Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Green Energy Is Now Mainstream, Attracting Trillions of Dollars

Wall Street Latches On 

Wall Street has latched on the the idea there is money to be made in green energy finance. 

That is what it took to get things humming, not politicians screaming nonsense about the end of the world. 

The WSJ reports Green Finance Goes Mainstream, Lining Up Trillions Behind Global Energy Transition

Assets in investment funds focused partly on the environment reached almost $2 trillion globally in the first quarter, more than tripling in three years. Investors are putting $3 billion a day into these funds. More than $5 billion worth of bonds and loans designed to fund green initiatives are now issued every day. The two biggest U.S. banks pledged $4 trillion in climate-oriented financing over the next decade.

Even if investors and governments suffer losses, the inflow of cash could produce innovations in areas like batteries that are needed to significantly reduce carbon emissions. “Wall Street will throw money at this problem,” said David Brown, principal analyst in the energy-transition practice at consulting and research firm Wood Mackenzie.

As recently as 2014, the world’s energy companies spent $735 billion on oil-and-gas extraction. The figure was less than half that last year, while spending on wind and solar projects rose to nearly $220 billion, up from about $135 billion six years earlier, according to Rystad Energy, a consulting firm. Some analysts predict spending on renewable energy will exceed oil and gas in the next several years.

Green Energy Spending Spree

Story Morals

  1. If there is money to be made, Wall Street will find it. 
  2. If there is a good solution to the alleged ‘Existential Threat of Our Time’ the free market would find it. 
  3. Politicians like Al Gore and AOC spewing nonsense about the end of the world as we know did little for this effort. 

The clean energy cause is picking up steam because clean energy is now competitive or nearly competitive with fossil fuels. 

Tesla founder Elon Musk delivered a big boost on battery technology. That free market inspired impact actually meant something vs all of Gretta’s and AOC’s meaningless moaning.

Energy SPACs Flying

Energy SPACs are flying. Many will fail. But if investors want Green Energy Risk (GER), I just made that up, Wall Street is happy to oblige.

Meanwhile, in case you forgot, please consider AOC “New Green Deal” Stunningly Absurd: Far More Ridiculous Than Expected

$90 Trillion Plans

In 2015, Business Insider noted A Plan Is Floating Around Davos To Spend $90 Trillion Redesigning All The Cities So They Don’t Need Cars

The $90 trillion proposal came from former US vice president Al Gore, former president of Mexico Felipe Calderon, and their colleagues on The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. 

Also recall AOC’s Green New Deal Pricetag of $51 to $93 Trillion vs. Cost of Doing Nothing

I concluded “The notion that politicians will do anything sensible about the problem seems ridiculous.”

I have been preaching for a decade that if there was a problem, the free market would find the solution, and in due time. 

Well, lookie, lookie, that’s the path we are on and it will not cost $90 trillion of taxpayer money. 

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Frank Sterle Jr.
Frank Sterle Jr.
5 years ago

Perhaps it’s time that every residential/business
structure began harvesting at least some of its own energy through solar cell
panels, even if only as an emergency/backup source of power via storage system;
albeit the idea likely would be opposed by various corporate interests.

Is it wise to continue having every structure’s entire electricity supply relying on external
power lines that are susceptible to being crippled by unforeseen events,
including storms of unprecedented magnitude, especially considering our very
vulnerable overreliance on electricity? There also are coronal mass ejections
to consider, albeit their damaging effects are rare, in which power grids are
vulnerable to potentially extensive damage and long-lasting power outages.

Of course there will be those (e.g. Internet trolls)
who will mock the idea for ‘not being realistic’. One post I read based his rebuttal
solely on the erroneous notion that if it were possible to have such
independent solar-power generation and storage, it would have been done by now
and made a few people very wealthy. Unfortunately, when such illogic is widely
believed, it’s much easier for some entity to maintain an outdatedly
problematic but still very profitable status-quo energy system.

Ossqss
Ossqss
5 years ago
How does green energy look on the TES charts? Can you find it? Is it really green in the end? 
MacPacAttack
MacPacAttack
5 years ago
Enough of this nonsense already.  Plant life thrives on CO2, the more the better.  If we want a green planet let’s maximize CO2 output to drive the photosinthsys equilibrium reaction forwards, thus promoting the growth of more plant life around the globe (which will of course find a new 02/CO2 equilibrium partial pressure that will be exactly the same as the old one).
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
Reply to  MacPacAttack
That scheme won’t work because of massive deforestation.  And in some cases, the deforestation is occurring in order that corporations get to the oil deposits.
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
“If there is a good solution to the alleged ‘Existential Threat of Our Time’ the free market would find it. “
Riiiiiiiight.   That is why it is working sooooooo well with the COVID pandemic disaster!

Earth to libertarians : “The vaccine works only if almost EVERYBODY on the planet gets it, not just those who can pay!”

amigator
amigator
5 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Free market not perfect just better than others.
Keep in mind the last pandemic took approximately 670k lives with a population of 100 million.
At present we are 70k below that with a population of 350 million.
whirlaway
whirlaway
5 years ago
Reply to  amigator
Yeahhhhh.  Must be.   That is why US has 1846 COVID deaths per million population while Cuba is at 77.     Must be the free market at work! 😉
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
5 years ago
Malinvestment-palooza.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Lots of money will be made on speculating on green energy,….but at the end of the day the math doesn’t work for green energy  (aka wind and solar) to ever replace FF’s. It never did and it never will.
Elon Musk is the poster boy for using speculative money to get rich off ideas that might never make sense. But silver, lithium, uranium, silicon…..and the kind of electronics that go into solar and wind power….it’s all going to go like gangbusters for a while. In the end there are are not enough raw materials to build out any system that comes close to what we enjoy from cheap oil.
Renewables is a euphemism for living off batteries. Ever really live off batteries? It is not generally a thing that lazy, uneducated people who only know enough about electricity to flip a switch can do well with. It requires paying some attention to details.
Battery technology is where it’s at….but we need some breakthroughs…nothing we have now is near good enough. Lithium has all kinds of problems, especially disposal at the end of useful battery life.  And more than half the world’s known reserves are in one country, Chile.
Nukes have potential, and when “green energy” proves to be insufficient, maybe we’ll finally learn to build safe nukes. It is possible. But there isn’t enough uranium either. If we can learn to get power from thorium, it will make a huge difference. The world is full of thorium.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
There’s more uranium than one might think. It’s the disposal problem that keeps everyone awake.
Thorium or fusion using Helium-3 is probably the future sometime in the next 50 years. As you noted, that’s what will be needed for those in northern climates where wind/solar isn’t good enough.
Also it’s funny that right as Mish publishes this, we see an article in Bloomberg (cited on ZH) says plenty of investment is being made in gas plants that will run long after Biden claims we will be at net-zero. Obviously those companies just say whatever to make Biden happy and plan to wait till he’s out of office.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
5 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Thorium is the product of uranium decay, so how can the world be full of thorium, and not have enough uranium?
I agree that high grade uranium ore is a scarce resource, and if it was a purely commercial product, only few would produce it.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Thorium is abundant worldwide and can be mined like anything else, from what I’ve read.
Zardoz
Zardoz
5 years ago
“If there is a good solution to the alleged ‘Existential Threat of Our Time’ the free market would find it. “
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
5 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Great minds think alike.
Nobody is about to solve that one. That’s the difference between a mere problem and a real predicament.
Doug78
Doug78
5 years ago
It’s the benefit of having deep financial markets. Speculation, especially reckless ones provided the cash that built virtually all new industries starting in financing ships for the East Indian Company trade to building the railroads to building the infrastructure for the internet to building rockets and now we see waves of money for green energy. Animal spirits rule. Accountants do not. 

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.