House Passes Build Back Better, It’s On to the Senate

This morning, the House Passed Biden’s $2 trillion Build Back Better Bill so it moves on to the Senate where it’s sure to be modified. 

Democrats initially hoped to pass the bill Thursday night, but an eight-and-a-half-hour speech by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) slamming the legislation prompted Democrats to postpone the vote until later Friday morning. Republicans in both the House and Senate have united against the bill, arguing that it would exacerbate rising inflation and slow the economy’s growth.

“This is the single most reckless and irresponsible spending in the history of this country,” Mr. McCarthy said in his floor speech, which stretched past 5 a.m.

Some centrist Senate Democrats haven’t committed to supporting the House legislation, and Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.) has called for removing a proposed paid-leave program. Other Democrats are seeking changes to the House plan for raising the $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes, warning that the proposed $80,000 cap with no income limit offers unnecessary tax cuts for high-income households. A measure giving temporary legal protections to immigrants in the U.S. illegally may face parliamentary problems that could force Democrats to strip it from the bill.

Many of the bill’s measures are funded only temporarily, though, a step Democrats took to keep down the package’s sticker price. For example, the expanded child tax credit would last only through 2022, neither indefinitely, as some had sought, nor for four more years, as Mr. Biden proposed.

Modifications Coming Up 

The protection for immigrants is nearly certain to be removed. 

Second, Democrats seek changes to State and Local Taxes (SALT).  On the surface, that means a revision but only if republicans stay united. 

If the SALT deduction is lowered, there is a chance the Bill will actually become revenue neutral. But that also assumes all of the temporary measures really are temporary. Some might be, but it is difficult in practice to kill entitlements once offered. 

Manchin has demanded that Democrats cut four weeks of paid leave provided in the House bill. 

He is likely to demand other unknown modifications and he could easily kill the whole thing if he wanted to. 

In the end, I expect the Senate to approve something, but with at least a few modifications.

Then What?

After the Senate makes amendmendments, the bill goes back to the House. AOC and the progressive caucus will piss and moan about the changes. 

Democrats and Republicans from high tax states like New York will also moan.

But in the end, all the Democrats and perhaps a few Republicans from New York will vote for the bill.

When Biden signs it, many of those pissing and moaning will turn to bragging about getting it done. 

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

64 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
I have a great computer – fast processor – 32GB memory – 4TB solid State Drive – about a 1.5 years old
I have too many applications and plugins to want to try a clean install of windows or a new computer 
I did try the media tool and disabling Trend Micro
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
That’s a nice machine.
One thing you could try is coping all the rollback files onto a backup USB drive (I assume you have such a thing). Then delete all the rollback files and try the upgrade again and see if it works. Regardless of whether it’s successful you then put back the rollback files.
I recall having to do this before on a work laptop a few years back when something somewhere on an old rollback wasn’t quite right.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I’m not a windows expert ,but  for what it is worth .  disable apps that startup on boot , look at background programs , uninstall any unneeded apps . Maybe to many processes   running in memory . looked at running update in safe mode – not recommended  .
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Update to windows 11 and that might do it. If it doesn’t work then you roll back to windows 10 and since the problem could be a driver hopefully the corrupted driver would have been reinstalled in the process. 
blacklisted
blacklisted
4 years ago
This is pure insanity, and you are part of the problem by not mentioning the origins and driving force behind Build Back Better (BBB) – Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum (WEF). I’m sure you have noticed that all of the other broke western govt’s are using the same BBB theme, which is another name for the Great Reset and 4th Industrial Revolution? So, why don’t you discuss the actual goals of the WEF, or the goals of Gates and Soros, for that matter?
BBB sounds good, just like the WEF’s 8 Predictions for the World (which are actually their goals), where the first prediction smilingly says, YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY. Have you read the WEF manifesto? Do you know all of the leaders in globalist organizations controlled by Schwab and Gates (EU, ECB, IMF, WHO, etc – https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/gates-schwab-control-europe/)?
I believe you also understand that CB’s are trapped, as are broke govt’s who have endlessly borrowed without any intention of paying off their debt. The can has reached the end of the road, and the only solution for politicians, who have zero intention of reducing the size of govt or their perks and power, is to take the totalitarian fork in the road. This is has been Schwab’s sales pitch (more power versus less), which includes the default of govt debts, telling the people it’s about eliminating their debts to make the world fairer.
When one understands the propaganda behind gloBull warming and coronadoom, it’s a cakewalk to sell the people on the idea that their debts will be forgiven and the State will own everything like the Soviet Union. Heck, people have been led to believe big pharma cares about saving people from cornadoom, when they have paid over $8 billion in fines over the last decade for defrauding the public, and have ZERO liability if their jabs harm people. Making a dumbed-down public believe that debt forgiveness and free everything is doable is much easier than convincing them Sadam had WMD’s and the world will end if we don’t eliminate life-sustaining hydrocarbons. 
As a brief aside, renewable fuels have ZERO chance of powering the nearly 1.5 billion automobiles, just under 30,000 aircraft, and almost 55,000 ships (mostly cargo). Gates and the nutjobs know it, which is why they are pushing lockdowns and jabs. Because of their coronadoom fear campaign and jab intimidation tactics, energy supplies have been constrained and more people have had their immune system compromised by the jab. Their goal is to reduce life-sustaining CO2 by reducing demand from vehicles and people. Fuel shortages, causing people to freeze to death (especially as we head deeper into the current cooling cycle), could kill more people than covid or the impact of job loss, but probably not more than those impacted by the jab and boosters.
Back to defaulting on govt debt … Since govt is the biggest borrower, anyone thinking that raising rates will tame inflation is more insane than Gates, Schwab, Soros, and Biden. What, govt is going to reduce their borrowing and spending?   
Obviously, defaulting on the debt means everything holding large amounts of govt debt are toast (i.e. pensions, SS, insurance funds, etc.), and this is where Guaranteed Basic Income is suppose to keep the natives from getting restless, at least for a little while, because when they come for IRA’s and 401K’s – forgettaboutit!  These natives have lots of guns. 
BTW, their need to move to all digital is part of the scheme to prevent hoarding and track and tax everything that moves, which is why they are letting crypto’s run free.  Of course, this sick scheme will fail in the long run, but in the short-term many will die, which is the actual goal of eugenisists, like Gates. 
Communists, like Schwab, actually believe communism would have succeeded if the US and Europe would have just thrown in with the USSR and China. When you combine this delusional thinking with Gates’ “zero carbon” and depopulation dreams of his father, and the “Open Borders”/One World Govt money of Soros, you have enough money and insanity to sway any self-interested politician. 
This is what’s happening, whether you know, or want to acknowledge, it. Building back better means destroying the existing system to rebuild it in the image of the Fabian Socialists (look it up or view the stained glass image inside the Fabian Society’s building).
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  blacklisted
… And now the lizard people know that you know
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
If only the woke would awaken.
Jordon Peterson: “In relation to the COVID restrictions, I talked to a senior adviser to one of the provincial governments a couple of weeks ago. He told me flat out that the COVID policy here is driven by nothing but opinion polls related to the popularity of the government. No science, no endgame in sight, no real plan…”
I watched Tucker’s interview with RFK Jr. He said that back when the vaccine makers were given immunity from liability, that Reagan asked the companies why don’t they make safer vaccines? The response was that vaccines were unavoidably unsafe.
The Covax is unavoidably unsafe, as VAERS has amply demonstrated, yet the medical industry mantra is, “safe and effective.”
Awake yet, Zardoz?
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Very OT
I have been attempting for 7 months to update Windows 10. Tried at least 50 times and spent at least 50 hours (no kidding) in aggregate. Hell it took me two months to figure out the update failed. No error message just stuck on the same version. Just thought it was Automatic Windows Updates.
Had someone over in the house toady for 5 paid hours. Mostly he just tried everything I did and failed. Many complaints on the internet about this. 
The Microsoft help was useless. They have a tool to run – detected no errors. Finally on some obscure page I found a reference to another Microsoft tool. This is where I am at today. Here is the log with a better description of where the error is.
Manufacturer = LENOVO
Model = 81UJ
HostOSArchitecture = x64
FirmwareType =
BiosReleaseDate = 20210621000000.000000+000
BiosVendor = BVCN16WW(V1.12)
BiosVersion = BVCN16WW(V1.12)
HostOSVersion = 10.0.18363
HostOSBuildString = 18362.1.amd64fre.19h1_release.190318-1202
TargetOSBuildString = 10.0.19041.1253 (vb_release_svc_prod2.210811-1921)
HostOSLanguageId =
HostOSEdition = Professional
RegisteredAV = Trend Micro Maximum Security
FilterDrivers = FileInfo
UpgradeStartTime = 11/19/2021 3:41:46 PM
UpgradeEndTime = 11/19/2021 4:26:59 PM
UpgradeElapsedTime = 00:45:13
CV = AataDDvkB0euezS6
ReportId =
Error: SetupDiag reports rollback failure found.
Last Phase = Finalize
Last Operation = Remove System Restore checkpoints
Error = 0xC1900101-0x20017
No solution – just a better error message. 
This had me tied up all day
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
That certainly sucks.
fiat124
fiat124
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Mish, did you or your guy try uninstalling your Trend Micro AV, rebooting then running Windows Update again? Seen a few reports of that causing the same problem you’re experiencing. Also, did you try downloading the Windows 10 Installation Media Tool from the Download Tool Now link and running that? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Clean boot then upgrade to Windows 11. If that doesn’t work and seeing the model is old it probably wouldn’t be worth the money and aggravation to spend more time on it. Buy a new one and trash the old one. You can use the old one to physically take out all your frustrations upon. It’s great therapy.
TechLover1
TechLover1
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Hi Mish,
Sorry to hear about this frustrating endeavor. This really sucks.
Given your time value for money, I would suggest you just buy a new computer. There are quite a few deals for black Friday.
If you have some data that is saved on old computer and not on the cloud, it should be simple to migrate it out if the old PC still boots up.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Reply to  TechLover1
Yes , obtain new computer with win10 preloaded . port data/docs over from old computer . Or pull off data from old computer , wipe drive , install new OS .  run both computers in tandem for a while.  I keep all my data on external drive(local)  in case of irreparable OS .   
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
And install the old disk as a secondary drive.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Completely OT. Best article I read this week. Topic is uranium and the impact of Sprott’s new ETF. I’m pissed I can’t buy SPUT on TD Ameritrade, This is for anybody interested in energy. It’s good. Enjoy.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

It’s a very
good article and explains in detail the working of a market where OTC contracts
are dominantly used by the major players. It also explains well how the Hedge
Book Managers hedge the OTC contracts that they have written and the complexity
involved as well as underlying that the service the traders provide are
valuable to the producers and the consumers alike. How valuable these services
are will surprise you. OTC contracts even on more exotically vanilla products can
give the seller 5 or 6% margins on the sell easily. On an exotic commodity like
uranium I could imagine that it could be higher. If that doesn’t make you
salivate then you are probably dead. The Sprott system looks to me as
the way traders “book” their transactions among themselves and may not exactly
be the market price but the price at which large blocks are recorded, exchanged,
or switched between accounts. The price may have been agreed upon days or weeks
before and depends not on demand of the underlying but more on the needs of the
hedge. There are few things on Earth more complicated and strange than an OTC
Hedge Book; women maybe but that’s about it.

Électricité
de France is I believe the biggest player the electricity markets in Europe and
they have a very large and sophisticated trading team. Since they have a 10
year supply of uranium fuel on French soil I would imagine that they are one of
the dominate players in the uranium market as well. Being a large producer of
electricity gives you a certain advantage in trading. You can never be naked
short which caused a lot of problems for Texas electric companies last winter.
Since they also are sitting on a large stock of uranium they are in the same
good position. I would guess that EDF made a lot of money trading these last
six months. 

I would like to add that counterparty risk is what determines if you can play or not.
Steve_R
Steve_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Great article on uranium, be careful what you ask for as far as SPUT, USO did not trade right until it reverse split 8 to 1 after the last leg down the rabbit hole in March 2020. The nuclear option is the future due to what I believe will be higher electric demand due to EV production. Sure will not be able to do it alone with solar panel and wind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlYFtgWmd7c 
Thought I would send you a video with Greg Foss, engineer and former bond trader. This is about stored energy, I realize BC is not popular for you but I think you might want to listen this man.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
Thanks Steve. I will give it a watch.
numike
numike
4 years ago
“Give me the facts and I will twist them to fit my argument”
Winston Churchill
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Why, exactly, should I subsidize other people’s decisions. Whether living in NYC, building in flood zones, incompetent management of companies, having children, being lazy,  being overweight, not saving for a rainy day….
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Because you exist. There is a baseline level of risk acceptance that comes with existing. Most people don’t understand this. These are fundamental risk management principles. Risk can never be reduced to nothing as long as you are alive on this planet.   You can live anywhere on the planet and this is true.  It would actually also be true if you could live anywhere. 
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
So drug addict people exist what is their risk acceptance? Why should we subsidize when we reduce the risk to exist, while others abuse it?
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Why are you still driving on roads for which someone else has paid more, maybe a lot more, than you did?    
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Chris Christie for President in 2024. You heard it here first.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Kidding, right?
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
ron desantis
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Only Democrats want Christie.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I’m technically a registered Republican.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I knew it! You have too much common sense to be a Democrat.
ajc1970
ajc1970
4 years ago
I’d be happy with Christie or DeSantis.  Christie ain’t happening though.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Heart-Stopping Texts
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
When will government realize you can’t always solve  problems by throwing money at it . Isn’t this the mind set ?  
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
Doesn’t business throw money at problems to solve them ?
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Businesses are far more efficient in allocating dollars than government .  Governments raise revenue by  Fiat. Government has no skin in the game .   
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
Don’t some businesses borrow taxpayer dollars  and pay no taxes ?
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Are we referring to fed income tax ?  Yes many businesses don’t pay fed income tax. However they  pay a plethora of other taxes . (e.g. state sales/income  tax, property tax, FICA/Medicare  -yes they pay for your retirement,  and tariffs to name a few). 
 
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
“Businesses are far more efficient in allocating dollars than government .”
No, they’re not. Not just because they’re arbitrarily labelled a “business” rather than a “department.”
If that was the case, medical care would be cheaper in the US than in Europe. Drug prices lower. The cost of everything lower, in fact, as efficiency is just another phrase for lower cost.
Instead, all that arbitrarily relabeling a government department a “business” accomplishes, is forcing people to hand over more money for the same, old thing. Such that arbitrary, dilettante “managers” and “executives” and “owners” get paid massively more than they would if they were a department on government pay scales. That’s it. More inefficient, and hence less expensive, to just socialize the whole darned thing if that’s what’s being called a “business.”
The lone exception being, if businesses are exposed to cut-throat, unfettered and un-“managed” competition. Such that anyone they serve, has complete discretion to simply not buy from them, and instead source their services from anyone else they please, if someone charge two cents more than the lowest cost provider anywhere on the planet does. When people do have such freedom, COMPETITION breeds results which are far more efficient than government allocation. But it is unfettered COMPETITION which does it. Not merely arbitrarily labeling some “public-private partnership” or some such nonsense a “business,” so that the monkey in the corner office gets to call himself CEO and collect an above-public-sector-wages salary, while his even more useless buddies get to do the same thing pretending to be “shareholders” and “investors.”
As a result, businesses in the relatively un “managed” garment industry, are mostly more efficient than any government. Since those who were not, have been overran by Shein, and no longer exist. To a much lesser; given bailouts, “industrial policy” and similar nonsense; extent, the same holds for automakers and Toyota.
But once you step into the protected realms of FIRE leeches, mandated health “insurance”, bans on drug importation, patents on one-click ordering, zoning and land use rackets, franchise laws and every other anticompetitive blah, blah, blah under the sun; “businesses” are rarely, if ever, any more efficient that just having some five year planner do the equally arbitrary resource allocation. At least he’s generally cheaper to hire.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Also, http://clerk.house.gov says that no Republican voted for this.   There was one “NOT VOTING” Republican but that is not the same as voting YES.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
The SALT provision might cut my taxes by $2-3k, which is way more than Paul Ryan saved me.  Count me in.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
The people in the 300k to 800k will squeezed the most by Republicans and Democrats because that’s what always has happen. Under Trump taxes went up for some and they were mostly in this income bracket that were W-2. The Democrats always squeeze this group the most as well because they consider them “rich”. The truth is this bracket keeps the economy going because they are responsible for about 70% of consumer spending, which is why no matter who is in charge, the economy stays about the same or gets worse.  When Obama was President he tried to go after this group by attempting to make 529s taxable. They said no way and told Obama to take a hike. It almost cost him the election in 2012. The bottom line here is the more people in this bracket that get squeezed under the current administration, the more likely the Senate, House and White House all flip in 2022 and 2024 respectively.  
I am willing to bet your taxes will go up in the net-net because the brackets are going to change again and you are going to get dinged by the Federal government. The changing of brackets is going to make taxes go up in the net for many in the higher brackets (again). The SALT isn’t indexed for inflation which means when property taxes rise for everyone, more people are going to get hit by SALT. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Correct.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
I didn’t see any change in brackets or marginal rates.  Did I miss it?
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Bolsheviks will get more than taxes….and will hand it to the refugees of the left, broke, illiterate and over producing serfs….its going to get ugly
TechLover1
TechLover1
4 years ago
Politicians are like an army raiding/looting the public. They need to find where the easy targets are. The true rich have the best defenses so they are not attacked. The true rich also have the means to attack if provoked (i.e. fund the politicians’ opponents) and are rational actors with long memories (think generational memories. Trump is still mad at Christie because he prosecuted Jared’s dad). The rich also act in concert with each other for their shared interests.
The poor have no money to be taken so it is best to recruit them in the fight. That leaves the upper middle class to be raided and looted. These people have enough money in the aggregate to be a good target for taxing and have the least number of defenses. They are also not united and not as sharp as the truly rich.
The best rational course of action for the high-income people is to align their interests with the truly rich, i.e. own similar assets to the truly rich as it is guaranteed that income/gains from those will be sheltered. It may not be possible for many, but if they can change their wealth source from income to capital gains, it will help tremendously as well.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
“But in the end, all the Democrats and perhaps a few Republicans from New York will vote for the bill.”

If the Ds from NY are crying about not getting tax cuts for the rich, why would Republicans from NY vote for it?   Of course, they would want tax cuts for the rich too – unless they are thinking that the 10K SALT limit was Trump’s idea and want to pretend that they fought to lower the SALT deduction cap.

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Another ‘policy error’ day in bond market … and $US (dxy) hit 52 week high to boot.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
It’ll be interesting to see how much this affects Biden’s horrible polling numbers. (I’m guessing not enough to get him or his party 4 more years.)
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I see no avenue for POTUS to raise his numbers.  In the past a prez with bad numbers would hit the campaign trail (or go international) and give some fiery speeches for boost.  Lets be honest, he is well managed to avoid doubts of his acuity (which, of course, precisely makes people wonder).  Carefully crafted photo ops here / there ain’t gonna cut it.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
That and going to war.
I don’t think his approval numbers matter. He won’t be able to run again. The problem is his numbers reflect the entire party.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Never, never underestimate the media’s ability to manipulate public opinion
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I think Biden is screwed no matter what. He inherited a shitshow and he’s caught in the middle of a shitstorm.  I think the best the country can do come 2024 as of now is Chris Christie, who is slowly taking the Republican party back from the fringe.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
I’m on the same page as you.
davidyjack
davidyjack
4 years ago
SALT deductions should be raised to 40K.   80K is too generous to upper middle / wealthy households.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  davidyjack
Bound to get lowered….but I’ll happily settle for 50K.    🙂
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Yes, that would cover roughly all the SALT for a family in Si Valley with 400K income and paying 24K a year in prop tax on a house valued at 2M.   There is no need to go beyond that.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Yes, that would cover roughly all the SALT for a family in Si Valley with 400K income and paying 24K a year in prop tax on a house valued at 2M. 
Or cover SALT on a Texas family with 400K income and 6 million in real estate. lol.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Don’t worry. Most brackets will change and more money will get funneled to the Feds.  I predict at best it will come out as a wash for most. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
At best, I’m sure. Every time I hear “tax cut” my butt puckers.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  davidyjack
A problem with raising the salt deduction, other than it reducing tax revenue, is no politician will be blamed for it. Everyone who hates it blames Trump and all the current elected officials are fine with that.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  davidyjack
SALT is a transfer of money from low tax states to high tax states. It encourages local governments in those states to over spend and over pay. The taxes that would have gone to support the federal government gets directed to local government in high tax states. That shortfall has to be made up by low tax state residents having to pay above what they should have without SALT.  It should be totally removed.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Your link says that high-income states pay more Federal taxes. It says nothing about if SALT is justified or not. Essentially you are claim that high SALT deductions benefit you more than people in lower-income states but since your income is higher you eventually make it up by paying more Federal taxes. That is a fallacy. You live in a donor state but states do not pay taxes, people do so being a donor state just means that many wealthy people live there. With a higher SALT you get a tax break that goes not to the Federal government but to the local one nevertheless you still benefit from the Federal good but you end up paying less for that good than someone who cannot benefit from the SALT deduction. 
A detailed argument can be found here:
The donor state argument is not a valid one when it comes to SALT but is often trotted out to justify keeping it. 
 
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
they have to keep housing in upper limits of space, reits became banks, investors bought into b and c paper, its now a fixed market….this is one way of fixing it..
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“But in the end, all the Democrats and perhaps a few Republicans from New York will vote for the bill.”
Well, duh … how else are we supposed to find out what’s in it ?? ….

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.