Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

What Will It Take to Break the Housing Market?

Highest Annual Sales Since 2006

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports Annual Existing-Home Sales Hit Highest Mark Since 2006.

Key Highlights 

  • In 2021, existing-home sales totaled 6.12 million – an increase of 8.5% from the prior year and the highest annual level since 2006.
  • At the end of December, the inventory of unsold existing homes fell to an all-time low of 910,000, which is equivalent to 1.8 months of the monthly sales pace, also an all-time low since January 1999.
  • In December, existing-home sales on a seasonally adjusted annualized rate slowed to 6.18 million, a 4.6% decrease from November.

Housing Snapshot

NAR Optimistic 

  • “December saw sales retreat, but the pull back was more a sign of supply constraints than an indication of a weakened demand for housing,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist. “Sales for the entire year finished strong, reaching the highest annual level since 2006.”
  • “This year, consumers should prepare to endure some increases in mortgage rates,” Yun cautioned. “I also expect home prices to grow more moderately by 3% to 5% in 2022, and then similarly in 2023 as more supply reaches the market.”
  • “We saw inventory numbers hit an all-time low in December,” Yun said. “Home builders have already made strides in 2022 to increase supply, but reversing gaps like the ones we’ve seen recently will take years to correct.”

The NAR is always optimistic. Even right before the 2007-2010 housing crash.

Regional Breakdown

  • Northeast sales, the smallest region, fell 1.3% in December, registering an annual rate of 750,000, a 15.7% decrease from December 2020. The median price in the Northeast was $384,600, up 6.3% from one year ago.
  • Midwest sales fell 1.3% to an annual rate of 1,500,000 in December, a 2.6% decline from a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $256,900, a 10.0% climb from December 2020.
  • South sales, the largest region fell6.3% in December, posting an annual rate of 2,700,000, a drop of 5.3% from one year ago. The median price in the South was $323,000, a 20.2% ascension from one year prior.
  • West sales, the second largest region decreased 6.8% at an annual rate of 1,230,000, down 10.2% from one year ago. The median price in the West was $507,100, up 8.4% from December 2020.

Hot Market

  • Properties typically remained on the market for 19 days in December, one day more than the 18 days seen in November, and down from 21 days in December 2020. Seventy-nine percent of homes sold in December 2021 were on the market for less than a month.
  • Individual investors or second-home buyers, who make up many cash sales, purchased 17% of homes in December, up from 15% in November and up from 14% in December 2020.
  • Median price up 6.3% in the Northeast, 10% in the Midwest, 20.2% in the South, and 8.4% in the West.

What Will It Take to Sink Housing Market?

Sales are hot thanks to cheap money from the Fed, rising rent prices, speculation, fear of missing out, three rounds of fiscal stimulus, and a booming stock market.

It’s difficult to put a percentage on each of those factors but they all tie together.

If the Fed gets in 3 or 4 rate hikes, mortgage rates will go up and so will alleged affordability.

The stock market boom makes people feel wealthy and that leads to second home buying which in turn reduces supply available to first time buyers.

Fear of missing out (FOMO) is always a factor in bubbles and the Fed sure blew another. Housing speculation is nowhere near as great as in 2007 but the stock market euphoria is much greater.

Finally, there does not have to be any reason for a selloff other than a change in sentiment.

Think back to 2006 when there were lines around the block for the right to enter a lottery to buy a Florida condo. Two weeks later there were no lines.

That spread from city to city and quickly nationwide. Sentiment changed and there was no apparent trigger. The pool of greater fools simply ran out.

This time the Fed will get the blame but the result will be the same. The stock market and housing will go down together and most will say “No one saw this coming.”

Negative Real Rates Are a Strong Recession Warning

In a very related post, please see Lacy Hunt: Negative Real Rates Are a Strong Recession Warning

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports?

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
“What Will It Take to Break the Housing Market?”
If people are dying of dehydration; next to an open, flowing well; it’s a pretty good sign that the “market” for water is pretty broken already…..
For any “market” to be one, there has to be freedom to demand, and to supply. Supplying houses, at prices people can afford, such that homelessness is not a bigger problem here than in bombed out Afghanistan of all places; is pretty darned trivial (perhaps not if one is genuinely stupid enough. I wouldn’t know…). Meaning, doing so is pretty darned cheap. Meaning, any “market” pricing for houses are low. They’re commodities. They may be a bit higher, perhaps, than the market price for a glass of water next to a well, but not tremendously so. Supplying either, has been a solved problem, for the remotely literate among us at least, for a century.
No matter how vigorously clueless, stupid people keep repeating to others of their pathetic ilk, that trivially reproducible $30K shacks are somehow “worth” millions on account of anything even remotely resembling a “market”; markets still requires freedom of both supply and demand. While the correct word for the sort of “system” where the local Don bans anyone else from supplying his captive saps at a lower price than his purely arbitrary usurious one, is a “racket.” Not a “market.” It will never, ever, be a “market” no matter how often the truly stupid, incompetent and useless keep repeating to themselves and other idiots that it is.
Dean_70
Dean_70
4 years ago
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
“What Will It Take to Break the Housing Market?”

Two itsy-bitsy rate hikes of 25 basis points each.   

RunnerDan
RunnerDan
4 years ago
The following would kill housing and alleviate much social tension, but won’t happen:
1) Get the government out of the marketplace (i.e., FannieMae, FreddieMac, FHA, etc.)
2) Prohibit the Fed Reserve from purchasing mortgage backed securities.  They presently own $ 2+ trillion or so.
3) Enforce mark-to-market accounting on banks and sell their assets on the courthouse steps when they aren’t in compliance.
4) Prohibit foreign buyers.
5) Heavily tax non owner occupied homes.
6) Moratorium on immigration until existing citizens are in better financial shape (include housing and student debt in the benchmark).
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
What Will It Take to Sink Housing Market?     
Require all single family residential  home/condo/duplex  be to owner occupied .
Individual investors or second-home buyers, who make up many cash sales,
purchased 17% of homes in December, up from 15% in November.
Many first time home buyers are getting “ZILLOWED” .  
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
Second residence super extra tax as all EU countries have. If it doesnt work, increase it until it does.
We do this for the water, electricity and gas, the payment is progressive, the more you consume the more it costs per unit, at least here in California.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
KTLA “news” had a story on last week about high gas bills from last month. Apparently, the unit price of natgas was higher, along with December being consistently colder than average. People interviewed said their gas bill was more than double what it typically would be. 
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
City-owned utilities generally do much better than the corporate ones.   In my town, we have city utilities for electricity.  A neighboring town has PG&E and they are getting screwed every summer!

But in the case of nat gas, we all have PG&E and so, we are all getting screwed.   There are just a few city-owned nat gas utilities in So Cal, and I would think their customers are a lot better off than those who depend on for-profit corporations like PG&E.

KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
People downsize when they retire and we have a bunch of retirements coming up. The inventory of detached existing single family homes is going to be going up for a couple of decades. Apartment/condo demand will be commensurably going up.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Health care spending is a broken window economy and is approximately 20% of GDP. This will put a damper on housing prices soon enough.
1-shot
1-shot
4 years ago
The housing market  is already “Broken”.
Scarcity of affordable buildable lots, building materials and competent labor are lowering builders’ profit margins and will continue to constrain the number of new homes built and thus sold. Buyers’ inability to find high quality existing (resale) homes to buy will keep those same buyers from putting their homes up for sale, constraining the number of existing homes for sale and sold.
Meanwhile demand and the backlog of buyers keeps growing, pushing prices higher, inventory lower and sales lower.  The market is totally out of balance and the logical resolution, building more homes, will take years. Somehow getting more resale properties on the market isn’t likely either, since no one wants to sell their best inflation hedge, their best investment and their secure place to live. The risk of being left without a new home to live in after selling a current one is very real.
I don’t see anything “fixing” the housing market any time in the next 1-2 years. Maybe overbuilding of rental properties will help, but most folks prefer owning to renting and rental rates make owning more attractive in most markets right now.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago

“How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked. 

“Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually, then suddenly.”

From Ernest Hemingway’s novel The Sun Also Rises

The current rise in Real Estate has not been in tandem with productivity and expressed creativity. High debt loads are hampering true productive investment and creativity. Paying a high price for a house or land that was made many years ago is not producing anything; it is just assessing a higher number. Same goes for stocks. Paying a higher price for shares has not created anything so is not a collective investment because for every buyer there is a seller. Nothing new has been created by the transaction. I do not see a lot of vibrancy in our economy. I see a lot of languishing.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
What difference does it make if you buy a home/stock for a more expensive price or a less expensive one. In both cases nothing get produced. In fact nothing gets produced when you buy a used car or any other used item (garage sale, eBay, flea markets, Goodwill etc).
Also just because homes have risen faster that productivity lately, how do you know that homes weren’t under priced before and are correctly priced now? The prices now mostly reflect historically low interest rates. If rates were 5-8% as they often were in the very recent (and far past) then home prices would not have been able to rise because most people buy a monthly payment (ie what they can afford monthly) and don’t really buy the final home price.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
This time the Fed will get the blame but the result will be the same. The stock market and housing will go down together and most will say “No one saw this coming.” 
Yes.
Anyone else notice POTUS put Powell in the hot seat in yesterday’s presser?
Powell been blaming inflation mainly on supply constraints (don’t blame us .., or our Krazy monetary policy).
Take note – this quote from PREPARED remarks.  Not off the cuff answer to question that needs to be walked back.
“A critical job in making sure that the elevated prices don’t become entrenched rests with the Federal Reserve, which has a dual mandate: full employment and stable prices.”
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
The US has 35 million people, roughly speaking, in their prime home buying years. That is a fundamental difference between now and the years leading up to the last housing bust. In 2006 it was 5 million less.
In 2006 30 year money was 6.4%. At the moment it’s still under 4%.
In 2006 over 6% of mortgages were 5 year ARM’s. Now that’t just 3.57%
There is talk of FHA 40 year loan money…..don’t know, but it might happen.
The predatory no-doc loans of 2006 do not exist, AFFAIK.
Just pointing out the differences, because there are some.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
PITI
Sure, the first “I” lower.
The rest??
Anyway, the 2% decline in weekly earnings (yoy) will come in handy to buy homes.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
People who can qualify are eager to buy, because the current inflation, if it persists, will price them out. I know, I have kids in their 30’s. My son is chomping at the bit, and  I think he’s right to pull the trigger now. Overpriced is relative when home prices are rising this fast.
I know it isn’t easy, but a house with a low interest 30 year loan against it is THE best inflation hedge you can get. A market crash would be deflationary…..for a year, maybe. That was the case in 2009, after the housing bust. One year and it was back to the races.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
More than a year.
Anyway, demographics working against ever increasing home prices … slowing AND aging population.
A LOT of boomers looking to unload the 4BR 3 BA in the coming years.
Property tax (increases) a definite issue in many areas.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I would imagine in some states the elderly are pushed out by higher taxes. California’s prop 13 protects the long term owner but makes new buyers pay way more in property taxes than the previous owner. This will come into the calculus as well.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Median price peaked June 2007 which meant 2007 was a net inflationary year. Median price fell and it bottomed in Q4 2008, which was the ONLY net deflationary year.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
If he has a good job (not just pay wise but safe from being laid off / company going under etc) and isn’t likely to move in the next 5-10 years then I’d agree with your assessment that it’s a good time for him to buy.
The thing people forget is that if you just ‘sit in cash’ waiting for prices to fall you are losing 5+% a year of your money to inflation so you have to invest (risk it) it somewhere (stocks, crypto etc) just to tread water while you hope for prices to fall. Plus as Eddie has said, people who are borrowing at 3% are literally getting paid because they’d be losing 2+% to inflation AND the value of their asset is highly likely to rise so they make out on both ends.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
“good time for him to buy.”
Sure, buy at the top.  I prefer to buy things when on sale.
My argument is NOT that long term there will be no appreciation (there will be), but right now we are sitting in 2005 / 2006 / 2007 territory for home price insanity.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
bingo.   smells like 2006 to me.    i remember the crazy market in phoenix where  i lived went up cuckoo in 2004 to 2005……..leveled off for 2006  and plunged in 2007 unitl 2012.      smells like this now nationwide.    i’ve owned and sold, investment properties for decades in about 4 cities.   i’m selling off all mine this year.   i suspect i’ll be buying back in future years at half off or more.   
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The peak in real real estate happened 1Q 2007 …. the bottom of the trough happened in Q2 2012 ….  it was not until Q3 2016 that prices once again regained the former peak. It was almost 9 years not 1 year. Prices continued to decline even after the Great Recession was over. I remember all the really hot markets, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Florida got hammered. I think hot markets are very susceptible unless the market is driven by investment in something other than service sector industries, and retirement communities.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“The predatory no-doc loans of 2006 do not exist, AFFAIK.”
Not needed when financial conditions this loose.  So glad they’ll never tighten ….
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“What Will It Take to Sink Housing Market?”
Time.
Existing home sales are counted when closed.  So contracts on these homes mostly signed in October / November.  More importantly mortgage rate locked in THEN.  Rates chopped around during that time span before surging early December till now. Average  30 yr rate ~ 60 bps higher than THEN.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Excellent point

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.