Economics Professor Proposes Price Controls as a Powerful Weapon to Contain Inflation

Isabella Weber, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, trots out proven economic nonsense in a Guardian article.     

Please consider her economically illiterate proposal: We Have a Powerful Weapon to Fight Inflation: Price Controls. It’s Time We Use It

Inflation is near a 40-year high. Central banks around the world just promised to intervene. However, a critical factor that is driving up prices remains largely overlooked: an explosion in profits. In 2021, US non-financial profit margins have reached levels not seen since the aftermath of the second world war. This is no coincidence. The end of the war required a sudden restructuring of production which created bottlenecks similar to those caused by the pandemic. Then and now large corporations with market power have used supply problems as an opportunity to increase prices and scoop windfall profits. 

The White House Council of Economic Advisers suggests that the best historical analogy for today’s inflation is the aftermath of the second world war. Then and now there was pent up demand thanks to high household savings.

President Truman was aware of the risks of ending price controls. On 30 October 1945, he warned that after the first world war, the US had “simply pulled off the few controls that had been established, and let nature take its course”. And he urged, “The result should stand as a lesson to all of us. A dizzy upward spiral of wages and the cost of living ended in the crash of 1920 – a crash that spread bankruptcy and foreclosure and unemployment throughout the Nation.” Nevertheless, price controls were pulled in 1946, again triggering inflation and a boom-bust cycle.

Today, there is once more a choice between tolerating the ongoing explosion of profits that drives up prices or tailored controls on carefully selected prices. Price controls would buy time to deal with bottlenecks that will continue as long as the pandemic prevails. Strategic price controls could also contribute to the monetary stability needed to mobilize public investments towards economic resilience, climate change mitigation and carbon-neutrality. The cost of waiting for inflation to go away is high. Senator Manchin’s withdrawal from the Build Back Better Act demonstrates the threat of a shrinking policy space at a time when large scale government action is in order. Austerity would be even worse: it risks manufacturing stagflation. We need a systematic consideration of strategic price controls as a tool in the broader policy response to the enormous macroeconomic challenges instead of pretending there is no alternative beyond wait-and-see or austerity.

Price Controls Never Work    

Never. How many times do we have to prove this?

Nixon tried them, so did Venezuela, Argentina, and countless other nations. 

There are however, conditions in which price controls might seem to work. 

Conditions Under Which Price Controls “Seem” to Work

  • Price controls are set high enough that they weren’t needed. 
  • The supply constraints or the issue resulting in higher prices was on the verge of being fixed by the market anyway.

Isabella Weber was soundly and repeatedly blasted on Twitter for her nonsense.

Shortages and Black Markets

If the government sets prices too low there will be shortages. Venezuela provides a huge case in point where the official price of gas is a dime. 

Try getting any for a dime. 

Not only do price controls lead to shortages, they lead to black markets where people are willing to pay a higher price and do. 

Fundamental Issues

  1. Interest rates are too low
  2. We had three rounds of stimulus overkill
  3. Pandemic lockdowns cause labor shortage
  4. Productivity going to hell because of boomer retirements 
  5. More regulations under Biden

Law of Bad Ideas 

In 2014 I proposed a Law of Bad Ideas

Law of Bad Ideas: Bad ideas don’t go away until they have been tried and failed multiple times, and generally not even then.

Corollary One: Left alone, bad ideas get worse over time.

Corollary Two: The overwhelming desire to implement bad ideas leads to compromises guaranteed to make things worse.

Corollary Three: Those in positions of political power not only have the worst ideas, they also have the means to see those ideas are implemented.

Corollary Four: The worse the idea, the more likely it is to be embraced by academia and political opportunists.

Corollary Five: No politically acceptable idea is so bad it cannot be made worse.

Today I propose a couple new corollaries

  • For every problem there is at least one economically preposterous idea on how to fix it!
  • For every problem an economically illiterate person attacks the symptoms. 

When I first saw the Guardian headline, I thought it was clickbait nonsense to generate reads. Unfortunately, Weber is serious as well as seriously delusional.

She did not mention any of the five fundamental issues. Instead she attacked prices, a symptom of the problem.

Weber is not fit to teach at the University of Massachusetts or anywhere else.

4,000 Years of Price Control

Every Measure of Real Interest Rates Shows the Fed is Out of Control

If you want to understand the key issue, please see Every Measure of Real Interest Rates Shows the Fed is Out of Control

You might also wish to consider Food! What’s in Your Basket and How Much is Inflation Eating?

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

41 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
megaculpa
megaculpa
3 years ago
Another corollary:   There is no economic idea so stupid that the Guardian will not print it.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  megaculpa
Ditto every other still remaining “newspaper.” Like in any other totalitarian dystopia; truth, and even basic intelligence and competence, are of the first victims.
xbizo
xbizo
3 years ago
Mish,
I think one point is off.  Productivity is actually outstanding right now.  We are putting out the same level of output as 2019 with fewer workers.  And it will get better.  Robot factories are going full bore to replace service work.  Boomer retirements will be absorbed.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  xbizo
“We are putting out the same level of output as 2019 with fewer workers.”
Of what? Debt?
Try to measure output in anything real and hard to fake. Like freeway miles constructed. Or housing units built in desirable locations. Or airplanes built. Or perhaps the most fundamental of all, increases median free energy consumption per person; which has historically always been THE metric for wealth. It’s how we “know” the industrial revolution resulted in increased wealth.
While differences from 2019 may not rise above the noisefloor, compare to the decades post WW2: Back when wealth was still being created in the US, instead of simply being burned by negative-value-add rank morons on Fed welfare.
Claiming “output” is increased, when “output” is measured in units which can cheaply be printed out of thin air by the ones doing the measuring, is trivial. By that class of metrics, Venezuela and North Korea is no doubt doing great as well. But, by any harder to fake measure, which have stood anything resembling the test of time, “we” are simply not growing at all. Haven’t been since 1971, for entirely obvious reasons.
xbizo
xbizo
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Well, that’s an optimistic outlook.  But if the only thing counted is hard goods or energy, you will miss counting services and intangible assets.  You miss technology improvements that reduce energy usage per capita.  Certainly, counting energy usage per person is a different way to measure.   And I think that viewpoint will have a person investing in the least productive areas of the economy.  We are in a turning point to a new economy with first generation technology being replaced by much, much more efficient technology that reaches way, way more people.
But that is not the point that I was making.  My point is that fewer workers are now producing at least the same amount of goods as before.  That is higher productivity and that leads to increased wealth, lower inflation.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
Price Controls may not have worked anywhere, ever, but that doesn’t mean that they won’t “work” in KlownWorld.
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Call_Me
Call_Me
3 years ago
It’s always about ‘controlling’ the price, never about stabilizing the purchasing power of the currency.  Much like western medicine, this is an effort to treat the symptoms instead of addressing the underlying cause!
Call_Me_Al
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
At my store, everything can be purchased at the low low price of $0.00. That’s right. No price gouging.
At present, all items are out of stock…
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
Breaking up monopolies and duopolies is a much better way to go.   
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
3 years ago
That we are seeing such articles in the media it is a blatant testimony of the intellectual bankruptcy of our nation.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Salary costs are a price for the university so maybe we should block economic professors salaries for five years and see if she is still for price controls.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Today, there is once more a choice between tolerating the explosion of profits that drives up prices…”
She is gaming the public. It isn’t an explosion of profits that is driving up prices. The price of lumber skyrocketed due to a lack of available supply. Used car prices skyrocketed when car-less people scrambled to get out of New York City and needed wheels. When demand outstrips supply, prices will fly.
“President Truman was aware of the risks of ending price controls.”
So don’t create them, then the risks of removing them can’t occur.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
time to reincarnate nixon, cheney and rummy.   the original 70s boys of price controls.    anyone who is caught up on D v R differences in this cmpire has been had.    there is no difference.    we are argentina.   
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
And the BBB would make us Argentina on steroids.  Why does the liberal economics playbook only include failed ideas from the past?  You’d think an economist would at least remember Econ 101 and what happens when you give away money to people not producing anything.  The Democrat party is proving Einstein’s definition of insanity:  doing the same thing again and again and expecting a different result.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
A cycle comes full circle. What is old becomes new again.
They got rid of Glass Steagall, so that what happened in the late 1920’s, could happen again. Called it Modernization Act. Just put new lipstick on an old pig, to market it. Maybe they can put some new lipstick on price controls, to market them as well. Call them safe and effective.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
My appriciation of academic degrees suffered another tumble. Not that it was high to begin with.
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Doesn’t AOC allegedly have a degree in Economics?  She clearly spent more time on her back than in the library.
1-shot
1-shot
3 years ago
Price controls are a REALLY bad idea. They didn’t work in the 70’s and they won’t work now.  Let the markets work out the imbalances themselves. If you think the FED controlling interest rates is bad, just imagine them controlling, rents, fuel, food, etc. – a perfect recipe for DISASTER!!!
The old saying is true “The cure for high prices is high prices.”
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Reply to  1-shot
True statement, 1-shot, so long as you don’t have barriers to new business by government regulation and unions.  However, high prices can still be an incentive for Chinese, Taiwanese, and other countries who want to manufacture and sell goods here.  No, there won’t be any new jobs from those new businesses, but they could help control prices.
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
They’ve been trying a form of price control in the UK Energy sector with the Government’s OFGEM price cap. They can’t raise the cap quick enough so as at the 3rd December 28 suppliers have gone bust during 2021. https://www.theenergyshop.com/guides/which-energy-suppliers-have-gone-bust
If you can’t increase supply or reduce demand, the only other method to deal with inflation is rationing. Raising interest rates is a sledgehammer to crack a nut method of reducing demand. They clearly don’t want to do that in any meaningful way, which is why they’re hoping that rising prices themselves will curtail demand. 
thimk
thimk
3 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Interesting ,  The many of the busted companies  where acquired by British/Scottish gas . Yes price controls could be a weapon of mass destruction and  could consolidate monopolistic  power into the hands of a few including government .  Britain’s largest casualty, Bulb Energy Ltd., has been nationalized by the Johnson administration, costing about 1.7 billion. As i recall china was similarly effected by price controls .
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Reply to  thimk
What caught them out, as your link pointed out, was that they mostly sold fixed priced contracts ( 1 or 2 years) to their customers, but didn’t lock in the price of their supply which soared. Although the big companies have taken over many of the customers they can’t profitably honour the existing contracts either. Their new customers will have to pay more eventually and the price cap will have to go up or more will go bust. So it’s not really price controls consolidating monopolistic power, it’s just that the big boys have deeper pockets and managed their risk properly. 
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Russia is building pipelines as fast as possible.  They’ll soon have so much of Europe dependent on them for energy, they’ll be able to do anything they want to Ukraine or anyone else, without fear of retribution of any kind.  Look how Germany is kissing Russian A$$ already, as they’ve done away with almost all their nuclear reactors and only burn coal in secret generating plants (in former East Germany?) and have no other way to heat their homes and businesses than Russian gas.
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
Yes too many eggs in one basket is never a good idea but it might not be as bad as you fear, Russia wants to sell it’s Gas too. 
Anon1970
Anon1970
3 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
In 2001, Pacific Gas & Electric went bankrupt when its wholesale cost for electricity exceeded the rates it could charge to its customers under California Public Utility Commission regulations.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
The result of Nixon’s price controls: Alan Greenspan’s Whip Inflation Now buttons.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Alan Greenspan was for market for everything, except the price of money which he tighly controlled. 
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
“WIN” Whip Inflation Now was a Gerald Ford Statement
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I’ll bet there’s a shipping container full of those old WIN buttons somewhere.  GOP should dig them up and start distributing to the Dems in congress.
Anon1970
Anon1970
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Arthur Burns was the Fed chairman when Ford was president.
Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago
I had to do a double take when I read the title of this article. It’s nice to throw ideas out there for discussion but wow. I was alive in the 70’s.
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Reply to  Jackula
I was a working adult in the 1970’s.  Bought a house we couldn’t really afford in 1973.  Sold it three years later as the value was up 61% from what we paid, and we bought a bigger house we couldn’t afford.  That’s what you did when you were confident your next raise would make you whole again.  We stopped trading up just in time (lucky, not smart) and were not one of the hundreds of thousands who bought homes at the peak and became almost instantly upside down in their mortgages and saw foreclosed homes across the street sold for 20% less than they owed on their similar home.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
3 years ago
Just another reason why I didn’t stick around for a phd
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
I KNEW this was going to be the next bright idea the Biden politburo trotted out. I think I mentioned it here a month ago. 
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
You did and so have quite a few others. It’s the natural progression of bad ideas.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Ugh… I’d starve. I am physically incapable of waiting in a long line.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
She just graduated a couple of years ago and out to make her name. A good way to do that these days is to become controversial and loved by the ultra Left and she is off to the tenure track. Her phone number is listed on her faculty web page which probably means he is inviting mean calls. 
BowserB46
BowserB46
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Wouldn’t it be handy if someone could publish the home address and phone of everyone in congress?
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
I agree that price controls are a bad idea. There is just no good method to insure a fair price. The one exception may be in health care where everyone makes money anyway and there really is no price discovery since prices are not known until after the fact.
There is one method that the government has that can help prevent high prices and that is good anti-monopoly and anti-trust enforcement. This needs to be enforced continually, not just when prices are high or a “pro-consumer” administration is in the White House. Competition is good for business and good for the nation in the long term.
fibsurfer
fibsurfer
3 years ago
I have been living in Argentina for the last 8 years and US is starting to make the same mistakes. Price controls are the least of our worries, government mandated salary increases is the one you never come back from. Good luck everyone.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.