Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Existing Home Sales Dive 7.2 Percent Wiping Out January’s Big Month

Existing home sales courtesy of Trading Economics

Existing-Home Sales Fade 7.2% in February

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports Existing-Home Sales Fade 7.2% in February

Key NAR Highlights

  • In February, existing-home sales fell to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.02 million. Sales were down 7.2% from the prior month and 2.4% from one year ago.
  • The inventory of unsold existing homes slightly increased to 870,000 as of the end of February, equivalent to 1.7 months of supply at the current monthly sales pace.
  • The median existing-home sales price rose to $357,300, up 15.0% from one year ago. This marks 120 consecutive months of year-over-year price increases, the longest-running streak on record.

Lawrence Yun Comments

  • “Housing affordability continues to be a major challenge, as buyers are getting a double whammy: rising mortgage rates and sustained price increases,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist. “Some who had previously qualified at a 3% mortgage rate are no longer able to buy at the 4% rate.
  • “Monthly payments have risen by 28% from one year ago – which interestingly is not a part of the consumer price index – and the market remains swift with multiple offers still being recorded on most properties.”

Yun is the NAR’s chief economist.

30-Year Mortgage Rates

Mortgage rates courtesy of Mortgage News Daily

30-Year Mortgage Rate Changes

  • 2022-03-18: 4.50%
  • 2022-03-01: 3.90%
  • 2022-02-02: 3.66%
  • 2022-01-03: 3.29%
  • 2021-12-01: 3.18%
  • 2021-11-01: 3.18%

Existing home sales are recorded at closing. New home sales are recorded at signing.

February existing home sales reflect mortgages locked in one to two months ago. With reasonable timing, rates were between 3.0% and 3.25% 

Get Used to Declining Home Sales

“Some who had previously qualified at a 3% mortgage rate are no longer able to buy at the 4% rate,” said Yun.

A rate lock today will be at a whopping 4.50%.

Demand Destruction

When someone buys an existing home, they paint, buy new furniture, fix up the lawn, buy new cabinets, buy new carpet, etc. 

Such purchases will stall. 

Fed’s Real Dilemma

Will the Fed strive to steepen the yield curve?

I do not think so. This was the subject of a friendly 4-way discussion. 

For details please see Diving Into a Seemingly Strong Housing Report and the Fed’s Real Dilemma

The above link pertains to housing starts and permits.

The data looked strong but it reflects ability to buy at a 3.0% mortgage rate. 

Now what?

Fed’s Dilemma

  • Guess what folks. We are building single family units that hardly anyone can afford.
  • Where is the supply of apartments? Affordable rentals? Less than pre-pandemic!
  • The Fed cannot build homes.
  • The Fed can try to cool demand for homes and home building, but a seemingly strong housing market is one of the few things the Fed has. 

Hawkish Fed? No, This Was a Dovish Fed Meeting

The Fed penciled in 7 rate hikes this year and 4 more next year. Who believes this?

That was my comment in Hawkish Fed? No, This Was a Dovish Fed Meeting

The Fed is trying desperately to thread a needle. If you prefer consider the Fed tiptoe through the tulips.

Actually, an attempt to walk a tightrope in 80 mile-per-hour winds might be more like it.

A Dramatic Yield Curve Transition From a Steep Front to Back End Flatness

One of my readers commented “rate hikes will be transitory”. So will QT, assuming it ever gets off the ground in the first place.

QT and a steepening yield curve at the far end (the only place it can occur), would destroy housing.

Arguably, it’s already happening even though existing home sales reflect a 3.25% rate, not a 4.50% rate.

For more discussion. please see A Dramatic Yield Curve Transition From a Steep Front to Back End Flatness

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
TCW
TCW
4 years ago
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
Real estate is LOCAL.
“National” figures mean nothing.
I am in west-central FL and houses stay on the market for less than  a week and get CASH offers at 100% or more  of the asking price.
My wife is a realtor and President of our county realtors association, so I am not talking out of my a**.
Fish1
Fish1
4 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
So we have just completed 120 consecutive months of home price increases.  I know you have been around here long enough to ask this question:  Does this current RE market/frenzy look familiar? 
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Here in my PNW small town, I’m seeing about 3x as many houses coming up for sale as this time last year, and they are now lasting more than a week, which was unheard of.  Seeing price drops too.  Something may be up…
zeno
zeno
4 years ago
In Indiana, the cost of construction of a single family house has rise to about $200 to $250 a square foot. The median house size built in the United States is now over 2000 square feet.  So, before you take into account the cost of the lot, a house will cost over $400,000 to build.  It’s become impossible to build an “affordable” house for people at the lower end of the wage spectrum, even in states where property and land prices are far lower than the coastal cities. 
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  zeno
It’s possible. Just build a 1200 sf house like everyone used to live in.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  zeno
thank you uncle F(r)ed  !
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Many wonderful people will no longer be with us soon. It is estimated that 164,000 Baby Boomers will die this month. Many will die broke with nothing to leave their heirs. Still others will have lived lives beyond the wildest dreams. Many rentals will have new occupants, and owner occupied dwellings will be sold. Housing is hitting a tidal wave of demographics that will be with us for the next 14 years at least.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
“Guess what folks. We are building single family units that hardly anyone can afford.”
Supply and demand being what they are, the solution to too high prices, is always to build more of them. Problem is, we’re not. Not even close.
The combination of simultaneously 1)not building enough, AND 2)robbing those who want to buy a home into destitution, for the benefit of those who already have one, certainly is a surefire way of guaranteeing that people won’t be able to afford them, though. Par for the course for the DumbAge, I suppose…
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
I was going to comment on a previous post, “https://mishtalk.com/economics/diving-into-a-seemingly-strong-housing-report-and-the-feds-real-dilemma“, with something about household formation rates, population growth, income trends, etc being usurped by Fed interest-rate policy and distorting the housing market. 
Now, this timely article by Mish. It is almost surreal watching the housing market, people borrowing $600K on lower-middle-class incomes. The demand-supply-price-quantity mechanism is corrupted. The end result will be a massive economic dislocation.
“Oh the houses you’ll buy! There is fun to be done!
There are lawns to be mowed. There are pools to be built. And the
magical things you can do with that McMansion will make you the winning-est
winner of all.”
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I think a “massive economic dislocation” is what we experienced in 2006-07-08…
Not the same reasons today, but the effect on the classes at the middle and below may be just as severe.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“Guess what folks. We are building single family units that hardly anyone can afford.”
That fits in with, you will own nothing and be happy.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
If no one can afford them then wait a while and then they will be able to afford them.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Going from 3% to 4.5% means housing affordability for most just dropped by 33%. If you could buy a $600,000 home based on paying 18k/yr in interest means you can now only afford a $400,000 home.
BowserB46
BowserB46
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
And this is just the beginning.  The Fed has promised many more rate hikes to combat inflation (I guess the 20 year run of the Fed supporting the stock market is just about over.)
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
4 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46

In a normal functioning market, this would mean the $600,000 house drops to $400,000 if it is to sell. 

StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  RunnerDan
In a normal, functioning market; heck in ANY “market”; goods which costs $100K to manufacture, don’t sell for neither $600,000 nor $400,000.
Only products distributed by way of rackets, like housing and cocaine, have prices this dislodged from economic fundamentals.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
For most reading here this means they will purchase a $400k home.
Those that could afford a $120k home 3-4 months ago don’t get a home.
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
4 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
In a normal functioning market, the $120K home prices sink to what today’s $120K buyers can afford.  However, the housing market can be rigged through many means: 1) Government steps in to allow people to stay in “their homes” for 3-5 years without paying the mortgage.  2) Requirements for GSE’s get looser, still.  3) Fed steps in and buys trillions worth of mortgage backed securities.
And the great Ponzi continues…
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
 “Sales were down 7.2% from the prior month and 2.4% from one year ago”
“The median existing-home sales price rose to $357,300, up 15.0% from one year ago.”
Just like last go round (lead in to GFC).  Prices stay high (sticky prices) while volume dries up.  How long will this interlude last? … before the price cuts commence? 
RE.Bubble.2 … your days numbered. 
BowserB46
BowserB46
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I wonder how many of the latest home buyers are going to be upside down in their mortgages a year from now?  I’ve seen prices paid for resales in my neighborhood.  All I could think was (1) SUCKERS and (2) there go my property taxes next year!  (Texas funds most stuff with property taxes instead of income tax, so property tax can be hugely harmful–it’s caused many a retired couple out of the homes they had lived in for decades.)
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
Many places have a cap on the amount property taxes can go up each year. We have that here. Don’t know about TX.
BowserB46
BowserB46
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
There’s an annual cap, but there are also loopholes.  Ask any Democrat mayor in Texas who has managed to get around it.  That was the very first thing the current mayor of Houston did.  And even an annual cap adds up–just like the CPI.  10% and prices double in seven years.  Exemptions for over 65 are a joke, especially for school taxes, which are the largest component of property tax.  Max exemption where I live is $45,000, and the tax rate is 1.4% of appraisal, with total of all taxing jurisdictions (where I live there are seven jurisdictions levying tax) is 2.9%.  A new development across the highway also has a utility district taxing at 1% with no exemptions, so there the tax rate total is 3.9%. 
Consider that when you hear Texas is great for taxes!  If you make a lot of money and can make Texas your residence, you avoid state income tax, but your “homestead” needs to be a two room shack, and your luxury “second home” should be in a different state.  Just a suggestion a friend mentioned to me.  Otherwise if you’ve saved your money and have a home that has appreciated drastically in Texas, you’ll see this state as anything but a tax haven.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
3.9% is absurd. Close to $20k/yr on a $500k home. Property taxes are probably more than annual interest for many.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
get Beto in as governor and he will fix everything right after he takes your guns.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
4 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
But the other options are no better. Oregon has a 9% income tax, but no sales tax. Washington has a 9% sales tax and no income tax. Idaho has a lower than Oregon income tax and a lower than Washington sales tax. The states get their money somehow. 
John Mauldin moved the Puerto Rico to escape taxes. How is your Spanish? 

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.