Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Biden’s Budget Assumes a Massive Retroactive Capital Gains Tax

Biden seeks to hike the top rate on capital gains to 43.4% from 23.8% for households with income over $1 million. 

He also wants to make the increase retroactive and force capital gains realization at death as well.

Opposition Mounts

The WSJ reports Biden’s Budget Said to Assume Capital-Gains Tax Rate Increase Started in April.

  • Leaders of six biggest U.S. banks, testified to Congress Thursday warning against a retroactive change.
  • Sen. Mark Warner (D., Va.), wants to maintain a lower tax rate for capital gains than for ordinary income. 
  • Lawmakers from farm states, including Sen. Jon Tester (D., Mont.) and Rep. Cindy Axne (D., Iowa) have objected to the changes on capital gains at death.

Now and Later 

Biden wants to make it retroactive so that millionaires cannot accelerate gains now. And he wants to make gains taxable at death to prevent heirs from holding. 

In short,  Biden wants his tax hikes now and later too. 

He continues to appease the Progressives. 

Lie of the Day From Biden: My Budget Will Pay for Itself

Earlier today I noted Lie of the Day From Biden: My Budget Will Pay for Itself.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says the budget is sustainable because long-term yields are below the rate of inflation, conveniently held there by the Fed.

The budget also assumes no recession for at least another 9 years despite the fact they happen about every 5 years on average. 

Finally, Biden’s budget not only assumes retroactive tax hikes but those hikes will bring in more money than the nonpartisan congressional budget office assumes.

Meanwhile, Enough is Enough, a Democratic Governor Courageously Says “No More Taxes”

Biden’s Budget Headed Nowhere

There is bipartisan support for about $900 billion in infrastructure spend, far short of the $2.3 trillion Biden seeks.

There is no bipartisan support for tax hikes. 

Moreover, Biden cannot afford to lose a single Democrat Senator on any issue, but the net impact of all his tax and budget proposals suggests he has lost at least 3 Senators.

His budget and tax hikes are headed to the gutter. Beyond infrastructure, it’s unclear if Biden can pass anything.  

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
ThaomasH
ThaomasH
5 years ago
What should the rate of taxation of capital gains be?  Should they be taxed at death?  Why or why not?
oee
oee
5 years ago
Playtime is over! the Trump “supply side” tax cut was supposed increase…supplies. It never did evidence by the fact there are shortages of computer chips, and other commondities. The truth is that the companies never invested in anything. They used the tax cuts to fund stock buy backs.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
5 years ago
Reply to  oee
So… if there is a shortage of any good, in any country, including chip-making Taiwan, it proves a “failure” of Trump’s tax cuts?  
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
5 years ago
A tax like that would lead to a global financial meltdown, and possibly the effective transfer of public companies to the US government or China. In the near term there would be huge taxes collected, but only once. Loses would exceed limits of deduction, and have to be carried over for years to come. So future years would generate fewer taxes than forecast.
Zardoz8045
Zardoz8045
5 years ago
Yes, but … at least with Uncle Joe we are getting some UBI, we are dealing with normal lies & not cult-of-extreme-liars lies which frighten & embrace everyone.  
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
5 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz8045
Different cult, different lies.  It’s not helpful if your UBI comes with UU and UD (universal unemployment and universal disinvestment).
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
5 years ago
whatever
we have to pay for stuff
Mike 2112
Mike 2112
5 years ago
Most of these wealthy zip codes voted for Biden.
Many of these wealthy ppl donate more to the dem party than the R party.
I dont feel sorry for them.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
5 years ago
Well, honestly, what did you expect?
Carl_R
Carl_R
5 years ago
Re: “Finally, Biden’s budget not only assumes retroactive tax hikes but those
hikes will bring in more money than the nonpartisan congressional
budget office assumes.”
An invariable truth of taxation is that tax hikes always bring in less taxes than expected. People, for some reason, apparently don’t like paying taxes, and they change their behavior so as to pay less.
oee
oee
5 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
That is not true. The Clinton tax increases increased taxes. The Wrong wingers claim that the Reagan tax cuts doubled tax revenues. What they do not say is that the economy grew in tandem. Thus, there was no increase in real money comming to the US govt. 
numike
numike
5 years ago
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  numike
Because wage increases lag the inflation the rate. I went through the 70’s inflation. It sucked. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  numike
Because it takes brains and perseverance to understand how to use inflation to preserve your money, and if you don’t figure that out and effectively execute a good plan, it keeps you poor and stuck in the underclass.
Scooot
Scooot
5 years ago
Doesn’t a lower capital gains tax than income tax encourage companies to take on more debt to repurchase their own stock. They can then distribute their profits via buybacks instead of dividends. Therefore equalising the two rates would remove the incentive for companies to pile on the debt in this way? 
Carl_R
Carl_R
5 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Dividends and buybacks are mathematically identical. The only time a company would have a preference for one over the other is if there are different tax consequences, either for the company, or for the stockholder. They should be treated identically, since they are identical.
Scooot
Scooot
5 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
I agree, but dividends are currently taxed at a lower rate as income aren’t they? Directors would rather their shares made a capital gain which is taxed at the lower rate, so they help the share price rise by buying them back, or have I got this wrong? 
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
May be so, but buybacks can make the stock price go up, which is advantageous to the sellers i.e. mostly the insiders, while dividends are advantageous to the holders i.e. the regular buy-and-hold stock owners.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Bingo.
Buy-backs preferentially reward CEO’s and other company officers paid in stock. This is why I don’t own stocks. Not all stockholders are created equal.
Everybody should understand this by now, but it goes over most people’s heads, apparently
Anon1970
Anon1970
5 years ago
Biden’s proposals would mean a big capital gains tax increase for those who owned their home for a long time, especially in areas with high cost housing.
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
“Biden seeks to hike the top rate on capital gains to 43.4% from 23.8% for households with income over $1 million. “

“OK, I will wait to worry until my income is half of that. 
Or half of that half.   
Or half of that half of that half .”

– 90% of Americans

shamrock
shamrock
5 years ago
The “angel of death” capital gains tax loophole never made any sense.  End that in exchange for the end of estate taxes.
Irondoor
Irondoor
5 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Just eliminate the stepped up basis on assets passed to heirs. Allow for some level of exemption. Maybe $500,000 or $1,000,000. But don’t make it immediately taxable unless there is a sale transaction. Most inherited property is in the form of illiquid closely held business interests, real estate, farms, etc. 
The current estate tax level is about right. Just leave it as is since most people have planned for it. The idea of taxing unrealized capital gains on illiquid property at death is not workable and everyone knows it. It was Joe’s opening gambit and won’t pass. 
Roto1711
Roto1711
5 years ago
Biden is a disaster on all fronts, Trumps tweets were bad, but I would still take Trump over Biden. Everything the current administration has been a disaster for the middle class, the economy, foreign policy, fiscal policy, racial equality, border policy, to name a few. 
shamrock
shamrock
5 years ago
Reply to  Roto1711
Right on!  Well, except for the stock market: up 20-25% since the election.  Oh and GDP running over 6%, best since Reagan.  Covid cases and deaths down 80%.   Total disaster!
Roto1711
Roto1711
5 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
You can thank Trump for the decrease in COVID deaths and as far as the stock market goes congratulations on your stock, mine have not appreciated significantly since Biden became President. Let’s see where things sit six months from now. Oh I forgot to list increasing inflation in my prior post.
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
Reply to  Roto1711
I will thank Trump for the COVID success – IF he does a PSA asking Americans to take the vaccine (that you claim he helped develop).
FloydVanPeter
FloydVanPeter
5 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Neither did much for vaccinations. Maybe Trump expedited FDA approval and alike.
Biden has less riots and and the MSM on his side. Refreshing, but is it Trump fault or the MSM bias?
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
Reply to  FloydVanPeter
I agree on the vaccinations.  But it is ludicrous for Trump fans to claim credit for him.  If they want to, they should ask him to advice all Americans to get vaccinated then.  
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
His administration did it so he gets the credit. Compare with European Union’s handling of the crisis. Which one would you have preferred, theirs or ours?
Irondoor
Irondoor
5 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Well, six Trillion of free money and high unemployment compensation does help the stock market. Where do you think that money was going to go?
goldguy
goldguy
5 years ago
Mish, I think you mean 900 billion not trillion, just an FYI…
And yes this is going nowhere.
Mish
Mish
5 years ago
Reply to  goldguy
Thanks 
Fixed
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
I hope you’re right. I’m very disappointed that Biden wants to destroy  the upper middle class with taxes. He has lost my support, which he only got in the first place because he wasn’t Trump. I support no tax hikes whatsoever. How about a little fiscal responsibility instead?
Peter Bartholomew
Peter Bartholomew
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Looks like you cut of your nose to spite your face, all because you believed all the propaganda being fed to you 24/7. I have no sympathy for people like you..None…Zero…Enjoy your new taxes. I hope you choke on them.
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
Where did you learn to build and deliver such blindingly logical arguments? Were you president of the debate club at Harvard?
Irondoor
Irondoor
5 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Biden was elected due to a couple of reason, in my opinion: 1. He was not Trump. Americans had tired of the craziness, which was brought to them 24/7 by Trump and his Twitter and the main stream media. 2. Biden had no plan for a campaign other than to sequester himself in his basement and hide behind a mask. Compared to the real crazies in his party, he seemed more palatable. But of course he has changed his tune after the election. 
The Democrats apparently realize that they have a narrow window to ram through all their pent-up stupid ideas and are doing it with zero regard to the future of the country. All aboard the Trillion Train.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.