France’s Macron and Le Pen Will Square Off On April 24 Election Runoff

Image from a live stream French news feed.

Round Two Rematch

French President Emanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen will square off in round two of national elections on April 24.

Round two happens when no candidate gets over 50% in round one which was held this weekend.

Reuters reports France’s Macron and Le Pen Head for Cliffhanger April 24 Election Runoff.

With partial results putting Macron in first place ahead of Le Pen after Sunday’s first-round voting, other major candidates admitted defeat. Except for another far-right candidate, Eric Zemmour, they all urged voters to block the far-right in two weeks’ time.

Ifop pollsters predicted a very tight runoff, with 51% for Macron and 49% for Le Pen. The gap is so tight that victory either way is within the margin of error.

“Nothing is decided!,” Macron told supporters, urging all voters to rally behind him on April 24th to stop the far-right from ruling the European Union’s second-largest economy.

While Le Pen has ditched past ambitions for a “Frexit” or to haul France out of the euro zone’s single currency, she envisages the EU as a mere alliance of sovereign states.

Conservative candidate Valerie Pecresse warned of “disastrous consequences” if Macron lost, while the Socialists’ Anne Hidalgo urged supporters to vote for him “so that France does not fall into hatred.”

“Not one vote for Le Pen!” added hard-left candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon, who, according to the estimates, placed third with around 20% of the votes.

51 Percent to 49 Percent?!

I struggle to see why the runoff will be that close given Macron is viewed as center  Left while Le Pen is viewed as extreme Right. 

The third place candidate, Jean-Luc Melenchon, is already backing Macron and so is conservative candidate Valerie Pecresse from the right.

“Emmanuel Macron played with fire,” Pecresse told supporters. 

On the other side, Zemmour acknowledged disagreements with Le Pen, but said Macron was a worse choice. 

Zemmour only received 7 percent of the vote so an endorsement from him would not seen to matter much.

What About Frexit?

Frexit is not as dead as Reuters claims. Eurointelligence discusses Frexit in Disguise.

Marine Le Pen may come across more rounded and motherly, with a claim to guide her country through these times of heightened uncertainty. She changed her way of talking, looks presidential, and mingles with the people. People do not find the idea of a president Le Pen so frightening any more.

But a closer look at her programme reveals that even if she stays away from provocative language, the substance of her nationalistic protectionism just reappears under a new header. When she talks about preventing fraud, this turns out to be Frexit in disguise. Les Echos was digging in her programme to find that this fraud prevention comes with an increase of border controls. In fact, Le Pen plans to hire 20,000 customs officers to get back to the level of 1990, the times from before the Maastricht Treaty.

So all these agents she plans to hire are to be placed at the borders with Italy and Germany to control merchandise coming into France. Because, as her campaign booklet explains, there is the need for a re-establishment of French borders to counter the serious shortcomings in the mechanisms established by the EU.

This would question the foundations of the European single market, established in 1993. She may not call this Frexit, but this is one way of pushing for it. Fraud is now the new code word to divide the good and the bad, meaning France and the EU, allowing French companies to enjoy the benefits of the single market without granting the same to those coming into France.

By invoking the spectre of fraud coming from the EU, Le Pen is still peddling narratives to please core voters from the far-right. This is a tale of the wolf in sheep’s clothing.

France 24 Video in English

Replay of 2017?

France24 says Election Rematch is No Replay as Macron, Le Pen Eye Suspenseful Final Duel

Macron vs Le Pen was a blowout last time. This rates to be much closer. 

The 2017 election was 66% Macron to 34% for Le Pen. I suspect something closer, say 55% for Macron is more likely.

However, strange things can happen in elections especially if disenfranchised voters sit things out or Macron says something widely disliked in the meantime.

Regardless of who wins, the French parliament is likely to splinter making legislative agenda difficult. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kiers
kiers
3 years ago
The whole purpose of the EU was really to serve as shiny friend and stipend-giving sugar daddy (thank you, EU taxpayers furthering Anglo Empire) worthy of aspiration so that NATO could continue expanding ever eastwards. 2022 and Nato is now up against Russia, literally at the border. EU has suddenly, no raison d’etre! clear as day! Brexit, Frexit, Lexit, Grexit…..
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
free money betting on macron to win.
LPCONGAS99
LPCONGAS99
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Does anyone in France, Europe, the U.S. or anywhere else on a planet where human beings live actually think their government officials will actually allow Le Pen to win????? LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
3 years ago
Time for Macron to call Biden, asking some advice about how to rig a close election….. With a teleprompter in front of him he might have the answer…. on the other hand though the poor fella probably didn’ t even know what was going on behind the scenes and is still convinced he actually won….
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
From my observation, the only people who ever bring up the idea of elections being rigged fit into one of four groups:
1. Conspiracy believers who also buy into such things as QAnon, flat earth, etc
2. People whose goal is the overthrow of the US republic, and the replacement of it with a dictatorship (you can’t overthrow a democracy so long as people have faith in elections)
3. People who just like to yank people’s chains
4. People unwilling to accept a result they don’t like
In any case there may be similarities between the French election and the one in the US. The US has had a recent trend towards nominating really bad candidates. Clinton was so bad that even Trump beat her. Biden is awful, and unlike most Democrats, didn’t even bother to run to the center, but fortunately for him, he ran against the only candidate he could have beaten, the one who was guaranteed to unite Democrats, and make them turn out to vote. In France, they also seem to have a trend towards awful candidates. Macron is not popular, and not doing a very good job, but LePen is probably the one opponent who will cause moderates and liberals to unite turn out to vote for Macron.
Dutoit
Dutoit
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
And the ones that claim that the recent elections in Belarus were rigged, in which group do you put them ?
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
Let me turn the question around to you. In the US, the Republicans investigated the election multiple times, at multiple levels. It was investigated at the state level, with Republicans in charge in multiple of the states in question. It was also investigated at the Federal level by the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department, both controlled by Republicans. None found anything substantial enough to change the outcome. In Belarus, was the opposition party given the chance to observe the election process, and then afterwards, even one chance to investigate the election? If so, then I will believe the election in Belarus was valid.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
You accuse me of being a conspiracy believer ? All I ever said the last two years is that the Covid hype was, is, and will most likely continue being the biggest scam ever, a tool to control the rif raf…. take off your blinkers occasionally and you might see I was right ! Neither is there any conspiracy believing in saying that the US is a fn warmonger directly responsible for the ungoing crisis in Europe. Deluded you are if you really think our western nations are still democracies, demockeries rather, as fake as can be, and only getting worse !
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
I didn’t accuse you of anything. I do think it’s likely that you belong in one of the four groups, but which one, I have no way of knowing.
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Don’t forget Category 5: Those who have read Means of Ascent and know that LBJ stole his senate seat in 1948 and later became President. Rigged elections have consequences!
LPCONGAS99
LPCONGAS99
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Hi Carl…… Is France a province of Islam? …….
kiers
kiers
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Biden’s secret weapon….”Uncle Clyburne”
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Zemmour was the one sunk by Putin rather than LePen. He spent a lot of time explaining why historically Russia should control Ukraine and more or less all of Eastern Europe and then Putin goes and invades Ukraine and even though Zemmour said he “deplored” the invasion his reputation as a Putin-lover was too hard to shake. LePen was much more circumspect about Putin before the invasion and it paid off for her. I have heard many adjectives describing LePen but “motherly” is not one of them. She is definitely not a motherly figure in any sense of the term and I wonder where Eurointelligence got that. Frexit is off the table for her and has been for a few years now even if sometimes she gives it lip-service. Generally not that many French want to leave the EU although most want a reform especially concerning immigration. The 20,000 extra border guards would be for fighting against illegal immigration rather than illegal goods coming across the border.
In France you can have some curious political outcomes that are counter-intuitive. In 2017 Macron got 66% and LePen got 33% but in the legislative elections which occurred just after her party got only 8.8% of the Assemblée nationale. Macron has proven to be a disappointment but that is par for the course in politics generally for incumbents. For now the polls give a much closer election than the last time and Macron’s results aren’t very good on two fronts, the economy and on security, both which have deteriorated during his rule. LePen has played it smart this time but she is bad in debates. I don’t vote because I am not a French citizen. It is going to be an interesting election and I can’t so who will win.
Dutoit
Dutoit
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I think that the bad result of Zemmour comes mainly from the fear that Mélenchon could beat Le Pen and reach the second round. This was my case, and in fact Mélenchon was not far.
I think that the main thing now is that the country is almost exactly divided in 3 antagonistic parts. It will be very difficult for the winner.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
Yes, the “vote utile” was definitely a factor.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
LePen might have had a better chance if Putin did not invade and LePen had not been seen as being friendly to Putin. I’m thinking most French people may remember that. If she does pull off the upset, it will be another nail in the coffin for the EU, NATO and a win for Putin. His goals of having Russian-friendly countries as far west as Portugal may not sound so far-fetched if a few elections can be tipped. The GRU groups that tipped the elections in the Ukraine, United States and England can still do damage and are considered Putin’s best of the best.
Dutoit
Dutoit
3 years ago
“The GRU groups that tipped the elections”
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Perhaps she can galvanize the progressive first-female-french president vote!
People vote for but also against: The anti-Macron sentiment is fierce.
It’s like Trump/Biden … it’s not who people like, but who they dislike most that is moving voters.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
“Perhaps she can galvanize the progressive first-female-french president vote!”
Unfortunately for her, she is another one of those special snowflakes, which is all that the “one, two, many…” counters gullible enough to fall for “progressivism” are able to comprehend. Female “presidents” are always good. But Le Pen is not a “real female president.” Because, you know like, she, like Maggie, is, like, “baaaad.”
Black politicians (the ones who admit to being able to count. The other ones are loving it….) are faced with similar problems in the US.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
3 years ago
Far-right? If Le Pen were getting 5%, maybe even 10%, the “far” in that label would fit. But, as it is, whoever is using that label is spending credibility bucks. And, by doing so, is raising the value of the “far-right” brand.
Lotta situations in the real world where a wallet with unknown contents is freely spent until suddenly empty. “Who could have foreseen this?!?”
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
However, these very same people are fine with boosting the far-right in Ukraine! Eventually, when that makes it way to their own countries, I’m sure they will all say that nobody could have seen that coming. Jeez!
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
Macron might just make it. But Biden is going to lose both the House and the Senate and become a lame duck. Looks like everyone who is trying to do regime change in Russia will be out of a job (or turned into toothless tigers, like in Biden’s case) before the year is over!
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Nazi Barbie is kinda cute. Maybe I need to give this fascism Thing another look.
Naphtali
Naphtali
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Vorsicht bei der Hunden!
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Funny how not wanting your country over-run with literally millions of uneducated immigrants makes you a Nazi these days.
Also funny how the same people who are for mass immigration into France are against the recent Russian immigration into Ukraine. Oh the hypocrisy!
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You should hear her belting out the Horst Wessel Song at the Berliner club on a Saturday night. She’s something to behold, in those black fishnet stockings and tiny leather jacket…

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.