Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Heading Into Recession, There Is a Huge Excess of Real Private Inventories

Real, inflation-adjusted inventory data from the BEA via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

The chart shows “real” inflation-adjusted inventories. The index year is 2012.

In four of the last six recession, inventories continued to build well into recession. In the other two, inventories peaked just prior to or at the start of recession.

Biggest Ramp in Wholesale Inventory History 

Real, inflation-adjusted, inventory data from BEA via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

Wholesale inventories are surging as retail inventories flatten. One way or another and perhaps both, there is huge problem somewhere. 

A Big Trucking Red Flag

https://twitter.com/FreightAlley/status/1597427598090735616

Composite PMI

Manufacturing Has Peaked This Cycle

ISM data provides strong evidence that Manufacturing Has Peaked This Cycle

The only major component of the Manufacturing PMI® not in contraction is production. That will not last long given the collapse in domestic and export orders coupled with the backlog of orders in steep contraction.

Also note that the US Composite PMI Suggests the Economy is On the Verge of Recession

Add a huge inventory problem to this toxic mix. 

Not to worry, Fed Chair Jerome Powell is still Preaching Soft Landing

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Chart: “Biggest ramp in wholesale inventory historY”
Anyone keeping track of how many historical records have been set, since governments caused Covid lockdowns?
Remember to Build Back Better (TM).
oee
oee
3 years ago
There is no universe that the econ is in recession and the econ created +263000 jobs in Nov 2022. More jobs in one month of Biden/Harris than Trump in 48 months. Get this the Oct payroll was REVISED HIGHER TO 284000. By my count, the Admin created 10.50 Million new jobs in 20 months of mandate whereas Trump LOST 2.50 MILLION in 48 MONTHS.
ADP should find another proffession . It’s job forecasts were wrong. wrong!.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  oee
don t compare peanuts with oranges , Biden /Trump , (peanut bein Biden ) ! Trump had to deal with one hell of a sudden covid crisis , to become the spiritual father of the experimental, intrinsically worthless, warp speed vaxxine….
oee
oee
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
President Marcon, PM Trudeau; PM Jarden; PM Sanchez and others met the challenge and beat Covid. Those countries have LOWER DEATH RATES THAT AMERICA. Trump mis-managed the crisis and was rightly thrown out of office. President Marcon was re-elected; PM Trudeau got re-elected. What is Trump’s excuse. The truth is he cannot manage a house of ill repute even if his life is dependent on it.
oee
oee
3 years ago
Reply to  oee
Also, the econ was lagging even before the plaugue hit.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Too much inventory? Not in oil. Just keeps dropping. Should drop a little faster next year now that SPR releases are almost done.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Bad news for real estate. Blackstone limits redemptions from their real estate funds.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I read that. EVERYONE should be concerned. This is a liquidity issue. Investors in those illiquid funds will find something else to sell that is liquid. Maybe those investors would use an online brokerage to short those funds (or a proxy) they can’t redeem. And it would not surprise me if other funds have similar monthly redemption rules and problems.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Just another argument for self investing.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Another reason to carefully read the prospectus before investing.
Fish1
Fish1
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
If anyone ever read those things you would never invest a nickel in anything. Just keep working because there is no “ brilliant” investment.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Fish1
Of course there’s no “brilliant” “investment.” Can’t be. “Brilliance” at picking random numbers, is simply a synonym for being an idiot, after all. And there exist no better randomisation algorithm than a large group of self-optimizers, all with access to the exact same information sources, trading semi-freely.
Capital markets can allocate resources effectively, only because for any given “investment”, those who are active in it, tend to skew towards those with asymmetric access to information regarding that specific “investment.” Resulting in capital flowing towards those with the most specific, relevant, knowledge.
All that goes out the door, once the policy of the land, is to instead use the illusion of “capital markets” as simple redistribution rackets. Aimed at redistributing wealth from those with specialised knowledge; to stupid and illiterate, but connected, dilettantes playing office in “Money Centers.” All of whom are flat out incompetent at absolutely everything.
Then, once devoid of any asymmetric knowledge; you are back to picking random numbers: Resulting in Musk ruining Twitter; VCs with predictably childbrained superstitions ruining Silicon Valley, and PE idiots hardly able to put together their all-important presentations destroying what little is left of America and The West. While a me-too peanut choir of self aggrandising, invariably imbecile to the core, “Home Owners”; so dumb they believe the mold in their walls are somehow creating value while their home sits there decaying in the weather, leads the cheerleading squad for more-more-more.
Now: (Channeling PapaDave…) Given the world we do live in, instead of whining: The “idea” of Blackstone, is that where smaller “investors” would take a loss and hence have to get a job; Blackstone is “too big to fail.” Hence, in their case, The Fed and government will instead see to it that it is other people who are forced to work to make them nominally whole again.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Retailers became conservative. Wholesalers might put THEIR inventory on memo. Retailers shift the risk to wholesalers
and mfg. Retailers don’t want to finance inventory. That might explain the higher prices. Wholesalers markup is higher than usual, because only a small portion of their memo will be sold til mid Jan/ Feb, when return for credit by customers is over and the actual sales sales are known and final. The memo might stay on the shelves to keep the system going, to give mfg inventory a chance.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Cheap stuff, on it’s way.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
potatoes in particular ….I hope
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
‘heading into recession’ ….That must be why idiots and fn algorithms are pushing up stocks and bonds ….
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2

Cranky comrade! Someone steal your potato?

FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
…a potato up yer fn arse , idiot !
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago

AD, money times velocity, is still too high in the 4th qtr. So, the target for N-gDp, and inflation, in the 4th qtr. is still too high.

Economists don’t understand money and Central banking. Milton Friedman, for instance, explains that “Fisher, in his original version, used T to refer to all transactions – purchases of final goods and services…, intermediate transactions…, and capital transactions (the purchase of a house or a share of stock).

In current usage, the item has come to be interpreted as referring to purchases of final goods and services only, and the notation has been changed accordingly, T being replaced by y, as corresponding to real income” (Friedman, 1990, p. 38).From Carol A. Ledenham’s Hoover Institution
archives: Friedman pontificated that:

Friedman: “I would make reserve requirements the same for time
and demand deposits”. Dec. 16, 1959.

Monetarism involves controlling total legal reserves, not excess reserve balances, not just nonborrowed reserves either. A decrease in required reserve balances (which Powell eliminated), has an immediate dampening impact on AD, on the economy, on N-gDp.

Under monetarism, the monetary authorities use two tools to control the money supply — legal reserves and reserve ratios. If these tools are to be effective, all legal reserves of all money creating institutions have to be in a form which the monetary authorities can quickly ascertain and absolutely control. The only type of bank asset that fulfills this requirement is interbank demand deposits in the District Reserve banks owned by the member banks (like the ECB).

Similarly, the monetary authorities have to have complete discretion over changes in reserve ratios. This is essential since under fractional reserve banking (the essence of commercial banking) these ratios determine the minimum volume of legal reserves a bank must hold against a specific volume and type of deposit liability.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
No banker knows with certainty when the depositors will show up and demand the immediate return of their money. It’s all statistics. A run on your bank is not the same as a run in your stocking.
TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
3 years ago
Who can plan production through to retail sale effectively when you always have the present monopolistic paradigm keeping all of our economic problems like inflation in continual suspension, and the FED, doing the dirty work for the Banks, alternately tries to goose or strangle the economy? It’s exactly like it was before the Copernican cosmological paradigm change resolved the major outnesses of Ptolemaic cosmology. That changed the world and our minds and all of the Ptolemaic pundits had egg on their faces. Too bad, too sad. Think paradigmatically, that is in terms of the application of a new operant concept, and avoid the embarrassment to the orthodox that every paradigm change has wrought.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Atlanta gDp nows’ downgrade: latest estimate: 2.8 percent — December 1, 2022 Now a recession seems imminent in the 1st qtr. of 2023.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
I saw this coming because Ocean freight peaked at 10 times the normal cost and is back down below normal levels. So I’ve been selling our inventory at a loss knowing I’ll be able to buy back at 60% discounts and even cheaper because my competition is now having to rent warehouse space to house their overpriced inventory.
I’ve now instructed my purchasers to only stock 1 month worth of inventory.
If you don’t need it, don’t buy it. The deals are coming.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
What Industry?
Wholesale or Retail?
Thanks
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
We sell to construction, agriculture, and industrial sales for packaging and fasteners. About 50/50 retail/wholesale. Most of our imported products made from steel like strapping and nails got impacted the most from the freight. Before the pandemic we stocked about a 4 month supply. It got up to a 6 month supply as prices climbed and as soon as I saw freight dropping and the west coast ports LA & Long Beach clearing up, I reduced our inventory to 1 month.
Over the past 10 years companies who kept inventory had their margins squeezed by their just-in-time customers. This last year we made it all back. My guess is that companies who invest in automation and AI will have the edge again.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
….so should we place our bets too ?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
That sounds like trading strategy with inventory. I bet, Wall Street could offer you a derivative product avoiding any inventory movement.
When things get really bad, Wall Street will have a party for the upcoming pivot.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
It works for Billy because Billy knows his specific business well.
While “Wall Street” knows no specific business particularly well. Hence, the only “edge” any of them ever had, and ever will have, is the edge handed them by the wash of money redistributed their way, ultimately from guys like Billy, by way of debasement.
Any broadly generalisable “trading algorithm” were discovered, then competitively bid down to providing no edge at all, so many thousand years ago; that the only edge left, is very specialised knowledge of very specialised businesses and processes. All of whom are, from a loss vs gain trading perspective, entirely different.
None of this is even remotely compatible with maintaining some “upper/owner” class who supposedly “make money” by broad “ownership” of resources which others then have to sharecrop while sharing any gains with this mythical “ownership” class. Free-, hence efficiently resource allocating-, markets; abhor this sort of permanent leeching classes acting as nothing more than deadweight boat anchors around the ankles of more competent people. Immediately routing around them wherever and whenever they should pop up.
Instead, in free societies: The minute you stop adding real value, by your individual actions: You’re on your way down the road to starvation. With the only thing preventing this inevitability; being government institutions forcefully redistributing value: From those who create it, to the connected leeches. This being exactly, and only, why The Fed exists. As well as the vast majority (not absolutely all) “laws”, “rules’, “restrictions”, “mandates” and “institutions.”
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“Add a huge inventory problem to this toxic mix.”
Yes. I’ve measured. I can squeeze a 75″ in where the 55″ sits.
Not pulling the trigger any earlier than President’s Day Sale.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
If you can go 77″, I highly recommend getting a 77″ OLED. The next OLED size down is 65″. You might be able to get a LG 77″ for under $1500 on greentoe in a few months.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
And all this time I thought inflation expectations don’t affect purchasing decisions.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
I think this is bankruptcy expectations, not inflation expectations since he’d be buying today in a spiraling inflationary climate.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.