-wingers who lead the party…” FLAT-OUT WRONG. The people who lead the party are the same ones who feed at the trough. Always have, always will,
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
What are the left-wing policies that Biden, Pelosi really support i.e. willing to actually fight for (not just pay lip sympathy to)? Here is a list that can help!

https://i.redd.it/8faa8vy7pv451.jpg

Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr_Novaxx
Bingo to Dr Novaxx
It is so obvious but as a Progressive, Whirlaway will never see it
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
LOL. If there was a real left-wing that was in control of the agenda, we would have a single-payer health insurance system, we would have stringent enforcement of antitrust laws, we would not have Russiagate mania driving our foreign policy, and on and on and on.
quantumatoms
quantumatoms
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
All this framing over progressives controlling the Democrats is disingenuous and ineffective. It is also lame. By the same logic, Manchin controls the Democrats.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Biden is trying to weaponize the bureaucracy.
As with the Supreme Court, these positions are not accountable to the people.
There is an increasing push to polarize every aspect of government and force people to go along with the Agenda.
It’s just like playing a pick-up game … there are always little sucks who try to win using the rules instead of just playing for the game.
Ruling outside enacted laws has been an important current for 150 years of political life, but the current is swelling.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.