Fed Hikes by 1/4 Point as Expected, Commits to More Rate Hikes

Please consider February 1, FOMC Statement.

Recent indicators point to modest growth in spending and production. Job gains have been robust in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Inflation has eased somewhat but remains elevated.

Russia’s war against Ukraine is causing tremendous human and economic hardship and is contributing to elevated global uncertainty. The Committee is highly attentive to inflation risks.

The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. In support of these goals, the Committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 percent. The Committee anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate in order to attain a stance of monetary policy that is sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2 percent over time. In determining the extent of future increases in the target range, the Committee will take into account the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity and inflation, and economic and financial developments. In addition, the Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities, as described in its previously announced plans. The Committee is strongly committed to returning inflation to its 2 percent objective.

In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committee’s goals. The Committee’s assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.

Key Point Synopsis

  • More rate hikes sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2 percent over time.
  • The committee will take into account lags.
  • Quantitative Tightening (QT) a reduction in the Fed’s balance sheet of Treasury and agency debt (mortgage-backed securities) will continue on schedule. 
  • The committee will monitor risks.

There was nothing in the statement that was the least bit unexpected. 

One point to emphasize is the fed expects multiple hikes.

“The Committee anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate in order to attain a stance of monetary policy that is sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2 percent over time”

A Word About Lags 

I discussed lags on January 30, in How Long is the Lag Between Fed Rate Hikes and Real World Activity?

It’s not really a matter of how quickly rate increases will slow the economy, but rather how quickly rate increases will slow inflation.

I don’t know the answer, nor does anyone else.

But the higher rate hikes go and the longer they stay there, the worse the prospects are for the stock market. 

How the Fed can untangle this inflationary mess is a mystery. The negative impacts of QE cannot be easily undone.

Press Conference

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents.htm

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

53 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
david halte
david halte
3 years ago
The Fed keeps public focus on adjustments to the FFR. As short rates approach historic averages, they have less influence on inflation. Long rates that are well below average, promote inflation.
Short rates influence inflation by higher credit interest, personal debt spending is reigned-in. Corporate margin debt gambling is more expensive and reduced. An inverted yield curve prevents corporate arbitrage of long term bonds and equity yields.
Lower than average long rates keep asset prices elevated. Allows businesses to invest in risky ventures. Government continues debt spending and funds entitlement programs.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Lots of doom and gloom on this site about Tesla. Let’s have an objective look by way of the Altman Z scores, which have a very good track record of predicting bankruptcy among established manufacturers.
Tesla’s scores blow Ford and GM right smack out of the water. The Z-score, developed in 1967, and an alteration developed in 2000, is a specialized ratio analysis. Think of the DuPont ratios and Graham & Dodd. Before collecting the numbers, I’d expected that Tesla’s recent emergence from start-up mode would play havoc with their scores because the company wouldn’t have enough retained earnings. That was true until 2022, when Tesla became a financially established company in its own right.
Tesla’s market cap has distorted its scores upward, but even at the recent pullback low not too far over $100, its scores are still much higher than Ford or GM. Even if I give Tesla a 75% haircut, i.e. a $45 stock price, its scores still blow Ford and GM out of the water.
There are two Z-scores, the original and something called Z-score double prime. I will present them in order, i.e., first the original formula and then the double prime formula. If either score is below 1.1, it’s a bankruptcy signal. If the original score is above 3, it’s a healthy company signal. If “double prime” is above 2.6, it’s a healthy company. The reason for the second formula is because of changes in the corporate bond market since the late 1960s.
Ford: 0.89 / 1.27
GM: 1.24 / 1.49
Tesla: 10.98 / 12.24
Now let’s adjust market cap, which distorts Tesla’s scores upward. The numbers below keep Ford and GM’s market caps where they are, while cutting Tesla’s by 75%.
Ford: 0.89 / 1.27
GM: 1.24 / 1.49
Tesla: 4.23 / 5.6

=========

What are the formulas?
They both use some or all of the following numbers from reported financials.
1 – Working capital, i.e. current assets (-) current liabilities
2 – Total assets
3 – EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes)
4 – Market cap
5 – Total liabilities
6 – Sales
7 – Retained earnings
The original formula:
[(1/2) x 1.2] + [(7/2) x 1.4] + [(3/2) x 3.3] + [(4/5) x 0.6] + (6/2)
Z-score double prime formula:
[(1/2) x 6.56] + [(7/2) x 3.3] + [(3/2) x 6.72] + [(4/5) x 1.05]
=========
Why go through this?
1. The Altman Z-score is said to have a very good track record of predicting bankruptcy of established manufacturers. (Apologies for my redunancy on that point.)
2. The results show how weak Ford is, and that GM ain’t out of the woods yet.
2. The results show how strong Tesla is and why it’s not wise to think the company will crash and burn, pardon the pun.
3. If you get hold of the financial statement numbers from those companies and then do the ratios that make up the Z scores, you’ll see that, apart from the distortion of Tesla’s high market cap, the company’s other ratios are much better than Ford or GM’s.
=========
The limitations I can see are:
1. I don’t have experience with Z-scores. Learned about them in business school, but they turned out to be irrelevant to my subsequent career.
2. I don’t have historical Z-scores for Ford and GM to get a sense of how far they’ve fluctuated, and in particular, what they were showing before Ford all but went bankrupt in the early ’00s, and before GM went bankrupt after the Panic of 2008.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Ford, in particular, might not make it through the electric car transition. Their Z-score is flashing bankruptcy, and the high materials cost and growing competition are going to be very challenging. It looks like Tesla has figured out how to make EVs profitable. Ford? Not so much. GM? We shall see.
blacklisted
blacklisted
3 years ago
Can someone please explain how the Fed’s rate hikes are going to bring inflation down to 2%? As you consider your answer, please ask yourself who is the biggest borrower, and will rate hikes reduce their borrowing?
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  blacklisted
They intend to weaken the economy enough to reduce pricing pressures.
blacklisted
blacklisted
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
The primary cause of inflation is supply constraints and out-of-control govt spending. How does increasing rates help either cause? All they are doing is aggravating stagflation and making the sovereign debt crisis worse.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  blacklisted
Inflation is caused by creating too much money. The Fed doesn’t actually create the rates. The rates change based on how much money the Fed creates. The Fed’s creating less money, so rates rise and eventually the economy slows. Yes, it’s more complicated than that, but this is how it works.
GruesomeHarvest
GruesomeHarvest
3 years ago
The Feds main job, which is unstated, is to shift the cost of government malfeasance, and bankster excess onto the backs of the common man. It’s an institution of the powerful, by the powerful and for the powerful.
amigator
amigator
3 years ago
Central Banks holding (buying) the most Gold since 1967. Why? They are selling what to buy Gold?
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  amigator
Link?
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  amigator
mortgage bonds on their b/s………and other fx reserves. or conjuring up dough
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  amigator
Probably USD debt. After what happened to Russia, a lot of countries are leery of holding too many USD assets.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
All they gotta do is not slaughter their neighbors.
grazzt
grazzt
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
lol, there is a lot more they have to do (or not do) than that. Ask Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, or any of the other 22 nations currently under US financial sanctions.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Does anyone here use the Altman Z-scores? I am interested in useful information. I’m familiar with the formula. Has anyone applied it to investing?
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
no. but i have used the magic formula (titled as a joke), a serious guide, that has helped me identify companies that seem like they are great shorts. in other words i use it to find real gems, but sometimes i uncover obvious dogs. good luck. i’m loving the new paradigm of rates higher after 15 years of zirp. even the FX carry trade is back. and oh boy really juicy. might be my favorite trade of all time. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/magic-formula-investing.asp
Topferment
Topferment
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
If one buys only S&P 500 stocks on the magic formula buy list the results are much better.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Yeah, except when the currencies adjust “prematurely” and you find that you will lose your a$$ buying a fiat at the market to pay back your loan.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
You can’t lock in an arb on everything.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
The Fed was very clear on what they are fighting now. JPow mentioned it a few times, the services inflation continue to be too high despite goods inflation coming down. The ghost of inflation past is done and now it’s the ghost of inflation future they are fighting and that’s one thing: labor, labor, labor. I see no mention of the upswing in the JOLTS report to 11 million here which the Fed mentioned.
Today is Feb 1, which means January is over. 22 workdays in January x 10,000 boomers retiring = 220,000 people vanished from the labor force.
The Fed can’t do anything about labor shortages so it will be futile to keep raising rates but inflation will rise due to labor shortages. There will be periodic reprieves as society adjusts but we’re just getting started.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
i think that is true and a great thing. the misery index is real. infliton and unemployment. employment is gonna be strong for decades to come it seems. a good thing. inflation is bad enough. but don’t put unemployment on top of it. us geezers remember the 70s to mid 80s. nyc had 20% unemployment when graduated hs and college. had to supplement my income with days at the racetrack as i could only find work like 2 or 3 days per week. it did teach me how to be a great trader though. and the secret to life. losers win, by losing. in life and investing. hat tip to ed seykota. the greatest trader of our generations.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
I’d say Richard Dennis was.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Like it or not Soros did OK as did Miliken.
footwedge
footwedge
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Technically I believe it’s 10,000 boomers turned 65, eligible for retirement.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
JP wants to dump RRP, but one day RRP might rise to $3T before $5T, while JP is paying the primary banks only zero rates or 0.5%.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Before default, the Euro zone might dissolve. RRP & Excess reserves might create a bubble. RRP drop from $2.5T to $2T
might be a backbone
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
JP is the worst Chairman ever. Good luck getting rid of the RRP. You take cash out of RRPs, you increase reserves and the money stock.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
High beta day. If NDX weekly close below Sept 2020 and May 2022 highs & if SPX weekly close < last week close… markets risk is high.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
JP raised rates, buy US and the German rates didn’t care. SPX failed to close > Sept 12 high. The Dow closed below Aug high and Dec high.
DXY might complete it’s round trip to Mar 2015 high, before popping up.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
The 10 year US bond price is against resistance of the 200 day moving average. The yield on the 10 year US bond has made a triangle. Both conditions have the potential for a trend reversal. There is still a few months left before the 4 year cycle in the 10 year US bond yield tops.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
sounds like the wizard of oz before dorothy went to OZ. when he was just the snake oil salesman. if you believe that stuff, well thanks for the laugh. anyone who thinks they know where markets are going are really fooling themselves. ti’s gambling. nothing more. and there are great gaming theory formulas which can attempt to keep one out of debtors prison. been an FX and equity and bond, trader for decades. i eat what i kill. gave up the customers long ago. if you want a fun classic book from a century ago, read, “where are the customers yachts”. paging SBF and every huckster salesman and blogger i’ve ever read.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Enough damage is done, but now, the Fed can say ‘we didn’t break it.’
radar
radar
3 years ago
Mish, are you still expecting 2400 on the S&P?
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
Reply to  radar
All the major indexes have recently had the “golden cross”, approximately 11 months after the “death cross” pattern. If you believe in charting it is good times ahead. The better question is are you expecting 4800 in the S&P this year?
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Yes 2400 very likely IMO
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
When?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Next Tuesday 10:31 EST.
Same as when J. Wellington Wimpy pays for his burger.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
Powell: ‘We can now say for the first time that the disinflationary process has started’
Nasdaq going crazy.
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Yep that was the moment for me. Missed TQQQ and she was gone racing. IWM and QQQ extended, maybe they can test daily EMA 20 for a quick reversion profit.
dtj
dtj
3 years ago
From mortgagenewsdaily.com: MBS prices are significantly stronger so far today. This strong upward movement in MBS should result in lower mortgage rates for today.
Funny how the last few times the Fed has raised rates, mortgage rates have gone down.
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
3 years ago
Reply to  dtj
Buydowns?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  dtj
I wonder what happens to the yield curve?
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  dtj
The general trend of the 10YT & 30YFRM has been down since early Nov. This is due to everyone thinking the economy is going to tip into a recession which will lead the Fed into a pivot. As you well know, the 30YFRM just edged down to 6.04%, meaning it could easily break through 6% sometime next week.
Pulte Homes just came out today stating that they’re seeing housing starting to stabilize, and they’re going to increase their housing builds this year. I’ve been predicting this since the first of the year.
I agree with JP’s assessment. It’s all about the labor market, and for now there’s still labor and supply shortages. Anyone who thinks we’re going to have a recession this year outside of a black swan event is crazy. There’s too much governmental spending helping to boost services demand.
The Fed will raise to 5% in March and then pause. By May, inflation MAY start to form a bottom trough as will housing. IMHO, there’s a better than 50/50 chance inflation starts to slowly rise by June or July at the latest.
As I’ve said many times of late, I agree with Bullard that a 7% terminal FFR is probably needed to squash inflation. And even then a 2% core PCE target is a pipe dream.
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
No worries. Chair Powell says that “his base case is still for positive growth for 2023”
The great and powerful Oz has spoken!
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
3 years ago
Next Fed meeting is March 21/22. In the interim, all the chatter from the financial peanut gallery will be …will they (the FED) or will they not raise another 25 basis points.
And also during this time, jawboning will be the dutiful responsibility of FED governors and voting members to strongly suggest the FED has more work to do. These FED personnel are acting like “B-movie” performers, as their act is getting old and worn.
The result will be a true cacophony of noise. Will they or won’t they?
(Spoiler Alert……yes they will and it ‘may’ not be their last increase of the year.)
Esclaro
Esclaro
3 years ago
The USD dropped like a rock afterwards and gold shot upwards. What gives if more rate hikes are on the table?
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
Most think this will be the final hike.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
“The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run.”
Does it mean, inflation will have to dip below zero to compensate for the current inflation?
That would be too logical and reasonable, so the answer is a foregone conclusion.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
As expected. My guess is this will be the last rate increase for years.
Dean2020
Dean2020
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Due to deteriorating conditions that would be logical but using logic is something the Fed has never been accused of.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Dean2020
The Fed has done a good job, except when they haven’t. LOL
SAKMAN
SAKMAN
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
And that is exactly why it won’t be.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
my guess is you have no clue, nor does mish, nor do i. fed could be hiking for another year, or 3. or never again.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.