Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Bitcoin Supply, Demand, Hash Rates, Halving, Fiction, and Irony of the Day

Bitcoin Halving

Wrong. Period.

Halving pertains to the rate of increase of  supply. The price of Bitcoin is a function of the overall desirability to hold Bitcoin and the supply increases every day. 

Sentiment, not halving, not hash rate, drives the price of Bitcoin. 

Someone has to hold every Bitcoin ever mined 100 percent of the time. Excluding lost keys, the supply of Bitcoin is ever Bitcoin ever mined and supply increases every day.

As with any investment (e.g. gold, Apple, housing, Bitcoin) an investor must decide if they prefer that asset to cash. The flip side is a person or firm must decide if they want to hold cash, the asset they currently hold, or something else.

It is the marginal propensity (increases or decrease in sentiment) that determines whether price rises or falls. Bitcoin is not different.  

And with Apple, Google, Exon-Mobil, earnings and dividends factor in. Bitcoin and gold have no earnings or dividend yield. Gold at least has thousands of years of history as money on its side.

The power of Bitcoin is not baked in. Period.

Is Halving Baked Into the Price?

Silly Statements Regarding Demand

Demand does not increase just because the rate of increase in supply is falling. 

This is obviously true, but most in the Bitcoin universe live in echo chambers where such nonsense so often people come to believe it.

Irony of the Day

“If gold served it’s purpose as global money, why are 8 billion people using free float fiat government currencies today?“

The irony of that question is stunning. It’s even more ironic given the person asking the question knows the answer.

8 billion people use fiat currencies because they have to. If you don’t pay your taxes, in fiat mandated, you end up in prison. 

Do you see the irony yet?

Bitcoin advocates believe Bitcoin will be money despite the fact that governments want to be paid in fiat, not Bitcoin.

While taunting gold, Dylan magically believes that governments will accept Bitcoin as money having trashed gold as money. 

Dylan is not alone. Nearly the entire set of crypto advocates believes that Bitcoin is money or will eventually be money.

A Word About Never

I hate using the word “never” but in this case I believe it applies. “Bitcoin has yet to succeed as money, and never will.” 

Will any major governments ever accept Bitcoin as money and demand payment in it? 

I think not because it would lessen their control over people. 

Is Anyone Paid in Bitcoin?

It’s theoretically possible but in practice almost never. There is a huge difference between being paid in dollars with that converted to Bitcoin than being paid in Bitcoin.

If you have a contract that pays Bitcoin Per Hour I will accept that as being paid in Bitcoin. Otherwise, that’s not what’s happening. 

Can You Pay Taxes In Bitcoin?

No, you cannot, except perhaps in meaningless setups like El Salvador. Even there, is anyone actually doing so?

Fundamentally, except by direct barter, you generally cannot pay any bill or buy anything with Bitcoin. 

Before you make a fool of yourself rebutting that statement, read it over and over until you get it. 

I have seen Tweet threads where people claim “Every transaction I made this year was in Bitcoin.” 

Well, it didn’t happen. But I can rephrase that so that it is accurate. “Every transaction I made this year involved Bitcoin”.

That’s quite different. Behind the scenes, you have to sell Bitcoin for fiat and pay in fiat. The only time that is not true is direct barter. 

Here’s an example. You have Bitcoin and want to buy a used car from an individual. That person loves Bitcoin and will hold it.

There is no increase in supply or demand of Bitcoin as a result of this transaction.

This adds another layer of irony. The person trading Bitcoin (trading = barter) would rather have a used car than Bitcoin.

Delusion of the Day

Anyone who truly believes Bitcoin is good for the environment or can be used to stabilize the grid is truly delusional.

Miner Bankruptcies

Some miners go bankrupt because they borrowed money to buy mining equipment.

If the price of Bitcoin doesn’t cover interest + electricity costs, then the mining firms exist the business go bankrupt.

Echo Chamber

Every day the echo chamber on Twitter gets louder and louder. One person Tweeted that a $1 million price prediction for Bitcoin was bearish. 

What’s going on should be obvious. 

These echo chambers primarily consist of HODLers seeing the value of their Bitcoin plummet.

They try to help their cause (sucker in more greater fools), with ridiculous price projections and patently false comments about supply, demand, hash rates, etc. 

Once trapped inside these echo chambers, it’s very difficult to escape. People believe what they want to believe rather than accept they made a mistake.

A Word About Always 

Looking Ahead

Looking ahead, I cannot tell you if sentiment towards, stocks, gold, or Bitcoin will rise or fall in 2023 and beyond. 

Importantly, no one else can either. At a minimum, it’s best to stay away from shills and their million dollar price tags.

But one thing I can say is the Fed is after speculative assets. It makes no difference if the Fed’s intent is direct or indirect. 

The Fed has repeated commitments to hiking and reducing inflation. It is reducing its balance sheet. The prices of houses and rent are too high in its mind. 

Speculative assets tend not to do well in such environments. Cathie Wood’s ARK fund and Bitcoin seem to be in the same boat. 

This doesn’t mean it’s impossible for Bitcoin to decouple from the setup, but until the Fed pivots and perhaps until the huge speculators like Michael Saylor and his leveraged bet get wiped out you are swimming upstream with liquidity and wind in your face. 

Are You Keeping the Faith in Cathie Wood’s ARK?

ARKK chart courtesy of StockCharts.Com, annotations by Mish

Some never had faith in ARK or Cathie Wood to begin with. But if you did, do you still?

For discussion please see Are You Keeping the Faith in Cathie Wood’s ARK?

As a thought exercise, Are You Keeping the Faith in Bitcoin? (or Tesla or technology or gold or anything)

If so, why? Are you caught in an echo chamber? 

Number One Investment Idea For 2023

Please see Here’s My Number One Investment Idea For 2023 for a discussion of echo chambers.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
desertsteve
desertsteve
3 years ago
Central banks buy and hold gold not Bitcoin. Governments have assets, tax receipts and militaries plus they have the ability to make laws outlawing threats to their control, like Bitcoin. Bitcoin proponents remind me of the mainstream media propagandists on MSDNC. Deep down they know the truth but they are so caught up in their lies and echo chambers they just have to keep telling more lies to themselves and everyone who will listen to keep it going. To your point Mish, they can’t get out. We all know and have seen this movie before in various forms and places. It doesn’t end well. However it can go on for a very long time. There simply a lot of fools out there. Fools raise and educate more fools and so it grows and grows. Only a major shock can sometimes jolt some of them out of it. The problem is the shock is not isolated to just fools.
Almost 1/3 of the U.S. population on welfare and growing. Those specific fools think it will go on forever. They don’t understand basic math. As they increase in size they decrease the size of those of us who are paying in to prop them up. It doesn’t end well.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Are You Keeping the Faith in Cathie Wood’s ARK?”
I am keeping my faith in parabolic moves. Per the ARKK chart, the bubble always bursts and deflates.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
@Dennis_Porter: “2021: No miners in Texas, record cold, grid destabilized, 246 recorded deaths

2022: Miners in Texas, record cold, grid stabilized, no recorded deaths

This is the headline everyone should be shouting: #Bitcoin miners stabilize the grid and save lives.”

Get your shot of Bitcoin today. It’s safe and effective.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
A ‘bitcoin’ will be money when government owns/controls the supply. Until then, ‘bitcoin’ is tolerated as a fad, not unlike trading Beanie Babies. Eventually, the Beanie Baby sentiment faded and the fad ended…
Some would say, the same is true of gold. However, governments and central banks accumulate the relic of Midas as a store of value–no other reason. Which raises the obvious question… why would government need an additional store of value besides its own money?
Regarding the ‘halving’ issue. Since halving is 100% predictable, if halving was to affect the value of a bitcoin in the future, it would already be priced in. Logic alone says halving has no impact on the bitcoin price…
Bader
Bader
3 years ago
I’m pretty sure the author misses half of the equation for monetary supply in his assessment. Bitcoin supply increases, but so does currency supply. The difference is the supply of bitcoin is decreasing, while the supply of USD is increasing, and recently at record rates. That is where the demand comes from when considering Bitcoin Halving is the difference in the increase in money supply between Bitcoin and fiat currencies. I don’t currently own any Bitcoin, so this isn’t just a Bitcoin Maxi getting defensive and in denial from a bad investment. I totally understand why that crowd leads people to conclude that speculation is the only price driver for crypto currencies. Despite the fact that the crazies currently run the show, the networks behind ETH and Bitcoin were built by some extremely intelligent individuals who do indeed understand the concept of hard money. They have in fact taken market fundamentals and macro economics into their design (with the exception of Bitcoin not having been tested for network functionality and no actual plan in terms of network verification with no reward for when the distribution cap is reached). The author is also a little biased when it comes to miners. Some miners are certainly unprofitable, in fact lots are right now. But not all are selling their Bitcoin. There is likely to be an upcoming miner consolidation, but the companies with access to cheap power and unencumbered growing Bitcoin Holdings like Hut 8 will come out stronger while the unprepared like Core Scientific fold, selling their assets on the cheap for the leaner companies to pick up.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Bader
Being knowledgeable about crypto does not make one smart.
Bitcoin masquerades as an asset–a dubious mix of digital product and service. I think of Bitcoin as Microsoft Word, 2008 edition, with the addition that some people subscribe divine value to it. However, unlike Word, Bitcoin was initially given away, could not be hacked (so far), could not be used to produce other goods or services of lasting economic value, and was never updated.
The fact is, Bitcoin (in the USA) dies to zero when the gov’t decides, or when a ‘better’ coin arrives on the scene
Bader
Bader
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
being knowledgeable about anything doesn’t necessarily make anyone smart. Being intelligent to envision an alternative money supply in the wake of the 08 financial crises that could potentially prevent the next one that involves an entirely non existant technology is a level of awareness and understanding that very few have. On other coins replacing Bitcoin- certainly, we already have them. ETH is harder, having a lower rate in increase of supply than Bitcoin. It’s also better for the environment, has much greater utility and has a development path that should in theory provide the network with viable transaction speeds for everyday purchases with the ability for automatic bill payments. (I said in my previous comment that I don’t own Bitcoin, I do however hold a covered option call ETH ETF in my TFSA which offers a 30% yield) That doesn’t necessarily mean there can be only one. Think of Bitcoin as a a store of value. Not very useful, but fundamentally not worthless. Whereas Ethereum is like digital cash plus digital wheat and water and gasoline. It’s useful for transactions while having a broader utility such that it is the staple of the decentralized and digital economy. Despite this- bitcoin still retains its value.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Bader
Intelligence is the ability to recognize patterns. The financial crisis of 2007-8 in no way justified an alternative FAUX-money supply. The crisis was largely about post 9/11 economics, a Fed (and gov’t) driving demand by keeping rates low and growing the ‘supply’ of money.
I will focus on the interest rate impact, but the FAUX money supply is equally important.
The effective Fed rate was under 2% by the end of 2001, and 1% by May 2004. Low rates made housing more affordable. Speculation and lenders did the rest–with a housing boom, ending in a crash–Fed rates reached 5.25% in 2007.
It didn’t take long before Fed rates were slashed– 0.16% in Dec 2008, long after Bitcoin was up and running. The rate stayed low thru 2016, when it slowly climbed to +2.0. Low rates resulted in speculation in residential real estate, and in Bitcoin. By May 2020, the Fed rate was down to 0.05%
Recognize the pattern, yet? It has to do with FAUX money games. The solution is NOT more FAUX ‘money’, no matter what it is called.
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
– Paul Simon “The Boxer”
MikeC711
MikeC711
3 years ago
BTC is low, but I learned the hard way, that low doesn’t guarantee upwards movement. I worked for a small software company and when stock crashed to $8 a share (from IPO of $18) … we were told that if it hit 6, everyone would cost average and buy a bunch of it so it would not go below that. I’m proud to say I bought at $18 (IPO price for us employees) and sold at 35 … cents. So, having been burned, I don’t tend to be a believer that something “can’t go lower”. Still, BTC refuses to die like so many elements of the crypto world.
Peacenik
Peacenik
3 years ago
Russia to allow use of Bitcoin in international trade starting next month: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/legal/russia-international-trade-bitcoin-january Also, Bitcoin is legal tender in El Salvador and other central American nations are supposedly interested (Guatemala).
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Peacenik
I think Mish’s comment was not so much that it’s “allowed” as it is who is actually using it.
It’s my understanding that central banks are buying more gold than Bitcoin.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Russia using or advocating Bitcoin is hugely negative for the price of Bitcoin. It will prompt the US and EU to look far more closely into all Bitcoin transactions.
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
Reply to  Peacenik
The point is that everything is referenced to the value of some fiat currency. When buying an item with Bitcoin, the price in currency is constant and the amount of Bitcoin required varies with the conversion rate of Bitcoin to the currency. You could just as well trade in any currency.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  PreCambrian
You might look at Zoltan Pozsar’s proposition, discussed here: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-12-26/zoltans-gold-mageddon-deconstructed
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Peacenik
I suspect Russia has a hidden agenda here; perhaps to torment the US; but more likely the goal is to test the waters prior to introducing a crypto-based (gold) unit for international trade.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Rather than yammer about the Econ 101, how about tackling a different subject: Bitcoin has traded basically sideways for the last 6 months. By contrast, among other things ARKK has been cut in half. Given what else is going on in the markets, it’s interesting to say the least that BTC has thus far hung in there while so much else in the speculative realm has collapsed. I happen to think the whole thing’s a scam, but obviously others don’t think so or BTC would be at 10,000 and falling rather than at 16,800 and change and holding steady, at least for now.
amigator
amigator
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Good points… We are probably at the stage were there are some very large investors that are doing their best to to provide a put for the price of Bitcoin. As Mish has shown the next level down is a disaster for the Bitcoiners.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
At 16-17K, we could say there’s a Bitcoin bottom.And it seems to be holding… until the next downward slam. I see the same process in gold–moving sideways in a band. I suspect it continues until something big breaks. Did you notice how quickly the Fed moved to brace Credit Suisse? Definitely cracks are forming in the banking system.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
To me, the markets for money proxies look thoroughly manipulated. I don’t know squat about the mechanics, but it seems clear that someone(s) are holding these prices in place artificially.
FlyNavy1
FlyNavy1
3 years ago
The interesting thing about Bitcoin is that the supply curve is really the demand curve (down and to the right). And that a decrease in the second derivative of supply for an asset that has no intrinsic value is irrelevant.
MBA SOFA
MBA SOFA
3 years ago
– The supply of bitcoin is limited.
May be. Probably, the programmer could change that.
– Bitcoin is the next universal currency.
The price and the small amounts of bitcoin make that impossible.
– The bitcoin is reliable and secure.
If miners don’t earn money, they switch off… and good bye bitcoin.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
If the lowest picture is the “mining site” of Core Scientific, bitcoin already contributed to the real economy!
They had to dig a hole, and bild the facility.
Source: My Krugman Dictonary.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Would it not have been much simpler to break a large number of windows and drive the economy with more employed glaziers?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
You can build a factory, then break the windows or burn it down.
Also from Krugman Dictionary.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.