Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Here’s the Best Combined Explanation for Surging Inflation: Cascading Idiocy

Blame game image from Tweet below.

Cascading Policy Errors

1: Covid hit. Lockdowns that were arguably excusable in the beginning, lingered far too long, affecting far too many businesses. Policy error one.

2: The Fed reacted with QE far to excessive and far too long, continuing all the way until March 2022. Policy error two.

3. Free Money from Congress. Again excusable in the beginning, but the second round by Trump was excessive and the third by Biden was preposterous. Policy errors three and four with Biden getting far more of the blame.

4. Demand shift to goods away from services as a result of the above three items. 

5. The demand shift to goods happened when there were fewer workers due to continuing lockdowns. 

6. The US meddled in Ukraine in 2014 setting the stage for war. And Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy kept insisting to the bitter end it wanted to be in the EU and NATO, both red flags to Putin. Accurately label Zelenskyy’s statements a policy error. And blame Putin for the war, so that makes policy errors five, six, and seven counting US meddling in 2014.

7: Let’s not leave Angela Merkel out of this. Kowtowing to the Greens, Merkel mothballed Germany’s nuclear plants creating greater dependence on energy from Russia. This is policy error number eight.

8. And what about Biden and the US Greens telling Big Oil it wanted to put them out of business. Guess what? Energy investment plunged. Policy error number 9

9. Inane sanctions in response to the war busted supply chains in energy. Policy errors ten and eleven by the US and EU. 

10. Finally, please consider Biden’s stupid energy policy to rising oil price. Instead of taking actions to increase oil supply, Biden blamed oil companies, threated tax hikes, threated FTC involvement, blamed gouging, then with refinery capacity already crippled demanded more ethanol from corn. The ethanol demand will increase need for fertilizer, increase summer smog, and drive more small refiners out of business. 

I am not sure how many policy errors there are in point ten. Pick a number. 

Passing the Buck 

Putin Tax

Search for Enemies 

Paul Krugman, No Policy Errors?!

No, it’s not all Biden’s fault. It’s Biden, the Fed, Congress, Merkel, Putin, Trump, the EU, and Zelenskyy.

Please apportion the blame, but here’s a simple way to start: 

  • It’s mostly Progressive free money policies by Biden and Congress coupled with inane responses to to the war with the Fed providing excess stimulus all the way to March of 2022. 
  • Key policy errors by Merkel and the US in 2014 set the stage for compounding everything that followed. 

Recession Watch Update, Where Do Things Stand After the Huge Fed Hike?

Meanwhile, regardless of blame assessment, a recession looms. 

Please consider Recession Watch Update, Where Do Things Stand After the Huge Fed Hike?

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

87 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
kewtiepie
kewtiepie
4 years ago
Gosh! If only we were all as smart as you are! Because you have it all figured out and you got your money all figured out and you’re wealthy and you have enough to share with others! I bet you’re loving that fantasy aren’t you except that sharing part
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  kewtiepie
You sound like you are angry because you chose the wrong parents. It’s not your fault.
david halte
david halte
4 years ago
Include the BLS for their calculation of inflation. The mortgage crisis cascaded when all major credit rating agencies gave worthless CMOs fraudulent AAA ratings. The underlying inflation spiral began when the BLS fabricated a 2 percent inflation target. Obfuscating the increase of real inflation, and removed the checks and balances on excess liquidity.
WendyBG
WendyBG
4 years ago
Mish, you will want to read this. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30116
Wendy
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
(Ground) 0. Fauci’s policy of Gain of Function research.
xbizo
xbizo
4 years ago
I’m gonna frame this one and put it up on my office wall….
kiers
kiers
4 years ago
This is why JAPAN doesn’t have INFLATION. They are the proof that NOT all developed OECD countries have inflation, it’s just those that subscribed to Anglo shenanigans of dock workers stop handling cargo, truck drivers get squeezed dry waiting in torture queues, needless tariffs ill conceived, covid shutdowns, and all other MAN MADE shenanigans to raise prices. It’ ain’t happenin in JAPAN!!!!! Take note!
we bein played! by playahs.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Let’s talk inflation a second. Price increases are not, by themselves, inflation. A bad harvest sends wheat prices up, and bread costs more? That’s a price increase, but it’s not inflation. People forget this ground truth. It’s inflation if the general price level rises because there’s more money than economic activity.
Now lets look at a really important, ubiquitous commodity. How about, say, motor fuel, prices driven upward because the feedstock (crude oil) is more expensive. If the Fed creates more money to accommodate that increase, you will get inflation. If (as in Japan in the 1970s) the central bank does not accommodate it, then if the commodity is sufficiently important, the general economy will suffer a loss of output, however denominated.
I write this because of all the commentary about rising prices of oil and/or food being “inflationary.” No, no, no, no, no! Inflation is a monetary phenomenon. I have commented on various Mish posts that velocity (turnover) gets too little attention, and that the fiscal side of Trump and especially Biden, turbocharged inflation by making the excess money added move faster and goose inflation upwards. That can be debated, and I would absolutely love it if Mish would dive into this issue, which I think is vastly underappreciated right now. But that’s something of a sidelight to my main point, which is that price increases by themselves are not inflation, unless they are ubiquitous and accompanied by monetary creation in excess of economic growth.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
I think #2 and #3 on that list are the biggies, closely followed by #8. I live in the intermountain West, and compare inflation to our ever-present summer wildfire threat. Wildfires are a function of the climate, the intermountain West (and west of the Cascades and Sierras too, but not as much) being arid, hot, and windy.

In any given year, how much of a wildfire problem is starts with the late winter and spring weather: how much rain? Lots of rain means lots of “grassoline.” The inflation analogy would be to the Fed’s QE. That provided the fuel. Back to wildfires, they are typically started by the region’s dry thunderstorms; the rain evaporates before hitting the ground, but the lightning gets all the way there. A wet spring and a really hot and dry summer sets up the fires, which can easily burn tens of thousands of acres. Even hundreds of thousands. On the inflation front, Trump’s fiscal stimulus followed by Biden’s turbocharging of the same, with the Fed still adding fuel, and the grass is now on fire.

Grass fires burn very hot but not for long. To continue the inflation analogy, we have to switch to forest fires, which usually take a bit longer to start and MUCH longer to control and to douse. A forest fire out here usually doesn’t really stop until sometime in winter, when the snows return. A big grass fire will typically be undetectable the following year; the grass grows back. There are exceptions, but not very many. Forest fire damage is visible for many years. Same with inflation. The price level rises, and stays there. Commodity prices tend to come back down, but not the rest. The risk of deflation is too great to allow it, so every “burn” lasts pretty much forever.

So: QE was the fuel, and fiscal stimulus and its contribution to monetary velocity was the lightning. Or, in California, the arson.

Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
I still blame the Fed the most. Job market was in strong recovery in summer 2021 and the Fed should have started raising rates. We would have been able to handle the Russia shock if rates had been raised.
Finally anyone thinking the US “meddling” in Ukraine in 2014 was several years late to Putin meddling in Ukrainian elections in 2003 and 2004 and hacking Ukranian infrastructure during 2012. The orange revolution was a response to all that. There are many here including Mish who truly don’t understand Putin.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
Casual_Observer2020
“I do expect the war to march to Moscow by 2023 as the government there falls and cries for democracy happen similar to what happen in Moscow in 2012.”
I expect the opposite and I believe what Putin has stated at the recent St Petersberg conference. There will be cries for change of elites in the west. The sanctions were a massive failure and blowback is coming for the west.
Putin: Western Problems Will Lead To Degradation And A ‘Change Of Their Elites’ – YouTube
“On the EU, he said: “The European Union has completely lost its political sovereignty, and its bureaucratic elites are dancing to someone else’s tune, accepting whatever they are told from above, causing harm to their own population and their own economy.”

He said there will be a “change of elites” in the West as part of the “revolutionary” shift initiated by the Ukraine war and the US-Europe overreaching: “Such a detachment from reality, from the demands of society, will inevitably lead to a surge of populism and the growth of radical movements, to serious social and economic changes, to degradation, and in the near future, to a change of elites,” Putin said.”

RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
You simply don’t understand the U.S. government. The U.S. has been meddling ever since the Monroe Doctrine.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Ok, now that we’ve handed out blame, what do we do about it?
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Wait for the Fed, as always.
omera
omera
4 years ago
I have been reading your assessment of the -mostly- the US economy with factual data. But you are quite out of your league to tie world events’ effect on the US and world economy. When crude oil per barrel hit negative -ever- at the peak of covid fear, my state CA residents were paying mid $3/g for gas. Now above $120 per barrel, CA residents happy to see if they get gas @ $6/g. Now the last time I checked, the US has been a self sufficient oil producer, and utilizing fracking makes it cheaper than conventional drilling. The problem is we still import oil, and a lot close to half of usage, because it has been cheaper to import (there is more to this but my point is blaming Biden for oil production is cheap shot at best, all administrations before him did this). Another monkey wrench to this chain to consumers is refineries. As CA residents, we know this well because, we paid close to $5/g (national average was mid $2/g at the time) when a refinery was out of production for a while during seasonal switch from winter to summer mix. The fact is, oil producers reduced their production along with some refinery workers were laid off. The oil industry has deep pockets and means to limit their losses faster and bolster their gains: when crude prices go down, it takes very long time to bear fruit for consumer but man when things go their way, you feel it right away. Now, going back to world economy: yes Europe did not take their energy dependency to Russia seriously, but it was cheaper right? So why don’t you blame the US consumers for buying Chinese goods? Look where we are with China now. For years the US policies looked the other way because it was cheaper to get stuff from China. And now China and India buying cheap Russian oil and natural gas. Every trouble generates its own economy. The US capitalism never worries about national security or energy independence by its own since profit and security do not align. Security costs money. It is easy to criticize Zelensky’s policies from thousands of miles away, but you don’t live next to Russia. Now look at Finland and Sweden. Are you going to criticize them for talking to joining to NATO too? Have you ever thought how Putin timed his invasion? I would say quite impressive. But thanks God the execution and expectation of resistance were poor.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
FOMC Projects Even Higher Inflation
William J. Luther & Morgan Timmann
– June 17, 2022
Fed officials raised their projections for inflation this week. The median Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) member now projects inflation will be 5.2 percent in 2022, up from 4.3 percent projected back in March. The most recent revision follows a string of misses at the Fed, which has consistently underestimated the extent to which prices would grow over the last year and a half. The median FOMC member’s projection of inflation has increased every quarter since June 2020.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Pretty doggone accurate!
Every hit a winner!
One of the best by Mish, maybe the best in the past 2-3 years.
JeffD
JeffD
4 years ago
Good summary.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Covid didn’t “hit; it was deployed. You want to know why? They needed a huge cash injection in order for their Global Debt Ponzi to avoid collapsing. Remember how the repo market had gone crazy? They needed a debateless cash injection pure and simple. And watchful people knew something was about to happen.
brace-for-impact-on-federal-reserve
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
search the above with the term economati in order to get to the link.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Biden should be blaming people for burning more gas than ever, but I don’t think that passes any kind of political sanity check.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
They threaten to put coal out of business and US coal managed a 9% increase in production in 2021.
Cocoa
Cocoa
4 years ago
Why do people still listen to Krugman-he’s in the flat earth society of infinite printing which got us here
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
Krugman got the Nobel Prize that Keynes did not get. He broke utterly no new ground. He’s been a self-important political hack ever since.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
He still got the Nobel, something neither of you two hacks can tout.
But I don’t want you to feel left out. Here’s a gold star for your Mish participation.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
True, I didn’t get a Nobel Prize. True, I’m not a boring left wing megaphone. God help me! LOL
billybobjr
billybobjr
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Wrong , Krugman called out Bush for his incompetence of deficit spending only to praise it
when Obama tripled down on it . Krugman is a political hack period .
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
4 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
Krugmans Nobel was for trade theory. He is way out of his element with pretty much everything else. Kind of an idiot savant
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
1/2 – Insane hourly wage bumps for lower wage workers in order to help them achieve a “livable” wage.
People who were making $9-$11/hr suddenly found themselves making $15-$17/hr. They were used to living and getting by on their former wages. The big bumps in hourly pay put a lot of extra $$ in their pockets to be liberally spent, which contributed significantly to inflation.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
I guess some folks just studied hard and developed enough new skills to be worth almost twice as much as before.
Or, maybe not.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
It’s a little misleading to say that gas prices have been rising since Biden took office in the sense that they were rising BEFORE he took office also. 26% increase in the 9 months from April 2020 to January 2021.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
April ’20 was a panic point. Of course gas prices cratered for a while.
Dr_Novaxx
Dr_Novaxx
4 years ago
I think they call this Wonderland.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
Excellent interview on Wealthion with Stephanie Pomboy.
Agree with absolutely every point made. Also mentioned pensions which are another major issue coming shortly.
Gold, Cash, Treasuries, Energy recommended.
Largest Market Bubble Of Our Lifetime Is Now Bursting, So Own This | Stephanie Pomboy – YouTube
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
The most important thing left out: Population/demographics. There are now 8 billion people on the planet all demanding the “good life” and no one talks about the fact that China’s population once lived as subsistence entity and now has a larger middle class than the USA. And just wait when millions of boomers leave the workforce around the world but still demand goods and services, oh boy it’ll get rough and costly.
The planet is being depleted, just ask the parched western part of the US but it will become far more visible with food shortages this fall.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
YEP ! ….absolutely so !
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Incredible that you have 8 billion and still have a brain deficit at the “top”.
The problems: over-indulgence in the consumer societies, and breeding-like population growth in the bottoms.
Yet, did you hear even whisper on the subject either in the corridors of power or academia?
At this point, the only hope is that some vile extraterrestrials become interested in planetary invasion, and make the necessary rational adjustments. /s
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Heard a statistic about population on the BBC earlier today:
“Every second, there are 4.3 births against 2.0 deaths”.
This is why we are going to hit and surpass 8 billion very quickly. Most of those births are coming from poor countries to the uneducated masses. If we didn’t send them food, then they might not continue popping out kids that they can’t feed.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Have you no heart?
If we don’t send them food and money right now there might not be enough people to save next year!
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
In order to be in recession we need two negative GDP quarters. We didn’t get the first one. Q1 2022 was up +1.6%. It was negative in real terms with 8.5% inflation.
Fred Claudia Sahm indicator is negative.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  8dots
….evwythin gonna be great again , you ll see….Right !
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  8dots
The two-quarter rule comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and it’s real growth not nominal.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Excuse me.
Q1 was negative
GDP Declines 1.4% in First Quarter of 2022 Sounding Recession Bells
No one looks a nominal GDP
Second it does NOT take 2 quarters of neg GDP either
That is a sufficient but not necessary condition
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Great post, Mish.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
….couldn t agree more …..if only the world had policymakers like MIsh , it might be a better place ….
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
When DXY was at the bottom of the pit in 2008, we could import little. But today DXY is 105, up 50%. Trump cont QE, flooded us with covid liquidity.
JP organic salad sucked liquidity, shaved Tailor rule. Inflation crushed Fed assets. Inflation crushed US debt in real terms.
The Fed will not exercise unrealized losses. The Fed can wait until maturity. The Dow round trip to Feb 2020 high might be good enough for now. We might wait for a deeper covid correction, for SPX and NDX S-wave : down to Mar 2020 low, up to a new all time high and back to Feb 2020 high. The big trend, the insane vxx, the big change will come later.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  8dots
What is DXY? I speak only some acronym, and am not fluent. You can also define “NDX S-wave” and “Tailor rule” if you’d deign to condescend. And explain “JP organic salad.” Hey, we’re not all mind melded, okay?
SleemoG
SleemoG
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Fun tip: If you highlight a commenter’s user name, the option to ignore them appears.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  SleemoG
I was just wondering that, after seeing crap from a “JoJo,” now on “ignore.”
SleemoG
SleemoG
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Ping me when when you’ve had enough of From Brussels lol
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Brilliant explanation. Mish, you’re a lot smarter than me. I’d love to see you write about velocity, the ugly stepchild of monetary analysis. I think it’s a major reason why QE + covid and infrastructure spending (a lot of which wasn’t spent on either of those, but just “helicopter Benned” out there) triggered inflation, or on the fiscal side, greatly exacebated it.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Velocity is mostly nonsense.
Friedman blew it
The implied assumption by his equation MV = PT are false
Velocity is an output that has no independent life of its own
One can measure money (with debate – is it M1 or M2 or M3)
One can measure prices * Transactions as GDP (again sort of)
But V is not a constant as implied and cannot be independently measured
When Friedman wrote his equation V was relative constant then went nuts
Now, it’s clear that velocity can rise or fall with prices, with GDP, with transactions, It predicts nothing
Yet I hear all the time “If velocity rises then …. such and such will happen”
Well, it’s simply not true.
V is an output and cannot be independently measured.
My one disagreement with Lacy Hunt is that he finds velocity useful.
Sunriver
Sunriver
4 years ago
Structurally, oil prices will remain elevated for years. That will perpetuate to the price of all goods and services for years to come.
Oil companies will have huge profits and if the government and the oil companies can get their act together, the production of domestic oil will increase and prices will fall. That may be like a 3 – 5 year recovery effort however.
Trump may be President before Oil gets back under control.
What a disaster. Recession or not, the cost of goods and services are doomed to stay high for sometime.
Automobiles and house prices may not stay high, but your ‘run of the mill’ goods (food, clothes, electricity, gas), prices will remain high for some time.
SleemoG
SleemoG
4 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
“Trump may be President before Oil gets back under control.”
Roundabout way of saying oil will never get back under control.
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
A kernel of truth! Did the U.S. “meddle” in Ukrainian politics during the Obama administration, very likely, but without it the Kremlin most likely would have a puppet regime in that country. So, sure without U.S. “meddling” this war may not have happened, but only to the extent that Putin would have had his own government installed in Kiev and invading the country would not be necessary. Did the “lock downs” following the onset of the pandemic last too long, possibly, but this is only known in retrospect. Were the PPP and other stimulus programs following the onset of the pandemic excessive, possibly? But I think that the blame for the inflationary cause and effect of these programs is more related to the way these programs were implemented and the delayed recovery of global supply chains. Lastly, I do not like the Democrats’ scapegoating of high energy costs on the energy companies. That being said, it took the U.S. oil producers nearly four years to get rig counts back close to the peak rig counts seen in early 2015 following the plunge in crude prices that occurred at the end of 2015. One can blame Biden’s moratorium on new leases on Federal lands for the slow return of U.S. oil production over the last 12 months, but that would be unfair because there are nearly 10,000 leases for rigs not year permitted and at a time when that moratorium did not exist it took four years for rig counts to approach the previous high.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
….if Putin had a puppet regime, ”democratically” elected btw, in Europe’s most corrupt country, it should ve been NONE of the US’ fn business to start with, don t you think so ?
hmk
hmk
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
No he thinks its better to lay waste to Ukraine and fight a proxy war until every last Ukrainian male has been killed. It all for the best as it serves our national interest. WTF it never ceases to amaze me how ignorant people can be.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  hmk
I fail to see any “national interest” that the U.S. has in Ukraine, which by the way has been “independent” for less than 50 years of its entire history going back roughly 1,000 years.
hmk
hmk
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Biden families income stream for one.MIC two.
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Did you sleep through your history classes? Let me refresh your memory. 1938: Germany pressures Austria into a political union and Germany mobilizes its military assets. England’s Nevile Chamberlain meets with Hitler and appeases him, fearing further antagonizing the aggressive dictator. Germany uses its military to occupy “German speaking” parts of Czechoslovakia. 1939: Germany fully occupies Czechoslovakia in spite of France having a Treaty obligating it to defend the country. Britain signs a mutual defense treaty with Poland fearing that Germany will invade Poland. Germany invades Poland. Britain and France declare war on Germany. The U.S. declares its neutrality. Canada declares war on Germany. 1940: Germany invades Finland and Denmark. Germany invades France. The Netherlands and Belgium surrender to Germany. Germany takes Paris and occupies France. Germany begins bombing England. U.S. begins the draft. The U.S. takes half measures using the lend/lease program to provide military equipment to England. U.S. freezes German assets. U.S. announces oil embargo against Germany, Italy and Japan. First gas chambers are used in Auschwitz. Nazi’s take Ukraine and kill 33,000 jews in Keiv. Pearl Harbor bombing. U.S. declares war on Japan and Germany declares war on U.S. HAD CHAMBERLIAIN BEEN MUCH MORE FORCEFUL IN 1938 AND THE U.S. NOT BEEN SO ISOLATIONIST ORIENTED AFTER HITLER INVADED CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND POLAND, HITLER LIKELY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BUILD UP GERMANY’S MILITARY AND WOULD HAVE LIKELY BEEN DETERRED FROM BEING SO AGGRESSIVE AND WWII WOULD HAVE LIKELY BEEN AVERTED.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
Never get an imaginative good story come in the way of facts.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
shadow stats is correct. inflation counted old way is north of 15%. or as gundlach explained if we used todays accounting, what was 15% inflation fourty years ago would only be 7%. fed has been telegraphing for long time they are jacking up rates. now it’s a competition with other central banks. most people didn’t believe the fed and got burned financially or ego wise. it’s stagflation and it will last for a decade or more, most likely. fits and starts until a fed chair puts rates north of 15%. stag (stagnant) flation (inflation). we all lose. there are NO winners. pack a lunch. it’s gonna be a very long slog.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
It is clear that inflation “counted the old way” was dramatically overstated in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Please remember that inflation is not just a number. The computed inflation number has real effects on real people whose income is adjusted to inflation. If a number is off by 4% in a single year, the error won’t be obvious, but if inflation is off by 4% a year, the effect over a longer period will be enormous. Look at what we saw in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Elderly on Social security from 1960 to 1980 saw their spending power double or triple, and all that with no legislation. Simply by consistently overstating inflation, their spending power grew every year. I’m not going to debate whether increasing their spending power was a “good” or “bad” thing. I’m just pointing out that it was done with no legislative or administrative action.
Let’s now turn to today. Let’s suppose that Shadow Stats is right, and that inflation has been understated by an average of say 4% a year for the last 25 years. That, similarly, would have had real world effects on real people. Those living on Social Security would today have 0.94^25, or 21% of their spending power in 1997. Do you seriously believe that Seniors today have a real, spendable income only 1/5 of what it was 25 years ago? In fact, based on my personal observation, the real spending power of those on Social Security is about the same as 25 years ago, proof that the CPI is not very far off from reality. No, it’s not going up anymore, but neither is it going down, which is as it should be. If we want to increase, or decrease their income, it should be done legislatively, not by using a clearly erroneous CPI number.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Just saying, your math is somewhat off. Let’s say official inflation is 2% and unofficial is 2+4=6%, but there is social security adjustment for the official number, so the math is 0.96^25 = 0.36.
However, what gives it a bad rap is the unaccounted housing inflation, which was jumping double digits, yet inflation remained cool as a cucumber. At these dizzying price levels, housing is by far the biggest cumulative expense of all.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
You are right! I used a 6% error a year by mistake. I got distracted by OP’s post that inflation is 15%, while the official number is under 9%, a 6% error, but I intended to use 4%, which is closer to the number Shadow Stats claims is the average error for the last 25 years. Still, the point is the same. I don’t think anyone can look at the elderly and say that their real standard of living is 1/3 of what it was 25 years ago. When you start talking about something that has clear, real world impact, it’s fine to create a theory that “the CPI is too low”, but the next step should always be to test it by looking at what has happened in the real world.
As far at the housing numbers, I tend to give that a pass for the reason that things, in the past, have typically returned to norm. Thus, over the long term, the CPI, and the CPI less food and energy are approximately the same, even though they are dramatically different at some times. My opinion is that, yes, housing has gone up dramatically more than is reflected in the CPI, but in the next decade we are likely to see falling housing prices, and things will return to norm. Even then, housing is more a capital expense than a regular expense, so the affect of housing increases on different people will be dramatically different. For those who own houses, their wealth increased, which is a positive, not a negative. That’s why I understand the use of OER instead of housing prices. Yet, OER is kind of a fuzzy number, and there are probably better numbers that could be used.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Your arithmetic was off (kudos for admitting it), but your point still stands.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
you lost me. sorry. also, let’s remember that each decade folks retire longer because of modern medicine and healtier habits like not smoking………..so today’s retirements at ages of mid 60s might be for a few decades. unheard of in 1960s and 70s………….
inflation is money creation. in our debt based money, add on debt creation of the state. the costs of things will change. but might take many years. and the counter vailing positive is productivity which is deflationary. the autos and houses work better today……….
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
Putin 2024
Im not sure how that will work out though, can you only run for 2 terms, since Putin won in 2020 and 2016?
While Im at the comedy,
Nuland, F the EU
-mission accomplished.
I cant take credit for the last one, seen that somewhere else.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Easy. You just change the constitution and voila! Putin can stay as long as he wants or as long as he can stay alive.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
It’s what Trump wanted to do and one reason he was so envious of Putin! Recall how he also wanted a big military parade through the streets of Washington D.C., just like the dictators do in Russia, NK, China, etc.?
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
I don’t know about you, but I love a parade.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Military hardware doesn’t get me off.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Don’t worry. It’s Pride Month. LOL
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
That is an off the cuff statement. Trump did not get a second term so how could he plan to change the Constitution to get a third term? If he wins the next time he would just have done something that has happened before by Grover Cleveland. Cleveland had a first term but lost to Harrison even if he won the popular vote then four years later was voted back in. If we compare that to Putin it is completely different. Putin did his two terms then stepped aside for his Prime Minister Medvedev who was then elected and who in turn appointed Putin as Prime Minister. It’s as if Bill Clinton after two terms got his Vice-President Al Gore elected president and himself Vice-President and four years later switched places again. It would be absurd for us.
Every 14th of July France has a big military parade down the Champs-Elysée. Trump was invited one year and liked it. It was one of his bad ideas but on the other hand he had a lot of good ideas too.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Krugman?
Didn’t he advocate (tongue in cheek, sort of) building a Death Star to combat deflation (which would benefit the masses)?
Speaking of policy error.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Probably one of your best reads in quite some time. Great explanations & timelines.
And unless something happens (e.g., Nov 2022) to derail Biden’s policies, we’re screwed for a few more years to come.
I can’t believe he’s letting corporation’s produce & export LNG abroad over domestic needs. It would be really interesting how Trump would have handled this. Given his part twittering about Germany & the EU, I would imagine he would have taken a tougher stance.
Thanks, Mish!
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
“I can’t believe he’s letting corporation’s produce & export LNG abroad over domestic needs”
I can definitely see that becoming an issue as time progresses. US natural production is flat and in decline. The more the US exports, the more the US consumer pays. US getting a temporary reprieve until Freeport comes back on line.
The dynamics are different with oil and I expect Biden to announce further strategic petroleum reserve withdrawals immediately after the midterms. I expect at some point that this will cause some panic when the US depletes this reserve.
Javier Blas on Twitter: “COLUMN: The US can’t use its Strategic Petroleum Reserve forever: it’s a finite stockpile fighting a potentially unlimited flow shortage More worryingly, it’s depleting its oil cache a lot faster than even the chart below looks My @opinion column: https://t.co/KXtdfl5oDv #OOTT https://t.co/He9NiXQU9x” / Twitter
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
why shouldn’t producers of goods and services sell them anywhere they want. LNG or panties or corn or corn chips………….
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
“why shouldn’t producers of goods and services sell them anywhere they want. LNG or panties or corn or corn chips………….”
That is definitely a valid question. Sell more natural gas abroad and benefit the producers or keep supply at home and benefit the consumers.
Im a Canadian and food for thought, if we kept our Canadian oil in Canada, we could easily drive our vehicles for the next 150 years.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Because it’s bad for the US consumer. How hard is that to understand? That side of corporate greed is exactly what’s exacerbating the whole situation right now. And this is a multi-year play at stake, possibly upwards of 10 years or more. When people on fixed incomes see their gas bills move up 2x, 3, 4x, that’s bad and un-American. You don’t see Chine taking these sorts of measures. Everything they do is to protect their economy which means taking care of their needs first.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
if you want president Xi to control you and what you pay, and protect you, i’d suggest you wouldn’t like such totalitarian regimes. but i don’t know you. just an internet chat. seems ridiculous to leave my purchasing decisions to the donald or sleepy joe or nancy or mitch.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Wonder what would happen with LNG exports if the US were to have a very cold winter? Double fck Europe ?
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
The US was actually running a 5 year low in natural gas reserves this year and winter supplies were actually questionable. Im guessing with the recent Freeport LNG issues that this issue has been rectified. None the less, it is something to watch in future years.
The US is no way can supply Europes natural supplies and Europe will be struggling every year with this issue. The Europe winter natural gas watch starts shortly. Oddly enough they have NS2 ready to supply natural gas but they dont want it because the US and Ukraine told Europe not to take it, evidently cutting into Ukraines transit fees. Somehow now natural gas transit fees are the least of Ukraines problems. Will definitely be eating the popcorn watching this winter what develops.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Reminds me of the perennially corrupt, bankrupt, basket case Ukraine cutting off gas to Europe in 2009 …That s exactly why Russia and Germany constructed the NS2, to prevent a crazy nation from committing economic/financial sabotage again…..and then the fn US of A came along, looking for a way to compensate for their disastrous, based upon outrageous lies , Middle East policies ! ….Who needs enemies with fn friends like the fn Yanks …..(Pardon me the f words again, always happens when I m pi$$ed) On the other hand I do understand the US, they are merely desperately trying to hold on to their rapidly dwindling global power. In particular I despise our worthless european ‘yes-idiots’, poor excuses for undemocratic leaders, they are in fact to blame for being fn emptyheads, instead of capable persons with sound ideas and perspectives , obviously not so, which makes me wonder , are they being bribed, armtwisted, even blackmailed into adopting their utterly INSANE politics ?! Who will tell ?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Do not forget that Biden’s son is in the natural gas business. He’s a highly-paid gas consultant and expert.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Addendum to #3
Loan forbearance + rent moratorium turbo charged fiscal stimulus. Bigly.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I meant to put that in too!

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.