Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Housing Affordability Index Drops to Lowest Rate Since 1989, Still Way Too High

Housing Affordability Index and mortgage rates via St. Louis Fed.

Affordability in June Was the Worst Since 1989

The Wall Street Journal reports Affordability in June Was the Worst Since 1989

It was more expensive to buy a U.S. home in June than it has been for any month in more than three decades, as record-high home prices collided with a surge in mortgage rates.

The National Association of Realtors’ housing-affordability index, which factors in family incomes, mortgage rates and the sales price for existing single-family homes, fell to 98.5 in June, the association said Friday. That marked the lowest level since June 1989, when the index stood at 98.3.

Housing Affordability Index

The NAR’s Housing Affordability Index is based on median income data current  through 2017, projected forward. 

Only 13 months of data is available on Fred, the St. Louis Fed repository.

Affordability is based on whether the median family earns enough income to qualify for a 30-year fixed mortgage loan on the median single-family home without spending more than 25% of the income on payment for principal and interest.

An index value of 100 means that a family with the median income has exactly enough income to qualify for a mortgage on a median-priced home. An index above 100 means a median family has more than enough income to qualify for a mortgage loan on a median-priced home, assuming a 20 percent down payment. 

Inquiring minds may wish to look at the NAR’s Housing Affordability Index Calculations.

Curiously, the NAR concludes the median household can nearly always afford the median home price.

Do you believe that? More importantly, even if accurate, so what? 

The median person who can afford a home and wants a home probably already has a home. 

First Time Buyer Index

In terms of new and existing home sales, what matters is what a buyer who does not have a home, but wants a home, is willing to pay and can pay. 

The First-Time Buyer Index for 2022 Q2 fell to 68 assuming a starter home price of $351,500. 

Can 68 percent of would-be buyers afford (and find) a $351,500 home in a neighborhood in which they want to live? 

68 percent is a much more reasonable number than the overall 98.5 percent calculation, but that still strikes me as too high. 

Case-Shiller National Home Price Index

I have not updated my full set of Case-Shiller home price charts for a while but that chart is current (May data). 

Case-Shiller lags by a few months so it’s even worse than shown. 

The pre-pandemic index was 212 and it’s now 306. That’s a 44 percent jump with real median wages declining, property taxes soaring, food soaring, and energy soaring.

Yet, the NAR says that median overall affordability has declined only to the 98.5 percent level. Yeah, right.

Meanwhile, rent and food keep rising and the price of rent will be sticky. Gasoline is more dependent on recession and global supply chains.

Food Prices Rise Most Since February 1979

For more on the price of food, please see Food at Home is Up 13.1 Percent From a Year Ago, Most Since February 1979

For more on rent, please note Tennant’s Unions Demand Biden Declare a National Emergency to Stop Rent Gouging

For more on producer prices please see Producer Prices Decline For the First Time Since the Pandemic Due to Energy

Spotlight on Fed Silliness

The Fed has blown three consecutive bubbles trying to produce two percent consumer inflation while openly promoting raging bubbles in assets especially housing.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Robbyrob
Robbyrob
3 years ago
The Wage Gap Between College and High School Grads Just Hit a Record High https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-wage-gap-between-college-and-high-school-grads-just-hit-a-record-high
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Case-Shiller National Home Price Index”
The chart looks like a parabolic rise. Parabolic moves always manage to fail. Something about the laws of math, i guess.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago

Powell increased the Gini coefficient to the
highest level in 50 years.

Greenspan never tightened monetary policy (despite 14 raises in the target FFR). Bernanke never eased monetary policy (despite the FOMC’s 7 reductions in the target FFR).
I.e., Bernanke demonstrated how to control housing prices. Banks are not intermediaries. Unless you understand that all monetary savings originate in the payment’s system, you don’t understand money and central banking. It’s the system vs. an individual bank. If there was only one bank, then the bank would be paying for the deposits that it already owns (and that’s how to look at the system).
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Greenspan demonstrated how to create a housing bubble. A fog a mirror, get a loan, lending standard. It was just like when the SEC gave the Big Five investment banks, leverage waivers. They all recklessly leveraged up to as much as 30 to 1, because there was no regulation.
The lessons were learned from the 1920’s debacle, but they were deliberately, not absentmindedly, ignored, so that they could be repeated.
How could Greenspan praise the bankers for “getting people into homes they otherwise could not afford,” when the truth was already known that they couldn’t afford those homes? It was all a scam.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ

By mid-1995 (a deliberate and misguided policy
change by Alan Greenspan in order to jump start the economy after the July 1990
–Mar 1991 recession), legal, fractional, reserves (not prudential), ceased to
be binding – as increasing levels of vault cash/larger ATM networks, retail
deposit sweep programs (c. 1994), fewer applicable deposit classifications
(including allocating “low-reserve tranche” & “reservable
liabilities exemption amounts” c. 1982) & lower reserve ratios
(requirements dropping by 40 percent c. 1990-91), & reserve simplification
procedures (c. 2012), combined to remove reserve, & reserve ratio,
restrictions.

This
was the direct cause of the GFC, the boom/bust in real-estate (as predicted by Dr. Leland James Pritchard, Ph.D. Economics, Chicago 1933 in May 1980).

Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ

You can thank the Ph.Ds. at the BOG for discontinuing the G.6
release in Sept. 1996 (debit & demand deposit turnover). Bank debits reflect both new & existing residential & commercial
real-estate sales/purchases. As such, the housing boom/bust would have stuck out
like a sore thumb. This isn’t rocket science.

prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
To people in a great many other countries, $350K for a home sure looks cheap.
Sunriver
Sunriver
3 years ago
In Boise, Median house prices are $526,000 and Median household income is $71,000 (I’m skeptical on that number).
That is plus 7 times annual salary. How is that affordable? How many households have $100,000 to put down on a house in Boise?
I agree with you Mish, the affordability index is way overstated.
The number could be around 40% in Boise.
Bubblicious.
QTPie
QTPie
3 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
Eventually the laws of physics shall prevail. The Boise real estate market has already started crashing. Given that housing inventory there currently stands at above pre-pandemic levels (a feat not even remotely matched by nearly all markets in the US which are still way below their prepandemic inventory levels), I would expect at least a 33% fall in prices peak-to-trough in the next year and a half in Boise.
jenipod
jenipod
3 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
Here in Los Angeles the median annual household income is roughly $65K, while the median home price is $950K! We’ve been in a bubble for fifteen years. If you consider the classic advice to purchase at a price of three times annual income, the median should be closer to $200K, right? Feels like a house of cards that just keeps being propped up with one trick or another. I read recently the majority of buyers in L.A. nowadays are investors & the city hasn’t even returned to pre-Covid employment. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens as prices fall, but as of now this market remains vastly unaffordable.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Is there any good reason why Case-Schiller isn’t incorparated into the bls inflation calculation?
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
There is a reason but not very good.
I mention it every time I do a CS update but the last was in April.
The Fed, economists in general say that housing is a capital expense, not a consumer expense.
My short rebuttal is “so what?” Inflation matters not just alleged consumer inflation. I am certain that is the correct view.
Home prices used to directly be in the CPI then they changed it.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I looked up what Canada does with housing and CPI on this site:
It seems like a good approach. Took a while to read though. Is this a big difference from what we do in the US?
Owned accommodation is 16.1% of CPI.
They outline the various approaches that “could” be taken including the “user cost” approach. Apparently, they use a variation of “user cost” which is outlined in greater detail later in the article. This user cost is broken down to 6 categories:
1. Mortgage Interest
Every month they take current house prices and current mortgage rates into account, and roll it into a 25 year moving average of mortgage interest since only a small portion of housing stock is sold each month.
2. Replacement cost
They add a depreciation expense of 1.5%/a to account for the fact that a portion of the housing stock will be replaced each year. It is based on current home values.
3. Property taxes
4. Insurance
5. Maintenance
6. Other
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
We are still heavily in the accommodative range on interest rates, much less rates that could fight inflation. A 0.75% FFR hike would bring us to neutral, at best.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
“Affordability is based on whether the median family earns enough income to qualify for a 30-year fixed mortgage loan on the median single-family home without spending more than 25% of the income on payment for principal and interest.”
Gee whiz, are we in some kind of 1950s time machine?
30-year hypothetical mortgage with no job loss, and scarcely any divorce?

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.