Profiles in Non-Courage

,

Moderates Democrats Hide Behind Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema

WSJ writer Kimberley A. Strassel accurately comments On Reconciliation Bill, Senate Moderates Hide Behind Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema

This Senate Democratic caucus isn’t divided into liberals or moderates as much as into doers and hiders. In the former camp are progressives, Mr. Manchin, and Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema, all doing pitched battle over the biggest proposed alteration to U.S. government reach in decades. In the latter are several of the most vulnerable Democrats whose seats are up in 2022—skulking in corners, happy to let their fellow “centrists” take the slings and arrows involved in making the bill less bad.

Compare and contrast the Arizona delegation’s members. Ms. Sinema is getting harassed by activists and facing threats of a 2024 primary challenge over her demands that the bill be reduced in size and stripped of onerous tax hikes. She is daily pummeled for not being more “open” about her requirements. Meantime, Sen. Mark Kelly, up for re-election next year, has yet to muster a concrete public position on most anything concerning the bill’s size, shape or timing.

Nevada’s Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto was among the “centrists” invited to the White House in October to discuss the bill. Yet her contribution appears to begin and end with her successful killing of a small provision to establish a new royalty on hardrock mining. This “moderate” otherwise appears to be good with . . . whatever. Three and a half trillion? Sure. Half that? Sure. Paid family leave? Sure. No paid family leave? Sure.

The skulkers’ political bet is that they can get through this ugly fight with the minimum of fuss, and then campaign on the most popular provisions and their other bipartisan achievements. They are counting on the press to continue giving them a pass—in aid of their re-election—and that’s certainly worked so far.

Will He or Won’t He?

That’s actually a dual question. Replace “He” once with Manchin and once again with Trump. First things first. 

Will Manchin Kill the Bill?

I find that doubtful, although its possible, perhaps a 15% chance. However, it is very likely he will insist on some changes that Progressives will be mad as hornets over.

Unfortunately, with Pelosi backing down and passing the infrastructure bill first, the Progressives will want to salvage something out of this mess. 

So even if the Senate kicks the bill back to the House, expect the House to vote for it. 

Will Trump Run?

Nearly everyone I talk to believes he will. I believe that if he does, will find an excuse later (health or personal reasons) to back out. 

Virginia and New Jersey show that Trump is best forgotten. Trump’s age and health will come into play. 

Fox News has discussion of the topic including quotes from Trump. 

Former President Donald Trump, in an exclusive interview with Fox News, said he will “probably” wait until after the 2022 midterm elections to formally announce whether he will run for president in 2024.

“I am certainly thinking about it and we’ll see,” Trump said. “I think a lot of people will be very happy, frankly, with the decision, and probably will announce that after the midterms.”

The former president said that timeline was “probably appropriate.”

“It doesn’t mean I will,” Trump said of whether he will stick to that timeline. “It’s probably appropriate, but a lot of people are waiting for that decision to be made.”

The former president said that “a lot of great people who are thinking about running are waiting for that decision, because they’re not going to run if I run.” 

“We have a lot, they’re all very well named,” he said of the GOP White House hopefuls. “But almost all of them said if I run, they’ll never run.”

The Republican Party’s dilemma over Donald Trump

A close friend of mine believes Trump will run. For his take, please see The Republican Party’s dilemma over Donald Trump

But we do agree on many key points including the following dilemma:

Republicans face a dilemma. Politics is not just about winning elections, but also about governing. A president whose strategy is to win with a minority of the popular vote and while in office is then content playing only for applause from his committed base is a threat to a party with an electorate shrinking demographically. In pursuing a policy agenda, the goal should be to try to convince those who did not vote for you to support your initiatives. However, Trump is so polarizing that it makes this almost impossible as it leads one open to the charge of being “like Trump.”

Trump is also scorched earth even among his supporters if they do not fall into line. That person will be vilified and face the prospect of being primaried with some significant percentage of the 74 million who voted for Trump ready to deliver his vindictive judgment. This hardened core of support is the source of his power over the party. Now Trump is now calling for Republicans not to vote in 2022 and 2024 if he does not get his way.

While Trump looks backward fueled by grievance, Ronald Reagan spoke with optimism of “morning in America” and the potential of the “city upon a hill.” With Trump winning is entirely personal. To Ike and Reagan victory was to advance principles. In his ascent Trump hijacked the “party of Reagan.” While Trump properly focused attention on many critical issues that had been ignored by establishment elites, his embrace of those issues sought polarization, rather than to build consensus.

Waiting Game

For starters, none of what Trump says is believable. In recently told OAN he still believes the 2020 election will be decertified.

Trump discredits himself with such nonsense, and he does it all the time.

Has everyone agreed to back out if Trump decides to run? Color me skeptical. He will say anything to feed his own ego. 

A big waiting game is in progress. No one wants to announce before Trump and have Trump steal their thunder. 

Trump wants to drag out his announcement as long as possible. 

“A lot of people will be happy with the decision,” is certainly a true statement by Trump. It holds true whether he announces to run or not. 

However, 3 years is a long time. So is two+ years when primaries start. Lots of things can happen in the next two years even if Trump announces before Thanksgiving that he will run. 

Things can easily change. 

Profiles In Courage and Non-Courage

Polarization is too intense already and all Trump can do is make matters worse with another round of nonsensical tariffs and trade wars on top of it.

As my friend said, the nation needs to look forward, not backward, out of revenge. Enough of the “I won big” lie. 

Trump lost, and like Hillary looks everywhere else but himsel for the reason. 

Hillary blames Russia, Trump says the election was stolen. Both are egomaniac lies. 

If nothing else, Republicans ought to have the decency and courage to stand up to obvious lies. 

Profiles in Courage and Non-Courage applies not only to the Senate, but to the next presidential election as well

The Virginia election proves that distancing from Trump is the smart thing to do. 

But if Trump runs, distancing will no longer be possible. Republicans will be forced into a decision to challenge him, or not. 

Some will have the courage. Others would rather suck up and shy away. It could get messy.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

35 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Moderates Democrats Hide Behind Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema”
It is job protectionism. Career politicians. None of these people need to “serve” like McCain, until they figuratively drop dead on the congressional floor.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
West Virginia coal is back baby . How ironical for Biden policies . Joe will water down BBB and remove legislation that impedes this renaissance.
 
Kick'n
Kick’n
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk

“Burn Baby Burn!” The red team’s version of BBB…

Tengen
Tengen
4 years ago
I think the blue team is toast  in ’24 but I would be shocked if the reds win again in ’28.
I predicted this death spiral of constantly switching back and forth between the parties every election cycle back in the days of TARP. We eventually got there, but it took a decade longer than I expected.
Greenmountain
Greenmountain
4 years ago
Could we a least applaud the dying breed of moderates on both sides….  ?  Remember the days of compromise.  But can not do do that when we are all enemies.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  Greenmountain
What would you consider to be “moderate conservatism?”  Or is it that “moderate Democrats” who have disappeared?
Evidence of this is the simple Leftward shift of everything.
For evidence of this, let’s look at how past Democrats would be viewed today:  JFK, for example.  Would he be a Democrat or a Republican?  How about even LBJ?  Shoot, let’s even take 90’s Joe Biden and compare him to the version he is now.  90’s Joe Biden signed the infamous Criminal Reform that put ‘all those black and brown people’ into cages.
Now let’s look at the other side.  Is Reagan more or less conservative than today’s Republicans (on the whole)?  Republicans are far more compromising on social-cultural issues, government spending, foreign policy than they ever have been.
So, again, who has moderated, and who has become more extreme?
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
“Unfortunately, with Pelosi backing down and passing the infrastructure bill first…”

Wrong.  It was the progressives that backed down and agreed to pass the infrastructure bill first.   Pelosi was the one that *made* them back down.

Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Very true.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Trump needs to back Ron DeSantis and then it will be a snuff.  Ron DeSantis should pick Candace Owens for VP.  What a 1-2 punch knockout they would be.  Of course, whoever is sitting in the hotseat is going to have to deal with the coming market collapse.  The Global Debt Ponzi cannot, and thus will not, continue forever.  Too much fed juicing of the markets will make food un-affordable and that is always the end of the game.  If you starve the little guy to appease the rich guy, the little guys band together and the pitchfork revolution becomes real.  No Ponzi runs forever and no, it won’t be different this time.
Tengen
Tengen
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
If you understand how QE forever destroyed the country, why are you still cheerleading for the red team? Both teams are in on the scam and besides, we’re well past the point of no return anyway.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
Yes DeSantis is  running on all cylinders. but my fear is,, if elected for pres,  who will govern  the state of florida ? 
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
More kookery won’t help anyone. Not even the kook worshippers.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
DeSantis and Owen will take no prisoners.  I love that ticket, and I think America will, too.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Trump. No chance. We’ve seen the movie. Not many people go for reruns.
Will Melania put up with the aggravation it will cause Byron in his teenage years?
The only chance for Trump is if the American system again succeeds in putting up a slate of candidates from which the voters have to decide who they dislike the most.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Who is “Bryon”?  You mean Barron?  You are wrong to think that Trump is pu$$y whupped like that. Maybe YOU would let your wife boss you around but I don’t think Trump does. I think everyone in his family knows he’s the alpha male, not a woke milquetoast liberal.  And who knows what Barron is thinking?  Maybe he has political aspirations and if that is the case then a second term for daddy would be perfect for him.  But I do think Trump is just too divisive to be good for the country.  I want someone in there doing conservative, intelligent things for the country instead of promoting socially destructive things like mandates else lose job, LGBT as some kind of leadership class instead of the mental disease that it actually is, pay for performance instead of pay for woke, etc.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
Sooooo manly!
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Webej
“The movie”, as you put it, was a great four years. The economy boomed. Taxes fell. Unemployment fell to about the lowest it’s ever been. The flow of illegals into the country was almost completely halted. Superb handling of the Covid crisis that led to the fastest development and mass  roll out of a vaccine ever.
And now we have serial disasters from the dribbling imbecile in the White House. The border crisis, a new Covid crisis, the Afghanistan debacle, the inflation crisis, and coming soon… an economic crisis.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
State Rep. Ryan Guillen switches to GOP in latest blow to South Texas Democrats
come on Joe you can do it too !!!
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
We don’t want him.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Still way too early to speculate who runs for the Republicans. Let’s cream the Democrats in the mid-terms first and then see. The Democrats will still being going with Joe or Kamala. There is no way for them to escape that that I see.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I think they’ve (democrats) all made a back-room deal.  I think Biden agreed to do one term as the antidote to Trump.  To get everyone’s support, he agreed to move on after his first term.  He’s even publicly said so.
I think they planned to have Harris take the baton, thinking that more exposure and “governing” would elevate her positives.  That isn’t working, and that’s why they’re panicking.  What is Plan B?  My guess is that Harris will bust up their deal and go rogue, running her own ticket, because the Party knows she is toxic.  So they will have to make her so toxic that she doesn’t even think about it.
I do agree with you that it will be a first — to have a P and VP not run again when the incumbency is theirs to take.
But if not them, then who?  The Democrats have a terrible bench, and all of their players are one-trick ponies.  They have no one like DeSantis, or Rand Paul or even a number of other younger Republicans.  Anyone that is young and Democrat is an extreme Leftist and is unlikeable on the national stage.  President AOC?  Rashida Taib?  Cory Booker?  These people are all risible.
They will probably run Buttigieg.  They still have to check the “gay” box for “First (filling in the intersectional politics blank) xxxx President.”  He’s novel in that way.  They’re always looking for the next “boundary” to be broken, without consideration of qualifications or appropriateness.
The way The Party thinks is that because he is a white male, he’ll satisfy the “moderate” voters, but being gay will give him his Progressive bona fides.  Win-win!
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Democrats have been trying to obstruct 2020 forensic audits in the swing states.
“Truth does not mind being questioned
A lie does not like being challenged”
What are the Democrats afraid of, if it was a free and fair election?
In fact, what even constitutes a free and fair election? Google, Facebook and Twitter meddled in the election.  The mainstream media was in the tank for Biden. The presidential debate moderators were in the tank for Biden- all Democrats. Even the FOX News moderator was a Democrat. One moderator even had to drop out, due to his exposed bias against Trump.
Seems more like free and fair election is the actual Big Lie.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Send OJ Simpson to ferret out who the real bad guys were.
LostNOregon
LostNOregon
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Sorry. OJ is still busy hunting for his wife’s killers.  Totally tied up at this time!
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Courage is a good topic. For some insight into what we can expect as far as courage among Republican sitting politicians, just look at how they all flip-flopped in the run-up to the 2016 election, just because it was convenient for them to kiss Trump’s……er, uh, ring.
In the early days nobody had any problem bashing DJT for his faults, but once he demonstrated he had broad support and he could affect their future re-election chances, they all got in line in a hurry. Only a very few demonstrated any courage, and the ones that did are either quitting now (Kinzinger) or facing intense negative waves from the Trumpite rabble (Cheney).
Non-courage is the default survival tactic of the mealy-mouthed pigs at the trough in DC, in both parties.
Unfortunately , I wouldn’t look for that to change, or for actual patriotism t0 actually ever count for a damned thing among the lot of them. We have these people who should  be thinking ahead for seven generations….who can only think as far as the next election.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Hmmm. That’s one way to look at what happened with Republican players’ reactions to Trump. And, it certainly describes politics and politicians in general. As you say, politicians find it hard to take a route that leads to fewer votes.
Another way to spin it: Republicans found Trump was not a NY Democrat posing as a Republican. Surprise! And they found he hit back, tit-for-tat, with street tactics rather than refined, dinner party circumspection. So they lined up with him. Interestingly, those who did not line up seem to dislike Trump for his public demeanor, juiced by the media, rather than his policies (OK, Neocon world policing and Ann Coulter immigration excepted).
Jmurr
Jmurr
4 years ago
I think it is time for the boomers to exit stage left. It’s time for new leadership of both parties. What could be more depressing than a Biden Trump rematch. Personally, I would rather have Kanye than either corrupt incompetent boomer. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
Yeah, that’d be a real great move, electing Kanye. One guy who can even give Trump a run for his money on pure egocentrism and craziness. Real smart.
Btw, I’d look for Boomers to be a major political force in this country for several more years. There’s a lot of them, they’re getting old, and old people vote. Your frustration is apt to get worse before it gets better.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
Yeah, we could use some younger blood like DeSantis.  But no, let’s not let some crazy stupid musician who waffles more than Denny’s run the country.  What planet are you from?
LostNOregon
LostNOregon
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
Trump is a Boomer, born in 1946. Biden was born in 1942, so he is a member of the Silent generation. 
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
I’ll disagree with LostNOregon and say Trump is not a boomer. He made it through high school before the pill. And there just weren’t any 46ers. 47’s? Yeah. Now we’re talking boomer.
But, not to worry. The big news in the next decade will be a constant stream of boomers-and-olders croaking. It is the weirdest thing that people speculate on Biden-or-Trump for 2024. Seriously? What odds do you have for each of those two to be dead by then?
Anybody who buys the great-man theory of history has gotta be thinking the next 10 years are totally, completely, thoroughly unpredictable. Why? Because it’s especially hard to predict what happens when the great man dies. And great men will die like flies Real Soon Now.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
I certainly hope Trump doesn’t run again. The last thing we need is another four years of Biden. Biden is driving voters away, but Trump is the most effective person ever at bringing out the Democrats to vote.
numike
numike
4 years ago
Corporations are using inflation as an excuse to raise prices and make fatter profits — and it’s making the problem worse
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  numike
When input costs go up, what should they do, just eat it and lose money??  They do not exist to lose money!  Blame the fed, not corporations.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  numike
Oh jeez. You can’t “use inflation to raise prices”. “Inflation” is rising prices (etc. and nuance, nuance… See old Mish postings.). So use simple arithmetic: If you earn 5% on your money, and you have $100, then you “profit” to the tune of $5. But, if, after inflation, your $100 is $1000, then, miraculously and hey, totally unexpectedly, your 10% is $50. Which, by this headline’s thinking, was you using inflation as an “excuse” to make $50 rather than $5.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.