Food, Rent, and Energy Prices are Totally Outside the Fed’s Control

CPI data from BLS chart by Mish

On Wednesday the BLS released CPI data. For overall details, please see CPI Year-Over-Year Drops a Bit, But Is it Believable?

This post is a closer look at food prices. 

Year-Over-Year Seven Categories 

  • Cereals and Bakery: 10.3%
  • Meat, Poultry, Fish, Eggs: 14.3%
  • Dairy: 9.1%
  • Fruits and Vegetables: 7.8%
  • Other Food At Home: 11.0%
  • Beverages: 9.8%
  • Food Away From Home: 7.2%

CPI With a Spotlight on Food 

Chart Details 

  • CPI: 8.3%
  • CPI Excluding Food: 8.1%
  • Food: 9.4%
  • Food at Home: 10.8%
  • Food and Beverage: 9.0%

Food Components in the CPI 

Weight Details 

  • Total Weight: 13.361%
  • At Home Weight: 8.245%
  • Away From Home: 5.116%

These percentages tend to change every month. More specifically, the weights of everything typically change every month.

I covered shelter in my previous post but let’s have another look.

CPI Shelter 

Key Shelter Points

  • Year-over-year rent was only up 3.8% in January and 4.8% in April.
  • Year-over-year OER was only up 4.1% in January and 4.8% in April.
  • OER is 23.816% of the CPI in April.
  • Rent is 7.278% of the CPI in April.

OER is the mythical price one would pay to rent one’s own house from himself, unfurnished, and without utilities.

Is rent and OER only up 4.8%? If you believe that, then the CPI numbers are believable. 

OER and Rent are 31.1% of the CPI.

Inelastic Items 

Rent is inelastic. So is food. Together, those two items make up 44.5% of the CPI.

Some of my readers think the Fed can do something about rent. 

Reader comment:

 I don’t think rent is inelastic, you can share an apartment rather than have your own, or move back into your parents house, smaller or less desirable rental, etc, etc, etc.

That is a tiny impact and one hell of a way to go about it. But yes, zoomers can move back in with mom.  

Another Reader Comment: 

I disagree with the notion that the Fed is totally unable to control rents. It most definitely can, albeit with a lag. This is because rents are affected by the underlying price of the asset and by influencing interest rates (especially thanks to its gargantuan balance sheet, which can be used to affect long term interest rates) the Fed can affect the price of housing (both for individuals and investors) and by association, rents. In fact, it is the specific influence of the Fed (albeit in the opposite direction) which was a major driver in the insane run-up in housing prices we’ve seen to date, which in turn was a major contributing factor to rents skyrocketing as well.

But houses bought higher need higher rents to support them., And where are the renters going? Back home with mom? How many will doubling up? 

The Fed can do something about the demand for houses. But that means fewer houses built and more demand to rent! 

The best argument for rent stabilization is the huge numbers of houses under construction thanks to easy money. But is that enough? 

And looking at the CPI, how many rent increases have not really been priced in? Is rent really only up 4.8% from a year ago? 

Education, medical care, and motor fuel are also mostly to totally inelastic. Some  motor fuel use, especially vacation, is discretionary. Driving to work isn’t. Of course that assumes you have a job.

At least two-thirds of the CPI is inelastic (demand changes little no matter what the price is). 

Some of the rest is partially inelastic (if you really need a coat you will buy one, but you will skip on buying an extra pair of shoes or a new fishing pole if times are tough). 

Yet, somehow the Fed believes inflation expectations matter. 

Hello Fed, Inflation Expectations Are Unglued, No Longer Well Anchored

Inflation Expectations data from New York Fed, chart by Mish

On April 11, I noted Hello Fed, Inflation Expectations Are Unglued, No Longer Well Anchored

It’s a good thing for the Fed that inflation expectations don’t matter because expectations are now unglued. 

However, this also highlights the difficulty of the Fed bringing inflation under control with rate hikes. 

OER and Rent are 31.1% of the CPI, and Food is another 13.4% of the CPI. What can the Fed possibly do about either? 

Hello Fed, Can You Supply Diesel?

https://twitter.com/FreightAlley/status/1524389465371860993

Can the Fed stop the war in Ukraine? Drill for oil? Manufacturer diesel?

At the same time, don’t pretend the Fed had nothing to do with inflation. By driving up asset prices, the Fed created artificial demand for cars, second homes, vacations, and other optional services. 

Importantly, a key difference in this recession is de-globalization forces act against the Fed now, whereas previously globalization was a big deflationary force.  

Good luck with that Fed, especially when US weapon deliveries to Ukraine rate to prolong the war, possibly for years.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Reader
Reader
1 year ago
Even if the FED doesn’t directly control the prices the FED’s policy can control their direction.
For example, the price of food and the price of energy are driven by the spike of commodity prices. The commodities are becoming a new type of assets that attracts lots of liquidity so their prices are not just driven by actual supply/demand but also by speculation. Once FED and other central banks drain this liquidity and increase the rates the commodity prices should come down significantly.
Also, low USD interest rates and abundant dollar liquidity increases demand for the commodities globally because other countries can borrow the USD and finance purchasing of the oil or agricultural products, which is good for the living standard of their population but it increases the global demand for commodities and hence their prices.
The rent is directly linked to the house prices. When house prices are rising the rents will usually follow. The rent is very inelastic as the house is an essential product and moving home is very difficult and costly for the families. A renter will probably cut on all other costs including food just to pay the rent. Also rising house prices don’t necessarily increase their supply probably because developers make more money by hoarding residential land and dripping it slowly making profits on the price appreciation.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Bloomberg headline today “Fed’s Daly Says Strong Economy Can Tolerate 50-Basis-Point Hikes”
If the economy were to withstand the rate hikes, employment would remain buoyant which would lead to inflationary wage demands. Therefore she’s effectively saying that future wage push inflation can withstand their 50bp rate hikes.
Hansa Junchun
Hansa Junchun
1 year ago

But houses bought higher need higher rents to support them., And where are the renters going? Back home with mom? How many will doubling up?

Higher cost houses aren’t the only thing driving up rental prices. Higher housing prices means higher values on the grand list, which is higher taxes. Also the cost of replacement has gone higher, meaning higher insurance. Those three will force up rents whether anyone likes it or not. So I guess its true the Fed is responsible for higher rents. As to where they are going, where CAN they go except to a cheaper jurisdiction? I think Paterson NJ is looking good for many NYC renters right about now…
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  Hansa Junchun
Don’t forget good ‘ol Newark, NJ!
rk6
rk6
1 year ago
Reply to  Hansa Junchun
If everyone moves to Paterson NJ, what does that do to the rents in Paterson?
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  rk6
Increase them.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Bought a little bitcoin yesterday. Might buy a little gold today as it is down as well. Just for trades. I’m not interested in holding either of those assets for the long run. I prefer real companies for the long run. Still trading oil stocks. Lots of volatility to take advantage of. Lovin it.
Hansa Junchun
Hansa Junchun
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
One’s an asset, the other’s a speculative vehicle, the last an investment. You hold one for protection, the other for a gamble, the last for profit.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
You should buy a little oil stocks with great dividends and thank Mish.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
I do thank Mish for this blog. This is where I learned about all the great oil stocks out there that are about to provide massive returns for their shareholders. And I have taken advantage of those recommendations. I hold a lot of oil company stocks, but I also enjoy trading them as well to boost my returns.
az_dirt
az_dirt
1 year ago
Let’s see, collusion by meat packers, capital discipline by oil companies, hedge funds buying up homes and constructing whole subdivisions to become rentals…..
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  az_dirt
I don’t know about the meat packer thing. I can buy chicken drumsticks\thighs for 0.99/lb. Chicken tastes a lot better with skin and bones. Don’t get why people pay a lot more for breast.
Hansa Junchun
Hansa Junchun
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Still, the 99 cent/lb chicken has now perhaps 20% retained water.
az_dirt
az_dirt
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Raise prices because you can.
“The four major meat companies in the U.S.—Cargill, Tyson Foods, JBS, and National Beef Packing—control 55% to 85% of the hog, cattle, and chicken markets”
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
“Pilot warning about imminent diesel shortages in the eastern half of the US”
A shortage of diesel in the east. A shortage of water in the west. Water and oil don’t mix.
Most cities in L.A. County will be restricted to outdoor watering 1 day a week June 1. There is also talk of an 80 gallon a day limit in some places.
Warning, if not adhered to, followed by flow restrictor placed on water line. Possibly, no outdoor watering allowed by September.
Coastal Commission vote on a controversial desalination plant in Huntington Beach, today.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  RonJ
I’ve lost water and electricity at my house. Losing water is far worse. No cleaning and one flush per toilet.
Hansa Junchun
Hansa Junchun
1 year ago
Reply to  RonJ
Why controversial? Because sea life gets sucked up into the plant? Or that its cheaper to recycle sewer water?
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  Hansa Junchun
Here’s the story:
———-
As water runs short in California, commission rejects $1.4 billion desalination plant
By Stephanie Elam, CNN
Updated 11:33 PM ET, Thu May 12, 2022
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
“However, this also highlights the difficulty of the Fed bringing inflation under control with rate hikes.”
It’s true the Fed can’t bring this type of inflation under control with rate hikes. However inflation usually leads to inflationary wage demands and hence more inflation. Slowing the economy down with rate hikes, if they’re aggressive enough, will eventually put a stop to the inflationary wage demands as unemployment increases. Its a sledgehammer to crack a nut tool so the Fed doesn’t want to do it, and they probably won’t until it’s viewed as the only alternative.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Luna down > 99% today …
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett

‘Tis but a scratch!

RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Sheer Luna-cy.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Buying opportunity. Can’t go down much more.
Jmurr
Jmurr
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
But the dip. Lol
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
King Dollar going King Kong
$US (dxy > 104) at 20 year high.
$Trillions in offshore debt priced in $US. We’re past “good luck” … now awaiting defaults …
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“Inelastic Items”
I don’t look at it as binary. A degree of inelasticity, definitely.
Most everything will be at mercy of supply / demand curve to a degree.
Rent? Double up / move home / move to less expensive area
Food? Americans waste 30% of food. As prices surge, consumption considered carefully.
Energy? Set thermostat up or down more than usual / car pool and public transportation / plan trips to take in multiple stops, etc.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Echos of Jimmy Carter… can a disco resurgence be far behind?
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
God no!!!! And please please please dont bring back corduroy!
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
VIP clop vip clop vip clop vip clop….. Bell bottoms AND platform shoes!
LPCONGAS99
LPCONGAS99
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
As long as ” I am Woman”……hear me roar does not come back.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I have a diesel automobile. Now that was a great idea. Stopped driving it at all with $7 per gallon diesel compared with $4.50 regular. So yes, there is always elasticity.
shamrock
shamrock
1 year ago
I don’t think rent is inelastic, you can share an apartment rather than have your own, or move back into your parents house, smaller or less desirable rental,etc, etc, etc.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  shamrock
Or live for free on Venice Beach!
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  shamrock
Or rent a single room for near the price of what a 1-bedroom apartment used to cost, which is not uncommon in the SF Bay Area. For example:
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
Or rent a tool shed for what a room used to cost.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
1 year ago
Regulations have effects, an elections matter. If you make it expensive to produce energy in the US prices will go up. If you make it expensive to hire drivers in the US prices will go up. If you make it expensive to hire people, prices will go up.
There is more to inflation that markets and monetary policy. Regulations under this Administration are extremely damaging and will be long lasting
Rbm
Rbm
1 year ago
Reply to  Karlmarx

I agree with you at the same time we did not get into this mess over night. Seems to me a lot of these issues stem all the was back to the days of Reagan. You can blame every politician / lobbyist and a host of others.

Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Rbm
The people that think one of the parties has their interests at heart are delusional. Voting is damage control at this point.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  Rbm
Don’t forget unions and government for driving up the cost of labor.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
Voting is consequential only if the two party system has failed.
QTPie
QTPie
1 year ago
I disagree with the notion that the Fed is totally unable to control rents. It most definitely can, albeit with a lag. This is because rents are affected by the underlying price of the asset and by influencing interest rates (especially thanks to its gargantuan balance sheet, which can be used to affect long term interest rates) the Fed can affect the price of housing (both for individuals and investors) and by association, rents. In fact, it is the specific influence of the Fed (albeit in the opposite direction) which was a major driver in the insane run-up in housing prices we’ve seen to date, which in turn was a major contributing factor to rents skyrocketing as well.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  QTPie
I was thinking the same. Many will decide between buying and renting and mortgage rates certainly effect the decision.
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
So they decide to rent. And because of hikes, builders don’t build as much
What then?
The only saving grace is the supply under construction
Not entirely clear how this nets out
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
It seems the FED is hell bent on forcing a recession. Which I’m all in favor of. Interest rates need to go up and stay up. Not just in the US, but worldwide. The sooner we realize low interest rates just make things worse long term, the better. I fear political pressure will force the FED to go back to easing and buying up debt
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“It seems the FED is hell bent on forcing a recession.”
They know a recession the only cure for inflation.
Unfortunately, the recession will lead to financial crisis. When the dust settles the country better off, but it won’t be fun getting from here to there.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett

The boomer party is over, and it was a blowout. The hangover will last 3 generations.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
A lot of boomers didn’t get an invitation.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I seriously doubt that. The FED failed to act when they should have to increase interest rates, which was sometime around Sept/2021, if not earlier. Now the media coverage and the behind the scenes politics are forcing them to take action, to “do something”. However, the only real tool they have is interest rates, which thy kept at near zero for far too long.
“When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail”.
And whatever they do with rates, it’s just going to slow the RATE of inflation. It’s not going to bring prices down, which is what people want/hope for. Only a long and deep recession will bring down prices but it is doubtful that it would get us back to where we were.
A loaf of bread was 10 cents in 1935. Now it is a minimum of $2-3 for the same size loaf and as high as $6-$7 in some supermarkets!
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
Prices will not come down much if at all.
Slowly, very slowly, very very slowly, wages will increase.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.